Victoria police criticised for Gaza protest tactics while thousands marched ‘freely' in Sydney
Tasnim Sammak from Free Palestine Coalition Naarm told Guardian Australia police did not inform protest organisers they were going to block the bridge before they arrived on Sunday afternoon.
Police had previously urged protesters to change their plans, claiming that blocking King Street Bridge – a major thoroughfare into Melbourne's CBD – could delay emergency services and put lives at risk.
Sammak estimated about 25,000 people protesting against the ongoing starvation in Gaza and demanding a ceasefire marched from the State Library of Victoria through the city to the bridge and were 'shocked' to be met by a 'heavy police presence'.
'It was a huge display of force by Victoria police against civilians and against members of the public who have been protesting for over 90 weeks in Melbourne,' Sammak said.
Images showed police in riot gear behind barricades on King Street Bridge, backed by a row of mounted officers and riot squad vans.
Sammak said protesters initially sat down at the bridge crossing, with footage showing fellow organiser Mohammad Sharab urging the crowd to remain calm.
'We are sitting here for Palestine … peacefully,' Sharab said.
'We have women, children, vulnerable people.'
Jordan van den Lamb, a Victorian Socialists candidate known online as PurplePingers, attended the protest. He said he was 'shocked' to turn on to King Street and see the bridge closed and police 'kitted out in riot gear, shields, horses, armoured vehicles, the lot'.
'I think they assumed that if they shut down the bridge, the protest would be less visible but really it's drawn more attention to the protest,' van den Lamb said.
'It would have just been done in half an hour if they hadn't closed the bridge. It's a bit stupid of them, really.'
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
He said police mostly stood silently behind their shields, with the main protest dispersing around 3pm as most attenders turned back towards the State Library.
A 'small group' wearing masks and goggles stayed, van den Lamb said. Footage shows the group stopped traffic, burnt an Australian flag and spray-painted 'Abolish Australia' on to Spencer Street.
In a statement, police said about 3,000 protesters gathered at the State Library on Sunday and 'despite repeated requests from police, they marched to King Street'.
'As a result of this, Victoria police closed the King Street Bridge and diversions were put in place,' the statement said.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
They confirmed there were no arrests but they were following up a report that an egg was thrown at a person during the protest.
Police did not answer specific questions about how many officers were deployed or the decision-making behind blocking the bridge, citing operational reasons. They said there had been no reports made to them of disruption to emergency services.
Sammak said protesters were left 'feeling very traumatised and confused' by the police response, suggesting it was made at the 'the encouragement' of the premier, Jacinta Allan.
'The Sydney Harbour Bridge was facilitated quite freely and easily, and there was a positive atmosphere. So why in Melbourne did we have to face riot cops?' Sammak said.
On Saturday, Allan had warned any protesters disrupting emergency services 'will be dealt with swiftly'. She defended her comments on Monday, telling ABC Radio Melbourne she had been focused on 'ensuring that safety wasn't compromised'.
Allan said the protest was peaceful and backed the police response. She also said there was 'a small group of extremists behaving in an extreme way'.
David Mejia-Canales, senior lawyer at the Human Rights Law Centre, said there had also been a heavy-handed response to Sydney's protest. On Saturday, NSW police had sought an order to prohibit the protest going ahead but it was rejected by the supreme court.
'In NSW and Victoria we are seeing how anti-protest laws from the Minns and Allan governments are emboldening heavy handed policing and the repressive treatment of protesters and attempts to shut down protests,' Mejia-Canales said.
