9 essential AI tips for CEOs from a people-first leadership expert
The following tips are a faithful reproduction of a LinkedIn post by Elaine Page, who is an influential voice and renowned talent strategist. Page begins her post by informing her followers that she has been doing what most would be doing at the moment – leafing through everything on AI and talking to founders, skeptics, operators, and optimists. And in all of these conversations, Page revealed one line that hit her harder – 'This isn't just a tool shift. It's leadership reckoning.'
The growth and transformation expert said that this line reminded that her job as leader was not simply to understand disruption; rather humanise it, translate it, and, most importantly, to help her team grow through it instead of being left behind. She later turned to one of her most trusted mentors, whom she describes as 'a no-BS-CEO-turned-investor' to ask what he would do if he were running a company today. Page revealed that her mentor laid out a crisp, people-first roadmap for AI transformation.
Below are the practical steps for leaders to navigate through the age of AI. These steps, born out of personal experience of Page's mentor, can resonate with leaders across the spectrum.
As we know, AI is no longer optional learning; it is important that every senior leader must go through an immersive, hands-on bootcamp. It should not just be a webinar or a white paper but rather deep learning. This is imperative, as according to Page, one cannot lead what they cannot understand.
Moreover, educating senior members in an organisation is key, as they are more likely to set the direction, culture, and pace of change. If they are unable to comprehend the benefits or disadvantages of AI, they cannot take informed decisions or raise the right questions. There could also be a possibility that they may unknowingly slow the innovation process, pursue hype and delegate AI strategy without vision.
In an organisational setup, as leaders are learning about the change, Page recommends that companies should deploy their best thinkers to start documenting real challenges across business.
In essence, they should skip the hype and just create a working list of problems that they would need better answers for. In simple words, dedicate resources to identifying real problems and focus on pain points across teams, workflows, and customer experience.
Once a list of problems has been identified, it is time to start matching them with AI solutions. The expert recommends looking for opportunities to boost productivity, improve customer service, reduce costs, and scope out new revenue streams. Page asserts that AI is not here to replace people but to support them. She advises business leaders to frame it this way and works towards proving it. 'Communicate with optimism' is the mantra here.
The present day evokes a need for leadership that is intentional and understands the technology, enables people, and most importantly, builds trust in the face of change.
Leaders should be cautious as to not leave this solely to the IT teams alone. Page advises setting up an AI helpdesk and recruiting internal 'power users' and curious learners who can be the 'AI coaches' for various teams. Page essentially calls them the in-house translators, change agents, and champions of AI. In short, make AI adoption peer-led and momentum-driven.
This can be one of the most useful recommendations for companies that desire to equip its staff with the latest AI tools. Primarily, because many organisations reportedly struggle with skilling their staff, and having an in-house helpdesk or familiar faces to coach them can be a valuable move.
There is a need to balance the portfolio. Page believes that although quick wins are essential to building energy and belief, organisations also need long-term bets to push themselves forward in the long run. The transformation expert advises balancing short-term sprints with long-term missions.
As we know, the AI landscape is currently a loud space with many selling their tools. The expert cautions against falling for just features. One should opt for ones that are adaptable, align with one's value, and grow with the needs of the organisation. One should look for flexibility, reliability, and strong values alignment. 'Think of relationships, not just features.'
Many CEOs and innovators are working towards embracing this change with policies that are human-centric, ensuring that everyone gets to reap its benefits. However, there are many who may be struggling to sift through these times of dimensional shift without the tools and skills needed to make the most of it.
Page believes that AI must come with governance, and it should not be phase 2. Leaders should be transparent with their teams, set boundaries around data use, and put people at the centre of every decision. In essence, companies should prioritise human-centred outcomes. Making ethics part of AI strategy should be a given.
AI is bringing along a need for a shift in mindset. In the past few years, perhaps the biggest challenge has not been keeping up with rapid AI advancements but leading through this phase with purpose and empathy.
Page terms this as 'the messy middle'. Even though people are likely to break things, they should celebrate the ones who experiment. Organisations should strive to make failing forward a part of their culture. Normalise learning and celebrate the bold.
At a time when there is a mad rush to scale, leaders should avoid simply tracking usage and focus on tracking value. These could simply be where you are saving time, which domains are showing enhanced productivity, or even where human potential is being unlocked. Page believes that ROI should be about real human outcomes and not vanity metrics.
The author claims that this is not a checklist but a cultural shift, and she believes that one should focus on building trust, learning, and transparency. Elaine Page is currently a chief people officer, board advisor, and talent strategist known for building high-performing teams.
