Palantir's meteoric rise has investors scrambling to justify valuation
Shares of the defense maker closed at another all-time high Friday, bringing gains since its 2021 debut to near 2,500%. The stock is up almost 150% this year, a rally underpinned by the company's growing use of artificial intelligence, business ties to the U.S. government and most recently, a stellar earnings report.
That surge has made Palantir eye-wateringly expensive compared to its peers: trading at 245 times forward earnings, it is the most richly-valued company in the S&P 500 Index. By comparison, chipmaker, another big gainer, trades at just 35 times forward earnings.
Palantir is "turning into a bit of a difficult valuation story to sell, but it's a great company,' said Mark Giarelli of Morningstar, who has sell-equivalent rating on the stock. The valuation "causes heartburn, but that's the story right now.'
Plenty of Wall Street pros and retail investors alike are happy to hang on for now, wary of missing out on further upside. Still, it's getting hard for them to ignore the increasingly high bar Palantir must meet to justify its performance over the longer term. Damian Reimertz of Bloomberg Intelligence estimates the company would need to generate $60 billion over the next 12 months to trade at a comparable valuation to its peers.
That calculation — based on a comparison of the software companies' enterprise value-to-sales ratio — is many times higher than the $4 billion in revenue Wall Street expects Palantir to earn in fiscal 2025 or the $5.7 billion analysts forecast for next year.
Valuation is also a sticking point for Gil Luria, managing director and head of technology research at DA Davidson. Luria praised Palantir's quarterly results and called it "the best story in all of software' in a recent note.
But he estimates that the company would have to grow at 50% annually for the next five years and maintain a 50% margin in order to get its forward price to earnings ratio down to 30, in line with the likes of Microsoft and AMD. Palantir's adjusted earnings per share are expected to grow at a 56% rate this year, falling to 31% and 33% in the next two years, respectively.
In a broader sign of Wall Street's unease, more than twice as many analysts assign the stock sell or hold ratings than buy, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Still, Palantir's shares have become a must-own for portfolio managers concerned with beating performance benchmarks, said David Wagner of Aptus Capital Advisors, which holds shares of the company.
"There's a lot of investors that just can't ignore it,' said Wagner. "They don't believe in the stock, but they're tired of it just hurting them on a relative performance standpoint.'
The logo of U.S. software company Palantir is seen in Davos, Switzerland, on May 22, 2022. |
REUTERS
Palantir bulls are betting that the company's business performance will support its stock price over the long term, a path taken by many of today's Big Tech elite. Online streamer Netflix, for instance, traded north of 280 times forward earnings at a 2015 peak, and now stands at a forward P/E of 40.
"Definitely Palantir is part of that AI craze, but not everything that goes to a valuation of 200 is a bubble,' said Que Nguyen, chief investment officer of equity strategies at Research Affiliates, referring to Netflix.
Brent Bracelin at Piper Sandler boosted his price target on shares to $182 from $170 following earnings and maintained his overweight rating. He is counting on the company to continue growing aggressively and sustain high free cash flow margins through 2030, aided by a market for defense spending estimated at $1 trillion in the U.S. alone.
"You have to squint your eyes. You kind of have to believe that these audacious growth goals can be achieved,' he said.
Of course, there are numerous examples of stock rallies that cooled when companies couldn't meet Wall Street's elevated expectations. Shares of Tesla are down nearly 20% this year, in part because the company's results aren't keeping pace with its lofty valuation of about 148 times forward earnings.
While Palantir aced its most recent earnings report, its high valuation could exacerbate a selloff if the company stumbles in the future, said Morningstar's Giarelli.
"Palantir is trading at such a high multiple relative to everyone else that there's just so much gravity underneath their stock chart,' he said. "There's a lot of room below the stock chart for it to reprice in a negative way because it's had such a stellar run.'
For Mark Malek, chief investment officer at Siebert, valuations remain a concern. Still, Palantir's potential for growth has kept him holding on to the stock.
