Main points and omissions in G20 communique
Here are the key points the finance ministers and central bank governors agreed on during a two-day meeting in the coastal city of Durban, South Africa, as well as which policy areas were omitted.
The communique highlighted the uncertainty in the global economy caused by conflicts, trade tensions, supply chain disruptions, high debt levels, and frequent extreme weather events and natural disasters.
It also affirmed the commitment of central banks to ensure price stability, stating, "central bank independence is crucial to achieving this goal."
The finance chiefs stressed the importance of multilateral cooperation, recognising the World Trade Organisation (WTO) role in advancing trade issues and maintaining agreed-upon rules as part of the global trading system.
However, they acknowledged the WTO's challenges, calling for "meaningful, necessary, and comprehensive reform."
The finance chiefs said they were committed to addressing debt vulnerabilities in low- and middle-income countries, including a commitment to further strengthen the implementation of the G20 Common Framework in a "predictable, timely, orderly, and coordinated manner."
Launched in late 2020, the G20 Common Framework is a platform that aimed to enable debt restructuring on a case-by-case basis and get overstretched countries back on their feet. But progress has been slow.
"We furthermore call for enhanced debt transparency from all stakeholders, including private creditors," the communique said.
While the communique referred to "extreme weather events and natural disasters" as economic challenges, it did not explicitly address climate change.
It also contained no mentions of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, long a point of division for the group, nor the conflicts involving Israel and Hamas in Gaza. Instead, the communique mentioned "ongoing wars and conflicts" without elaborating.
The word tariff did not appear in the commmunique, which instead referred to "trade tensions."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
5 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why Afghan data breach cover-up is a genuine scandal
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The scandal that landed last week over the cover-up of a massive data breach of not only tens of thousands of potential Afghan refugees but also British intelligence agents and special forces personnel will run deeper and longer than the headlines and outrage it generated. We have come to expect significant data breaches, be they through incompetence and error of administrators, the criminal exploits of organised crime or political agents of foreign powers intent on bringing down our democratic freedoms. What continues to shock many people, however, is when the politicians and officials we expect to look after our interests go to extraordinary lengths to cover-up their failures, be they innocent or guilty of the original misjudgment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Our political class appears to find no difficulty in being prepared to sign-off not just millions or even hundreds of millions – but billions of pounds to make problems we were not even aware of appear to go away. Large numbers of Afghans fled the country when Western forces withdrew and the Taliban took over Kabul in 2021 (Picture: Master Sgt Donald Allen/US Air Forces Europe-Africa) | U.S. Air Forces Europe-Africa vi Democratic scrutiny denied As if that is not a scandalous enough breach of public trust, some politicians then travel down the road of using legal processes such as super-injunctions to prevent public knowledge of their department's administrative failure to protect them from political embarrassment. The use of a super-injunction means the reporting of the actual injunction itself is not possible – so only a limited few are aware of the scandal and the legal cover-up that has taken place. It means the ordinary democratic processes of public scrutiny and accountability are automatically denied and the democratic order of making elected representatives responsible for their judgments and actions is bypassed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One might think the natural order of actions having consequences in a democracy would be restored when there is a change of government but, as is so often the case, the poor decisions of previous governments are very often picked up by new administrations who see there is advantage in continuing with the same approach as they too might suffer some blow-back and might want to avail themselves of the same secret protections. Veterans at risk To sum up, when the real life-threatening failure for many of sending personal data to the wrong person was discovered, a conspiracy between ruling politicians, government officials and then opposition politicians who became the new rulers resulted in several billions being committed to accepting 25,000-30,000 refugee applicants into our country. The possibility that some of those might actually not be who they appeared to be, but have criminal histories and intentions or be agents of terrorist groups cannot be discounted. Meanwhile the new government, aided by many activist lawyers working through lawfare, take it upon themselves to instigate processes that put our veterans at risk of prosecution and spend a great deal less on veterans' welfare such as housing. