Like Frankenstein on steroids. Musk and Trump both created monsters
Sometimes you're better off letting the children fight. That was President Donald Trump's callous wisdom on looking the other way as the Russians and Ukrainians continue to kill each other. But it might better be applied to Trump's social media spat with Elon Musk. It's hard to think of two puer aeterni who are more deserving of a verbal walloping.
Their venomous digital smackdown fulgurated on their duelling social media companies, flashing across the Washington sky.
In March, Trump showed off Teslas in the White House driveway and bought a more than $US80,000 red Model S. Now, he says he's going to sell it.
Thursday was the most titillating day in the US since the sci-fi classic The Day the Earth Stood Still, when a spaceship landed an alien to warn human leaders to stop squabbling like children, or the aliens would destroy Earth.
On Friday, Trump tried to convey serenity. 'I'm not thinking about Elon Musk,' Trump said aboard Air Force One. 'I wish him well.' But Trump then jumped on the phone to knock Musk, telling ABC's Jonathan Karl that Musk has 'lost his mind' and CNN's Dana Bash that 'the poor guy's got a problem'. Trump had to know that would be seen as a reference to the intense drug use by Musk, chronicled by The New York Times.
As Raheem Kassam, one of the owners of Butterworth's, the new Trumpworld boite on Capitol Hill, assured Politico, 'MAGA will not sell out to ketamine'.
The Washington Post reported on Friday: 'Across the government, the Trump administration is scrambling to rehire many federal employees dismissed under DOGE's staff-slashing initiatives after wiping out entire offices, in some cases imperilling key services such as weather forecasting and the drug approval process.'
On Truth Social on Thursday, Trump threatened to take away government contracts that have handsomely enriched Musk even though, as Leon Panetta pointed out on CNN, 'some of those contracts, particularly on SpaceX, are very important to our national security.'
Musk tried to tie Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, offering no evidence. He shared a post on Epstein that said Trump should be impeached. Trump reposted a message from Epstein's last lawyer, saying the smear was 'definitively' not true.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together
Instead, they were animated by issues that weren't so potent back in 2016, like the excesses of the 'woke' left and pandemic-era public health policy or anger at rising prices, crime, homelessness and an influx of migrants. In different ways, Joe Rogan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Musk each epitomise different facets of this enlarged Trump coalition. It seemed possible that vehement opposition to progressives would hold everyone together during the presidency, as it did during the campaign, and that maybe Trump would also do enough to please each group and avoid alienating a constituency. Less than five months into Trump's term, there are indications that this broader coalition is fraying. Polls suggest many young and non-white voters who backed Trump in November now disapprove of his performance. There haven't been as many examples of elite defections, but there have been many signs of queasiness with the excesses of his policies. The extent of Trump's tariffs, his defiance of the courts, his attacks on high-skilled immigration and higher education, and more simply go beyond what many of Trump's backers thought they were signing up to support. Musk's defection is not necessarily representative. His grievances may be personal as much as they're about policy. Still, Trump failed to keep Musk on board, and it seems to have been at least partly because of the challenge in reconciling the ideologically diverse factions in his orbit. And while Musk complained most loudly about how much the Republican tax and spending bill would add to the national debt, the possibility that other policies were a factor – like attacks on international students or reducing support for renewables – shouldn't be discounted. And even if other Trump policies, like deportations or universal tariffs, weren't problems for Musk, they might well erode Trump's support among other members of his coalition. Loading The return of deficit politics For the past decade or so, deficits haven't been a major issue in American politics. This is changing fast. The US fiscal picture has become markedly worse over the past few years. The national debt is projected to be well over 100 per cent of gross national product in a decade. Already, interest payments on the debt have reached nearly one-fifth of federal revenue. The country is projected to have trillion-dollar deficits for the foreseeable future, even during a period of low unemployment and economic growth. High interest rates will make it expensive to finance additional debt. The deteriorating fiscal situation is beginning to affect politics, most obviously in the challenge of passing a big tax and spending bill. In the past, it was easy enough for Republicans to cut taxes. Now, with the deficit and interest rates so high, a nearly $3 trillion ($4.6 trillion) expansion in the debt over the next decade is suddenly not so easy to swallow. Loading This challenge for Republicans won't go away. The alliance between traditional and populist conservatives was much easier when Trump could promise tax cuts while sparing popular entitlement programs. As the burden of the debt mounts, this win-win proposition will be hard to sustain. Less obviously, the same fiscal issues will be a major challenge for the Democratic coalition as well. With all the fighting between progressives and moderates over the past decade, it's easy to overlook that deficit spending made it much easier for the party to stay unified. Mainstream Democrats could bridge the gap between the party's ideological wings by campaigning on investments in infrastructure and renewable energy as well as on modest but significant expansions of the social safety net, like paid family leave. The debt issue might prove to be even a bigger one for Democrats than Republicans. It's hard to say whether the Republican mega-bill is really the reason Musk broke with the president. Still, he called the bill an 'abomination'. And the potential power of this issue over the longer term should not be underestimated.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Musk break-up shows it's getting harder for Trump to keep the gang together