"It's uncomfortable to buy it at these levels, but we're not afraid to buy when stocks are overvalued,' he said. "Where else are you finding 30% growth rates out there?'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
10 hours ago
- Japan Times
Banking's ailing climate coalition loses ground in Europe
Inside the world's largest climate coalition for banks, there's speculation that an exodus led by Wall Street could be about to spread to the European Union. The Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), an organization dedicated to decarbonizing global finance, may be facing defections by some large EU banks with sizeable U.S. exposures, according to a person close to the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. The risk of being accused in the U.S. of having an anti-oil bias appears to be a key concern among the banks, the person said. EU exits from NZBA would mark a painful milestone for the group. In the U.S., where President Donald Trump's re-election has brought with it intensified political attacks on net-zero policies, banks have had to navigate a landscape in which NZBA commitments have come with the risk of lawsuits and Republican blacklists. In the EU, meanwhile, net zero has been enshrined in law and the bloc's banks stand out as some of the world's most climate conscious. A spokesperson for NZBA said the alliance is committed to supporting its remaining members, without commenting on possible EU defections. This moment calls for "long-term work that requires courage, consistency and true leadership to stay on track, even when faced with barriers to action,' the person said. BNP Paribas, the EU's biggest bank by assets, was questioning the value of continued NZBA membership as recently as June, according to another person familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private conversations. The bank is reluctant to create headlines by leaving, however, and back in June discussed postponing a formal decision until around the end of the year, the person said. A spokesperson for BNP declined to comment. Deutsche Bank, Germany's largest lender, is "monitoring current developments and will assess them,' according to a spokesperson, who added that the bank's own sustainability and net-zero targets remain unchanged. A spokesperson for Spain's Banco Santander said it's still committed to net zero but declined to say whether that includes remaining an NZBA member. A UniCredit spokesperson reiterated comments it made last month in connection with its earnings release, when the bank noted that it's an NZBA member with a net-zero transition plan to support clients in their low-carbon transition. Commerzbank closely monitors "market trends, regulatory developments and jurisdictions to ensure we can act appropriately if necessary,' Beate Schlosser, a spokeswoman for the bank said by email. Commerzbank's 2050 net-zero goal still holds, she said. Among reasons EU bank executives have given in the past for staying in NZBA was the access it gave them to other banks. But as defections continue, that access is no longer a selling point. Barclays, which left earlier this month not long after U.K. peer HSBC Holdings, said the string of walkouts means NZBA "no longer has the membership to support our transition.' Barclays' exit was promptly followed by UBS Group of Switzerland. Those departures, though all by banks in non-EU countries, have added to speculation that EU banks will be next, the person familiar with discussion inside NZBA said. The value of climate alliances such as NZBA remains a topic of debate. Lisa Sachs, head of Columbia University's Center on Sustainable Investment, said that a key weakness of frameworks like NZBA is the assumption that the finance industry can have a material impact on the low-carbon transition simply through setting targets to reduce emissions and committing to nudging portfolio companies to decarbonize. "Financial institutions are not the right institutions to fix market flaws or deliver societal transitions because their mandates are to maximize returns within existing market conditions,' she said. "And their assessments of risk are based on those parameters rather than on long-term societal risks.' NZBA still has 125 members across the globe representing a combined $41 trillion in assets, according to its website. Banks in Northern Europe are among the most outspoken in their support, with ING Groep and ABN Amro Bank in the Netherlands, Swedbank and SEB in Sweden and Danske Bank in Denmark all underscoring their backing via spokespeople. The alliance was created to encourage banks to throw their weight behind the net-zero transition. It initially required members to align their financing operations with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. But after being virtually wiped off the North American map earlier this year, NZBA dropped that requirement and recast itself in more of a support role. It's a dramatic loss of stature for the alliance, which was created back in 2021 and feted