logo
A ham-fisted inheritance tax grab on the middle class would end in tears

A ham-fisted inheritance tax grab on the middle class would end in tears

Times3 days ago
Surely the government could not be so unwise as to target Middle Britain with an inheritance tax raid on money given to your nearest and dearest?
Yet here we are, with the chancellor now reported to be considering a crackdown on lifetime gifts, which presumably could cover anything from extending the seven-year tax-free rule to scrapping the exemption that allows unlimited gifts made from your 'surplus income'.
This could be an unwelcome resurrection of the capital transfer tax that Labour introduced in 1974, and that Nigel Lawson duly replaced with inheritance tax and the seven-year rule. The return of such a policy would hit the Bank of Mum and Dad hard and stop thousands of young buyers from getting on the property ladder.
Aggressively going after family wealth seems like an odd thing to even consider; it would raise relatively little and would be deeply unpopular.
Before every budget the Treasury will present the chancellor with all sorts of cost-cutting scenarios, many of which won't actually be considered. However, this year we cannot rule anything out. And we also now know that Rachel Reeves has a £50 billion black hole to fill with our cash.
Many cannot understand why inheritance tax is consistently ranked as the most-hated tax in Britain when it affects relatively few people — about 1 in 20 estates pay it every year.
But let's not forget that behind every estate noted in that government data is a family of brothers and sisters, sons and daughters, and grandchildren. The true impact is far greater than the official statistics suggest.
• Britain pays record £5bn in inheritance tax
The grief caused by the threat of inheritance tax is also never recognised in the stats. To avoid an unnecessary bill for their loved ones, the older generation are often forced to employ accountants and advisers in their twilight years to work out a strategy to ensure that their hard-earned money can stay in the family.
The very wealthiest already know how to pay as little inheritance tax as possible. As a wealth tax, it has a lot of holes.
However, a series of chancellors have now exploited fiscal drag, through the freezing of the tax-free allowances, to turn inheritance tax into something that, quite frankly, most middle-class families now need to worry about.
Reeves has already extended the freeze on inheritance tax thresholds for two years up to 2030, as well as throwing the value of unspent pension pots into the mix, which in turn will push many, many more into paying the death tax.
• Surge in families caught out by inheritance tax
If you die owning an average semi-detached home in the southeast of England and have decent pension savings, your family are now likely to get a bill.
HM Revenue & Customs this week also confirmed that even the pensions of those who die before retirement will be liable for inheritance tax. The scope of this tax is changing all the time, and it's never in our favour.
The inheritance tax nil-rate band has been £325,000 since 2009, and the extra allowance for leaving a family home to a direct relative has been fixed at £175,000 since 2020 (on estates worth less than £2 million). This is all despite inflation soaring and property prices booming.
Putting aside all that, inheritance tax is distasteful to many. It's levied at the worst time for families and is seen to be just another excuse to claw back money that has been earned with income tax already deducted.
What's more, delays to probate mean that many families are having to pay the bill before they get their hands on the estate, and if they miss the six-month deadline they face a punishing interest rate of 8 per cent.
Finally, our 40 per cent rate of inheritance tax is one of the highest in the world.
• Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts
Quite often, politicians learn about the Laffer Curve the hard way and before it's too late; it shows that increasing taxes can, and often does, lead to a drop in revenue. Jeremy Hunt's heavy-handed cuts to the capital gains tax allowance led to receipts falling by more than £2 billion a year.
You cannot stop people from dying, but you can take action to ensure that not a penny of your estate is caught in the tax net. Whatever the taxman throws at families, they will resentfully find a way to beat it.
In 21st century Britain, thanks to the Treasury's addiction to fiscal drag, inheritance tax is no longer a levy on the very richest, but a penalty on the unaware and the unprepared.
We should not forget that it is not the government's job to redistribute wealth. We need incentives to put our money into the economy, rather than sheltering it from the taxman.
The inheritance tax regime doesn't need toughening up. It needs simplifying and resetting. A far smarter move would be to heavily reduce the headline rate and get rid of the complex web of exemptions and allowances. An opportunistic tax grab on family money would be economically unwise and a giant political folly.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Scrap Tory two-child benefit limit to lift kids out poverty' Neil Kinnock says
'Scrap Tory two-child benefit limit to lift kids out poverty' Neil Kinnock says

Daily Mirror

time10 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Scrap Tory two-child benefit limit to lift kids out poverty' Neil Kinnock says

