logo
Donald Trump 'In Denial' About Job Figures, Economy—Nate Silver

Donald Trump 'In Denial' About Job Figures, Economy—Nate Silver

Newsweek7 days ago
Based on factual reporting, incorporates the expertise of the journalist and may offer interpretations and conclusions.
Pollster Nate Silver on Sunday called out President Donald Trump's reaction to the latest data about jobs, accusing him of "denialism" and warning that it won't help him fix the nation's slowing economy.
"Firing the BLS commissioner won't prevent the effects of tariffs. But it will reduce American economic leadership and increase uncertainty for businesses, workers and investors," Silver wrote in his newsletter, referring to Trump's decision to fire Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), after the agency published a weaker-than-expected jobs report for July.
Silver stressed that U.S. economic data remains reliable, as it is meticulously documented and regularly revised "because measuring something as complex as the modern American economy is an incredibly challenging task."
"I'm not sure exactly where firing the BLS commissioner ranks on the list of Trump-related outrages," Silver wrote. "Even if Congress does its job and McEntarfer replaced with another competent successor, this could have a chilling effect on BLS and other government agencies to operate independently."
Newsweek has reached out to the White House by email on Sunday outside of normal business hours for comment.
Why It Matters
Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer has sent shockwaves throughout the country, with economists and Democratic lawmakers criticizing the move. Some have accused Trump of trying to "kill the messenger" over heavy revisions to May and June's job numbers, which removed 258,000 jobs previously announced in those months.
This followed the July jobs report, which reported 73,000 jobs added, which is well short of the projected 100,000 jobs. The unemployment rate also rose to 4.2 percent.
The firing of a high-level labor statistician after the release of adverse economic data raised alarms about the politicization of nonpartisan agencies and reliability of official U.S. economic statistics. Experts and lawmakers stressed that the integrity of the BLS is central to public trust and informed economic decision-making.
What To Know
Silver, the founder of 538 and one of the most prominent polling experts in last year's presidential election, wrote in his newsletter that July's jobs report has suggested a slowing economy and "Trump is in denial about it."
"Each monthly payrolls figure is actually revised three times: once in each of the first two months after initial publication (so July's 73,000 figure will be re-reported in August and then again in September) and then again each January as part of the BLS's annual benchmark revisions," Silver wrote.
He argued that the jobs report often only receives attention at the initial announcement, with politicians and news media treating the figure as a simple "beat" or "bust" factor relative to the initial estimate, and that not enough attention is given to the regular cycle of "large revisions and the difficulties in estimation."
"All of this feels a little too familiar: it's the same thing that happens when news organizations breathlessly report polling data without considering the margin of error and other challenges for surveys," Silver wrote.
He noted that revisions during every month of Trumps' second administration have seen negative revisions, which he wrote is "actually common enough" and that it's more important to look at the trend of revision from month-to-month.
Those trends help experts and analysts understand if they're seeing sampling errors or statistical biases in the numbers, which can occur also in the event of an economy facing "some sort of trauma or disruption."
Silver also wrote that any attempt to undermine Trump would be better executed by reporting the lower estimates instead of revising them down later, since "revisions don't usually get as much media attention as the headline figures," and that "the May and June revisions are relatively pedestrian."
"The largest change ever to an initial jobs figure ever after two months came in March 2020 as the pandemic hit American shores; initially reported as a job loss of 700,000, it was later revised to nearly 1.4 million instead," he wrote.
President Donald Trump departs the White House en route to Bedminster, New Jersey, on August 1 in Washington, D.C.
President Donald Trump departs the White House en route to Bedminster, New Jersey, on August 1 in Washington, D.C.
Andrew Thomas/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images
What People Are Saying
President Donald Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Sunday: "Head of the Bureau of of Labor Statistics did the same thing just before the Presidential Election, when she lifted the numbers for jobs to an all time high. I then won the Election, anyway, and she readjusted the numbers downward, calling it a mistake, of almost one million jobs. A SCAM! She did it again, with another massive 'correction,' and got FIRED! She had the biggest miscalculations in over 50 years."
Trump also wrote on Truth Social on Friday: "McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months. Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative. The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP' despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting 'Kamala' elected – How did that work out? Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put "out to pasture." Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
Ernie Tedeschi, the former head of Yale University's Budget Lab, wrote on X on Friday about McEntarfer's firing: "I've worked closely with Erika. I know of no economist who is more data-focused & devoted to truth in statistics. She never shied from speaking truth to power when the data were disappointing. Nothing would be worse for US credibility than political meddling in our economic data."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ultra-wealthy Illinois Dem gov hits back at Mamdani for declaring billionaires shouldn't exist
Ultra-wealthy Illinois Dem gov hits back at Mamdani for declaring billionaires shouldn't exist

