Gold edges up with focus on US inflation data
Spot gold was up 0.3% at $3,354.91 per ounce, as of 0453 GMT. U.S. gold futures for December delivery were steady at $3,405.40.
Gold slipped 1.6% on Monday, while futures dropped by more than 2% after U.S. President Donald Trump said tariffs will not be placed on imported gold bars, easing jitters in the market.
"Market participants now will be definitely focusing on the upcoming Fed rate cut, which has been more or less priced in for September. If we start to see the core CPI data came in slightly below expected, that could actually further support this rate-cut expectations," OANDA senior market analyst Kelvin Wong said.
"That could lower the cost of holding gold and the long-term U.S. 10-year treasury yield still remains below certain key resistance level, so that could actually support gold prices."
All eyes are on U.S. consumer prices index data, which is due at 1230 GMT. Economists polled by Reuters projected that core CPI likely rose 0.3% in July, pushing the annual rate higher to 3%, away from the Fed target of 2%.
Traders are pricing in around an 85% chance of a Fed rate cut next month, as per the CME FedWatch Tool. Gold tends to perform well during periods of uncertainty and in a low-interest-rate environment.
Traders appeared to show scant reaction to a statement from a White House official that Trump signed an executive order on Monday, extending a pause in sharply higher U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports for another 90 days.
Elsewhere, spot silver gained 0.7% to $37.88 per ounce, platinum rose 0.3% to $1,330.25 and palladium climbed 0.9% to $1,145.47.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starbucks sets ambitious new goal to combat customers' biggest gripe
Starbucks is making a bold promise to tackle customers' biggest gripe — no coffee will take longer than four minutes. America's biggest coffee chain has lost millions of customers in the past year, some fed up with high prices or shoddy stores. But, by Starbucks' own admission, most had grown weary of waiting 20 minutes for a drink. CEO Brian Niccol, poached from Chipotle in the fall, is rolling out a new 'Green Apron Service' to tackle this and other customers moans. Baristas have a target that no custom drink should take more than four minutes. The key to cutting wait times is Starbucks' biggest hiring spree in history — which adds as many as 85,000 workers across its 17,000 US locations. When Niccol's announced the recruitment blitz at a huge Starbucks convention in Las Vegas in June, the 14,000 stores managers roared their approval. Five years ago, Starbucks stores averaged 23 employees. Cost-cutting has since trimmed that number down to 18 to 19 — four to five fewer workers per location. 'It's centered on putting enough partners on the roster in the stores and then deployed correctly so they can provide that customer connection, that experience, that frankly Starbucks really was founded on,' Niccol said. Restoring pre-Covid staffing levels would mean hiring between 68,000 and 85,000 people across all US stores. Even focusing solely on the 11,000 company-owned locations, the increase would still be a massive 44,000 to 55,000 hires. The new hires are also expected to support Starbucks' efforts to bring back a more personal touch — including a new policy asking baristas to handwrite notes on customers' cups. The former Chipotle boss has embarked on a series of plans to return Starbucks to its original 'third place between home and work' concept. Coffee drinkers have turned away from the chain in recent years, put off by high beverage prices, long wait times and impersonal experiences. Niccol has set about axing complicated drinks from Starbucks menus, asking staff to put messages on customer's coffee cups and scaling back promotions. The plan will help address the major customer pet peeve of long wait times before getting their hands on a coffee. It will also likely be popular with front of house employees who have complained of chronic issues with understaffing, which compounds the backlogs. Another change is Starbucks' decision to axe mobile and pickup-only stores. All 80-90 locations will either shutter or be converted to traditional coffeehouses by next year. Other changes include removing complicated drinks and new uniform rules — the latter resulting in baristas threatening to quit. The changes were not enough to improve Starbucks' sales, which declined for its sixth straight quarter. Both its global and North American sales dipped by two percent — higher than price drops anticipated by Wall Street.
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Why Traditional Mobile Banking Apps Are Reaching Their Limits and How Agentic UI Will Replace Them: By Paul Shumsky
Every major shift in digital banking has started with a problem that could no longer be ignored. Moving from branches to online banking addressed the need for convenience. The move from online to mobile banking apps gave customers access to their finances anywhere and anytime. Now a new challenge is emerging. Even the best mobile banking apps are beginning to show their limits. Neobanks like Revolut and Nubank have set the standard for modern design and strong user experience. Yet as they expand into super apps offering trading, insurance, travel bookings and shopping, the trade-off becomes clear. Each new product competes for space on the screen. Menus get deeper, journeys get longer and customers struggle to find the value that drew them in. This is not a problem that affects only challengers. Traditional banks face it too. When more becomes too much To keep things manageable, many banks have split their offerings into separate apps. One for personal banking. One for businesses. Another for young customers. Another for wealth and investments. This approach makes each app less cluttered, but it creates a new problem: fragmentation. Customers need multiple logins, must switch between different designs, and face inconsistent experiences. It is also expensive. Separate apps require separate development teams, separate technology platforms and separate infrastructure. That is duplication of cost without duplication of value. The next breakthrough will not be about creating more apps or adding more menu tabs. It will be about creating a single intelligent experience that recognises each customer, understands the products they use and knows how to make their life easier. Personalisation that means something Banks often talk about personalisation in terms of letting customers change colours, switch to dark mode or rearrange widgets. In reality that is not personalisation. Studies consistently show that the vast majority of customers never change default settings. True personalisation is proactive. It guides customers through their financial journeys and anticipates what they will need next. A small business owner logging in on payroll day should see cash flow projections and quick-pay links before anything else. A frequent traveller should see currency exchange, travel insurance and lounge access in the weeks before a trip. Enter agentic UI Agentic UI represents the next step in the evolution of mobile