logo
The WNBA Has a Good Problem on Its Hands

The WNBA Has a Good Problem on Its Hands

The Atlantic28-07-2025
For the first time in the nearly three-decade history of U.S. professional women's basketball, its star players have become household names. What would it take for them to get paid accordingly?
While warming up recently for the WNBA All-Star Game, players wore T-shirts that read Pay Us What You Owe Us, in reference to the ongoing collective-bargaining negotiations between the players and the league. Until that point, there had not been much buzz about the WNBA's negotiations, but the shirts had their intended result, taking the players' labor fight mainstream. As the WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert presented the All-Star Game MVP award to Napheesa Collier, fans inside Indianapolis's Gainbridge Fieldhouse booed Engelbert and chanted, 'Pay them!'
Outside the arena, however, the reaction was more mixed. As the WNBA became a trending topic on X and national pundits began to weigh in, many turned out to not share the perspective of the fans at the game. Dan Hollaway, a co-host of the podcast Drinkin' Bros, posted on X that the players should actually be paying back the team owners, given the league's unprofitability: 'Ladies, you owe, not the other way around.' Another post critical of the players' efforts was viewed nearly 40 million times. 'Imagine being an employee at a company that has NEVER turned a profit and showing up to work in these shirts,' Jason Howerton wrote.
Many critics cited a New York Post article from last October reporting that, despite the WNBA's explosive growth in 2024—which was punctuated by the arrival of the Indiana Fever sensation Caitlin Clark—the league was expected to lose $40 million that year. A source close to the situation told the Post that the NBA, which owns a large share of the women's league, was antsy about the WNBA's unprofitability.
The timing of the Post 's report was interesting. It came three days before the WNBA players' union announced that it was opting out of the current collective-bargaining agreement. To some degree, this is part of the gamesmanship that takes place whenever there is labor tension between players and owners. During the 2011 NBA lockout, owners claimed that they were on track to lose $300 million that season and had suffered similar losses since 2005. Further analysis showed that this wasn't true, and that the league was in fact profitable.
Jemele Hill: The one downside of gender equality in sports
To be fair, claims that the WNBA has been unable to turn a profit during its 28 years of existence are more credible. Over that time frame, NBA owners have indeed spent a considerable amount of money to keep the league afloat. But that spending wasn't charity; it was an investment. And the investment is very clearly about to pay off.
The 30 NBA team owners own 42 percent of the WNBA; another 42 percent is controlled by private WNBA ownership, and the remaining 16 percent belongs to an investment group that stimulated a $75 million capital infusion in 2022. Among the notable names in that investment group are former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, The Boston Globe CEO Linda Henry, and Michael and Susan Dell.
The capital raise was so big because investors could see what was coming. The WNBA's profile had already been growing steadily. Then came Clark, whose presence—and rivalry with fellow rising star Angel Reese, of the Chicago Sky—is poised to financially elevate the WNBA beyond anyone's expectations.
Last year set popularity records for the WNBA across the board, and the growth shows no signs of slowing. In 2024, ESPN, the league's primary television partner, saw a 170 percent boost in viewership. Overall ratings are up by 23 percent this year. Ticket sales are up 26 percent, and merchandise sales have increased by 40 percent.
The most important figure is $2.2 billion. That's the value of the 11-year media-rights deal that the WNBA secured last year, which starts in 2026. It includes partnerships with Disney (ESPN's parent company), Prime Video, and NBC Universal. The league also signed a separate deal with Ion Television to air games on Friday nights. Terms weren't disclosed, but reports speculated that between the two deals, the WNBA has a media package worth close to $3 billion over the next decade.
This colossal source of revenue helps explain the immense valuations of WNBA franchises.
The WNBA will add five expansion teams by 2030. Owners in the three cities that have so far been awarded a franchise—Detroit, Philadelphia, and Cleveland—paid a fee of $250 million each to join the league. Ten of the existing 13 WNBA teams are valued at $200 million or more. The Golden State Valkyries top the list, at an estimated $500 million. The Valkyries, which in 2023 became the WNBA's first expansion team in 17 years, are the first women's professional sports team to ever be valued that high. They also lead the league in attendance—a sign that the sport's popularity doesn't depend on Clark.
Alex Kirshner: Caitlin Clark is just the beginning
With such outsize growth happening across the league, the fact that WNBA players currently receive a mere 9.3 percent of the league's total revenue is embarrassing. (That works out to about $78,000 for Clark and a bit less for Reese, who are still on their rookie contracts, and just over $249,000 for the league's highest-paid veterans.) By comparison, players in the NBA, the NHL, and the NFL all receive about half of their league's sports-related income. Even in the Ultimate Fighting Championship—which has a nasty history of underpaying its fighters—the athletes receive 16 to 20 percent of the revenue. The WNBA isn't yet as big as those leagues, and its players have never said they should be paid as much as Patrick Mahomes or LeBron James. Their argument is only that they deserve a similar proportion of the revenue generated by their labor.
Every professional sports league has experienced financial ups and downs, but that has never stopped the players from demanding and receiving more. The NBA was in such bad shape in the late 1960s and early '70s that teams had to pool together money to subsidize the salaries of the league's top players, including Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Elvin Hayes. Heading into the early '80s, the league's future was precarious because of rampant drug problems among players and low television ratings. The arrival of Magic Johnson and Larry Bird helped change all of that.
In every sports league, players have had to fight for their worth. At 28 years old, the WNBA is arguably in better shape than the NBA was at the same juncture. As the league grows, the players' salaries should be growing right along with it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WNBA trade deadline is Thursday. Will Indiana Fever make any moves?
WNBA trade deadline is Thursday. Will Indiana Fever make any moves?