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Unsurprisingly, these revelations have led to recriminations about the role of some previously respected politicians who were thought to be on the side of veterans and seen as hawks in the pursuit of protecting our all-too-porous borders. Politicians such as the former Secretaries of State for Defence, Ben Wallace and Grant Shapps, have been forced to justify their actions at the time. Of course, when a scandal breaks under the pressures of competitive politics, naïve confusion and wilful misrepresentation abounds. Some politicians who were not in office at the time and had no responsibility for a particular error – such as the application for a super-injunction or the establishment of potentially costly refugee schemes that could be open to abuse – are smeared by the accusations and recriminations. Super-injunction may have backfired Establishing a timeline of when decisions were taken, whom they were taken by and what the consequences were becomes crucial in determining if the policies pursued were justifiable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In the case of the mistaken release of data, there is now good reason to believe the pursuit of the super-injunction – while thought at the time to be necessary to protect lives – only served to elevate the importance of the data and make it more valuable to the Taliban. Sadly this type of misjudgment without consequences is all too prevalent in British establishment circles. We should recall how in June 2021, Angus Lapsley, a British official, left behind classified Ministry of Defence documents at a bus stop in Kent. They were found by a member of the public, dripping wet from the rain and handed in to the BBC. The papers included PowerPoint presentations and e-mails that revealed sensitive military recommendations regarding the UK's military presence in Afghanistan; details about the British military's response to Russia's reaction to HMS Defender's passage through disputed Ukrainian waters; further plans for a possible UK military presence in Afghanistan; details of service numbers around Kabul and arms export campaigns. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lapsley was not dismissed or prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act but had his security clearance suspended and was redeployed to the Foreign Office. Yet this year he was appointed Britain's permanent representative to Nato. In contrast, another senior civil servant, Richard Jackson, was fined £2,500 under the Act for leaving sensitive papers about al-Qaeda on a train in 2008. Politicians must trust public Cover-ups and sometimes consequence-free misjudgments appear all too easy in our parliaments. If our political discourse and decision-making – including whom we choose to elect – is to improve, then we need to be better informed. Treating the public as children rather than adults only ever results in child-like behaviours and outcomes. For our people to make considered choices and be able to trust our politicians requires far more trust in the public from the politicians themselves. When Prime Ministers make promises before general elections, they should be expected to do everything in their power to deliver them – or learn not to make pledges they cannot keep. When politicians fail, they should be ready to accept responsibility, and only those that do should be given the opportunity for redemption – rather than shielding those who have hidden the truth from us for years and even decades.
Reuters
6 minutes ago
- Reuters
Gold hits five-week high as dollar, yields ease; spotlight on trade
July 21 (Reuters) - Gold prices gained over 1% to hit a five-week high on Monday as the dollar and U.S. bond yields weakened amid uncertainty ahead of a U.S. deadline of August 1 for countries to strike trade deals with Washington or face more tariffs. Spot gold was up 1.5% at $3,398.23 per ounce at 12:12 p.m. ET (1612 GMT), hitting its highest since June 17. U.S. gold futures were up 1.6% at $3,410.40. The U.S. dollar index (.DXY), opens new tab was down 0.7%, making dollar-denominated gold more affordable for buyers using other currencies, while benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yields hit a more than one-week low. "With the August 1st deadline looming, it brings a level of uncertainty to the market and that certainly is supportive," said David Meger, director of metals trading at High Ridge Futures. The European Union is exploring a broader set of possible counter-measures against the U.S. as prospects for an acceptable trade agreement with Washington fade, according to EU diplomats. On the interest rate front, traders are pricing about a 59% chance of a rate cut by the U.S. Federal Reserve in September, according to the CME FedWatch Tool, opens new tab. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the entire Federal Reserve needed to be examined as an institution. Talk of earlier-than-expected U.S. rate cuts is building, with speculation around a possible replacement of Fed Chair Jerome Powell and reshaping of the Fed adding to market jitters, Meger said. Gold is considered a hedge against uncertainty and tends to perform well in a low interest rate environment. Data showed the world's leading gold consumer, China, brought in 63 metric tons of the precious metal last month, the lowest amount since January. Its imports of platinum in June fell 6.1% from the prior month. Spot silver gained 2% to $38.94 per ounce, platinum also rose 2% to $1,449.65 and palladium was 2.3% higher at $1,269.64.
