logo
Super Micro (SMCI) Secures $1.79B Receivables Facility to Enhance Liquidity

Super Micro (SMCI) Secures $1.79B Receivables Facility to Enhance Liquidity

Yahoo26-07-2025
Super Micro Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ:SMCI) is one of the growth stocks that could double by 2027. On July 16, 2025, SMCI entered into a $1.79 billion Receivables Purchase Agreement with MUFG Bank, Crédit Agricole, and other financial institutions.
An engineer in front of a computer screen, reviewing a project-based outsourcing proposal.
The uncommitted facility allows Super Micro to sell eligible accounts receivable at discounted rates based on Term SOFR plus 1.15%–2.80%, depending on the debtor. If not treated as a sale, the company grants a security interest in the receivables. The agreement can be terminated with 30 days' notice or immediately in case of a termination event.
Super Micro Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ:SMCI) develops advanced server and storage systems optimized for global applications in data centers, artificial intelligence, cloud platforms, and edge computing environments.
While we acknowledge the potential of SMCI as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: and .
Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Money over love? How finances are affecting romantic relationships
Money over love? How finances are affecting romantic relationships

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Money over love? How finances are affecting romantic relationships

Although the median U.S. annual salary is about $62,192, Americans on average expect their ideal partner to earn six figures, a new survey found. On average, women want their ideal partner to earn $110,000 while men expect theirs to earn $90,000, according to a Tawkify survey of 1,000 Americans. A quarter of respondents want more, saying their ideal partner should earn over $150,000. That's still not enough for 1 in 10 who are holding out for $250,000 and 1 in 20 who want $500,000 or more. Some responses were contradictory. More than 6 in 10 Americans (63%) surveyed said they would marry for love, even if it meant a lifelong financial struggle. But if forced to decide between love and money, 46% said they would pick the latter. In fact, nearly 1 in 3 said they'd consider getting back with an ex if that person became wealthy. Those unemployed in a rough job market may find more trouble in their love life. Nearly half of Americans are taking the lyrics to TLC's 1999 hit 'No Scrubs' to heart, with 48% reporting they would not date someone without a job, even if they were attracted to them. Brie Temple, Tawkify's chief commercial officer and chief matchmaker, said the matchmaking company's clients want to date someone who adds to their life and not someone who is financially dependent on them. More: Uncomfortable Conversations: What is financial infidelity and how can you come clean? 'Women, in particular, are saying things like 'I'm not interested in being a nurse or a purse,' particularly if they're dealing with an older demographic,' Temple said. More: Can you afford your friends? That active social life can come at a steep price Deal breakers While not the leading cause, money issues are one of the reasons couples get divorced. But conversely, in some cases, money is the reason people stay together. Some 69% of those Tawkify surveyed said they remained in a relationship longer than they wanted due to shared finances. Single people might be quicker to cut someone off over bad money habits. A separate survey of 2,000 Americans conducted by Talker Research on behalf of Chime, found 26% said a date being ungenerous or stingy gives them a 'financial ick.' At the same time, a third said they would be put off by a partner who lives beyond their means. Jason Tartick, a banker and host of the podcast 'Trading Secrets,' said overspending is no longer 'cool' because it represents a lack of authenticity. 'It's beyond refreshing in this dating environment because it's allowing for a bit more openness,' said Tartick, who was also a contestant on season 14 of The Bachelorette. 'I think the openness is what will actually create connection, not a facade of something that is just an illusion.' For Tartick and Dr. Traci Williams, a certified financial therapist, a romantic partner not willing to talk about finances is a red flag in a relationship, if not a deal breaker. Williams added that a partner having lots of debt without a repayment plan or being reckless with money could also be cause for concern. More: Gen Z is getting serious about their finances. What's in the way? 'It is possible for couples to be together if they don't have exactly the same values. But can you agree, and can you work together?' Williams said. 