logo
People Are Sharing The "Modern Scams" They Discovered That Made Them Realize, "Wait, This Whole Industry's A Rip Off"

People Are Sharing The "Modern Scams" They Discovered That Made Them Realize, "Wait, This Whole Industry's A Rip Off"

Buzz Feed16-03-2025

Recently, someone on Reddit asked, "Redditors who unexpectedly discovered a 'modern scam' that's everywhere now — what made you realize, 'Wait, this whole industry is a rip off?'"
Here's what everyone shared:
1. "Once upon a time, I attended a time-share presentation because they offered money to go. Yes, they are all high-pressure salespeople and scammy by nature, but on this one, I spotted exactly how they would hose everyone involved. I read the contract carefully (since I was there anyway, and it made their salesperson shut up while I read)."
"Quietly buried near the bottom was a mandatory cleaning and maintenance fee of about half the rent of a modest apartment that they could adjust at any time, with no stated limits. Fortunately, they'd supplied a shuttle to pick up people and take them to the timeshare presentation location. About 15 of us were in one of those little shuttle vans with seats facing each other. We started chatting on the way back, and I pointed the clause out to everyone in the group."
— Terpsichorean_Wombat
2. "Furniture. My wife is a huge fan of home design shows, especially one called Dream Home Makeover. That'll be important later. So, one day, she picked out a rug for our dining area. It's called 'The Janette' (yes, they name rugs), and we ordered it. It's something like $1500. The rug arrives with a label on the back that says, 'The Samuel.' I thought we ordered the wrong thing, so I Google the brand and 'The Samuel.' I find it on Wayfair for $300. This can't possibly be the same rug, can it?"
"I take a chance and order it from Wayfair, and when I have both in my possession, I do a side-by-side. It's the EXACT same rug. Basically, these designer brands are buying stuff directly from vendors, changing the name, and charging 5x the price. Fast forward a few months. She finds a dining table on the Studio McGee website (the folks who have the Dream Makeover show). I do a Google reverse search on the picture of the table and find it on a random furniture store's website for 1/3 of the cost."
— schaudhery
3. "I don't know if this counts, but I found an empty lot with barely visible no-parking signs next to an ATM. Tow trucks would wait just behind the building for someone to park there. The person would park and walk around the corner to use the ATM. Then, they returned to their car, which was already hooked up, and the tow truck driver would unhook it for a fee...conveniently able to be obtained from the ATM. It's been years, but I'm still enraged when I think of it."
4. "I worked a month as a pharmacy clerk, and the health insurance price disparity is insane, especially on things like insulin."
5. "I had a 'job interview' with what you'd now call an MLM way before they entered the mainstream consciousness. The interviewer spent the whole time talking about all this hustle culture bullshit, talking about how hard you gotta work if you want to succeed, how it's all down to your network, and you need to be a go-getter; you better earn that commission and all that shit. Well, I'm a fiercely introverted person who wasn't very self-motivated at the time, so when I was called into the 1-on-1 with the interviewer, I couldn't help myself. I told him I was a bad fit, and it didn't sound like it was for me."
"To my surprise, his tone instantly flipped. He started talking about how it wasn't that hard, how you could work less and still make a good living, how generous the commission structure was at lower levels, and so on. Exact opposite of his earlier vibe. And that flip, that's what made me realize it was a scam. They didn't care about my skills, my drive, or my personality. They'd do whatever because all they wanted was for me to buy in. And though I didn't understand the whole scam, I knew that had to be a bad idea. That's the only interview I've ever walked out of partway through."
— GrinningPariah
6. "Mobile gaming. It's been like this for probably a decade now that mobile gaming is just psychologically designed to give you just enough satisfaction at first but keep you wanting more and locking stuff behind paywalls or extremely long-timers. It's nearly impossible to get where you want without dumping money for in-game currency and stuff. Mobile games are designed to the core to be addictive and siphon money from people. So many people still play them. I can't touch them anymore and haven't for years."
7. "When I saw my first crypto rug pull. That's when I realized that most of the industry is a giant casino, and it's all about who can time when to get out of the coin the best. Very few coins offer any real utility and most aren't using them for anything legitimate. Most of it is just to move money across borders without the banks and governments seeing it."
— shotsallover