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
FTSE 100 ends day above 9,000 points for first time
European stocks ended mixed on Monday, as investors anxiously await developments on tariff talks, with an August 1 deadline nearing. The FTSE 100 index closed up 20.87 points, 0.2%, at 9,012.99, ending a day above the 9,000 points threshold for the first time. It failed to set a new intraday high on Monday, however. The FTSE 250 closed up 114.20 points, 0.5%, at 22,012.46, and the AIM All-Share closed down 1.90 points, 0.3%, at 770.88. In European equities on Monday, the CAC 40 in Paris lost 0.3%, while the DAX 40 in Frankfurt edged up 0.1%. 'The latest news on tariffs is mixed. Over the weekend US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said that he hoped a trade agreement would be reached between the US and the EU, but that the August 1 deadline was hard, although no previous deadline from the US has been that hard so far,' XTB analyst Kathleen Brooks said. 'Early on Monday the news was less positive, with reports suggesting that the new universal tariff on all EU goods will be above the current rate of 10% with fewer exemptions. Voices are also getting louder in the EU about retaliatory measures including new taxes on US tech giants, which could disrupt negotiations even further.' The pound was up at 1.3506 dollars late on Monday afternoon in London, compared with 1.3444 dollars at the equities close on Friday. The euro traded at 1.1711 dollars, against 1.1656 dollars. Against the yen, the dollar was trading down at 147.29 yen compared with 148.48. In New York, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 0.5%, the S&P 500 traded up 0.6% and the Nasdaq Composite added 0.8%. SPI Asset Management analyst Stephen Innes said: 'This week is about managing two ticking clocks: the August 1 tariff deadline and the start of big tech earnings. It's a high-stakes cocktail — part policy roulette, part valuation validation.' The yield on the US 10-year Treasury was quoted at 4.36%, narrowing from 4.42%. The yield on the US 30-year Treasury was quoted at 4.92%, narrowing from 4.99%. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said on Monday that the institution of the Federal Reserve – and whether it has been successful – must be examined, as President Donald Trump escalates pressure on the independent central bank. While Jerome Powell's term as Fed chief ends in May 2026, Mr Trump has recently zoomed in on the Fed's 2.5 billion dollar renovation project as a possible avenue for his ousting. The fresh attacks came after months of criticism aimed at Mr Powell as the central bank held interest rates steady this year, holding off cuts while policymakers monitored the effects of Mr Trump's tariffs. Asked if he would offer his opinion on firing Mr Powell, Mr Bessent told CNBC on Monday: 'I think that what we need to do is examine the entire Federal Reserve institution and whether they have been successful.' On the up in Europe were mining shares. Antofagasta rose 4.7% and Glencore climbed 3.0%. China started building a mega-dam on Saturday on a river running through Tibet and India, with premier Li Qiang attending the commencement ceremony, state media said. Beijing approved the project in December on the river – known as Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet and Brahmaputra in India – linking it to the country's carbon neutrality targets and economic goals in the Tibet region. 'The electricity generated will be primarily transmitted to other regions for consumption, while also meeting local power needs in Tibet,' state news agency Xinhua reported after the groundbreaking ceremony in south-eastern Tibet's Nyingchi. The development boosted iron and steel prices. In Amsterdam, steelmaker ArcelorMittal added 4.4%. Oxford Nanopore rose 19%. It left its full-year outlook unchanged, though revenue was higher than expected in the first half of 2025. The Oxford-based biomedical company focuses on DNA and RNA sequencing technology. It is expecting to report around £105 million in revenue for the six months that ended June 30, up by a quarter from £84.1 million a year prior. This 25% rise is ahead of the company's expectations, it said. Apax Global Alpha rose 18%. It agreed to a 916.5 million euro takeover from Apax Partners. The deal values each Apax Global Alpha share at 1.90 euros, an 18% premium to its closing price on Friday. Elsewhere, Aeorema Communications shot up 15%. It expects profit and revenue for the year to June 30 at the upper end of expectations following a 'transitional year'. The London-based live events agency said it expects revenue of at least £20.4 million for the 12 months that ended June 30, rising at least 0.5% from £20.3 million in financial 2024. Underlying pre-tax profit of no less than £600,000 is anticipated, up at least 37% from £437,000 and surpassing March guidance of £550,000. Chief executive Steve Quah said: 'We are pleased to be trading at the upper end of expectations, with strong revenue, profit and cash performance during what has been a transitional year. Furthermore, our restructuring is progressing well and sets us up to improve margins in 2026 without compromising our creative edge.' The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were Antofagasta, up 88.00p at 1,956.50p, Endeavour Mining, up 90.00p at 2,284.00p, Fresnillo, up 52.00p at 1,497.00p, Anglo American, up 74.00p at 2,307.00p, and Marks & Spencer, up 10.40p at 352.40p. The biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 were BAE Systems, down 39.50p at 1,900.50p, Informa, down 14.20p at 822.40p, Diageo, down 32.00p at 1,897.00p, London Stock Exchange Group, down 175.00p at 10,655.00p, and Haleon, down 4.40p at 354.30p. Tuesday's local corporate calendar has third quarter numbers from contract caterer Compass. The economic calendar has UK public sector net borrowing data. Contributed by Alliance News.
