PHC rejects bail pleas in wheat theft scandal
The defense argued that suspect Arshad was serving as a storage officer in Azakhel, while Talha Muhammad was a former employee. They are accused of misappropriating wheat worth millions of rupees, but, according to the defense, other individuals were also implicated in the case. The lawyers maintained that there were no criminal charges or concrete evidence against their clients, whose duties were limited to maintaining records.
The Additional Advocate General informed the court that the Chief Justice had already rejected the bail petitions of other accused in the same case. He said that 3,300 bags of wheat had gone missing from the storage facility, causing a loss of over Rs190 million to the national exchequer.
The defense countered that no shortage occurred during their clients' tenure and that documentary evidence supported this. They also offered to personally bear the cost of weighing the wheat stock.
Additional Director of Food Imran Jadoon told the court that while the paperwork appeared in order, the stock was found short, and a letter had been sent to the Chief Secretary requesting a high-level inquiry. The Additional Advocate General added that two other suspects had withdrawn their bail applications from the Supreme Court after rejection.
With the trial ongoing in the lower court, the PHC dismissed the current bail applications, keeping the accused in custody.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
PHC rejects bail pleas in wheat theft scandal
The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has dismissed the bail applications of suspects accused of embezzling 3,300 bags of wheat from the Azakhel wheat storage facility. The hearing was conducted by Justice Syed Arshad Ali, with the suspects' lawyers, Additional Director of Food Imran Jadoon, Additional Advocate General Inaam Yousafzai, and other officials in attendance. The defense argued that suspect Arshad was serving as a storage officer in Azakhel, while Talha Muhammad was a former employee. They are accused of misappropriating wheat worth millions of rupees, but, according to the defense, other individuals were also implicated in the case. The lawyers maintained that there were no criminal charges or concrete evidence against their clients, whose duties were limited to maintaining records. The Additional Advocate General informed the court that the Chief Justice had already rejected the bail petitions of other accused in the same case. He said that 3,300 bags of wheat had gone missing from the storage facility, causing a loss of over Rs190 million to the national exchequer. The defense countered that no shortage occurred during their clients' tenure and that documentary evidence supported this. They also offered to personally bear the cost of weighing the wheat stock. Additional Director of Food Imran Jadoon told the court that while the paperwork appeared in order, the stock was found short, and a letter had been sent to the Chief Secretary requesting a high-level inquiry. The Additional Advocate General added that two other suspects had withdrawn their bail applications from the Supreme Court after rejection. With the trial ongoing in the lower court, the PHC dismissed the current bail applications, keeping the accused in custody.
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
PHC reserves verdict in missing wheat case
The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has reserved its verdict on a bail petition filed by an accused in the high-profile case involving the disappearance of wheat from the Azakhel storage facility. The hearing was presided over by Justice Syed Arshad Ali, who grilled the Anti-Corruption Department's representative over the progress of the investigation. "What progress have you made so far? the judge asked. "Have you even read your own audit report? Where is the auditor? What is this performance? The audit correspondence looks fine on paper, but there's a shortage of wheat on the ground. This is the state of your department, you're relying entirely on others." The hearing saw the appearance of the petitioner's lawyer Advocate Farooq Malik, Additional Director Food Imran Jadoon, and Additional Advocate General Inam Yousafzai, among others. Arguing for bail, the defense counsel maintained that the petitioner was not solely responsible, asserting that others were also involved. He stressed that there were no criminal charges or concrete evidence against his client, whose role was limited to maintaining records. "As long as he was in charge, no discrepancy occurred, and relevant documentation supports this. He is even willing to have the wheat weighed at his own expense," the lawyer argued. In response, Additional Advocate General Inam Yousafzai informed the court that similar bail petitions filed by other accused had already been rejected by the Chief Justice. He stated that over 3,300 sacks of wheat were missing from the storage facility, causing a loss of more than Rs190 million to the national treasury. Justice Arshad Ali sharply criticized the performance of the Anti-Corruption Department during the hearing. When the department's representative claimed that an audit had been conducted, the judge responded, "Then check your report. Where is the auditor? What are you people doing? The wheat is missing on the ground, and your department still depends on others to get the job done." Additional Director Food Imran Jadoon told the court that while the paperwork appeared to be in order, the physical stock was short. "We've written to the Chief Secretary, requesting a high-level inquiry," he added. The Additional Advocate General reiterated that the case involved significant financial loss to the national exchequer. He also noted that two other suspects in the case had already had their bail pleas rejected, and later withdrew their petitions filed before the Supreme Court. The case is currently under trial in the lower court.
Express Tribune
24-07-2025
- Express Tribune
PHC dismisses contempt plea against police
A two-member bench of the Peshawar High Court (PHC) comprising Justice Ejaz Anwar and Justice Faheem Wali on Thursday dismissed a contempt of court petition filed against the arrest of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) provincial leader Syed Haider Shah Bacha. During the hearing, Justice Ejaz Anwar remarked that summoning the police in every case could hinder their ability to perform their duties effectively. He noted that the police admitted to arresting the petitioner but stated that they had not received any court order prohibiting the arrest. "If the police claim they acted on orders from higher authorities, then we would have seen how they could defy court directives," the judge added. The hearing began with Additional Advocate General Bashir Naveed and the petitioner's counsel appearing before the bench. The petitioner's lawyer argued that his client was arrested under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) for protesting against electricity load shedding and was subsequently sent to Dera Ismail Khan Jail, despite having secured protective bail from the court. He contended that the arrest constituted contempt of court as it violated a prior judicial order barring police from detaining his client. Justice Ejaz Anwar questioned how the arrest could be justified if a court order existed, adding, "Is the police so powerful that it can ignore the judiciary?" The police, in its written reply, stated that they had no knowledge of the court order at the time of arrest and released the petitioner once the order was received. The court also took note of the fact that 18 FIRs had been registered against the petitioner. His counsel responded that the petitioner was already on bail in those cases. After hearing arguments from both sides, the bench ruled that there was insufficient evidence to establish contempt of court and dismissed the petition accordingly. Livestock notification Meanwhile, PHC has suspended the notification issued by the Livestock Department regarding the premature repatriation of the Project In-Charge for Khyber District, and has issued notices to the Secretary of Livestock and other relevant officials, seeking a formal explanation. The case was heard by a two-member bench comprising Justice Ijaz Anwar and Justice Faheem Wali. Advocate Aminur Rehman Yousafzai, representing petitioner Naeemullah, the current Project In-Charge of the Integrated Development Package in Khyber District, told the court that his client's appointment was made in April 2025. However, on July 1, the posting was abruptly withdrawn and he was directed to report back to the parent department. The counsel argued that the transfer order was issued without the recommendations of the relevant committee, making it procedurally flawed. He further informed the court that the provincial government has already issued a formal policy for project-based appointments.