In an interview with The Mirror, the former Labour leader Neil Kinnock said the Tories had left the country in a state that would 'make Charles Dickens furious' with 'intolerable' hardship Neil Kinnock has said the controversial two-child benefit limit should be scrapped to lift hundreds of thousands of kids out of poverty. ‌ In an interview with The Mirror, the former Labour leader blamed the Tories for undoing Gordon Brown's proud legacy of cutting child poverty. He said after 14 years the Conservatives left the country in a state that would "make Charles Dickens furious" with "intolerable" hardship. ‌ Getting rid of the two-child benefit limit - one of the most severe cuts to the welfare state by austerity Chancellor George Osborne - would be the "immediate and direct way of trying to correct the conditions the government inherited," he said. It comes after Mr Brown hit out at the return of 'poverty of 60 years ago'. ‌ READ MORE: KEVIN MAGUIRE: 'Labour must find engaging story for the UK - or face election wipeout' The policy, which restricts Universal Credit and Child Tax Credits to the first two children, has been blamed by charities for trapping kids in poverty. Labour MPs are calling on Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves to axe the policy at the Budget in the autumn, or as part of an ongoing child poverty review. Asked whether the government should now scrap the two child benefit-limit, Lord Kinnock, who led Labour between 1983 and 1992, said: "I would want them to do it. They may not be able to do it all at once, but I really want them to move in that direction because the figures are that if that did occur it would mean that about 600,000 kids, fewer, are in poverty." He later added: "Yes, I would say that. It might have to be done in a phased fashion - simply because of the revenue implications - but heading strongly and evidently in that direction is the way to go." The former Labour leader said tackling child poverty - among other issues facing the country - could be paid for by a tax on the assets of the super-rich or a hike in levies on the top 1%. He told The Mirror: "I think people would see the justification of increasing taxes on assets and the very, very highly paid - I'm talking about the top 1% - in order to make the transfer directly to reduce child poverty. "I know it's the economics of Robin Hood, but I don't think there is anything terribly bad about that." ‌ Lord Kinnock has previously said a 2% levy on asset values over £10million - a "very big fortune" - could bring in around £11billion for the Treasury. He added: "The thing is we live in a fair country where the instincts are fair, so people approve of the idea of the broadest backs bearing the heaviest burden. "Of course the very rich do make a substantial contribution. It's not enough. And it hasn't kept pace with the increase in their asset wealth. Simple and straightforward as that." Earlier this year official figures showed a record 4.5million children living in poverty. Pressed on what this said about the state of the nation, Lord Kinnock said: "All you've got to do is reflect where we were under Gordon Brown's government when they cut child poverty gigantically by millions. ‌ "In 15 years, starting from a position where beneficial change was taking place, we've got to the place that would make Charles Dickens furious. It's been allowed to happen because the kids are voiceless and their parents feel powerless. I defy anybody to see a child in need and not want to help." Keir Starmer has previously vowed to slash the number of kids living in poverty. And Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, who is leading the child poverty task force alongside Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, has suggested ending the two-child benefit limit remains on the table. ‌ Asked what he would like to see from the taskforce, Lord Kinnock said: "Recognise the basic thing that poverty exists because people haven't got enough money. That's so obvious you almost feel foolish saying it. But unless and until it's recognised in operational policy then it's going to continue." Lord Kinnock made clear he wants to see a reform of the "unjust" tax system. He told The Mirror: "To do it in the name of equity, fairness. "People need to see a demonstration of the fact that things really are changing for the better. We live in a country now where lots of people are utterly fed up. When the encountered reality that whatever happens in the world, whatever happens in Britain, the same people come out on top, always, untouched." ‌ Ahead of the autumn Budget, Lord Kinnock also praised the "smart" and "gutsy" Chancellor Ms Reeves. He added: "She's got a very, very difficult task. Last July they [Labour] inherited a phenomenal mess, a gigantic mess, almost of a post-war scale and we haven't had a war. "What we have had is 14 years of continual and chronic underinvestment in crucial areas. Not just the health service and education system, but the care system... virtually eradicated. The support for young families, really smashed to pieces. "The [defence] forces, so underinvested, that we've got a smaller army than we had at the time of the Napoleonic wars. All of that is cumulative and just as in every other sphere in life, demolition is easy. Reconstruction is difficult. "They've got this huge task of reconstruction. It is fundamental. I would actually like them to treat it not only as a terrible challenge, which it is, but also an opportunity that the mess that the Tories left is so big, so wide, that it could be used as an invitation for radical change. "My gut tells me, my brain tells me, that our country needs that."

Starmer under new pressure over migrants after 700 protestors stage angry demo at Scots asylum hotel that housed rapist
Starmer under new pressure over migrants after 700 protestors stage angry demo at Scots asylum hotel that housed rapist

Daily Mail​

time10 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Starmer under new pressure over migrants after 700 protestors stage angry demo at Scots asylum hotel that housed rapist