Indianapolis Star

time16 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

WNBA trade deadline is Thursday. Will Indiana Fever make any moves?

PHOENIX – For the first time in a few years, it has been a slightly active WNBA trade deadline. Trades are notoriously hard to make midseason in the WNBA because of the hard salary cap. Teams are already juggling with limited money, as players' salary demands are expanding at a higher rate than the salary cap, and franchises have no option to go over the cap unless there is a hardship situation. Still, there have been two trades so far in the week leading up to the trade deadline: the Dallas Wings traded guard DiJonai Carrington to the Minnesota Lynx in exchange for Diamond Miller and Karlie Samuelson and the Washington Mystics traded All-Star Brittney Sykes to Seattle in exchange for Alysha Clark, Zia Cooke and a 2026 first-round pick. Now, the deadline is coming up 3 p.m., Thursday. And it seems like the Indiana Fever are going to stay where they're at in their roster construction. The biggest indication Indiana would likely stand pat was the decision to sign forward Chloe Bibby to a rest-of-season deal on Aug. 1. Bibby came to Indiana on July 25 on a seven-day contract, and the Fever could have signed her for up to three seven-day deals this season. If the Fever were to have signed Bibby to another seven-day contract on Aug. 1, they would have had a lot more flexibility in possible trade options or roster space. They could have waived her at any point in that seven-day contract with no repercussions if they wanted to make a trade. A seven-day contract would have also given them more cap space to work with. But Indiana decided to sign Bibby to a rest-of-season contract in the week leading up to the trade deadline, guaranteeing her prorated $23,322 (per Her Hoop Stats) for the rest of the season. Bibby fit what the Fever needed, too, and what they would have likely tried to trade for if they decided to be active at the deadline. Indiana has been struggling with post depth this season, with Damiris Dantas and Makayla Timpson going in and out of the rotation, Brianna Turner playing sparingly and DeWanna Bonner leaving the team after nine games. Bibby is a stretch four, able to shoot 3-pointers and space out the floor. The Fever were able to get her for a low price with the prorated minimum. By signing Bibby they filled their final open roster spot. They could waive her in the event of a trade and just eat the cost of her contract, like the Wings did with Teaira McCowan or the Mystics did with Sika Kone. But then why sign Bibby to a rest-of-season contract instead of a second seven-day in the first place? The Fever don't have many trade assets, either, that they would be willing to give up. The only players under contract past 2025 are Aliyah Boston, Caitlin Clark and Timpson, and the first two are completely untouchable. Timpson has potential and is under contract through 2028, but she doesn't have much trade value as she plays limited minutes. All other players would be seen as rentals to potential trade partners, as they're going to be free agents at the end of the season. Indiana has found success with this roster, even with Clark on the sidelines, in recent weeks. The Fever have won five of seven coming out of the All-Star break, and they're looking like the contenders everyone thought they would be in the preseason.

