Trials start for 189 arrested for protesting the government in Turkey
The Istanbul prosecutor's office said it plans to put 819 people on trial in 20 criminal investigations after police detained nearly 2,000 people in the protests between March 19 to 26, with the first mass trials starting Friday.
The opposition Republican People's Party, which organized the events, said than 2.2 million people demonstrated in support of the mayor of Turkey's largest city, the BBC reported.
Ekrem İmamoglu, İstanbul's mayor and opposition candidate to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, was arrested on March 19 of corruption charges. İmamoglu wants to run for president in 2028 against Erdoğan.
Imamoglu and his party said the charges against him are politically motivated, as the ruling Justice and Development Party has governed Turkey since 2002, with Erdogan as prime minister and then president since 2003.
Of the arrests, 650 were accused of attending peaceful protests on March 27 after the ban ended. Protests have continued this month.
Arrested protesters have been accused of taking part in illegal protests and failing to obey orders to disperse. Video footage verified by Human Rights Watch shows the use of tear gas, rubber bullets and water cannons to control the demonstrators.
Among the arrests, 107 are charged only with participating in unauthorized demonstrations and failure to disperse. Other offenses include carrying a weapon, covering their faces to hide their identity and incitement to commit a crime. There are also eight journalists on trial.
All but about 50 students remain in detention, according to information provided by Parents Solidarity Network to BBC Turkish.
The government has banned public gatherings and penalties for doing so range from six months to five years in prison, according to Human Rights Watch.
"Given the glaring absence of evidence, it is hard not to conclude that the intended purpose of these rushed trials is to send a warning against exercising the rights to peaceful protest or free expression," said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "The prosecutor should be calling for these cases to be dropped unless there is direct and substantive evidence that particular individuals committed specific crimes."
Supporters, including family members, journalists, university lecturers and lawmakers from the opposition party, appeared in two courtrooms in the mass hearings.
"We have no fear, we are not the ones who should be afraid," a second-year student from Mimar Sinan University in Instanbul told the BBC.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
7 minutes ago
- UPI
Marco Rubio sanctions four more International Criminal Court officials
Four International Criminal Court officials are subject to U.S. sanctions announced on Wednesday, raising to eight the number of ICC officials who are subject to U.S. sanctions for violating national sovereignty and other alleged offenses. File Photo by Robin Utrecht/EPA-EFE Aug. 20 (UPI) -- U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has sanctioned four more members of the International Criminal Court for attempts to investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute individuals in non-member states. ICC Judges Kimberly Prost of Canada and Nicolas Guillou or France and deputy prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji and Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal are subject to U.S. sanctions, Rubio announced in a State Department release on Wednesday. "The United States has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicization, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty and illegitimate judicial overreach," Rubio said. "The court is a national security threat that has been an instrument of lawfare against the United States and our close ally Israel." Prost is sanctioned for authorizing an ICC investigation of U.S. personnel in Afghanistan, while Guillou is sanctioned for authorizing the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. Khan and Niang are sanctioned for continuing to support "illegitimate ICC actions" targeting Netanyahu and Gallant since each assumed leadership of the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor. The sanctions of the four individuals mean all of their property and interests in property that are located in the United States or under the control of U.S. persons are blocked and must be reported to the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control. The sanctions also block all entities that the individuals either directly or indirectly own or in which they have at least a 50% interest. Individuals and entities are prohibited from contributing funds, goods or services to the four ICC officials or receiving the same from them. The ICC rejected the sanctions in an online statement on Wednesday. "These sanctions are a flagrant attack against the independence of an impartial judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 states parties from all regions," ICC spokesperson Fadi El Abdallah said. "The ICC will continue fulfilling its mandates, undeterred, in strict accordance with its legal framework as adopted by the states parties without regard to any restriction, pressure or threat," El Abdallah said. The United States in June also sanctioned ICC Judges Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru and Beti Hohler of Slovenia, plus ICC Second Vice-President Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin. Neither the United States nor Israel is part of the 125-member ICC, which was established in Rome in 2002, following the adoption of the Rome Statute in 1998 by the ICC's member states. The ICC is comprised of 33 African, 28 Latin American and Caribbean, 20 Eastern European, 19 Asia-Pacific and 25 Western European and other states. U.S. neighbors Canada and Mexico are among the ICC's member states.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Chilling' political interference of BBC must stop, says former news boss
