Trump's Vietnam trade deal lifts Nike, Under Armour, Levi Strauss shares
After months of negotiations, Trump's trade deal with Vietnam includes a 20% tariff on imports from Vietnam, lower than the initial 46% rate he had announced in April.
Apparel makers have been diversifying production away from China to Vietnam, Cambodia and Indonesia, as Trump's reciprocal tariffs on imports from these countries proposed in April raised concerns over supply chain costs and higher product prices.
'Investors may be looking at this as a sign that many of the threatened tariffs (on Vietnam and other countries) will be rescinded,' Morningstar Research analyst David Swartz said.
The deal also includes a 40% levy on transshipments from third countries. Trump said in a post on Truth Social that Vietnam would provide the U.S. with greater market access, with no tariffs on U.S. exports into Vietnam.
Nike's shares were up nearly 3.6%, Under Armour rose 2.3%, and Levi Strauss gained 1.6%. Shares in Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch were up less than 1%.
According to the company's annual filing, Vietnam manufactured about 50% of the total Nike brand footwear in fiscal 2024. North America is Nike's largest market in terms of revenue.
Tariffs could add about $1 billion to its costs, but Nike expects to fully mitigate the impact over time, it said last week.
Shares of electronics retailer Best Buy were up marginally. The company had factored in Trump's base tariff rate of 10% in its annual forecast in May.
'The transshipping aspect is an important wrinkle, but I'd expect suppliers will quickly move to adjust supply chains to avoid paying that hefty duty,' said Matthew McCartney, analyst at Wedbush Securities.
'Bigger picture, this deal brings clarity to the industry for a critical consumer electronics hub and eliminates some downside risk to Best Buy's outlook.'
The companies — including Nike, Adidas, Puma
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
US-Vietnam trade deal sows new China uncertainty
The Southeast Asian nation has the third-biggest trade surplus with the United States of any country after China and Mexico, and was targeted with one of the highest rates in the US president's "Liberation Day" tariff blitz on April 2. The deal announced Wednesday is the first full pact Trump has sealed with an Asian nation, and analysts say it may give a glimpse of the template Washington will use with other countries still scrambling for accords. The 46 percent rate due to take effect next week has been averted, with Vietnam set to face a minimum 20 percent tariff in return for opening its market to US products including cars. But a 40 percent tariff will hit goods passing through the country to circumvent steeper trade barriers -- a practice called "transshipping". Washington has accused Hanoi of relabelling Chinese goods to skirt its tariffs, but raw materials from the world's number two economy are the lifeblood of Vietnam's manufacturing industries. "From a global perspective, perhaps the most interesting point is that this deal again seems in large part to be about China," said Capital Economics. It said the terms on transshipment "will be seen as a provocation in Beijing, particularly if similar conditions are included in any other deals agreed over coming days". 'The looming question' Shares in clothing companies and sport equipment manufacturers -- which have a large footprint in Vietnam -- rose on news of the deal in New York. But they later declined sharply as details were released. "This is a much better outcome than a flat 46 percent tariff, but I wouldn't celebrate just yet," said Hanoi-based Dan Martin of Asian business advisory firm Dezan Shira & Associates. "Everything now depends on how the US decides to interpret and enforce the idea of transshipment," he added. "If the US takes a broader view and starts questioning products that use foreign parts, even when value is genuinely added in Vietnam, it could end up affecting a lot of companies that are playing by the rules." Vietnam's government said in a statement late on Wednesday that under the deal the country had promised "preferential market access for US goods, including large-engine cars". But the statement gave scant detail about the transshipment arrangements in the deal, which Trump announced on his Truth Social platform. Bloomberg Economics forecast Vietnam could lose a quarter of its exports to the United States in the medium term, endangering more than two percent of its gross domestic product as a result of the agreement. Uncertainty over how transshipping will be "defined or enforced" is likely to have diplomatic repercussions, said Bloomberg Economics expert Rana Sajedi. "The looming question now is how China will respond," she said. "Beijing has made clear that it would respond to deals that came at the expense of Chinese interests." "The decision to agree to a higher tariff on goods deemed to be 'transshipped' through Vietnam may fall in that category," added Sajedi.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Trump's tax bill struggles to gain GOP support in late-night session
House Republicans were straining past midnight to advance President Donald Trump's tax and spending cuts package, after GOP leaders spent the afternoon and evening working furiously to persuade sceptical holdouts to send it to his desk by the Fourth of July deadline. The roll call vote that started late on Wednesday was held open for hours as several Republicans refused to give their votes. With few to spare from their slim majority, the outcome was in jeopardy. House Speaker Mike Johnson had recalled lawmakers to Washington, eager to seize on the momentum of the bill's passage the day before in the Senate, and he vowed to press ahead. 'Everybody wants to get to yes,' Johnson said during an interview on Fox News as the voting was underway. But as voting stalled Trump lashed out in a midnight post: 'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove???' He also warned of political fallout from the delay: 'Costing you votes!!!' The idea of quickly convening for a vote on the more than 800-page bill was a risky gambit, one designed to meet Trump's demand for a holiday finish. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way, often succeeding by the narrowest of margins — just one vote. Their slim 220-212 majority leaves little room for defections. Several Republicans are balking at being asked to rubber-stamp the Senate version less than 24 hours after passage. A number of moderate Republicans from competitive districts have objected to the Senate bill's cuts to Medicaid, while conservatives have lambasted the legislation as straying from their fiscal goals. It falls to Johnson and his team to convince them that the time for negotiations is over. They will need assistance from Trump to close the deal, and lawmakers headed to the White House for a two-hour session on Wednesday to talk to the president about their concerns. Republicans are relying on their majority hold of Congress to push the package over a wall of unified Democratic opposition. No Democrats voted for the bill in the Senate and none were expected to do so in the House. 'Hell no!' said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, flanked by fellow Democrats outside the Capitol. In an early warning sign of Republican resistance, a resolution setting up terms for debating Trump's bill barely cleared the House Rules Committee on Wednesday morning. As soon as it came to the full House, it stalled out as GOP leadership waited for lawmakers who were delayed coming back to Washington and conducted closed-door negotiations with holdouts. By nightfall, as pizzas and other dinners were arriving at the Capitol, the next steps were uncertain. Trump pushes Republicans to do 'the right thing' The bill would extend and make permanent various individual and business tax breaks from Trump's first term, plus temporarily add new ones he promised during the 2024 campaign. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 (€5,000) deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 (€64,000) a year. In all, the legislation contains about $4.5 trillion (€3.8tn) in tax cuts over 10 years. The bill also provides about $350 billion (€297bn) for defence and Trump's immigration crackdown. Republicans partially pay for it all by less spending on Medicaid and food assistance. The Congressional Budget Office projects the bill will add about $3.3 trillion (€1.8tn) to the federal debt over the coming decade. The House passed its version of the bill in May by a single vote, despite worries about spending cuts and the overall price tag. Now it's being asked to give final passage to a version that, in many respects, exacerbates those concerns. The Senate bill's projected impact on the nation's debt, for example, is significantly higher. 'Let's go Republicans and everyone else,' Trump said in a late evening post. Speaker Johnson is intent on meeting Trump's timeline and betting that hesitant Republicans won't cross the president because of the heavy political price they would have to pay. They need only look to Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina, who announced his intention to vote against the legislation over the weekend. Soon, the president was calling for a primary challenger to the senator and criticising him on social media. Tillis quickly announced he would not seek a third term. Democrats target vulnerable Republicans to join them in opposition Flanked by nearly every member of his caucus, Democratic Leader Jeffries of New York delivered a pointed message: With all Democrats voting 'no', they only need to flip four Republicans to prevent the bill from passing. Jeffries invoked the 'courage' of the late Senator John McCain giving a thumbs-down to the GOP effort to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, and singled out Republicans from districts expected to be highly competitive in 2026, including two from Pennsylvania. 'Why would Rob Bresnahan vote for this bill? Why would Scott Perry vote for this bill?' Jeffries asked. Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that Medicaid cuts would result in lives lost and food stamp cuts would be 'literally ripping the food out of the mouths of children, veterans and seniors,' Jeffries said Monday. Republicans say they are trying to right-size the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and applies existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to more beneficiaries. States will also pick up more of the cost for food benefits. The driving force behind the bill, however, is the tax cuts. Many expire at the end of this year if Congress doesn't act. The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 (€127) tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 (€1,480) tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 (€9,290) tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired.
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
'Trump's diplomacy, hastily and wrongly labeled as isolationist, is interventionist'
Donald Trump does not claim to be an expert on the conflict between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), but he knows two things about it: "They were going at it for many years, and with machetes." While not inaccurate, the oversimplification, which featured in his statement on Friday, June 27, to salute the peace deal the United States had brokered between the two countries, was somewhat glib for a war that has killed several million people over nearly 30 years, and not just with machetes. In reality, the US president knows at least two other things about the region, both of which largely explain his unexpected involvement in the negotiations: It is rich in critical minerals, and China is heavily invested there. Trump's style of diplomacy, which has been hastily and wrongly labeled as isolationist, has been active, messy and interventionist, including where it is least expected. His "peace through strength" concept is, in practice, a deal-making style of diplomacy: Diplomacy as conducted by a handful of the president's trusted agents, in which economic objectives play a significant role and a style which does not rule out the use of force, as seen with the strikes against Iran. It is a diplomatic policy of ceasefires far more than it is one of just and lasting peace agreements. The US president has, admittedly, stayed stuck on the two major issues he had promised to resolve upon his return to the White House – Ukraine and Gaza – but, in the meantime, his envoys have been busy on all fronts. His loyal ally Steve Witkoff, who, like Trump, comes from the New York real estate world, has had a lot on his plate: Gaza, Ukraine, Russia, Iran. Staged events More conventionally, General Keith Kellogg, who is officially in charge of Ukraine, recently made a trip to Minsk, where he secured the release of 14 political prisoners from dictator Alexander Lukashenko, a vassal of Vladimir Putin, including the opposition leader Siarhei Tsikhanouski, who was unrecognizable after five years in prison. More than 1,000 others remain in Belarusian jails, being just as mistreated as Tsikhanouski had been, and it is unclear whether Kellogg's intervention will lead to any further releases.