8. "Any solar roof that is not paid in full at the time of installation. Specifically talking about 20-30-year solar 'leases' and, even worse: 'Power Purchase Agreements.' Scammy, scammy scams. They prey on people. They'll lie and tell you it's a great investment for your house that the next buyer will love. WRONGGGG. Couldn't be more wrong. No buyer wants to take over the next 18 years of your solar lease. You'll have to pay it all off at closing, and GUESS WHAT? it's $50k+. Which is absurd because the panels would have cost less than $10k if you had gotten a real company to do it."
"Even worse: the systems are usually so poorly designed that they don't even appreciably lower your electric bill. So, $50k for nothing. Worse than nothing because you'll have to spend more money taking them off whenever you need work done on the roof. There's also a decent chance that the solar company that sold you that 20-30-year lease goes out of business, so there's no one to talk to about your system. Someone else bought the leases (but none of the service warranties), and you are still on the hook for the payments regardless of whether it works or not, and if you stop paying, they have a lien on your house. SCAM, SCAM, SCAM, SCAM. STAY AWAY FROM 'PAYMENT-PLAN' SOLAR. Regular solar that you pay in full upfront: fine. Good, even. Payment plan solar: SCAM."
— shinywtf
9. "Like a decade ago, Reddit was big on safety razors, the old-fashioned twisty open thing you put a single blade into like what your grandpa might have used. Eventually, I tried it out because of this. I now spend less on shaving per year than I used to spend on a pack of razors for a week or two."
u/Winnipork / Via reddit.com
10. "Individual 'pods' for laundry are a total ripoff that forces you to use specific portion sizes. Companies want you to waste products like this so you buy more often. With liquids or powders, even the caps and scoops are designed so that you use too much. If your clothes are particularly soiled, you can use a little more, but otherwise, you don't need to use a lot for clothes to come out clean and smell nice. You can use half of the recommended amount for most loads, and things will be perfectly fine."
u/Tlammy / Via reddit.com
"Also, fabric softener and dryer sheets are mostly unnecessary garbage. They leave unnecessary scented chemicals on your clothes, can damage some synthetic fabrics over time, and make towels significantly less absorbent. Clean clothes won't smell like anything at all…you don't need to add a chemical perfume to every fabric. Static cling is just a temporary effect of low humidity when you remove things from a dryer."
— BrianMincey
11. "I'm not sure why modern nursing care facilities/homes are not higher on the list. Some are good (but they're $10k/month or more), but most others are shit. Not to mention, they drain older citizens' savings until they have nothing left, then push them to Medicare and then bill the government at a higher cost due to the 'extra' work involved in using that system. A total scam making some of the larger corporations that own hundreds of these little out-of-the-way homes billions each year."
— op4
12. "Most glasses, especially ones you can get at an eye doctor. You can get frames and lenses online for like $30. There's a big monopoly company that jacks up the prices in most brick-and-mortar stores."
13. "Weddings. Everything about a wedding is incredibly overpriced and so far booked out for no real reason."
— MiPaKe
"I used to work at a little seaside place that would take wedding bookings. Someone would call and ask about a wedding, then be told, 'Oh, we're booked out until next year! Yeah, everyone wants to have a wedding here, sorry!' then take down their number. A week later, they'd call them and say something like, 'Oh, it looks like so and so isn't able to make the booking, do you want it?' Then they'd basically triple the price they advertised online. They would use this method multiple times a week, and as a result people were foaming at the mouth trying to get in there. The only time they took real bookings was for known locals."
— airfryerfuntime
14. "I had a too-good-to-be-true feeling about streaming services pretty early on. When interest rates started going up, I thought, 'Oh boy, here come the ads, price jacks, and quality drop.' So far, two have become true; time will tell if quality stays good over time."
15. "Companies posting that they are hiring, but in reality, the jobs were only posted as a way to show the company is growing. I believe it's a way to manipulate their stocks. Fake job listings make it so much harder to find actual real jobs."
— Nat_StarTrekin
16. "New phones each year that aren't big improvements with software that is obsolete before the phone itself is."
— Jappie_nl
And finally:
17. "The 'service fees' scam. You see a price, think you're getting a deal, and then — BAM! At checkout, a bunch of mysterious fees appear out of nowhere. Concert tickets? 'Processing fee.' Ordering food? 'Convenience fee.' Even some hotels now have 'resort fees' for things like using the pool (which you didn't even touch). It's like companies sat down and said, 'How can we charge people more without actually raising prices?' And we all just… accept it. Pure daylight robbery."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Content karma catches up to Reddit in its fight with Anthropic
Content karma catches up to Reddit in its fight with Anthropic