Based on my interactions with enterprise leaders, tech innovators, and organisational experts, one recurring theme is the lack of clear direction around AI adoption. But insights from leaders like Page suggest a growing effort to bring clarity and structure to what often feels like a chaotic wave of advancement. Her post offers not just guidance, but a much-needed human lens on transformation.
Bijin Jose, an Assistant Editor at Indian Express Online in New Delhi, is a technology journalist with a portfolio spanning various prestigious publications. Starting as a citizen journalist with The Times of India in 2013, he transitioned through roles at India Today Digital and The Economic Times, before finding his niche at The Indian Express. With a BA in English from Maharaja Sayajirao University, Vadodara, and an MA in English Literature, Bijin's expertise extends from crime reporting to cultural features. With a keen interest in closely covering developments in artificial intelligence, Bijin provides nuanced perspectives on its implications for society and beyond. ... Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘One of the darkest days…': Indian CEO recalls firing 25 employees in a day, reveals why he couldn't even say ‘I'm sorry'
A LinkedIn post by Mumbai-based entrepreneur Sampark Sachdeva has struck a chord online after he opened up about one of the toughest moments of his professional life, being asked to fire 25 employees in a single day. Recalling the incident, Sachdeva said the management had instructed him to remain 'cold' and detached while breaking the news. He wasn't allowed to show sympathy or even say 'I'm sorry,' since it could be seen as taking responsibility. Instead, he had to stick to a script: 'Please submit your ID card and laptop. HR will reach out for formalities. Your system's access will be disabled shortly.' What made the ordeal unbearable, he wrote, were the faces he had to look into while delivering the message. One that still haunts him is that of a single mother, seated across from him, trying to hold back tears. 'I saw the tear form at the corner of her eyes. And then, snap, it dropped.' Sachdeva clarified that he had no part in deciding who would be laid off; he was simply the one chosen to deliver the decision. But that did little to ease the weight of the task. 'Try telling that to a father of two. To someone who just took a home loan. To the girl who had moved cities for this role,' he reflected. One employee's response has stayed with him over the years. Without bitterness, the man told him: 'Sir, you had hired me. You were here, so I stayed. Today, you are asking me to go, so I will go.' Once the task was complete, Sachdeva said he rushed out of the office and broke down, away from his team. 'That day, I didn't feel like a leader. I felt like a number. A face delivering a system's decision. And yet, I carried their faces with me long after.' Now, years later, the memory still lingers. He admitted that while companies move forward and employees eventually rebuild their lives, some moments remain etched forever. 'Some days, when I sit quietly by myself, that single tear still haunts me. Because leadership is not just about making decisions. It's about learning to live with them.' His post has triggered a wave of responses from professionals, with many sharing their experiences of layoffs, on both sides of the table, and reflecting on the often unseen emotional burden that leadership carries. An individual wrote, 'I can completely understand what you are going through Sampark, I had to do that twice in two years, and it broke me completely inside but this is the dark side of corporate world. Had to explain myself that I had to just do my job without any emotional feelings but the scar still remains.' Another person commented, 'Layoffs may be a business reality, but the way they're handled leaves a lasting imprint on both sides of the table.' A third individual wrote, 'This is a moving reflection on the human side of leadership. A reminder that every decision impacts lives far beyond the office walls.'
Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
Free-AI: How well India adopts AI will shape its future
Rahul Matthan The Reserve Bank of India's Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI) has submitted its report. It has recommended an approach that enables innovation and mitigates risk. Contradictory as it sounds, it can be done. The Reserve Bank of India has constituted a Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI) Gift this article For the past six months, I served on the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI). It has been an enriching experience putting it together, and I am sure I speak for all members of the committee when I say that we are proud of what we produced. Now that we have submitted our report, I am glad to finally be able to write about it. For the past six months, I served on the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI). It has been an enriching experience putting it together, and I am sure I speak for all members of the committee when I say that we are proud of what we produced. Now that we have submitted our report, I am glad to finally be able to write about it. Unlike most artificial intelligence (AI) regulation frameworks, this is not one that is focused solely on risk. On the contrary, we have proposed a two-pronged approach—one that both enables innovation and mitigates risk. In my view, the weaving together of these two seemingly contradictory sets of objectives is what's novel about this report. To enable the use of AI in the financial sector, we centred our recommendations around three distinct pillars: infrastructure, policy and capacity. We proposed the establishment of the sort of data infrastructure that would be necessary for building AI models and, more generally, encouraging the use of AI in the financial sector. There is a lot of financial sector data in disconnected silos that, if organized, can be helpful for building models and developing AI applications. To that end, we have recommended an initial investment of ₹ 5,000 crore, with an additional ₹ 1,000 crore per annum over the next five years. We have also suggested setting up an AI innovation sandbox in which RBI-regulated entities, fintech firms and just about anyone interested in applying