'If one person likes to save, and one person likes to spend, yes, you can spend, but are we also saving for our future?' Generational shifts Financial responsibility is particularly appealing to members of Generation Z – 78% of whom consider it an important attribute when choosing a partner, according to a separate survey of 1,069 adults by Bank of America. Most Gen Zers are finding ways to date without spending money, with 53% of men and 54% of women reporting they spend $0 per month on romance. A quarter of Gen Z men and 30% of Gen Z women said they spend less than $100 a month on dating. When Gen Z does spend money on dates, they're more open to splitting the bill than older generations. The Talker Research/Chime survey found while 45% of Gen Xers and 42% of baby boomers believe men should pick up the tab, only 36% of Gen Zers agreed. Overall, 39% of men said they feel pressured to appear more financially stable than they are. At 47%, nearly half believe men should cover all the costs of a date, compared to only about a third of women. 'It's just fascinating for me to watch people's conversations online,' Williams said. 'People are regularly saying, 'I want a man who will pay for everything and take me on trips and here, there, and everywhere,' but in reality, when people are actually dating, they tend to be a bit more flexible.' When the love versus money question is asked in a different way, 58% of women are more likely to pick a 'broke and magical' relationship over financial security, compared to 51% of men, the Tawkify survey found. When broken down by age group, Gen Z is the generation second most likely to choose love over money, second only to millennials. More than half of both groups said they'd pick the 'broke and magical' relationship. Only 46% of Gen Xers and 48% of baby boomers reported the same. When and how to talk about money Half of Gen Zers and millennials said it's attractive when someone is upfront about their income, compared to only 23% of baby boomers, according to the Talker Research/Chime survey. It also found, however, that money remains one of the largest sources of stress in dating. To alleviate some of that anxiety, Temple recommends couples talk about money early and often in their relationship. Williams suggests setting up a specific time to chat about it once a week or every couple of weeks, if a couple is living together or in a serious relationship. For those struggling to broach the subject, Williams said even talking to your partner about egg prices is a place to start. More: What a viral TikTok teaches us about ghosting 'The reality is that it's relatable that life's so expensive,' he said. 'As opposed to creating tension with finances by not willing to have the conversations, you can actually create vulnerability by connecting via relatability.' If your partner shares financial information, Tartick said make sure not to use it against them. 'When we say money, everyone becomes very guarded... We are afraid of being shamed and blamed,' he said. 'You hear people joking around at the dinner table, 'Oh, my wife or husband has Amazon packages everyday' and we're constantly weaponizing information that has to do with spending.' Financial questions couples should discuss Tartick suggests asking the following questions to learn about someone's financial values while keeping money conversations fun: If you won $1 million and had to spend it in 24 hours, what would you spend it on? What's one thing you know you overspend on, but will keep doing it anyway? What's your dream income? Temple recommends asking: What's the largest splurge purchase you've made for yourself and why? When I say, 'financial freedom,' what does that bring up for you? Growing up, how did your parents or guardians talk about money? Williams also suggests setting clear expectations about who plans and pays for dates early on in a relationship. If money is tight, she recommends budget-friendly ideas including game nights and taking advantage of free museum days. Tartick said it's time to get real about numbers when a couple thinks about moving in together or getting married. He said they should ask about each other's credit score, number of financial accounts, annual expenses, salary, debt to income ratio, net worth, overall risk tolerance, and their target retirement age. 'If these are the numbers the bank is looking at to decide if you can get a mortgage or a loan to start up a company, why aren't these numbers that we're talking about with our partner?' he said. Reach Rachel Barber at rbarber@ and follow her on X @rachelbarber_ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Money or love? Survey finds Americans divided over which matters more

This summer's hottest trend on Wall Street: 'Private for longer'
This summer's hottest trend on Wall Street: 'Private for longer'

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This summer's hottest trend on Wall Street: 'Private for longer'

