Philips chops back US tariff bill
AMSTERDAM : Dutch medical equipment manufacturer Philips said today that the impact of US tariffs would be much less than it initially estimated, sending its share price surging.
The company had originally estimated in April that US tariffs could cost it €250 million to €300 million this year after President Donald Trump unveiled a 20% tariff rate for goods from the EU.
Brussels and Washington reached a deal over the weekend that will see goods from the EU face a baseline 15% levy when imported into the US.
It said today it now expects between €150 million and €200 million impact from US tariffs this year.
Chief executive Roy Jakobs said Philips updated 'the guidance because we have certainty now around what is happening between the EU and the US.'
Shares in Philips jumped more than 10% during morning trading, while the Amsterdam market rose around 0.4% overall.
The trade deal has come under widespread criticism in Europe as having been lopsided, saddling its manufacturers with a costly 15% rate with little in return from the US as certainty is a relative concept given Trump's propensity to change positions.
Jakobs said that certainty 'is what we value in' in the deal, while acknowledging 'it's a painful additional cost we have to carry'.
The company still targets a one to 3% increase in annual sales.
Second quarter net profit fell by 47% to €240 million, but last year's performance was boosted by exceptional income from insurance payouts linked to long-running issues with its sleep apnoea machines.
Sales slid by 2.8% to €4.3 billion, although they edged higher on a comparable basis that excludes currency changes. The company also noted orders rose by 6% on a comparable basis.
The appreciation of the euro relative to the dollar and other currencies has been crimping the results of European companies as their revenues abroad result in fewer euros on the balance sheet.
Long known for its light bulbs and television sets, the Dutch company has refocused its business towards medical equipment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
In figuring out why the United States tariff shock hasn't sent the economy or financial world into a tailspin, Britain's exit from the European Union trade bloc provides something of a playbook — and without a particularly happy ending. Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted. The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They didn't, at least not at the outset. To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' currencies. But, to some extent, the steep drop in sterling after the referendum vote and the dollar's plunge on President Donald Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact, at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue. More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no "big bang" economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right, even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds. In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020 and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later. But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly GDP print — confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby. Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. What's more, it's taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels. Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy. One academic study by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalised. But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell three per cent and overall exports fell 6.4 per cent, largely because of the 13 per cent hit in exports to the EU. While this slump seems relatively modest compared with the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector over the next 10 years continues to worry the City. The US tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience. Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5 per cent to one per cent off US gross domestic product over time. That's a US$150 billion to US$300 billion hit, which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that's growing at a roughly two per cent annualised rate, where imported goods represent just 11 per cent of GDP and where tech and AI trends are generating considerable tailwinds. But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman said in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5 per cent of GDP, he argued, is "the equivalent of every household in America taking around US$1,000 and lighting it on fire, then doing it again every year. Forever." In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes don't necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex economies. The latest YouGov opinion poll shows 56 per cent of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU, some nine years after their narrow vote to leave. The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump proposes 250% tariff on imported pharmaceuticals
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump revealed plans to impose tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals that could escalate to 250%, alongside new duties on foreign semiconductors. The move aims to push for domestic manufacturing of critical goods. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one-and-a-half years, maximum, it's going to go to 150 percent,' Trump said in an interview on CNBC. 'And then it's going to go to 250 percent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' The announcement follows earlier tariffs on steel, aluminum, and auto parts, part of Trump's broader trade strategy targeting imports deemed a national security concern. The administration has conducted investigations into pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, signaling upcoming policy shifts. Trump also indicated an imminent increase in tariffs on Indian imports, citing the country's purchases of Russian oil. 'I expect to raise the US tariff on Indian imports very substantially over the next 24 hours,' he said. The proposed pharmaceutical tariffs mark a significant escalation in trade measures, potentially disrupting global supply chains. Industry analysts warn of higher drug prices, while supporters argue it will strengthen US self-sufficiency. - AFPpix
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Trump says ‘getting very close' on extending China trade truce
A preliminary deal between the US and China is set to expire on Aug 12. - Photo: Reuters WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said he was "getting very close to a deal' with China to extend the trade truce that saw the two countries agree to reduce tit-for-tat tariff hikes and ease export restrictions on rare earth magnets and certain technologies. "It's not imperative, but I think we're going to make a good deal,' Trump said in an interview with CNBC, adding that the US was "getting along with China very well.' Still, Trump downplayed the notion that he was eager for a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, saying he would only want to see his Chinese counterpart as part of an effort to conclude trade negotiations. "I'll end up having a meeting before the end of the year, most likely, if we make a deal,' Trump said. "If we don't make a deal, I'm not going to have a meeting.' "It's a 19-hour flight - it's a long flight, but at some point in the not too distant future, I will,' Trump added. A preliminary deal between the US and China is set to expire on Aug. 12. That initial truce eased worries of a tariff war that threatened to choke off bilateral trade between the world's two largest economies and also gave the countries more time to discuss other unresolved issues such as duties tied to fentanyl trafficking. Last week, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng met in Stockholm - the third round of trade talks between the US and Beijing in less than three months. While Chinese officials and the Communist Party's official newspaper had signaled satisfaction with the Stockholm talks, the pact remained fragile. Bessent had said that any agreement to extend the arrangement would be up to Trump. - Bloomberg