AI innovations to the financial sector can experiment. Since the general-purpose large language models (LLMs) that are currently available may not serve the specialized needs of our financial sector, we have recommended developing sector-specific models capable of catering to the country's linguistic diversity. In order to reward innovation in all these areas, we are hoping that RBI will institute challenge grants and innovation prizes designed to shine a light on noteworthy innovations. Finally, we believe that AI can and should be integrated into India's digital public infrastructure so that its reach can be extended even further than is currently possible. Under the policy pillar, we believe that the country needs a flexible approach that can adapt to keep pace with the evolution of technology. Regulators should periodically assess existing policies and not be afraid to review and amend them if new technologies so demand. We have suggested that RBI constitute a permanent multi-stakeholder committee for this purpose. We were also keen to encourage the use of AI to reach those otherwise excluded or underserved. The report encourages the use of AI to bring first-time borrowers into the country's formal financial system and recommends appropriate relaxation of existing regulations to enable that. Recognizing that AI systems are fundamentally probabilistic, we believe that it would not be appropriate to apply the binary lens we currently use to determine liability. While we need to ensure that customers are always protected, if we penalize AI developers for each small misstep, we will stifle innovation. To that end, we have recommended a graded approach to supervisory action under which the first instance of a failure will not automatically trigger full scope supervisory action, as long as the regulated entity has taken appropriate steps to mitigate harm and proactively remediates issues that have been identified. There is a need for capacity building in the sector, and for that we have recommended measures to improve the capacity of regulated entities as well as the regulators and supervisors responsible for the sector. We have also suggested putting in place a framework for sharing best practices so that the entire sector can benefit from everyone's experiences with using AI. As important as it is to incentivize innovation, we must make sure that the framework is designed to mitigate risk. To that end, we have proposed 13 recommendations across three broad pillars: governance, protection and assurance. Regulated entities are encouraged to establish board-approved AI policies and to ensure that data is protected across the entire AI lifecycle. They need to ensure that they have in place appropriate governance frameworks for the AI systems they use. Since most regulated entities already have product approval processes, we ask that they be modified to take into account the use of AI in their products and services. Beyond pre-release testing, we also recommend regular red-teaming to ensure that failures can be anticipated in advance. Customer protection is paramount, and regardless of how AI is used by users, regulated entities must ensure that they are protected at all times. This includes appropriate grievance redressal measures and awareness campaigns to keep customers well-informed while interacting with AI. To ensure AI availability, regulated entities are encouraged to put in place business continuity plans. We have also suggested the establishment of an incident-reporting framework with a good-faith approach to encourage timely disclosure of notable incidents. AI can prove transformational for India's development and we have to do whatever is necessary to allow this to happen. It calls for an entirely different approach to regulation than what we currently have—one that encourages responsible innovation and also mitigates risks. This, in sum, is the Free-AI approach. The author is a partner at Trilegal and the author of 'The Third Way: India's Revolutionary Approach to Data Governance'. His X handle is @matthan. Topics You May Be Interested In
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Japan's SoftBank to invest $2 bn in Intel
Tokyo: Japan-based tech investor SoftBank Group said Tuesday it will invest $2 billion in Intel , as the US government reportedly considers taking a 10-percent stake in the troubled US chip giant. The move is the latest in SoftBank's succession of investments and business deals in the United States as its charismatic founder Masayoshi Son aggressively courts US President Donald Trump. "This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role," Son said in a joint press release with Intel announcing the deal. SoftBank will pay $23 per share of Intel common stock. SoftBank's move came as the Trump administration discussed taking a stake of about 10% in Intel to boost the chipmaker and the American semiconductor sector, according to US media, including Bloomberg News and the Wall Street Journal. Since Trump returned to power, Son has already announced other investment plans in the United States, including its leading role in the $500-billion Stargate project to build AI infrastructure in the United States along with cloud giant Oracle and ChatGPT-maker OpenAI. Son stood beside the US president and fellow investors to announce the Stargate project at the White House in January. Lip-Bu Tan, Intel chief executive officer, said in the statement the latest deal demonstrates its close ties with SoftBank. It is "a company that's at the forefront of so many areas of emerging technology and innovation and shares our commitment to advancing US technology and manufacturing leadership," he said. Trump had pressed Tan, a Malaysian-born tech veteran, to resign "immediately," after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. But during a meeting last week, Trump praised Tan, saying in a social media post that "his success and rise is an amazing story." Trump also wrote that members of his cabinet would work with Tan and come up with "suggestions". Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. Sharon Chen, an analyst from Bloomberg Intelligence, described SoftBank's investment as "small" but said it "suggests the company could invest more in the semiconductor industry as it seeks to be a key participant in the sector's development".
