Germany's Merz urges MPs to back spending bonanza in fiery debate
Merz's conservatives and the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD) -- in talks to form a coalition after February's general election -- unveiled the plans for vast extra outlays last week, and are now racing to push them through the current legislature.
"In view of the alarming security situation in Europe in every respect and the growing economic challenges in our country, far-reaching decisions... cannot be postponed any longer," Merz told lawmakers at the start of the debate.
When it came to the armed forces in particular, "any further delay" in boosting spending "would be irresponsible", he said. "We must now take action to significantly increase our defence capabilities, and we must do so quickly."
Fraying Europe-US ties under President Donald Trump have fuelled calls for Germany, long dependent on the US security umbrella, to quickly boost military funding, while infrastructure spending is seen as a route to pull Europe's top economy out of stagnation.
Merz's plans envisage exempting defence spending from the country's strict debt rules when it exceeds one percent of GDP and setting up a €500 billion fund for infrastructure investments.
While the plans have won praise from German allies abroad, who grew weary of inaction under outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Merz faces a desperate scramble to push them through parliament.
'History is knocking'
As the measures involve a change to the constitutionally enshrined "debt brake", which limits government borrowing, they require a two-thirds majority in parliament.
This means that Merz's CDU/CSU bloc and SPD want to get them passed before a new parliament convenes later this month in which far-right and far-left parties, who have expressed scepticism about extra defence spending, will be in a position to block the measures.
Stressing that action needed to be taken quickly, SPD parliamentary leader Lars Klingbeil told MPs: "When history knocks at our door, then we must open it -- we don't know if we will have a second chance".
But there are hurdles ahead, particularly after the Greens -- whose votes are needed to reach the two-thirds mark -- threatened to torpedo the plans, complaining they were rushed and did not do enough for climate protection.
Green lawmaker Irene Mihalic criticised the attempt to force through major changes to the constitution "with the old majorities" in parliament, rather than waiting for the new parliament to convene.
Such a manoeuvre "shows complete ignorance of the reality in our country and of this parliament, and I fear it damages trust in politics as a whole," she said during the debate.
Legal challenges
Parliament is convening for two special sessions to debate the measures, on Thursday and also next Tuesday -- when a vote on the proposals is also to take place.
Merz's plans also face another threat with both the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) -- which came second in the election -- and the far-left Die Linke party having filed legal challenges at the constitutional court, arguing there will be insufficient time for consultations.
Chairman of the Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD) Lars Klingbeil comes back to the plenary during a debate at the Bundestag (lower house of parliament) in Berlin on March 13th, 2025. Photo: Tobias Schwarz / AFP
If Merz fails to get his plans through, observers fear he would lose momentum and his future government could face the same paralysis that beset Scholz's ill-fated, three-party coalition, whose November collapse precipitated last month's election.
The pressure has only increased on him in recent weeks as Trump has become increasingly hostile towards Ukraine and made overtures to Russia.
Still, the incoming government would have options to boost spending if the current parliament fails to pass the plans next week, analysts said.
Merz's conservative bloc and the SPD are also due to begin full-fledged negotiations on forming a coalition Thursday after concluding exploratory talks at the weekend.
The fate of the spending plans could have a bearing on these talks, noted Der Spiegel news outlet.
A failure to push them through parliament "would possibly also put an end to the coalition negotiations", it said.