New York Post

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ultra-wealthy Illinois Dem gov hits back at Mamdani for declaring billionaires shouldn't exist

Billionaire Illinois Dem Gov. JB Pritzker on Sunday ripped socialist New York City mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani's contention that people of his net worth shouldn't exist. 'Look, how much money you have doesn't determine what your values are,' Pritzker fired back on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Mamdani had declared shortly after his shock Democratic primary win in June that he that he doesn't want Americans to be allowed to amass billion-dollar fortunes. Advertisement 3 Illinois Dem Gov. JB Pritzker on Sunday defends his progressive bona fides despite being a billionaire. NBC 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality, and ultimately, what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' he told 'Meet the Press' at the time. But Pritzker, an heir to the Hyatt hotel fortune, Sunday rattled off his beliefs in universal healthcare, free public education, democracy and opposition to 'MAGA Republicans' as evidence that he is a legit Democrat. Advertisement 'It does not matter what your income level is. What matters is what your values are. And that's what makes me a Democrat,' the ultra-wealthy pol contended. 3 Leading Big Apple mayoral contender Zohran Mamdani has ripped into the notion that billionaires even exist. James Keivom Pritzker, who has led Illinois since 2019 and is one of the richest politicians in the country, has an estimated net worth of about $3.6 billion, according to Forbes. His fortune stems almost entirely from his family's wealth from its ownership of the Hyatt hotel chain, which was founded by his late uncle, Jay. Some of the gov's wealth comes from other investments, such as the Pritzker Group. Advertisement The Pritzkers have been a fixture on Forbes' 'America's Richest Families' for decades. The Illinois Democrat has donated heavily to the party throughout the years and tapped into his deep pockets for his own runs, having spent an estimated $323 million on his two campaigns for governor. Now he's gearing up to seek a third term — although he hasn't ruled out a 2028 presidential run. 3 Mamdani once floated the idea of the government seizing means of production. James Keivom Advertisement Mamdani's campaign did not respond to a Post request for comment. As with many top Democrats, Pritzker has refrained from backing Mamdani outright. The governor has meanwhile made headlines for welcoming Texas Democrats to Illinois in a bid to disrupt GOP redistricting efforts in the Lone Star State. Pritzker shrugged off Republican attacks on him for being hypocritical, given that his state has one of the most heavily gerrymandered maps in the country. 'What Texas is trying to do is, again, violate the Voting Rights Act. We didn't,' Pritzker claimed. 'We held public hearings, legislative hearings. People attended them. They spoke out. There was a map that was put out. There were actually changes made to the map.' Democrats control 14 of Illinois' 17 congressional seats — or 82%. Former Vice President Kamala Harris won the state in November with 54% of the vote. By comparison, Republicans have 26 of the 38 congressional seats in Texas — or 68%. President Trump won Texas in November with 56% of the vote. Trump is hoping to squeeze another five seats out of Texas through the proposed mid-decade redistricting. Texas Democrats have held up the redistricting effort so far by fleeing the state to stop the state legislature from passing it.

Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'
Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Sunday shrugged off the idea of Vice President Vance being the likely Republican frontrunner for the 2028 presidential elections. 'Neither Trump, nor he nor the Republicans of today have anything of significance to say to working class people,' he said on CNN's State of the Union with Dana Bash. 'Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party,' he added. President Trump said on Tuesday that Vance would be the 'most likely' successor of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) Movement in 2028. 'So it's too early to talk about it, but certainly he's doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point,' Trump said. Bash reminded Sanders that Vance is from a working-class family in Ohio and could appeal to many voters in red states, but Sanders shrugged off the idea that the vice president could be a threat to Democrats in 2028. 'What they are trying to do is divide us up, 'you're a Muslim, you're undocumented, you're black, you're gay, let's divide everybody up so the rich can become richer'. Our job is to bring people together. Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party,' he continued. Trump also said Tuesday that he would 'probably not' try to bridge a third term and touted the idea that Secretary of State Marco Rubio could run alongside Vance as vice president in 2028. In February, Vance was already seen as a favorite successor to Trump in a Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) poll. Sixty-one percent of respondents said they would support Vance as the future of the Republican party. Other Republican politicos and media personalities have been rumored to be thinking about campaigning in 2028, including Secretary Rubio, right-wing influencer Steve Bannon and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Dangerous nostalgia: Trump wants to turn back time
Dangerous nostalgia: Trump wants to turn back time