banking. It is a conversational, adaptive, AI-powered interface that learns from each customer's profile, behaviour and context in real time. Instead of navigating static menus, customers interact with an intelligent agent. The interface adapts to who is using it, when they are using it and why they have come. This is the type of experience that Finpace helps financial institutions bring to life. With the right integration, one app can serve every customer segment and every product line without compromising on simplicity or clarity. Benefits for customers and for the business For customers, Agentic UI means fewer clicks, faster answers and the feeling that their bank truly understands them. For the bank, it brings higher engagement because customers do not have to search for value, lower support costs because there are fewer 'how do I…' queries, reduced technology spend by removing the need for multiple apps, and faster launches of new products because they can be introduced contextually to the right customers. Platforms like Finpace, Kasisto, Personetics, and Glia are already making these capabilities possible today. Finpace focuses on unifying multiple product lines into a single adaptive banking app, Kasisto enables natural language conversations that feel human, Personetics powers hyperpersonalized recommendations and goal-based journeys, and Glia integrates real-time AI assistance into the customer's digital session. Together, they are proving that Agentic UI is not a distant vision but an achievable standard for forward-thinking financial institutions. Learning from other industries Other industries have already moved in this direction. Netflix recommends what to watch without asking. Google Maps adjusts travel time based on live traffic. These are systems that adapt to the user, not the other way around. Banking can work the same way. The difference is that financial journeys are more complex, more regulated and often more sensitive. Agentic UI, enabled by platforms like Finpace, can make those journeys simple, relevant and compliant without losing the personal touch. The road ahead The case for Agentic UI is becoming stronger every day. As super apps grow and traditional banks seek to unify their offerings, one adaptive app that delivers the right experience to the right customer at the right time is becoming the logical next step. Those who start exploring this now will have a clear advantage, not only in customer satisfaction but also in cost efficiency and time to market.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Investors react to US-Russia summit reaching no agreement
NEW YORK, Aug 15 (Reuters) - A highly anticipated summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine, despite both leaders describing the talks in Alaska as productive. During a brief appearance before the media following the nearly three-hour talks, the two leaders said they had made progress on unspecified issues. But they offered no details and took no questions, with the normally loquacious Trump ignoring shouted questions from reporters. "There were many, many points that we agreed on. I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway," Trump said, standing in front of a backdrop that read, "Pursuing Peace." COMMENTS: HELIMA CROFT, GLOBAL HEAD OF COMMODITY STRATEGY AT RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, NEW YORK: "It seems to be the scenario that we anticipated in our note. Soundbites signaling diplomatic progress but few concrete deal specifics. We will watching to see whether the 'too be continued' outcome is enough to table the secondary sanctions on India for continuing to import Russian oil. Certainly will fall short of anything that will convince the Europeans to consider vacating their Russian energy sanctions." CAROL SCHLEIF, CHIEF MARKET STRATEGIST, BMO PRIVATE WEALTH, MINNEAPOLIS: "The only news was absolutely no news out of it. Not sure there will be any market impactful portions - geopolitical issues in general do not tend to preoccupy market attention for very long if at all." "Markets are at new highs despite this conflict going on for three years. Markets care more about consumers, inflation and commentary from Wyoming next week." ERIC TEAL, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, COMERICA, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA: "The fact that there were no economic sanctions is a positive and markets should breathe a sigh of relief, but it doesn't appear as though a deal is in hand." "If anything, we see opportunity in the energy sector, as oil prices are at pretty low levels here and the prospect of sanctions on oil did not bear out. There could be a relief rally and that would be an opportunity to invest in energy as we head into higher seasonal demands and economic growth beginning to re-accelerate." "Gold and precious metals are likely to sell off because of being an asset class good for safety. Given concerns about inflation, they are a good buying point as well if any weakness." EUGENE EPSTEIN, HEAD OF TRADING AND STRUCTURED PRODUCTS, NORTH AMERICA, MONEYCORP, NEW JERSEY: "I don't think anybody expected it to be particularly specific or substantive. It's essentially a first step towards potentially something more. They both kind of said everything diplomatically. But it's more about the significance of the meeting as a whole, as opposed to the content of what they're saying." "Again, I don't think anybody really expected them to suddenly within a couple of hours come up with a very specific set of plans or any kind of blueprint to something. It basically was just showing their willingness to have continued talks to arrive at a conclusion that is beneficial for all parties. And I think this is just the first steps, and many more to come." "Basically, President Trump needs to go back to the European Union and relay what Putin has said. And then he's got to negotiate with Zelenskiy. For the most part, I think they've laid the groundwork for a deal. And my feeling is that it will probably get done, but there's probably a couple more steps. I'm thinking one of those steps will be Trump, Putin and Zelinski all meeting in the next month." "They will probably reach a deal in 30 days. I was kind of surprised that they didn't take any questions. So there's a little bit of disappointment in that, but until a deal is done, you can't really take any questions." "Overall, the markets will like it marginally because I think they've made some progress. But I don't think we will be up 400 points in Dow futures on Sunday night." MICHAEL ASHLEY SCHULMAN, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, RUNNING POINT, EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA: "At this point, it has been three years into the war, so it really shouldn't have much effect. I think markets will take it as status quo, but I think there's only upside from here." JAMIE COX, MANAGING PARTNER, HARRIS FINANCIAL GROUP, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA: "Without Ukraine at the table, there was little chance for a peace accord. That Putin attended at all was significant, but he can't be seen ending the conflict while on American soil meeting with Trump."