by global bank executives at the COP26 climate summit in Scotland. Back then, when interest rates were at crisis lows and a global pandemic had created room for a green energy boom, net-zero finance looked like a reliable path to commercial success. That narrative was reinforced when U.S. President Joe Biden a year later signed the Inflation Reduction Act — the biggest piece of green legislation in U.S. history. Ironically, NZBA is hemorrhaging members just as fossil-fuel finance appears to be in decline on Wall Street. Policies designed to push up supply and drive down prices have pummeled the oil sector, and analysts at JPMorgan Chase have said this moment may mark the first decline in global upstream oil and gas development spending since 2020. In all, financing provided to oil, gas and coal projects by Wall Street's top six banks fell 25% to $73 billion this year through Aug. 1 from the same period in 2024, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. "A fundamental truth is that financial institutions follow markets — they don't create them,' Sachs of Columbia University said. Banks that have left NZBA in the U.K. have faced some pushback from clients and investors. HSBC lost a string of green customers, and the Church of England Pensions Board says it's now "engaging' with Barclays and HSBC on their NZBA exits. "As a shareholder we want to see banks to be genuinely committed to acting to address very real quantifiable financial risks like climate change,' says Laura Hillis, director of responsible investment at the pensions board. "It is very clear that some banks simply are not prepared to stay the course on their own commitments long term, which points to governance issues.' At the same time, banks leaving NZBA have said they'll continue to help clients decarbonize their businesses. UBS said on Aug. 7 its "commitment to sustainability remains unchanged and we recognize the importance of an orderly transition to a low-carbon economy.' Departing banks are also sticking with their sustainable finance goals. HSBC, for example, says it did $54.1 billion in deals it categorized as sustainable finance in the first half of 2025, which is up 19% from the same period a year ago. The bottom line remains that the decisions made by financial institutions "are driven by whether a specific investment is financeable today, given current market conditions, policies, and risk-return profiles,'' Columbia's Sachs said.
Japan Today
a day ago
- Japan Today
Are you in a mid-career to senior job? Don't fear AI – you could have an important advantage
By Kai Riemer and Sandra Peter Have you ever sat in a meeting where someone half your age casually mentions 'prompting ChatGPT' or 'running this through AI', and felt a familiar knot in your stomach? You're not alone. There's a growing narrative that artificial intelligence (AI) is inherently ageist, that older workers will be disproportionately hit by job displacement and are more reluctant to adopt AI tools. But such assumptions – especially that youth is a built-in advantage when it comes to AI – might not actually hold. While ageism in hiring is a real concern, if you have decades of work experience, your skills, knowledge and judgement could be exactly what's needed to harness AI's power – without falling into its traps. What does the research say? The research on who benefits most from AI at work is surprisingly murky, partly because it's still early days for systematic studies on AI and work. Some research suggests lower-skilled workers might have more to gain than high-skilled workers on certain straightforward tasks. The picture becomes much less clear under real-world conditions, especially for complex work that relies heavily on judgement and experience. Many older workers do experience AI as deeply unsettling. As one U.S.-based CEO of a large multinational corporation told us: "AI can be a form of existential challenge, not only to what you're doing, but how you view yourself." But leaders are also observing an important and unexpected distinction: experienced workers are often much better at judging the quality of AI outputs. This might become one of the most important skills, given that AI occasionally hallucinates or gets things wrong. The CEO of a South American creative agency put it bluntly: "Senior colleagues are using multiple AIs. If they don't have the right solution, they re-prompt, iterate, but the juniors are satisfied with the first answer, they copy, paste and think they're finished. They don't yet know what they are looking for, and the danger is that they will not learn what to look for if they keep working that way." Experience as an AI advantage Experienced workers have a crucial advantage when it comes to prompting AI: They understand context and usually know how to express it clearly. While a junior advertising creative might ask an AI to 'Write copy for a sustainability campaign', a seasoned account director knows to specify 'Write conversational social media copy for a sustainable fashion