logo
Samik: Not party's job to attend ‘namaz' or ‘hari naam sankirtan'

Samik: Not party's job to attend ‘namaz' or ‘hari naam sankirtan'

Time of India6 days ago
Kolkata: Bengal BJP president Samik Bhattacharya, who has been making attempts to recalibrate its political narrative in the state, on Tuesday said a party's job was not to attend "namaz" or "hari naam sankirtan (chanting Hari)".
Bhattacharya, who emphasised BJP's "inclusive politics", also claimed that Trinamool had fostered divisions in society.
"A political party's duty is not to participate in namaz or hari naam sankirtan, but to provide assistance to people for hospitalisation, admission in schools, or better civic amenities. People don't come to political workers to listen to Sundarkanda of Ramayana," Bhattacharya said at a workers' meet in Cooch Behar.
Bhattacharya, who has earlier tried to bridge the gap with minority communities and said BJP is not against Muslims, asked party workers to refrain from divisive politics. "A political party's job is not to wedge a divide among people. We want Durga visarjan and Muharram processions to go forward simultaneously. They shouldn't need different routes," he said.
You Can Also Check:
Kolkata AQI
|
Weather in Kolkata
|
Bank Holidays in Kolkata
|
Public Holidays in Kolkata
Taking on Trinamool, Bhattacharya said: "Who is trying to change the situation in Bengal? Who is forcing Hindus to unite overnight? Trinamool has changed the narrative in West Bengal."
He claimed a member of the Muslim community could not even protest against atrocities on Hindus without being "attacked" by the governing party.
In the same breath, the Bengal BJP president criticised attempts at radicalisation. "What is happening in Murshidabad, Maheshtala or Kidderpore? Radicalisation is a curse on the entire world and we have to fight against this," he said.
Saying the party had always put the country first, Bhattacharya said: "Indira Gandhi was a Congress neta. Yet (former PM Atal Bihari) Vajpayee ji called her 'Devi Durga'. BJP doesn't believe in political differences if it is about the national interest."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Polyandry back in spotlight after brothers marry woman in Himachal: What law says
Polyandry back in spotlight after brothers marry woman in Himachal: What law says

India Today

time16 minutes ago

  • India Today

Polyandry back in spotlight after brothers marry woman in Himachal: What law says

A recent wedding in Himachal Pradesh's Shillai village has brought the ancient tradition of polyandry back into public ceremony, where Sunita Chauhan married two brothers—Pradeep and Kapil Negi—was held with full community participation, highlighting this practice among the Hatti the event was celebrated openly, it has raised important legal questions: Is polyandry legal in India? Can this marriage stand legal scrutiny?advertisement Is polyandry legally recognised? As far as the law is concerned, polyandry is not legally recognised in India. Under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — which governs marriages among Hindus — a valid marriage must be 5 of the Act stipulates that "neither party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage." This makes bigamy or polyandry (having multiple husbands) legally fact, bigamy is punishable under Section 82 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which criminalises marrying again during the lifetime of a spouse without legal the Special Marriage Act, a person cannot have more than one living spouse at the time of Act states that at the time of the marriage, neither party has a spouse living, which means that if either person is already married to someone who is still alive, the new marriage is void under the it is important to note that the Hindu Marriage Act does not apply to the members of any Scheduled Tribe, unless the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, otherwise the Constitution, "Scheduled Tribes" refers to such tribes or tribal communities, or parts or groups within them, as are deemed under Article 342 to be Scheduled Tribes for the purposes of this far as cases like the present one are concerned, Indian personal law does allow for customary practices to be taken into account, especially in tribal 13 of the Evidence Act provides for facts which are relevant when right or custom is in question, which basically allows parties to present evidence to establish customs, when those customs are legally in judicial interpretation its also been evolved by courts that customs have to pass certain tests, including whether they are ancient, certain, reasonable, not opposed to public policy, morality, judicial interpretation, it has also been established by the courts that customs must pass certain tests — including whether they are ancient, certain, reasonable, and not opposed to public policy or to India Today TV, Advocate Rajat Nair said that under the law, these marriages would be void but someone has to challenge it. If there is consensus and immediate family members have no problem and no one approaches the court, occasion to seek this marriage as void will not said that under law, marriage would be recognised only with one person, and person can't be married to two persons at same agreed that these cases may fall under the grey area as these practices persist as customary tradition in certain areas and amongst some tribal communities, adding that courts have repeatedly emphasised that monogamy is the only valid form of marriage under the actOn the other hand, Advocate Ibad Mushtaq said that as far as practices of Scheduled Tribes are concerned, the same are not governed by the Hindu Marriage Act. Thus, no disability attaches to the customary practices of STs. The marriage would therefore be Tarini Nayak said that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 does carve out certain exceptions in favour of certain customary practices, thereby allowing for the possibility of multiple marriages if sanctioned by a potential loophole exists within Section 5 of the Act, which stipulates that at the time of the solemnization of marriage, neither party should have a spouse wording arguably implies that if a person marries two persons simultaneously—without either party being or having a 'spouse' in a legal sense at that precise moment—such a union may technically fall outside the ambit of a void marriage, thus creating an interpretative gap in the statutory scheme.- Ends