One of the hottest places in private markets this summer is in the secondary market, where a record amount of big funds and their customers struggling to exit positions are finding a way out. Welcome to continuation funds or vehicles, also known as "CVs." A good chunk of this year's activity in that space has so far come from private fund managers, most of all those in private equity. The vehicles allow fund managers to flip older assets from their maturing funds into new, fresher pools of capital. Funds do this because they don't think they've gotten enough value from their older assets. The structure style has largely been normalized by the private equity market, according to Jefferies. Not without a history of controversy, continuation funds have so far proven to be one of the fastest-growing areas of the secondaries market this year, accounting for $41 billion worth of transaction volume. That's a 60% jump from the level of activity in the first half of last year. Rollovers into these fund structures now make up 19% of all industry exits. Over the first half of 2025, close to 75% of the 50 largest private fund managers said they used a continuation fund both for giving investors a way out and hitting their own goals. How it all works Traditional private equity funds raise money from large institutional investors in order to buy out companies. The next step is to improve margins so that they can eventually take these companies public or sell them and return profits to their investors. That model has faced difficulty in recent years, with the struggle for exits coming down to a combination of valuation discrepancies between buyers and sellers amid higher interest rates, which has tapered growth in the IPO and M&A markets and led to a growing backlog of unsold assets. The slower exits have also contributed to a tougher year for the stocks of Wall Street's biggest private market megafund managers. That includes Blackstone (BX), Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR), Apollo Global Management (APO) and Blue Owl (OWL). (Disclosure: Yahoo Finance is owned by Apollo Global Management.) Blackstone and KKR are down 3% and 6%, respectively, while the stocks of Apollo and Blue Owl have fallen roughly 17% and 19% over the same period. There is a gap between the inventory of active private sponsored companies operating globally and the amount of opportunities currently available in the deals market, according to Andrew DiGeronimo, co-head of partnership solutions for major private markets player Warburg Pincus. 'I think you'll see record year after record year over the next several years in this business just simply because of a structural imbalance,' said DiGeronimo. In short, fund managers have more assets to sell than there is demand from buyers. That poses an obstacle for delivering investors the cash profits they planned for. A fund's life A typical buyout fund has a lifespan of 10 years, while a little over half of all active private equity funds globally (55%) are between six and nine years old, according to a June report from PitchBook. The wider controversy surrounding continuation vehicles revolves around conflict of interest questions from investors, given how the fund manager or financial sponsor selling the asset is often also the buyer. Within overall fund manager or general partner-led secondary transactions (87% use continuation vehicles), just 17% of limited partners rolled their investment over into these new funds over the first half of this year, according to Jefferies. Critics also worry about fund managers using these rollovers as an opportunity to charge investors with new fees on old assets. Still, there has been some effort to establish parameters around continuation vehicles. The Institutional Limited Partners Association, a trade group, issued guidance on the practice in 2023, calling for more deal transparency in addition to hiring outside parties to review conflicts of interest and ensure a reasonable sales process. In some cases, big funds are now using the maneuver as a way to hold on to their biggest assets. For example, New Mountain Capital formed a $3.1 billion continuation vehicle in April to roll portfolio healthcare company Real Chemistry into its own single-asset fund. "This growth is not merely cyclical but reflects a fundamental shift in how private equity liquidity is managed, and even the most resistant investors are now seeking exposure to the asset class," according to Jefferies. Warburg's DiGeronimo sums it up even more succinctly as "the trend of private for longer." David Hollerith is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering banking, crypto, and other areas in finance. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Meet vibe coding's nerdy but sane sibling
Meet vibe coding's nerdy but sane sibling

Fast Company

time27 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Meet vibe coding's nerdy but sane sibling

By now you've probably heard of 'vibe coding': creating software from scratch by prompting AI to generate the source code for you, instead of writing it yourself. The promise of spinning up real working apps from nothing but mushy human language is tantalizing—and companies such as Lovable and Replit have already ridden it to billion-dollar valuations. There's just one catch. For a wide swath of businesses with straightforward but mission-critical needs, vibe coding doesn't actually work. AI still hallucinates, which means the code it generates is often sloppy and occasionally downright malicious. It can't be trusted to be secure or consistent. No wonder that according to one major survey, 72% of professional software developers don't use vibe coding tools on the job. A New York-based startup called Aboard is pursuing a different approach. Call it 'vibe product management.' Instead of using AI to jump right into generating code (and holding on for dear life), business leaders can work with 'solution engineers' at Aboard who use AI to turbocharge the planning and discovery phases of enterprise software development—the lumbering, unsexy, but essential work of deciding what components to code and how to assemble them reliably. If vibe coding is like asking a robot architect for a summer house and watching it start to pour concrete for a pool you may never have asked for, Aboard's approach is all about making the robot focus on drawing up the blueprints first. It's still faster, but also saner.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store