By Jastinder Khera with Sam Reeves in Frankfurt
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
US trade tensions hit China's export growth – DW – 06/09/2025
In May, China's exports to the US fell nearly 12% from April. The report of the slowdown comes just hours before another round of trade talks between US and Chinese officials in London. China's export growth slowed to a three-month low in May as shipments to the United States dropped following tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, according to customs data released on Monday. While exports rose 4.8% year-on-year, it was down from 8.1% in April, with shipments to the US falling almost 12% month-on-month. The report of the slowdown comes just hours before another round of trade talks between US and Chinese officials in London. In May, China exported $28.8 billion (€25.23 billion) worth of goods to the US, down from $33 billion in April. Analysts say the strong trade figures in March and April can be attributed to a rush by exporters to ship goods ahead of anticipated tariff hikes. At the same time, imports from the US also fell 7.4% to $10.8 billion. Trump, Xi phone call signals thaw in ties On Thursday, Trump said he had a "very good phone call" with China's President Xi Jinping, which "resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries." The call comes amid a 90-day tariff truce that came into effect last month which paused a spiraling trade war between the world's two largest economies. Trump has lowered his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days to allow for talks while China also reduced its taxes on US goods from 125% to 10%. Trade war still hurts US ports despite tariff relief To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Beijing braces for economic fallout The China-US trade talks are happening as US policymakers have voiced frustration at China's stalling on export license approvals for rare earths and other elements needed in the high-tech, defense, and clean energy sectors. China's government data also showed a fall in the producer price index, while consumer prices dipped. Meanwhile, to cushion the economic blow, Beijing introduced new stimulus measures in May, including interest rate cuts. Edited by: Kieran Burke
DW
18 hours ago
- DW
What is the US National Guard and how is it deployed? – DW – 06/08/2025
The US National Guard is usually deployed to fight natural disasters, but it can be used for much more than that. What are its powers and who commands it? DW provides an overview. However, US President Donald Trump has sent the National Guard to Los Angeles, California, where protests against the deportation of illegal immigrants have broken out. What is the National Guard? The National Guard is part of the US Armed Forces Reserve. It consists of two branches: The Army National Guard and the Air National Guard. It was formed in 1903 by the Militia Act. US federal law determines the current structure of the National Guard. According to the Defense Manpower Data Center, as of 2023, approximately 419,000 reservists serve in the National Guard. About 9,500 are stationed in US territories such as Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands (as of 2017). Protests in Los Angeles grow over ICE immigration raids To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Where is the National Guard deployed? The National Guard has a wide range of duties. It is deployed to provide disaster relief. Most recently, it was called upon during the devastating forest fires in California in January 2025 and was also deployed after Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Over 50,000 National Guard members helped with evacuations, rescue operations, and restoring order in New Orleans. It can also be deployed to ensure internal security. During the storming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, over 25,000 National Guard troops were stationed in Washington DC, to ensure security around the inauguration of President Joe Biden. During the George Floyd protests in 2020, thousands of National Guard troops were mobilized in several states to support local police forces. The National Guard can also support military operations abroad, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Who commands the National Guard? When reservists are deployed inside the US states, the governor of the state in question usually assumes command. When deployed nationwide, the US president is the commander-in-chief. However, President Donald Trump decided to override the authority of California Governor Gavin Newsom when deploying the National Guard in Los Angeles during protests against ICE immigration raids. Trump cited national security as the reason for this move. Governor Newsom criticized the deployment and accused the government of "deliberately" inflaming tensions with its intervention. Who can join the National Guard? In principle, all US citizens are eligible to join the National Guard. However, they must meet certain physical, mental, and legal requirements. Most National Guard members serve in the units on a part-time basis, but there is also a minority of full-time soldiers. Soldiers who have completed military service in the army can apply to serve in the National Guard. They usually do not require any further training. Another option is voluntary enlistment for exclusive service in the National Guard without serving in active units. In this case, training is completed at a military facility. Typical duties of a National Guard member include one weekend per month and two weeks per year. National Guard members receive between $200 and $600 (€175 - €525) for weekend duty, depending on their rank. There are also allowances for accommodation and meals, education assistance, and health insurance. Pension entitlements can also be claimed for longer periods of service. This article originally appeared in German.