The Attack On a Bureaucrat in Odisha is a Blow to Sardar Patel's Vision on Civil Service
The Attack On a Bureaucrat in Odisha is a Blow to Sardar Patel's Vision on Civil Service

The Wire

time16 minutes ago

  • The Wire

The Attack On a Bureaucrat in Odisha is a Blow to Sardar Patel's Vision on Civil Service

During Naveen Patnaik's tenure as Chief Minister of Odisha for 25 years, the state administration got streamlined to govern and deliver services to people. Welfare policies got implemented without delay. The best example of such implementation is the scheme called KALIA (Krushak Assistance for Livelihood and Income Augmentation). The scheme provided Rs. 6,000 to each eligible farmer, including agricultural labourers. It was a novel project in India which included in its scope not just the farmers but agricultural labourers as well. Thousands of beneficiaries across the state were receiving the amount and the credit for that was given to the civil servants who worked day and night to deliver the services. A probationary IAS officer used to crack jokes that those going to Odisha were free to handle the projects assigned to them as a tall regional leader knew what to do with the civil service, including officers of the Odisha Administrative Service (OAS). In sharp contrast to the tenure of Patnaik as the CM, Ratnakar Sahoo, an OAS officer was dragged from his office in broad daylight and kicked and punched by some local Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders of Bhubaneswar. This shocking and murderous treatment of a senior officer of Odisha bureaucracy outraged the state and indeed India as whole. A foundation laid by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel It is well known that Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel laid the foundation of the civil service in independent India. Once, when members of the Constituent Assembly/Provisional Parliament made sharp attacks on civil service, Patel famously said, "Do not quarrel with the instruments with which you want to work. It is a bad workman who quarrels with the instrument. Nobody wants to put in work when he is criticised and ridiculed in public." BJP leaders who try to appropriate Patel must be mindful of his vision. Liberal democracy demands public bureaucracy to negotiate between public and the elected political leaders. They are supposed to be neutral and non-partisan in its approach. It is also expected that they will protect constitutional rights of citizens and bring benefits of development to people. Civil servants are professionals. They are recruited through written examination conducted by independent entities, be it UPSC or State Public Service Commissions. These civil servants are trained and aware of rules and regulations of the state. By following the rules, they try to implement the developmental programmes. In the end they are accountable to people for thedelivery of services to them. A bureaucrat is a person who holds to his bureau or chair in his or her official room, but if he or she gets attacked by the goondas of the political leaders controlling the state apparatus then it would strike a death blow to professional bureaucracy. On August 23, 1949, when the Constituent Assembly was discussing Article 320 (corresponding Article 286 in the draft Constitution) dealing with the functions of the Public Service Commissions, Laxminarayan Sahu, a distinguished Member of the Assembly representing Orissa (now Odisha), said, '...we are providing for the formation of a Public Service Commission solely with a view to ensure the smooth and efficient running of our Republican Government'. However, he cautioned by saying that, 'But when a democratic form of Government is established, many political parties dominate the field and they adopt undesirable methods for appointments in the services'. 