'Devil is in the detail' of tariff agreement with US
Peter Burke said that the EU-US deal avoids both a trade war and EU counter-measures, which would have had an effect on the north-south economy.
He said 'the devil is in the detail' of the trade agreement finalised on Sunday by Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland.
'We had a lot of modelling carried out on the various different options, and some were very perverse, that would have closed the market if you had over a 30 per cent tariff with a stacking mechanism,' Mr Burke told RTÉ Radio.
'The key thing is that there will be a number of carve outs. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agrifoods and potentially spirits.' Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment, Peter Burke (Image: Collins)
The bloc is set to face 15 per cent tariffs on most of its goods, including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products, including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth $750 billion over three years.
Mr Burke said it was his understanding that the 15 per cent tariff on the pharmaceutical sector would be a maximum rate.
He added: 'I think the president of the Commission has been very clear that 15 per cent will be a ceiling.'
It is still unclear from the deal, agreed five days before Mr Trump's threat of a 30 per cent tariff would have come into effect, will mean Ireland will need to invest in US energy, he added.
'This all has to be worked out yet, as you can appreciate, I'm only hearing this for the first time last night, and we have nothing on paper.'
Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris welcomed the agreement struck on Sunday, saying that while Ireland 'regrets' the baseline tariff of 15 per cent, it welcomed the certainty for businesses.
Mr Harris said further detail was needed around how tariffs would affect sectors including pharmaceuticals.
Ireland remains vulnerable to a slow down in trade with the US economy, due to exports of products such as alcohol, dairy and beef.
The Irish government has also expressed concern at how tariffs could affect pharma multinationals based in Ireland, which employs about 45,000 people here, as Mr Trump had signalled he intended to target that industry.
In addition, 65 per cent of all aircraft are leased through Ireland globally.
Business group Ibec said although the uncertainty may be dissipating, the agreement was 'punishing' for Europe.
The group's chief executive Danny McCoy said 'Europe has capitulated on this' and 15 per cent is 'very substantial'.
'I don't think it's a great deal if I'm really honest,' Simon McKeever, of the Irish Exporters Association, said.
He said the deal was not a good one for Irish businesses and said the EU was negotiating with 'one if not two hands tied behind our backs' because of the EU's reliance on the US in relation to defence and security.
He said questions remained about the effect it would have on Northern Ireland given the UK had a lower tariff of 10 per cent in place.
'There's a huge amount of this that is extremely uncertain,' he said.
Last week, Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe said the Irish government would spend €9.4 billion on its budget in October, based on a zero-tariff scenario for next year.
He and Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers said these estimates would need to be revised if there was a shock to the Irish economy.
Mr Burke said it was not naive to base the government's economic scenario on a zero-for-zero trade agreement with the US.
'No it wasn't because we didn't know what we were to be faced with,' he said on Monday.
'We do need to find out what happens in other areas, because this is very complex.
'It depends what happens with China, that's a very significant market that a deal hasn't happened yet.
'It really impacts what happens with our exporters here in Ireland as well, because so much product is in danger of being redirected into EU market.
'We also don't know what separate carve outs are going to emerge for the different sectors that are so vulnerable from an Irish perspective.
'Until we get flesh on the bones and all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what budgetary parameters (we) will end up with.'