The BBC should be protected from "political interference", the corporation's former director of news has said, after the culture secretary appeared to call for the resignation of director-general Tim Davie earlier this year. Lisa Nandy said ministers expected "accountability at the highest levels" following the iPlayer broadcast of Bob Vylan's highly controversial Glastonbury set in June. James Harding, who previously edited the Times and now runs Tortoise Media, told the Edinburgh TV Festival the BBC should remain independent of government, and said Nandy's close involvement in the Bob Vylan scandal was "chilling". In response, a DCMS spokesperson said: "The culture secretary has been repeatedly clear that the role of the director general is a matter for the BBC board. Any suggestion to the contrary is untrue." In his keynote MacTaggart Lecture, Harding said the perception of a "political presence looming over the BBC" is a problem and that the broadcaster needs to be "beyond the reach of politicians". Several staff were asked to step back from their duties after the live streaming of Bob Vylan's Glastonbury set, where the punk duo led chants of "death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]" and made other derogatory comments. Nandy's subsequent call for accountability at the top of the corporation for the decision not to pull the live stream of the performance was subsequently interpreted as calling for Davie's resignation. In his speech, Harding criticised "political interference", or the perception of it, in relation to the BBC, saying it was something "we've got too accustomed to". "The culture secretary's office insists she did not explicitly ask Samir Shah, the BBC chair, to deliver up the director general's resignation... but people inside the BBC were left in no doubt that was the message," Harding said. "Whatever your view of the hate speech vs freedom of speech issues, an overbearing government minister doesn't help anyone," he said. "The hiring and firing of [the director general] should not be the job of a politician." A DCMS spokesperson said: "The BBC has itself acknowledged a number of serious failings in recent months, including the broadcasting of the Bob Vylan set at Glastonbury. It is entirely right that the culture secretary raised these issues with the BBC leadership on behalf of licence fee payers. "The government remains committed to the very important principle that the BBC is operationally and editorially independent. We are focused on securing a sustainable future for the BBC and helping strengthen public trust in the Corporation as part of the upcoming Charter Review." Read about previous MacTaggart Lectures: 2018: Michaela Coel reveals she was sexually assaulted 2019: Dorothy Byrne says media have right to call politicians 'liars' 2020: David Olusoga: 'TV industry left me crushed' 2021: TV has 'utterly failed' disabled people, writer Jack Thorne says 2022: Maitlis says BBC rebuke over Cummings remarks made no sense 2023: Louis Theroux: Anxious TV bosses should stop playing it safe 2024: James Graham calls for more working-class people in TV The BBC has been criticised for a number of high-profile scandals in recent months, such as breaching its own editorial guidelines on accuracy in relation to a documentary about Gaza. Elsewhere, Match of the Day host Gary Lineker left the BBC after sharing an Instagram reel about Zionism that featured an illustration of a rat, considered an antisemitic slur. Harding said the BBC was "not institutionally antisemitic", and that it was "untrue and unhelpful to say it is", adding that it was "much better to correct the mistakes and address the judgement calls that have been wrong". He acknowledged the BBC had "made mistakes... and it can be much too slow to correct them". Referring to a debate early in the conflict about the BBC's use of language, Harding said he thought it the BBC was "wrong not to use the word 'terrorist' for the attacks of October 7th; journalists shouldn't censor words, but use them accurately". Harding did not comment on the events surrounding Lineker's resignation, but did say he felt football pundits generally "should be able to have views as a citizen, as well as a job as a BBC broadcaster". Harding also used his speech to argue the BBC has a crucial role to play in defending truth in an age of artificial intelligence (AI) and declining trust in traditional media. "A shared understanding of what's true is disappearing before our eyes," he said. "More people are paranoid, prone to conspiracy theories. Large numbers of people are giving up on the idea of facts." He continued: "Politics and technology are doing untold damage to trust in the world. "On the one hand, politicians are trying to control or cancel the media, particularly news. On the other, AI is beginning to lay waste to the economics of information, while also remaking the job of storytellers." In an age where "we're more divided, more certain we're right", Harding argued, the BBC should be protected and championed as the "most important source of information in this country". He said the corporation was "the best defence of truth and trust against the lies of dictators and demagogues". The BBC's royal charter will be up for renewal in 2027, and it has not yet been decided whether the licence fee will be replaced by a new funding system. Harding reflected: "We're at the beginning of a new information age, if we want it to be truly creative, innovative and competitive globally, we can't short-change the BBC again. "We need, surely, to be thinking about a mix of funding that gets closer to doubling its resources," Harding said. "Because obviously, given the cost of living, that's not going to happen just through the licence fee. "Over five years, nearly two-and-half million households have dropped out of paying the licence fee, so this needs fixing. It's expensive and unfair on those who pay. If we believe in the universality of the BBC, we need to return to the principle in some form or other that every household pays." Harding also suggested news and current affairs programmes could be opened up to independent producers in an effort to make the BBC more of a "people's platform" and allow more varied thinking while maintaining standards of truth and accuracy. YouTube now second only to BBC as media destination Social media now main source of news in US, research suggests BBC senior staff told to 'step back' from duties following row Lineker to leave BBC sooner than planned after antisemitism row UK broadcasters 'need urgent boost from YouTube' BBC boss vows to tackle Britain's 'crisis of trust'
UPI
37 minutes ago
- UPI
Korea at a crossroads: Two visions of liberation collide