DW
2 days ago
- DW
Stymied French politicians turn to sins of the past – DW – 06/07/2025
Amid parliamentary deadlock, the politics of remembrance has gained momentum in France. Three new initiatives attempt to recognize and heal historical injustices — at least symbolically. On Thursday, two years after France's controversial retirement age increase, the National Assembly voted to withdraw the reform. While the news was politically explosive because the far-right National Rally helped the left-wing opposition gain a majority in the vote, the decision hasn't yielded any actual legal results. The situation reflects the country's ongoing failure to address structural reforms since the parliamentary elections last summer, which left the government won without an absolute majority. But in the area of remembrance policy there has been significant movement. In the same week as the toothless retirement resolution, parliamentarians adopted three texts that reclassify historical events or offer the prospect of reparations. Alfred Dreyfus, shown here in the 1930s, is considered a national hero by many French people today Image: epa/AFP/dpa/picture alliance Alfred Dreyfus posthumously promoted On June 2, the French parliament voted unanimously to posthumously appoint Alfred Dreyfus to the rank of brigadier general. The Jewish officer was wrongly accused of high treason in 1894, based on falsified evidence that he revealed military secrets to the German embassy in Paris. Dreyfus subsequently spent four years in the notorious Devil's Island penal colony off the coast of French Guiana. The Franco-German dimension of the case had explosive foreign policy implications even then. The suspect's Jewish origins and his family background in the Alsace-Lorraine region, which came under German rule after the Franco-Prussian War, and strained relations with Germany, made him an ideal target for the nationalist mistrust many French people harbored at the time. Writer Émile Zola famously sided with Dreyfus in his essay "J'accuse…!", which played a critical role in the officer's exoneration and military rehabilitation in 1906. Nevertheless, after serving in the First World War as a lieutenant colonel, Dreyfus was only reinstated at a lower rank. This posthumous promotion for Dreyfus still has to pass the Senate. Alsatian MP Charles Sitzenstuhl, a member of French President Emmanuel Macron's center-right Renaissance Party, who introduced the initiative, offered a link to the present as a warning: "The anti-Semitism that plagued Alfred Dreyfus is not a thing of the distant past," he said. In June 1954, Indochinese conscripts hastily erect new fortifications for French colonial forces in Phu Ly, south of Hanoi, Vietnam Image: AP/picture alliance Recognizing returnees from Indochina Just one day after the Dreyfus vote, the National Assembly also passed a law to recognize and compensate former returnees from French Indochina after the colonial rule of territories including Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia ended in 1954. Around 44,000 people were repatriated to France, among them colonial officials, soldiers and their families, the descendants of French colonizers and local women, as well as local collaborators. Between 4,000 to 6,000 returnees ended up in temporary camps, which were often outfitted with wooden barracks that lacked heating and plumbing. Returnees were also subject to degrading policies that included bans on going out and owning cars or other luxury goods. The new law introduced by the left-wing Socialist Party now provides for financial support based on someone's length of stay in the camps. It is estimated that up to 1,600 people could claim compensation. Haiti is one of the world's poorest countries today Image: Java Reparations for Haiti? On June 5, the Assembly adopted a resolution addressing a "double debt" to Haiti that goes back to 1825. That was the year that France forced Haiti, which had declared independence in 1804, to pay compensation of 150 million gold francs. This was intended as a recognition of independence that would also compensate for the loss of French colonial possessions, including income from slaves. Haiti was forced to settle this "independence debt" over decades — a considerable economic burden that contributed to long-term poverty and instability on the island. The resolution, initiated by the Communist Party, calls for recognition, repayment and reparations for Haiti. But the text does not include concrete political steps or financial agreements. Nevertheless, the far-right National Rally voted against it. The "Senegalese riflemen," or "tirailleurs sénégalais," were a colonial infantry recruited by the French army during the First World War Image: The Print Collector/Heritage-Images/picture alliance A history of remembering Remembrance politics have some tradition in France. In 2001, the "Taubira" law, named after the parliamentarian who introduced it, recognized the slave trade and practice of slavery as crimes against humanity. The topic has been a part of school curricula in France ever since. In October 2006, the National Assembly passed a bill to criminalize the denial of the Armenian genocide of 1915 in the Ottoman Empire with a year in prison or fine of €45,000 ($51,300). The bill never came into force after it failed to pass in the Senate, and was followed by a similarly doomed initiative introduced under President Nicolas Sarkozy. That draft law passed both chambers of parliament, but was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Council in February 2012, which said that it amounted to unlawful interference with freedom of expression and research. Another example is the treatment of the so-called "Senegalese riflemen," the colonial soldiers from Africa who fought for France in the two world wars. For decades, many received significantly lower pensions than their French comrades, especially if they lived outside of France after decolonization. It was not until 2009 that President Sarkozy decreed an equalization of pension benefits, a step that held great symbolic significance. Social maturity or empty gestures? The latest spike in such initiatives has been met with mixed interpretations by political scientists. Some experts see the willingness to take historical responsibility as a form of social maturity. But others point out that in a politically paralyzed legislature, symbolic initiatives are easier to pass than structural reforms in areas such as pensions, education or the budget. This article was originally written in German.