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Content karma catches up to Reddit in its fight with Anthropic

In the fast-evolving world of generative AI, a new kind of arms race is underway, one that has less to do with GPUs and more to do with data. And Reddit, once a renegade darling of the internet, is now learning just how vulnerable its own data can be. The company's lawsuit against AI startup Anthropic, filed on Wednesday in Superior Court in San Francisco, accuses the Claude chatbot maker of illegally scraping Reddit content to train its models. But this lawsuit invites a question Reddit may not want to ask too loudly: Is this really data theft, or just karmic symmetry? Reddit's business model: A content glass house? Reddit's value proposition has long been about community, what it calls "authentic conversation." Much of that authenticity is built on user-contributed content that, ironically, often originates elsewhere. Reddit users share news articles, images, and other copyrighted materials, sometimes without proper attribution and certainly without payment. Users post this content freely, Reddit monetizes it through ads, and little of that value flows back to the original creators. This practice was noted by my former Business Insider colleague Julie Bort before Reddit's IPO in 2024. "Journalists like myself have watched as Reddit users have posted copies of our work on the platform, in violation of copyright laws, with moderators looking the other way," she wrote. Investors must be pretty concerned about the value of Reddit's content being sucked away by giant AI models, Bort added at the time. "In the words of Taylor Swift, ' Karma 's gonna track you down.'" Pot, meet kettle Reddit's monetization strategy relies in part on hosting content from around the web without paying for it, calling into question the ethics of its data economy. Now, Reddit is suing Anthropic for doing what some might see as a more automated version of Reddit's own game: collecting free content from the web and monetizing it. In its complaint, Reddit alleges that Anthropic scraped its platform in violation of the site's user agreement and file, ignoring technical and legal boundaries designed to protect Reddit's commercial value. The lawsuit hinges on the idea that Reddit deserves to be compensated for use of its data, especially as it now sells access to that data through licensing deals such as those it signed with Google and OpenAI. In the current AI gold rush, platforms are racing to carve out paywalls around their data, whether or not they respected similar boundaries in the past. The truth is, we're in an era where copyright law is barely enforceable at internet scale, and data — once it hits the open web — tends to be treated as fair game until someone with enough lawyers says otherwise. (And even then, the copyright lawyers have yet to show real results). The irony of content "ownership" Reddit thinks it owns or at least controls the data created by its users. But unlike publishers or professional content creators, Reddit doesn't pay users, verify originality, or license incoming materials. It is essentially trying to exercise IP rights it may never have quite earned. I asked Reddit all about this. Cameron Njaa, a spokesperson for the company, said "there are a number of misunderstandings here," but didn't elaborate late on Wednesday. (One possibility: Reddit argued in the complaint that this is more about the privacy of its users' data). If I get more input from Reddit, I'll update this piece. An Anthropic spokesperson said, "We disagree with Reddit's claims and will defend ourselves vigorously." This suit more than a legal maneuver. It's a referendum on who gets to claim ownership in the data economy, especially when everyone's borrowing from everyone else. If Reddit wins, it may crack open a new revenue stream for creators and companies that produce or host content. But if it loses, it may find itself on the wrong side of the same data free-for-all it helped normalize. Either way, karma may have finally come for Reddit.