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Dangerous nostalgia: Trump wants to turn back time

In the 1978 film 'Superman,' the hero performs many impossible feats, including traveling backward in time by flying around Earth at super speed. Donald Trump, who seems to fancy himself an all-powerful Super President, appears eager to go back in time as well in an effort to return America to 'the good old days' of his youth. Trump was born in 1946, eight years after Superman made his comic book debut. Discrimination based on race, sex and other characteristics was widespread and legal. Most schools taught children a whitewashed version of America's story, glossing over racism and largely ignoring the achievements of people of color. Movies usually portrayed Black people as slaves, servants, cowards, criminals or buffoons. Consequently, 'the good old days' for Trump — born rich, white and male — were 'the bad old days' for many people of color, women, LGBT individuals and those not born to wealth and privilege. Obstacles to advancement facing these Americans — among them my Black parents — were far greater than they are today. Trump grew up at a time when white men dominated the ranks of most professions and elected offices far more than they do now. Only about 34 percent of women were in the workforce in 1950, compared with 57 percent today. Key civil rights laws were not enacted until Trump was in his late teens and 20s. They include the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the 1968 Fair Housing Act, which together outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin in federally funded programs, employment, public accommodations, voting and housing. America has made great progress to become a more just and equitable society since Trump was born. But now the president is sparing no effort to roll back that progress and harm millions of Americans. Trump is obsessed with ending programs promoting diversity, equity and inclusion. He has falsely denounced DEI programs as illegal discrimination against white people and men, when in truth they simply open the doors to the American dream a little wider to take advantage of the talents of all Americans. Trump's Department of Education is investigating more than 50 universities for their DEI programs and has cut billions of dollars in federal funding to higher education, prompting schools to end DEI efforts in hopes of restoring aid. Trump has halted DEI programs in the federal government and demanded a halt to DEI in the private sector. The Republican majority on the Federal Communications Commission required that Paramount (parent company of CBS) and the movie studio Skydance agree to not operate DEI programs as a condition for approving the companies' $8 billion merger. The president seems to believe that white Americans — particularly white men — are hired for jobs based on merit, while many people of color and women are less qualified and get into college and jobs primarily because of DEI. He has forced highly qualified federal officials and members of the military who are not white men out of their jobs. Trump fired the chairman of the military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force Gen. CQ Brown, a Black man, after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth vowed to end DEI in the military and claimed Brown placed a higher priority on DEI than on the effectiveness of the armed forces. The first women to head the Coast Guard and the Navy were both forced out of their jobs, as were women who served as the senior military assistant to Hegseth and the head of the Defense Health Agency. Trump successfully pushed Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery, to resign after denouncing her as 'a strong supporter of DEI' and fired Carla Hayden, the first woman and first Black person to head the Library of Congress. The president and the Republican-controlled Congress have turned back the clock on American progress in many other ways. The White House launched a program designed to deport millions of unauthorized immigrants, reminiscent of Operation Wetback, which deported an estimated 1 million people to Mexico in 1954, including some who were in the U.S. legally. The administration is seeking to increase U.S. oil, natural gas and coal production, along with nuclear power generation, by reducing environmental protection regulations imposed starting in the 1970s. Trump and Congress have also cut federal support for renewable energy programs enacted under the Biden administration. Trump has called global warming a Chinese hoax designed 'to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.' The White House and Congress eliminated all $1.1 billion in previously approved funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which was created under a law enacted in 1967 to help fund PBS, NPR and their member stations. The Corporation soon announced that it would be shuttering. Nostalgia is a powerful emotion. It is understandable that Trump has fond memories of growing up rich in a world of white male privilege before most Americans alive today were born. But nostalgia should not drive public policy. Our country has achieved greatness because — until now — our leaders have been focused on the future, rather than fixated on recreating the days of their youth. Christopher Reeve's portrayal of Superman traveling back in time was great entertainment. But it was fantasy. We need a president who accepts reality and works to build an inclusive and equitable future for everyone in our diverse population.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store