'Governments and police have a legal obligation to protect protesters, not punish or hinder people who are peacefully demonstrating and exercising their human right to demand justice.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
Israel to decide next steps in Gaza after ceasefire talks collapse
JERUSALEM, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Benjamin Netanyahu will convene his security cabinet this week to decide on Israel's next steps in Gaza following the collapse of indirect ceasefire talks with Hamas, with one senior Israeli source suggesting more force could be an option. Last Saturday, during a visit to the country, U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff had said he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza. But Israeli officials have also floated ideas including expanding the military offensive in Gaza and annexing parts of the shattered enclave. The failed ceasefire talks in Doha had aimed to clinch agreements on a U.S.-backed proposal for a 60-day truce, during which aid would be flown into Gaza and half of the hostages Hamas is holding would be freed in exchange for Palestinian prisoners jailed in Israel. After Netanyahu met Witkoff last Thursday, a senior Israeli official said that "an understanding was emerging between Washington and Israel," of a need to shift from a truce to a comprehensive deal that would "release all the hostages, disarm Hamas, and demilitarize the Gaza Strip," - Israel's key conditions for ending the war. A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Sunday that the envoy's visit was seen in Israel as "very significant." But later on Sunday, the Israeli official signalled that pursuit of a deal would be pointless, threatening more force: "An understanding is emerging that Hamas is not interested in a deal and therefore the prime minister is pushing to release the hostages while pressing for military defeat." What a "military defeat" might mean, however, is up for debate within the Israeli leadership. Some Israeli officials have suggested that Israel might declare it was annexing parts of Gaza as a means to pressure the militant group. Others, like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir want to see Israel impose military rule in Gaza before annexing it and re-establishing the Jewish settlements Israel evicted 20 years ago. The Israeli military, which has pushed back at such ideas throughout the war, was expected on Tuesday to present alternatives that include extending into areas of Gaza where it has not yet operated, according to two defence officials. While some in the political leadership are pushing for expanding the offensive, the military is concerned that doing so will endanger the 20 hostages who are still alive, the officials said. Israeli Army Radio reported on Monday that military chief Eyal Zamir has become increasingly frustrated with what he describes as a lack of strategic clarity by the political leadership, concerned about being dragged into a war of attrition with Hamas militants. A spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) declined to comment on the report but said that the military has plans in store. "We have different ways to fight the terror organization, and that's what the army does," Lieutenant Colonel Nadav Shoshani said. On Tuesday, Qatar and Egypt endorsed a declaration by France and Saudi Arabia outlining steps toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which included a call on Hamas to hand over its arms to the Western-backed Palestinian Authority. Hamas has repeatedly said it won't lay down arms. But it has told mediators it was willing to quit governance in Gaza for a non-partisan ruling body, according to three Hamas officials. It insists that the post-war Gaza arrangement must be agreed upon among the Palestinians themselves and not dictated by foreign powers. Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar suggested on Monday that the gaps were still too wide to bridge. "We would like to have all our hostages back. We would like to see the end of this war. We always prefer to get there by diplomatic means, if possible. But of course, the big question is, what will be the conditions for the end of the war?" he told journalists in Jerusalem.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Dan Sheehan handed four-match ban for dangerous clear-out on Tom Lynagh that went unpunished
Dan Sheehan, the British and Irish Lions hooker, has been banned for four matches after a dangerous clear-out on Australia fly-half Tom Lynagh that went unpunished by the officials during the third Test. According to a press release issued on Monday morning by World Rugby, Sheehan did not accept that foul play had occurred nor that the offence warranted a citing. This extended his eventual ban, though it will be reduced by a week if the 27-year-old completes World Rugby's coaching intervention programme, widely known as 'tackle school'. Sheehan, who appeared to hit Lynagh in the head with his elbow during the first half of the Lions' 22-12 loss on Saturday, was collared with charging into a ruck or a maul and a panel found his actions to be reckless. Tom Lynagh flattened by elbow to the head. #AUSvBIL — Jobson Growthe (@electricBAU) August 2, 2025 The committee also found that he made head contact with Lynagh, who subsequently left the field and did not return, and that Sheehan's actions 'amounted to a high degree of danger and that no mitigation applied'. There was minimal reaction to the clear-out from any players at the time, with Lynagh even staying on the field long enough to kick a penalty goal, which might have spared Sheehan from greater scrutiny. Michael Lynagh, the former Wallabies fly-half and father of Tom, has used his X account to repost several questions of how the officials missed Sheehan's actions at the time. One of them derided the situation as 'utterly insane'. Another, from Jack Quigley, said: 'So, just to be clear: This TMO will stop the game to check literally EVERYTHING except Dan Sheehan's hit that took Lynagh out. What are we doing here.' Had referee Nika Amushakeli been alerted to Sheehan's actions, it is highly likely that a card would have resulted. Even though 20-minute red cards were in play during the series, allowing teams to replace the offending player after that amount of time, the bunker official would have had scope to send off Sheehan permanently. Sheehan will now miss Leinster's pre-season game against Cardiff as well as their first two matches of the United Rugby Championship campaign against Stormers and Sharks. Provided that he completes World Rugby's coaching intervention programme, he will be available to face Munster on October 18.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
We know the Sydney Harbour Bridge march against the killing in Gaza was huge – but just how big was it?