Instead, they were animated by issues that weren't so potent back in 2016, like the excesses of the 'woke' left and pandemic-era public health policy or anger at rising prices, crime, homelessness and an influx of migrants. In different ways, Joe Rogan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Musk each epitomise different facets of this enlarged Trump coalition. It seemed possible that vehement opposition to progressives would hold everyone together during the presidency, as it did during the campaign, and that maybe Trump would also do enough to please each group and avoid alienating a constituency. Less than five months into Trump's term, there are indications that this broader coalition is fraying. Polls suggest many young and non-white voters who backed Trump in November now disapprove of his performance. There haven't been as many examples of elite defections, but there have been many signs of queasiness with the excesses of his policies. The extent of Trump's tariffs, his defiance of the courts, his attacks on high-skilled immigration and higher education, and more simply go beyond what many of Trump's backers thought they were signing up to support. Musk's defection is not necessarily representative. His grievances may be personal as much as they're about policy. Still, Trump failed to keep Musk on board, and it seems to have been at least partly because of the challenge in reconciling the ideologically diverse factions in his orbit. And while Musk complained most loudly about how much the Republican tax and spending bill would add to the national debt, the possibility that other policies were a factor – like attacks on international students or reducing support for renewables – shouldn't be discounted. And even if other Trump policies, like deportations or universal tariffs, weren't problems for Musk, they might well erode Trump's support among other members of his coalition. Loading The return of deficit politics For the past decade or so, deficits haven't been a major issue in American politics. This is changing fast. The US fiscal picture has become markedly worse over the past few years. The national debt is projected to be well over 100 per cent of gross national product in a decade. Already, interest payments on the debt have reached nearly one-fifth of federal revenue. The country is projected to have trillion-dollar deficits for the foreseeable future, even during a period of low unemployment and economic growth. High interest rates will make it expensive to finance additional debt. The deteriorating fiscal situation is beginning to affect politics, most obviously in the challenge of passing a big tax and spending bill. In the past, it was easy enough for Republicans to cut taxes. Now, with the deficit and interest rates so high, a nearly $3 trillion ($4.6 trillion) expansion in the debt over the next decade is suddenly not so easy to swallow. Loading This challenge for Republicans won't go away. The alliance between traditional and populist conservatives was much easier when Trump could promise tax cuts while sparing popular entitlement programs. As the burden of the debt mounts, this win-win proposition will be hard to sustain. Less obviously, the same fiscal issues will be a major challenge for the Democratic coalition as well. With all the fighting between progressives and moderates over the past decade, it's easy to overlook that deficit spending made it much easier for the party to stay unified. Mainstream Democrats could bridge the gap between the party's ideological wings by campaigning on investments in infrastructure and renewable energy as well as on modest but significant expansions of the social safety net, like paid family leave. The debt issue might prove to be even a bigger one for Democrats than Republicans. It's hard to say whether the Republican mega-bill is really the reason Musk broke with the president. Still, he called the bill an 'abomination'. And the potential power of this issue over the longer term should not be underestimated.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
The Coalition says it's open to tax reform – but there's a catch
The Coalition has offered support for bipartisan 'holistic' reform of the nation's creaking tax system as long as it does not involve higher taxes, ahead of Anthony Albanese's first major post-election speech, in which he is expected to map out his agenda for the next three years. Opposition finance spokesman James Paterson on Sunday said the Coalition could find common political ground with the government in finding ways to make the tax system more efficient as part of a process to help pay for an increase in defence spending. The Coalition is opposing the government's planned changes to tax on people holding more than $3 million in superannuation that Treasurer Jim Chalmers estimates will raise about $2.7 billion a year towards repairing the budget and covering the cost of spending initiatives. Chalmers has said the proposal is key to the government's tax agenda, pushing back at calls from economists, business groups and parts of the social welfare lobby for the treasurer and prime minister to be more ambitious. Paterson, who as the Coalition's home affairs spokesman previously backed a substantial increase in defence spending, said he and the rest of the opposition would work on 'strong fiscal rules' over the next two-and-a-half years that would improve the budget and allow for more investment in national security. Loading Admitting the Coalition had been wrong in opposing the government's cut to personal income tax ahead of the last election, Paterson said he was not opposed to a broader and bipartisan approach to tax reform. 'If the Albanese government and the Treasurer Jim Chalmers were talking about genuine tax reform, holistic tax reform across the board, that for example, reduced the collection of taxes in inefficient areas and collected that revenue in less distortionary ways, we'd be up for that conversation,' he told the ABC's Insiders program. 'We'd be happy to sit down and have that. But that's not what [the superannuation tax change] is. This is a grab for revenue from people's family savings in a way that will have severe unintended consequences.'