'We are going to form the Public Service Commission' he said, 'solely with a view that political parties may not be in a position to adopt such methods' and '...no one may be able to suggest that the Services are working under the influence.' That vision articulated by an Odia in 1949 got trampled in Odisha in 2025 when an officer of the state civil service was brutally assaulted in full public view by those belonging to the ruling party, BJP. It is widely reported that Odisha government led by Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi does not allow the civil servants to attend the cabinet meetings. It is standard practice that those heading various departments are supposed to attend those meetings but tragically that practice has been dispensed with. Trust between politicians of the BJP and civil servants is at the lowest level in the state It seems that trust between politicians of the BJP and civil servants is at the lowest level in the state. This can harm the development of the state immeasurably. It is reflected in the behaviour of the politicians vis-à-vis the civil servants. The question is that whether the BJP hooligans could have mustered the courage to beat an incumbent BMC Additional Commissioner belonging to IAS? It deserves a cogent answer. J.P. Das who left the IAS after serving for a few years recalled that till Nandini Satpathy became the chief Minister of Odisha, leaders of political parties in the State used to call IAS officers of Odisha as Sirs or Madams. She tried to change that pattern of treating civil servants as superior to their political bosses. IAS officers used to live in eight roomed quarter with dozens of servants paid by the government and ministers would live in much smaller dwelling units. Such power relationship changed but not to the desired extent. The real work in administration in Odisha is done by the OAS officers who work as subordinate officials of the IAS incumbents. Ajit Triparthy, the former chief Secretary of Odisha once told this author that IAS officials behave like wise old owls in the state by handing over the works to OAS officers who behave like fish in a handful of water. The tragedy inflicted on Sahoo, who belonging to OAS, is a lesson for the entire civil service cadre of the state that BJP leaders acting in partisan manner would not hesitate to unleash violence against them in case their work is not done. Those operating the state machinery must rescue the civil service from such heinous assaults It is heartening that the IAS and OAS Officers' Associations came together to deal with the attack on Sahoo. In addition to the existing provisions, they should demand a special law to protect them in their work places from the assault by intruders affiliated to the ruling party. It is also a welcome sign that in wake of the stand of the OAS officers association that it would go hartal chief minister Majhi called a meeting which resulted in the compromise that the main BJP leader Jagannath Pradhan would be arrested to face legal consequences. This is indicative of the ecosystem of fear and anxiety within which civil servants of Odisha are now working. When the country was embroiled in partition-related violence after independence, Sardar Patel, as stated earlier, had said that no civil servant would give his/her best when mocked at in the public. It is indeed tragic that when we are celebrating the 75th anniversary of the Constitution, the civil service in Odisha is facing attacks and the life and limbs of civil servants are placed in grave peril. Those operating the state machinery must rescue the civil service from such heinous assaults and salvage the state and its people.

'Bengal Won't Bow Down': Mamata Banerjee Declares War on BJP in Fiery Speech at Martyrs' Day Rally
'Bengal Won't Bow Down': Mamata Banerjee Declares War on BJP in Fiery Speech at Martyrs' Day Rally

Time of India

time16 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Bengal Won't Bow Down': Mamata Banerjee Declares War on BJP in Fiery Speech at Martyrs' Day Rally

'Bengal will not tolerate BJP!' thundered West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee as she delivered a powerful speech at the Trinamool Congress's Martyrs' Day rally in Kolkata. In a fiery address to lakhs of supporters, she accused the BJP of attacking Bengali identity, planning NRC-style moves in the state, and failing to protect women in BJP-ruled states. She also slammed the Centre for remaining silent on the shackled deportation of Indian immigrants from the US, sarcastically remarking that 'Trump controls the Modi government.' The TMC chief vowed to take the resistance to Delhi if needed and accused Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma of 'meddling' in Bengal's internal affairs. From women's safety to language pride, foreign interference to 2026 election goals, Mamata's speech fired up the party base for a long and aggressive political campaign.#mamatabanerjee #martyrsdayrally #tmc #bjp #tmcvsbjp #nrcbengal #assamcm #bengaliidentity #2026elections #shaheeddiwas #trumpmodi #womensafety #westbengalpolitics #trinamoolcongress #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store