
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted.
The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They didn't, at least not at the outset.
To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' currencies. But, to some extent, the steep drop in sterling after the referendum vote and the dollar's plunge on President Donald Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact, at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue.
More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no "big bang" economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right, even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds.
In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020 and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later.
But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly GDP print — confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby.
Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. What's more, it's taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels.
Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy. One academic study by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalised.
But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell three per cent and overall exports fell 6.4 per cent, largely because of the 13 per cent hit in exports to the EU.
While this slump seems relatively modest compared with the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector over the next 10 years continues to worry the City.
The US tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience.
Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5 per cent to one per cent off US gross domestic product over time. That's a US$150 billion to US$300 billion hit, which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that's growing at a roughly two per cent annualised rate, where imported goods represent just 11 per cent of GDP and where tech and AI trends are generating considerable tailwinds.
But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman said in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5 per cent of GDP, he argued, is "the equivalent of every household in America taking around US$1,000 and lighting it on fire, then doing it again every year. Forever."
In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes don't necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex economies.
The latest YouGov opinion poll shows 56 per cent of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU, some nine years after their narrow vote to leave.
The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
6 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Pharmaniaga completes regularisation plan, set to exit PN17 by 2026
KUALA LUMPUR: Pharmaniaga Bhd has completed its Practice Note 17 (PN17) regularisation plan following the completion of its capital reduction exercise through the cancellation of RM520 million in issued share capital. In a statement today, the pharmaceutical company said the step firmly sets the group on course to exit the PN17 status latest by the first quarter (1Q) of 2026. "The capital reduction exercise, which involved the cancellation of RM520 million in issued share capital, was completed after confirmation was received today from the Registrar of Companies that all statutory requirements have been fulfilled. "Following the completion of this exercise, the issued share capital of the group is RM249.62 million, comprising 6.55 billion shares," it said. Pharmaniaga fell into PN17 status in February 2023, dragged by its RM552.3 million provision for "slow-moving inventories" of COVID-19 vaccines. At the close of trading today, the counter finished unchanged at 18.5 sen, with 28.69 million shares changing hands.


Free Malaysia Today
10 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump says US will charge tariff of about 100% on semiconductor imports
The US Congress created a US$52.7 billion semiconductor manufacturing and research subsidy program in 2022. (Pixabay pic) WASHINGTON : The US will impose a tariff of about 100% on semiconductor chips imported from countries not producing in America or planning to do so, president Donald Trump said. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday the new tariff rate would apply to 'all chips and semiconductors coming into the US,' but would not apply to companies that had made a commitment to manufacture in the US. 'So 100% tariff on all chips and semiconductors coming into the US. But if you've made a commitment to build (in the US), or if you're in the process of building (in the US), as many are, there is no tariff,' Trump said. It is not clear how many chips will be covered by the tariffs. Congress created a US$52.7 billion semiconductor manufacturing and research subsidy program in 2022. The commerce department last year under president Joe Biden convinced all five leading-edge semiconductor firms to locate chip factories in the US as part of the program. Last year the department said the US produced about 12% of semiconductor chips globally, down from 40% in 1990. Trump added: 'If, for some reason, you say you're building and you don't build, then we go back and we add it up, it accumulates, and we charge you at a later date, you have to pay, and that's a guarantee.'


New Straits Times
36 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump announces US$100 billion new investment pledge from Apple
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that Apple will invest an additional US$100 billion in the United States, a move which will expand the company's domestic investment commitment and could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iPhones. The new pledge brings Apple's total investment commitment in the US to US$600 billion. Earlier this year, the company had announced it would invest US$500 billion and hire 20,000 workers across the country over the next four years. The announcement centers on expanding Apple's supply chain and advanced manufacturing footprint in the US, but still falls short of Trump's demand that Apple begin making iPhones domestically. "Companies like Apple, they're coming home. They're all coming home," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, moments after Apple CEO Tim Cook gave him a US-made souvenir with a 24-karat gold base. "This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhones sold in America also are made in America," Trump added. Asked if Apple could eventually build entire iPhones in the US, Cook noted that many components such as semiconductors, glass and Face ID modules are already made domestically, but said that final assembly will remain overseas "for a while." While the investment pledge is significant, analysts say the numbers align with Apple's typical spending patterns and echo commitments made during both the Biden administration and Trump's previous term. In May, Trump had threatened Apple with a 25 per cent tariff on products manufactured overseas, a sharp reversal from earlier policy when his administration had exempted smartphones, computers and other electronics from rounds of tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump's effort to reshape global trade through tariffs cost Apple US$800 million in the June quarter. "Today is a good step in the right direction for Apple, and it helps get on Trump's good side after what appears to be a tension-filled few months in the eyes of the Street between the White House and Apple," said Daniel Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities. "A SAVVY SOLUTION" Apple has a mixed track record when it comes to following through on investment promises. In 2019, for instance, Cook toured a Texas factory with Trump that was promoted as a new manufacturing site. But the facility had been producing Apple computers since 2013 and Apple has since moved that production to Thailand. Apple continues to manufacture most of its products, including iPhones and iPads, in Asia, primarily in China, although it has shifted some production to Vietnam, Thailand and India in recent years. Despite political pressure, analysts widely agree that building iPhones in the US remains unrealistic due to labor costs and the complexity of the global supply chain. "The announcement is a savvy solution to the president's demand that Apple manufacture all iPhones in the US," said Nancy Tengler, CEO and CIO of Laffer Tengler Investments, which holds Apple shares. Partners on Apple's latest US investment effort include specialty glass maker Corning, semiconductor manufacturing equipment supplier Applied Materials, and chipmakers Texas Instruments, GlobalFoundries, and Broadcom. Apple shares closed up 5 per cent on Wednesday. Shares of Corning rose nearly 4 per cent in extended trading, while Applied Materials gained almost 2 per cent. (Reporting by Andrea Shalal, Nandita Bose and Arsheeya Bajwa; Additional reporting by Doina Chiacu and David Shepardson in Washington and Zaheer Kachwala and Akash Sriram in Bengaluru; Editing by Colleen Jenkins, Andrew Heavens, Deepa Babington and Leslie Adler)