India-US trade deal: Fifth round over, India is not budging
trade negotiations
, as the fifth round of talks for the proposed India-US
Bilateral Trade Agreement
(BTA) concluded in Washington this week. Led by
Rajesh Agrawal
, India's chief negotiator and Special Secretary in the Department of Commerce, the Indian delegation engaged in four days of deliberations with their American counterparts from July 14 to 17. The return of the negotiating team marks a critical juncture in the ongoing dialogue, which seems to remain mired in unresolved issues.
Union Commerce and Industry Minister
Piyush Goyal
's firm remarks on Saturday, following the conclusion of this latest round, make it unequivocally clear that India will not be rushed or coerced into finalizing a trade deal that does not align with its national interests. Speaking at a function hosted by ASSOCHAM (Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India), Goyal asserted, 'If India gets a good trade deal, we will go ahead with it. If not, we won't. India always keeps the country's interest first.'
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
MBA
Project Management
Data Analytics
Data Science
PGDM
Digital Marketing
Leadership
healthcare
Others
others
MCA
Operations Management
Cybersecurity
Public Policy
Degree
Finance
Technology
Design Thinking
Healthcare
Product Management
Artificial Intelligence
Data Science
CXO
Management
Skills you'll gain:
Financial Management
Team Leadership & Collaboration
Financial Reporting & Analysis
Advocacy Strategies for Leadership
Duration:
18 Months
UMass Global
Master of Business Administration (MBA)
Starts on
May 13, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Analytical Skills
Financial Literacy
Leadership and Management Skills
Strategic Thinking
Duration:
24 Months
Vellore Institute of Technology
VIT Online MBA
Starts on
Aug 14, 2024
Get Details
Strategic patience over speed
This declaration reiterates a central theme that has characterized India's approach under the current administration: strategic patience over external pressure. Earlier this month, on July 5, Goyal had emphasized that India negotiates from a "position of strength," not according to imposed deadlines, a clear response to the July 9 timeline previously set by US President Donald Trump, which was later pushed to August 1. Goyal's consistent messaging suggests India is uninterested in symbolic or hurried agreements driven by political timelines in Washington.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Ringing in The Ears? Do This Immediately!
Live Happier
Click Here
Undo
This approach is particularly significant in the current
global trade environment
, where developed economies, including the US, are looking to restructure key trade relationships in the wake of changing geopolitical dynamics and economic realignments post-COVID and amid ongoing global supply chain shifts.
India's posture underscores its growing economic self-assurance. While the US seeks deeper market access in areas such as agriculture, digital trade,
intellectual property rights
and medical devices, India is focused on securing greater access for its IT services, textiles and pharmaceuticals, while protecting sensitive sectors like
agriculture and dairy
from potential disruption.
Live Events
In line with this, India's trade negotiators have reportedly resisted US attempts to extract concessions in sectors where India remains cautious, particularly on agriculture and dairy. By refusing to compromise prematurely, India appears to be echoing its broader trade philosophy which is balancing globalization with the protection of domestic industry and livelihoods. Goyal's recent remarks further reinforce this narrative, portraying a government that remains keen to avoid repeating past mistakes of asymmetrical agreements.
'No negotiation through media'
Adding to his resolute tone, Goyal also took a swipe at attempts to influence public opinion during sensitive negotiations. 'I've already mentioned that we don't negotiate through media, we negotiate in the negotiating room. Talks are ongoing, and once the team is back, we will get feedback on the response and the progress,' he told reporters, highlighting New Delhi's disciplined and professional handling of the talks. This was likely in response to leaked or unofficial reports attempting to project the US as driving progress while India remains hesitant.
This statement can be interpreted as a subtle critique of Washington's pressure tactics, including setting public deadlines and possibly shaping narratives through the media. India's choice to avoid reactive diplomacy and instead stick to official channels is consistent with its desire to maintain autonomy and dignity in international dealings.
What lies ahead
While the fifth round of talks has concluded, both sides seem to have left the door open. India is expected to analyze the outcomes internally and recalibrate its strategy accordingly. Yet, what is increasingly clear is that India is not desperate for a deal. As Minister Goyal's statements suggest, the current government is not interested in optics but in substance, a fair and mutually beneficial agreement.
In a world increasingly shaped by
economic nationalism
and realpolitik, India's measured and self-assured stance may set a template for other emerging economies negotiating with larger powers. By refusing to blink in the face of deadlines and media narratives, India is not just negotiating a trade deal, but reaffirming its position as a sovereign and assertive player in the global economic order.