South Korean President Lee Jae-Myung speaks after receiving letters of appointment during a "people's appointment ceremony," which is essentially the inauguration ceremony, at Gwanghwamun square in Seoul on Friday. Photo by Jeon Heon-kyun/Pool/EPA SEOUL, Aug. 20 (UPI) -- On the 80th anniversary of Korea's liberation from Japanese colonial rule, two voices offered radically different interpretations of what a vision for the peninsula should look like. One seeks accommodation with permanent division; the other proclaims unification as a historic calling. In his Liberation Day address, President Lee Jae Myung departed from the long tradition of framing the national destiny around reunification. He declared: "Liberation Day is not only a holiday for the South; it is also a day the North celebrates. ... We will recognize the North's system and will not interfere in its internal affairs." By effectively endorsing a "two-state" reality, Lee signaled that his administration would accept permanent division so long as Pyongyang demanded it. For critics, this was nothing less than an abdication of the historical mission of unification, one that independence fighters saw as inseparable from liberation itself. The dissonance deepened later that evening, when Lee presided over what was billed as a "people's inauguration" in Gwanghwamun. The spectacle was less a unifying celebration than a partisan rally, capped by his controversial pardons of political allies. The controversy over Lee's Liberation Day pardons was sharpened by the identities of those he chose to absolve. Cho Kuk, a former justice minister, was convicted of academic fraud and abuse of power stemming from efforts to secure elite university placements for his daughter. Yoon Mee-hyang, a former lawmaker and activist, was indicted on charges of embezzling funds from a civic group that supported surviving "comfort women" --Korean women forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military during World War II. For many citizens, forgiving such figures on a day meant to honor national sacrifice and liberation struck a jarring note. A day earlier, on Thursday, another vision had been articulated before an international audience in Seoul. Hyun Jin Preston Moon, chairman of the Global Peace Foundation, framed Korea's division as a foreign construct that could -- and must -- be overcome. "Thus, the division of the peninsula was a 'foreign construct' that had nothing to do with the aspirations of the Korean people and their movement for independence and self-determination," he said. "Their dreams and aspirations were brushed aside like a sacrificial pawn on the global chessboard of great powers seeking to shape the future of Northeast Asia." Moon emphasized that North Korea itself already has abandoned unification as a national goal, underscoring the bankruptcy of the regime's vision. "The world should view the DPRK's efforts ... as a feeble effort to gain global legitimacy in pursuing a permanent two-state solution on the peninsula. The only real path to denuclearization is the peaceful unification of the two Koreas," he said. Rather than clinging to a Cold War framework, Moon called on Koreans to recover their ancient mandate of Hongik Ingan -- "to live for the benefit of humanity." He presented the Korean Dream as a unifying vision capable of renewing national identity, overcoming economic and demographic crises, and inspiring the world. "The vision for this new age is the Korean Dream. It will not only engender a rebirth of Korean culture and historical heritage, but reconnect all Koreans to the providential calling of our people rooted in our founding ideals," Moon said. The Korean Dream, he argued, transcends left-right ideological divides by grounding itself in Korea's history and in universal values. It offers a framework not only to heal the wounds of division, but also to address the internal crises facing both North and South -- from the South's demographic collapse and overreliance on export-driven conglomerates to the North's political repression, poverty and isolation. By providing a common vision that speaks to both sides of the 38th parallel, it holds the potential to overcome obstacles that ideology and power politics have failed to resolve. Concluding his address, Moon underscored the gravity of the moment: "We live at a historic crossroads in a time when the fate of the peninsula and our people lie in our hands. ... I believe that divine providence is guiding us to undo the mistakes of the past and lead our people to the promised land of unification centered upon the Korean Dream." A shifting global order Korea today stands at a decisive inflection point. The U.S.-led liberal order that shaped the post-Cold War era is being remade. Under President Donald Trump, Washington has reasserted economic nationalism, redrawing trade rules and demanding fairer burden-sharing from allies. For a nation like South Korea, where exports account for nearly half of gross domestic product, U.S. tariffs and global supply-chain realignments strike at the heart of its economic model. At the same time, China's slowdown and mounting confrontation with the United States leave Seoul with shrinking room to maneuver. Compounding these external pressures is an internal crisis: the world's lowest fertility rate, the erosion of the traditional family structure and an export-driven economy still dominated by a handful of conglomerates. Without a new animating vision, Korea risks demographic decline, economic stagnation and growing irrelevance in the face of global upheaval. Beyond old ideologies Against this backdrop, Lee's decision to legitimize permanent division appears out of step with the scale of the challenges. It reflects the lingering habits of South Korea's progressive camp -- approaching the North through a lens of coexistence while ignoring the deeper shifts transforming the international system. Yet, what Korea needs today is not an outdated ideological posture, but a forward-looking national purpose that can unite its people, rally allies and meet a rapidly changing world. The Korean Dream offers such a vision. It ties the nation's destiny not to resignation or division, but to renewal -- a chance to overcome historical wounds, restore national unity and provide a model of reconciliation for the world. Eighty years after liberation, the true vision for the Korean people remains contested. Whether Korea's future is defined by resignation to division or by a bold embrace of unification will determine not only its national destiny, but also its standing in the world.