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Martin defends EU tariff deal to avoid ‘damaging' US trade war & rules out ‘hand-out approach' help for Irish businesses
MICHEAL Martin has hit back at claims EU chiefs rolled over in the Trump tariff talks. And the Taoiseach claimed an all-out trade war with the US President The deal received a mixed reaction from EU members, with some countries claiming that the Bloc is getting nothing in return for an agreement that will punish Europe and boost the US. READ MORE IN IRISH NEWS But Germany's leader Friedrich Merz praised the deal for averting a trade war. At home, Asked if Mr Martin warned a trade war between the US and Most read in Irish News He said: 'A trade war would have been very damaging to jobs in this country and The Government will now carry out work to assess the impact that the new 15 per cent tariffs will have on the Irish economy and jobs here. NO HAND-OUT APPROACH But the Taoiseach today ruled out He said: 'This is not 1 Micheal Martin warned a trade war between the US and EU would have devastated the Irish economy Credit: 2025 PA Media, All Rights Reserved
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Paul Hosford: The game of roulette is sure to continue
And so the Donald Trump tariff roulette ball lands on 15. That is the percentage rate which EU and US goods will be subject to after weeks of showdown talks between the two parties. The deal will impose 15% tariffs on almost all European exports to the US, including the likes of cars. It brings what the government here is calling clarity, and avoids a 30% trade war between the two largest trade partners in the history of commerce. Privately, the message is similar across the board: it's not great, but it's not as bad as it could have been, which in an Irish context will mean tighter belts, but more of a watching brief in this year's budget. Most around the Irish government are of the opinion that the impact of tariffs will probably not be seen in its entirety this year, given the late stage at which the tariff framework has been agreed. What happens from here on out is where the challenge lies. Last week, the Government released its summer economic statement, which outlined a total budget package of €9.4bn. Included in this is €1.5bn in tax cuts and €7.9bn in increased spending. Though how much of that is already accounted for was not clear as public expenditure minister Jack Chambers and finance minister Paschal Donohoe released the document last Tuesday. The message from Mr Chambers has been that spending needs to moderate, particularly in a day-to-day sense. US president Donald Trump with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the Trump Turnberry golf course in Scotland last Sunday. Picture: Jacquelyn Martin/AP The Government has been quick to play down the idea that October 7 will see an austerity budget, but it will probably be the closest that a generation of taxpayers can remember. This will be far from those swinging days of cuts and protests and febrile demonstrations, but it will not bring with it a huge expansion of spending. In part, that is because the budgets of recent years have seen a huge expansion of public expenditure. In Budget 2020, passed in October 2019, there was a total gross voted current expenditure of just under €62bn. Flash forward to last October, and that figure stood and a little over €90bn. The state cannot realistically continue to grow at a rate of tens of billions of euro in baked-in spending every five years. Some moderation was always going to happen. Beyond that, there is the simple fact that nobody knows whether this 15% tariff is here to stay. Given the continuing rate of change within the Trump administration on the issue of tariffs, there is no guarantee that we won't be back worrying about the future face of trade between the EU and the US in mere months. Who is to say that the next time Mr Trump has a domestic issue to quell, a 30% tariff is not back on the agenda? The summer economic statement published last week was done so on the basis the tariffs would be 10%. Ireland does two sets of economic projections a year in April and October, and so last week's figures were based on the situation as had been the case in April. The document itself says that, should the tariff situation worsen, there would be a need to look at Ireland's economic model. The document said that if the tariff landscape deteriorates, the government would "recalibrate" its fiscal strategy, reducing the quantum of the budgetary package. While 15% is not the worst spin of the roulette wheel, more challenges lie ahead.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Ukraine and democracy: public force Zelenskiy to retreat
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy beat a hasty retreat on his proposed bill to curb the independence of two anti-corruption organisations last week after an intense round of street demonstrations, political and international protests against the measure. The episode tells an important story about Ukraine's commitment to democracy and the rule of law in the middle of its war with Russia. Ukraine was chronically prone to corruption in the two decades after achieving independence from Russia in 1991, as state assets were privatised and an oligarchy of economic magnates emerged and consolidated their power. Popular dissatisfaction with this was a powerful force behind the 2014 revolt which turned Ukraine decisively westwards towards Europe and away from any close alignment with Russia. Two anti-corruption bodies were set up in response to political pressure from the European Union and International Monetary Fund. They symbolise that new orientation internationally and their work within Ukraine is popularly seen as a guarantee that the rule of law continues to operate even in wartime. The immediate street protests and international political reaction against the rapid passage of the bill through parliament last week shows how strongly these democratic instincts survive in Ukraine. Zelenskiy frankly acknowledged their concerns in justifying his retreat, saying the people's voices must be heard. Any further moves to centralise authority around his office will be difficult amid widespread worries that he tried to protect powerful figures in his own entourage from corruption probes. The potential opportunities arising from huge aid flows to Ukraine are now more plainly visible. Most Ukrainians are war weary yet remain determined to defend their independence even if that requires strategic compromises and concessions to Russian aggression. Pressures to agree a ceasefire and negotiate an end to the war will mount in coming months and may well be reciprocated from the Russian side as they too count the costs of the conflict.