Celtics linked to $97 million Nets big man Nic Claxton amid roster reshuffle
Celtics linked to $97 million Nets big man Nic Claxton amid roster reshuffle

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Celtics linked to $97 million Nets big man Nic Claxton amid roster reshuffle

Celtics linked to $97 million Nets big man Nic Claxton amid roster reshuffle originally appeared on The Sporting News The Boston Celtics continue to retool their roster following Jayson Tatum's torn Achilles in the Eastern Conference semifinals. Facing looming financial constraints and a potential gap year, the team sent Jrue Holiday to the Portland Trail Blazers for Anfernee Simons — though Simons may still be rerouted on his expiring contract. Boston also dealt Kristaps Porzingis for Georges Niang, who was later sent to the Utah Jazz. Additionally, the Celtics lost Luke Kornet and are widely expected to lose Al Horford in free agency. With Chris Boucher, Neemias Queta and Luka Garza as their primary options at center, Boston is likely to pursue further frontcourt upgrades. MORE: NBA writer offers trade update on Celtics' $45 million sharpshooter Sam Hauser Brandon Austin of Pro Football & Sports Network labeled Brooklyn Nets center Nic Claxton as a trade candidate, suggesting he could be on the move in Brooklyn's rebuilding effort. 'The Brooklyn Nets are clearly in rebuilding mode, evidenced by a disappointing 26-26 finish last season,' he wrote. 'Despite being a key defensive anchor, Nic Claxton could eventually find himself outside the team's long-term rebuild strategy, which prioritizes draft capital.' Given Boston's urgent need for frontcourt help, Claxton could be a strong fit. The Celtics already have offensive weapons and don't require a high-scoring center. The 26-year-old is also under contract through the 2027-28 season, and he'd provide stability if the team is forced to navigate the 2025-26 campaign without Tatum. Claxton averaged 10.3 points, 7.4 rebounds, 2.2 assists and 1.4 blocks across 26.9 minutes per game in 70 regular-season appearances in the 2024-25 campaign. His defensive presence and athleticism would be an intriguing addition for Boston amid its roster reshuffle. MORE NBA NEWS: NBA writer eyes Bucks as trade destination for Hawks star Trae Young Giannis Antetokounmpo tops Eastern Conference player rankings for 2025-26 season Warriors could target shooting guard upgrade in Jonathan Kuminga sign-and-trade Star guard Tyrese Maxey breaks down blueprint for Sixers' success ahead of 2025-26 season Knicks weighing backcourt options as free agency decision looms

Nets display how scouting department approached 2025 NBA Draft
Nets display how scouting department approached 2025 NBA Draft

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nets display how scouting department approached 2025 NBA Draft

The Brooklyn Nets went into the 2025 NBA Draft with an interesting strategy as they found a way to get five first-round picks and use all of them in the same class. Brooklyn seems to be sold on rebuilding the franchise through the Draft and understandably so, but the Nets' content team showed what the conversations were like behind the scenes. "One of our slogans is disagree and commit. That's front and center in our war room. The meaning behind that is that it's healthy to disagree," general manager Sean Marks said during the fourth episode of the team's SCOUT series. The web series has been giving Nets fans a behind-the-scenes look into how Brooklyn's scouting department prepared for the 2025 NBA Draft, including the debates. "It's healthy to debate. If there's no debate and there's no disagreement, then I think something must be wrong," Marks continued. "We've all seen players in different life cycles at different points in their careers and so forth. So, we should be asking ourselves questions of who he reminds me of and, what would I question about that person?" One of the themes that followed the Nets after the conclusion of the 2025 Draft was whether Brooklyn overthought its picks too much or didn't do enough the opportunity they had with multiple first-round picks. The Nets taking guard Egor Demin with the eighth overall pick in the Draft appeared to surprise many people covering the draft, but this episode attempts to explain the thought process behind Brooklyn selecting Demin as high as they did. "You want to see if guys are fighters, if they care about winning as a team, competing as a team, like not just to win a game, but give yourself a chance," Nets head coach Jordi Fernandez said when explaining the general mindset of the team. "That's what competitive is, especially in this world. So, you know, we can see that in players and try to figure it out in different ways." This article originally appeared on Nets Wire: Nets display how scouting department approached 2025 NBA Draft

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store