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer faced mounting pressure over the housing of illegal immigrants last night after 700 people were involved in angry clashes outside a migrant hotel in a Scots town. Police had to call in reinforcements as local residents and anti-racism groups hurled bottles and insults at each other outside the hotel in Falkirk which can hold more than 50 asylum seekers. Community tensions had reached fever pitch after Afghan asylum seeker Sadeq Nikzad, 29, – a former resident in the hotel – was jailed in June for raping a local 15-year-old schoolgirl. Yesterday, one of Sir Keir's own Labour MPs said he believed that migrants should be removed from Falkirk's Cladhan Hotel. Euan Stainbank, the MP for Falkirk, said: 'These hotels don't work for host communities or those who stay there and their use will be ended by this government.' And a senior Tory MSP demanded Sir Keir's government find an alternative way to house migrants as soon as possible – and said locals had 'legitimate safety concerns for themselves and for their children'. Yesterday's demo is the first large-scale asylum hotel protest in Scotland following similar demonstrations in England, notably outside The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. On Friday, Epping Forest District Council managed to secure a temporary block on The Bell accepting any further asylum seekers due to an increase in community tensions. If a judge rules in the council's favour on Tuesday it could open the door to a flurry of similar applications to the courts to dismantle asylum hotels at a community level, including from Falkirk. But last night Scottish Conservative Community Safety spokeswoman Sharon Dowey called for Labour to intervene as a priority. She said: 'Robust action is needed from Labour ministers if they're serious about keeping Scots safe. 'They can start by heeding the concerns of local communities and look into closing these hotels by delivering an alternative solution to housing asylum seekers.' Recent Norstat polling suggests the vast majoity of voters in Scotland, 77 per cent, want immigration to either decrease or remain at current levels. The survey published in February 2025 appeared to mirror a UK-wide trend in voters seeing immigrantion as an issue of concern. Ms Dowey believes this weekend's protests 'reflects the widespread outrage felt by those in the community' following the rape conviction of Nikzad. The migrant, who had entered the UK illegally on a small boat, subjected a vunerable 15-year-old to an 'appalling, opportunistic attack' in Falkirk in October 2023. He was later handed a 12-year extended sentence at the High Court in Livingston. The Afghani claimed he'd not been educated on 'cultural' differences and repeatedly shouted 'liar' at judge John Morris, KC. Nikzad – who had uploaded a picture of himself onto his Facebook posing in one of the chairs inside the Cladhan Hotel – is due to be deported after serving his prison term. Hundreds of people turned out to protest alongside Save Our Future and Our Kids' Future outside the hotel yesterday, including Darren, a local father, who claimed he feared for the children's safety in the area. He said: 'There are kids getting followed home and it all leads back to here. And it's not just young lassies, it's boys as well.' Father-of-two Connor Graham took to a megaphone to tell protesters: 'Here's my message: We are not going away. We are not going to be intimidated into silence. And we are certainly not going to be written off as extremists. 'We want a safer Falkirk... we want answers and we want action and we want the same thing every decent person should want, a community where our children can grow up safe.' On the opposite side of the protests was Claire Love, a 42-year-old social worker from Bonnybridge, who joined Stand Up to Racism counter-protestors. She told The Mail she feared there had been an 'increase in racism, homophobia and xenophobia in recent times'. Falkirk MP Mr Stainbank said the former Conservative Government was to blame for a 'broken asylum system' and insisted his party will get to grips with the issue. Referencing the Tory scheme that aimed to send failed asylum seekers to Rwanda which Labour scrapped when it won power last year, he said: 'We must fix the broken asylum system for communities such as Falkirk and those fleeing conflict across the world. 'Refocusing resources away from Rwanda and onto processing will allow us to end the use of asylum hotels, which were set up by the Tories and many of their rebranded Reform colleagues. 'This approach has already seen the asylum backlog reduced by over 59,000 by the start of 2025 compared to if we had kept the Tories broken system. 'These hotels don't work for host communities or those who stay there and their use will be ended by this government.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Since taking office, we have taken immediate action to fix the asylum system and have started closing down hotels and returning more than 35,000 people with no right to be here. 'From over 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023, costing almost £9 million a day, there are now fewer than 210, and we want them all closed by the end of this Parliament. 'We will continue to work closely with community partners across the country, and discuss any concerns they have, as we look to fix this broken system together.'

Starmer to speak with coalition of the willing ahead of Zelensky-Trump meeting
Starmer to speak with coalition of the willing ahead of Zelensky-Trump meeting

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starmer to speak with coalition of the willing ahead of Zelensky-Trump meeting

Sir Keir Starmer will speak to western allies on Sunday ahead of Volodymyr Zelensky's White House meeting with Donald Trump. The Prime Minister, France's Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Friedrich Merz will host the meeting of the coalition of the willing on Sunday afternoon. The coalition, made up of 30-plus nations, is prepared to deter Russian aggression by putting troops on the ground in Ukraine once the war is over. The meeting, which is expected to take place at approximately 2pm UK time, comes on the heels of US President Mr Trump's summit in Alaska with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. Mr Trump hoped to secure a peace deal from the talks at a military base in Anchorage, but both he and Mr Putin walked away without agreement on how to end the war in Ukraine. The US leader, however, insisted 'some great progress' was made, with 'many points' agreed and 'very few' remaining. Several news outlets have cited sources which claimed that during the negotiations Mr Putin demanded full control of Donetsk and Luhansk – two occupied Ukrainian regions – as a condition for ending the war. In exchange he would give up other Ukrainian territories held by Russian troops. Other outlets reported that Mr Trump is inclined to support the plan, and will speak to Mr Zelensky about it on Monday when they meet in the Oval Office. After the Alaska summit, the US president told Fox News it was now up to Mr Zelensky to 'make a deal' to end the war. Sir Keir commended Mr Trump's 'pursuit of an end to the killing' following a phone call with the US president, Mr Zelensky and Nato allies on Saturday morning. But he insisted Ukraine's leader must not be excluded from future talks to broker a peace in Ukraine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store