Cheesecake Factory slammed for ‘sad' new portion sizes on its signature item: ‘This makes me mad'
Cheesecake Factory slammed for ‘sad' new portion sizes on its signature item: ‘This makes me mad'

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Cheesecake Factory slammed for ‘sad' new portion sizes on its signature item: ‘This makes me mad'

Are they serving slimmer slices of this fattening fave? Foodies with a hankering for hulking hunks of cheesecake are calling out the dessert's eponymous restaurant for allegedly skimping on its serving sizes amid the 'shrinkflation' crisis. 'The last couple of times I got a slice of cheesecake it was about half the size of the usual slice,' wrote a Cheesecake Factory whistleblower on Reddit, emphasizing their outrage with a pic of a 'sad' to-go piece of what appears to be the eatery's Adam's Peanut Butter Cup Fudge Ripple delicacy. Advertisement 5 A Reddit user claims the portion size of their dessert from the Cheesecake Factory is noticeably smaller than usual, while its calorie count remains the same. Reddit/Fancy—Wolf 'What is more disturbing is that the calories per slice listed on their website have not changed,' the Redditor ranted, 'which would make one assume they should be getting the same size of slices.' For folks with a sweet tooth, receiving a skinny slab of cake cuts deep. Advertisement But, unfortunately, peewee portions aren't limited to after-dinner indulgences nowadays. 5 McDonald's, PepsiCo and more have been accused of shrinking goods without decreasing their prices. JR-50 – From tampons to toilet paper, from McDonald's sandwich patties to Costco cookies, everyday items are shrinking in scale — but not in cost. Shrinkflation, a pox that has most recently plagued society since the pandemic, is a sneaky form of inflation that sees businesses reduce a product's size or value, yet offer it at the same retail price as its former glory. Advertisement Imprints such as PepsiCo, Arby's and Kleenex have also been called out for reportedly committing the 'deceptive' downsizing. And now, apparently, it's the Cheesecake Factory's turn in the hot seat. The Post has reached out to the restaurant chain for comment. 5 The Cheesecake Factory is the latest brand to be blasted for offering customers 'shrinkflation'-sized goods. Christopher Sadowski 5 Stunned social media users were incensed by the Redditor's tiny slice of cake. morozov_photo – Advertisement 5 Online critics claim the serving sizes at The Cheesecake Factory have become smaller and smaller in recent years, Facebook/Cheesecake Factory 'This makes me mad. Like WTH,' a ticked commenter roared beneath the Reddit post. 'That sucks.' 'All serving sizes at Cheesecake Factory have gone down,' another declared. 'That slice is way smaller than it was 10 years ago. Probably also costs nearly double.' 'Remember everything is a transaction. They don't care about you specifically, they want your money,' carped a complainer. 'I remember getting massive slices and not being able to finish them in one sitting and having to split it up over a day or two,' said another. 'Now, they're all gone in a matter of minutes! Kinda disappointed.' 'They have been getting smaller since COVID,' a bellyacher agreed. 'And the price goes up.'

X changes policy to restrict AI training on posts
X changes policy to restrict AI training on posts

The Verge

time2 hours ago

  • The Verge

X changes policy to restrict AI training on posts

X has updated its developer agreement to add a new restriction on using posts on the platform to train AI. The updated policy, spotted earlier by TechCrunch, says developers can't use content from X or its API to 'fine-tune or train a foundation or frontier model.' The policy change could set up X to make AI training deals with third-party companies, similar to the deal Reddit struck with Google. Reddit, which has a similar policy to block AI crawlers, sued Anthropic on Wednesday over claims the company's AI crawlers accessed the site more than 100,000 times since July 2024. Elon Musk's AI company, xAI, acquired X for $33 billion on paper in March. Though X's developer agreement now bars companies from training AI on its content, its privacy policy still states that third-party 'collaborators' can train AI models on the site's data unless users opt out. X also feeds user data into its AI model, Grok, for training.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store