The number of people who joined a pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday exceeded everyone's expectations. But just how many braved the rainy weather to urge the Australian government to do more to pressure Israel to stop the death and destruction in Gaza? That's been a sticking point. New South Wales police said initial estimates put the crowd at 90,000. A spokesperson for rally organisers the Palestine Action Group said police had informed them 100,000 people were in attendance – but the group estimated the figure was closer to 300,000. This article includes content provided by Instagram. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'. Here's what we know. Just after 5pm on Sunday, the acting deputy police commissioner Peter McKenna said police estimated 90,000 people took part – far more than the 50,000 organisers expected. He said it was the largest protest he and the assistant police commissioner Adam Johnson had seen in their time in the force. Johnson also said it was the 'most perilous' in his '35 years of policing'. However organisers estimated it was closer to 300,000. 'It's even bigger than my wildest dreams,' one of the main protest organisers, Josh Lees, said while at the front of the march at the midway point. Lees later said a number of people had come up with a similar figure after crunching the numbers based on widely shared aerial footage. Dr Aldo Raineri, a senior CQUniversity lecturer and expert in crowd safety management, estimated the figure to be significantly higher than what police suggested. Guardian Australia shared drone footage with Raineri that showed the crowd just north of the bridge's midway point, extending back to Wynyard station and Lang Park, where the march began. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The distance from Wynyard station up to where protesters began to be turned back is approximately 2.5km. The roadway along the bridge is 30 metres wide. Based on these dimensions and what appeared to be an occupancy of three or four people per square metre, he estimated between 225,000 and 300,000 people attended. However, he noted 'these figures are really rough, given the variation in density'. Organisers said there were still people at Lang Park, who had not yet started to march, when police sent a message telling protesters to turn back. Lees said many who had gone to Sunday's protest felt it was on par with past major protests they had been to, including the anti-Iraq war protest in 2003, which saw demonstrators march through the CBD, and the walk for reconciliation march in 2000 which went across the Sydney Harbour Bridge. According to the National Museum of Australia, about 250,000 people walked across the bridge in a continuous stream lasting nearly six hours during the reconciliation march. NMA called it the 'largest political demonstration ever held in Australia'. In 2003, police estimated more than 200,000 took part in the anti-Iraq war rally, while organisers put the total at about 300,000, the Sydney Morning Herald reported. The paper said it was 'thought to be the biggest in the country's history'. In 2023, an estimated 50,000 people took part in a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge as part of WorldPride. Chris Nash, who attended Sunday's march, said it 'felt much bigger' than the 2000 reconciliation march he also attended. 'That was much more spaced out,' he said. The former NSW premier Bob Carr marched at the head of the pro-Palestine protest across the bridge. He was the premier during the reconciliation march in 2000. Asked how the crowd sizes compared, he said: 'All that matters was that it was a big, beautiful success. A success with cheerful police cooperation and good-natured people motivated by the horror of Israel's actions in Gaza.' At about 3pm on Sunday, NSW police sent out a mass text message throughout the city ordering the pro-Palestine march to stop due to safety concerns, with authorities turning protesters around at the north end of the bridge. Police sent a second mass text message saying they had consulted with the organisers and were turning everyone around. 'We could not get those people, the number, the significant size of that crowd off that northern egress route without risking crowd crush. We could not allow those numbers to then egress into the northern side, into those train stations without, again, that real risk of crowd crush,' McKenna told reporters. He said there were 1,000 police facilitating the protest. Raineri said allowing the crowd to amass without effective transport to disperse them would have been unsafe. He said the police went about this the right way by using mass text messages and consultating with protesters. However, Legal Observers NSW said the 'confusing and unplanned' directions from police were dangerous and could have caused a crowd crush. 'Police had not adequately planned for the initial route to North Sydney and there did not appear to be a plan if crowd numbers exceeded expectations and made entering and leaving North Sydney difficult,' the group's report on the protest said.