India's response after the fifth round of the India-US BTA talks reflects a firm, principle-driven approach to trade negotiations. Minister Goyal's reiteration that 'India always keeps the country's interest first' is not just rhetoric but a policy stance backed by a clear track record. Whether or not a deal is signed by August 1, India's message is clear: deals will be made on its terms, not under pressure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Us' bashes ‘Them'
Attacks on immigrants in West & internal migrants in India extract big socio-economic costs In one variation of the trolley dilemma, you can stop a runaway tram and save five lives by throwing a heavy man on the track, but almost nobody likes this solution. It's because humans – despite all the gore in history – are not normally comfortable with violence. Yet, Charanpreet Singh was bashed up in Adelaide on Saturday evening. A few hours later, another Indian was brutally assaulted in Dublin. Both cases have the appearance of hate crime, which is a growing problem around the world. It might not be the age of peak hate against foreigners because something like America's Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which practically barred immigration from China for about 60 years, seems unthinkable today. But that could be the result of political correctness. Data from America – self-appointed guardian of democracy and liberal values – shows a 13% jump in hate crimes in the top 10 cities between 2022 and 2023. As Indians, we narrowly focus on attacks targeting Indians, whether in US, Canada, UK, Australia, or elsewhere, but other nationalities are equally targets of hate. In Jan, Nigeria issued an advisory for its citizens travelling to Australia. Let's not forget that internal migrants in India are often targeted by goonish groups. It is normal for people to be suspicious of the outsider – different in speech, appearance, garb, customs – and be reserved, but violence is hard to explain. What might trigger it? Toxic ideology was the culprit in Nazi Germany. Now, there are reactionary ideologues everywhere. Even Trump's Maga push relies on the vilification of immigrants. But as economist Michael Martell points out in a paper, hate is not the way to achieve national greatness. In fact, it has enormous social and economic costs. Martell cites the 2012 shooting at a gurdwara in Wisconsin that left six dead. Not a high toll at first glance, but its cost to society quickly added up. The gurdwara upgraded its security. Alongside, mosques and Hindu temples took note of the attack and spent on better security systems. Terrorised immigrants curbed their movement, affecting local businesses. And this was just one case of hate crime among many. The cumulative cost of fatal and non-fatal hate crimes in US, in 2019, was estimated at $3.4bn. The economic loss from all the hate crime around the world would be many times more. The social cost enormous. As a community leader in Dublin pointed out, immigrants are crucial for keeping services running. Even demographically young India needs Chinese manufacturing experts, and US needs Indian scientists and engineers. So, all countries – India included – must make an effort to dial down xenophobia. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India restarts visas for Chinese tourists after a 5-year pause
India on Wednesday announced the resumption of tourist visas for Chinese nationals, making another step in the normalisation of bilateral ties that were taken to their lowest point in six decades by a military standoff on the Line of Actual Control (LAC). External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar meets China President Xi Jinping, in Beijing. (@DrSJaishankar X) The move, unveiled by the Indian embassy in Beijing on social media, came almost two months after India and China agreed in April on the resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra after a gap of five years – seen as the first major breakthrough in people-to-people exchanges. A post on WeChat by the Indian embassy in Beijing said Chinese nationals could apply for tourist visas to visit India by filling applications online from July 24. The post said applicants could then book appointments to submit documents at centres in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Barring the social media post, there was no official word from the Indian side on the development. People familiar with the matter confirmed the resumption of tourist visas for Chinese citizens and said on condition of anonymity that the process for accepting applications will now commence. India had imposed wide-ranging restrictions on visas for Chinese nationals after border skirmishes between troops of the two countries in April-May 2020 triggered the face-off in Ladakh sector of the LAC. A brutal clash in Galwan Valley in June 2020 that killed 20 Indian soldiers and at least four Chinese troops sent bilateral ties plummeting to their lowest point since the border war of 1962. China did not impose restrictions on visas for Indian nationals though travel between the two countries was impacted by the lack of direct flights. China issued about 85,000 visas to Indians, mainly students, tourists and business professionals, between January and June 2025. Before the Covid-19 pandemic and the standoff on the LAC, India issued almost 200,000 visas to Chinese nationals in 2019, but the figure declined to just 2,000 in 2024. The two sides reached an understanding on disengagement of forces along the LAC last October, and this was followed by a meeting in the Russian city of Kazan between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping, who agreed to revive several mechanisms to normalise bilateral relations and address the long-standing border dispute. Since then, there have been several meetings between the foreign and defence ministers and national security advisers of India and China, and the Special Representatives for the border issue – NSA Ajit Doval and Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi. These meetings have resulted in forward movement in normalising relations, including the resumption of the Kailash Mansaorvar pilgrimage to a holy mountain and lake in Tibet. External affairs minister S Jaishankar met his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Beijing on July 14 when he visited China for a meeting of foreign ministers of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and discussed ways to take bilateral ties forward. This was Jaishankar's first visit to China after the start of the stand-off on the LAC. 'The two sides agreed to take additional practical steps, including travel to each other's country and direct flight connectivity, for facilitating people-to-people exchanges,' an Indian readout issued after the meeting said. Jaishankar said at the meeting that India and China must build on 'good progress' in normalising their relations by addressing issues related to the border, including de-escalation, and avoiding 'restrictive trade measures and roadblocks' to economic cooperation. He was referring to China's curbs on exports of rare earth minerals – in many of which Beijing has a near monopoly – and fertilisers. The restrictions on rare earth exports have been officially raised through diplomatic channels by India, especially in view of the impact on manufacturers of electric vehicles.
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Opposition bloc will ‘collectively decide' on VP election: Mallikarjun Kharge
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge told HT on Wednesday that the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) will 'collectively take a decision' for the upcoming vice-president election. The Election Commission of India, earlier in the day, announced that it has already started the preparations relating to the vice-presidential elections, 2025. (PTI) The Election Commission of India, earlier in the day, announced that it 'has already started the preparations relating to the vice-presidential elections, 2025. On completion of the preparatory activities, the announcement of the election schedule to the office of the Vice-President of India will follow as soon as possible.' VP Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned on Monday evening, citing health grounds, in an unexpected move that has rocked Parliament for two days. On Wednesday, Kharge told HT, 'We will call a meeting of the INDIA group parties and take a collective decision on what to do for the VP election.' In the last VP election in 2022, the Congress-led Opposition fielded former Union minister Margaret Alva against Dhankhar. The INDIA bloc came into existence next year when more than 30 parties joined hands to fight the Lok Sabha polls. Kharge added that every party needed to be consulted to arrive at a decision and the bloc will act together on issues inside and outside Parliament. A section of the Congress leaders indicated that the INDIA group will decide its candidate depending on several factors, including the National Democratic Alliance's nominee.