brand targeting eco-conscious millennials, emphasizing our client's zero-waste manufacturing process and keeping the tone authentic but not preachy'. This skill mirrors what experienced professionals do when briefing junior colleagues or freelancers: providing detailed instructions, accounting for audience, objectives, and constraints. It's a competency developed through years of managing teams and projects. Younger workers, despite their comfort with technology, may actually be at a disadvantage here. There's a crucial difference between using technology frequently and using it well. Many young people may become too accustomed to AI assistance. A survey of U.S. teens this year found 72% had used an AI companion app. Some children and teens are turning to chatbots for everyday decisions. Without the professional experience to recognise when something doesn't quite fit, younger workers risk accepting AI responses that feel right – effectively 'vibing' their work – rather than developing the analytical skills to evaluate AI usefulness. So what can you do? First, everyone benefits from learning more about AI. In our time educating everyone from students to senior leaders and CEOs, we find that misunderstandings about how AI works have little to do with age. A good place to start is reading up on what AI is and what it can do for you: If you're not even sure which AI platform to try, we would recommend testing the most prominent ones, OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Gemini. If you're an experienced worker feeling threatened by AI, lean into your strengths. Your decades of experience with delegation, context-setting, and critical evaluation are exactly what AI tools need. Start small. Pick one regular work task and experiment with AI assistance, using your judgement to evaluate and refine outputs. Practice prompting like you're briefing a junior colleague: be specific about context, constraints, and desired outcomes, and repeat the process as needed. Most importantly, don't feel threatened. In a workplace increasingly filled with AI-generated content, your ability to spot what doesn't quite fit, and to know what questions to ask, has never been more valuable. Kai Riemer is Professor of Information Technology and Organisation, University of Sydney. Sandra Peter is Director of Sydney Executive Plus, Business School, University of Sydney. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. External Link © The Conversation
Nikkei Asia
a day ago
- Nikkei Asia
Dow scales record high on hopes of Fed rate cuts, trade deals
(Reuters) -- The Dow Jones Industrial Average hit an all-time intraday high on Friday, making it the last of the three major U.S. indexes to clinch a record in Wall Street's rally fueled by the prospect of a looser monetary policy, easing trade tensions and upbeat corporate earnings. The Dow surpassed the previous peak of 45,073.63 touched on December 4, helped by a jump in UnitedHealth Group shares after Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway revealed a new investment in the health insurer. Counted among the oldest and most followed indexes, the Dow tracks the performance of 30 U.S.-listed large-cap stocks. The blue-chip index is price-weighted rather than market-cap-weighted, differentiating it from indexes such as the S&P 500, for which companies with larger market values carry the most weight. The Dow's gains have been propelled by a solid year-to-date performances from Wall Street bank Goldman Sachs, tech giant Microsoft and industrial equipment maker Caterpillar. Chip designer and AI champion Nvidia, which became the first publicly listed company to clinch $4 trillion in market capitalization, has also aided the Dow's rise. The stock has gained more than 30% this year. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite reached all-time highs late June, thanks to renewed AI enthusiasm, hopes of U.S. trade deals and rising bets on interest rate cuts, which helped drive a turnaround in U.S. stocks from a sharp rout earlier this year. The Dow, however, has lagged in reaching record highs, as limited exposure to AI names and the underperformance of companies such as UnitedHealth Group and Salesforce restricted its overall increase. The Dow has jumped more than 20% since hitting this year's lowest in April when U.S. President Donald Trump announced sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" to rebalance the global trade order in favor of the United States. After a series of U.S. trade agreements with the U.K., Japan, and the European Union, investors are certain that a worst-case global recession scenario can be avoided. Meanwhile, a weak labor market report for July prompted traders to increase their bets on an interest rate cut as early as September. Trump's moves to shake up the Federal Reserve leadership -- including an interim pick for a Fed governor post and an expanded search to replace Chair Jerome Powell next year with someone willing to lower interest rates -- have also added to rate cut bets.
