Lower costs for lifesaving treatment coming to Oregon in 2026
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — Lifesaving cell and gene therapy will be offered at lowered costs to people on the Oregon Health Plan (OHP) in 2026.
The OHP is Oregon's Medicaid program, offering coverage for healthcare services. The implementation of this new cut to costs will help those who are covered under OHP and are seeking treatment for a rare or severe disease.
35 states, including Oregon, applied to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) 'Cell and Gene Therapy Access Model' (CGT), designed to lower costs to patients in need as well as the states offering these services. The plan intends to begin by focusing on sickle cell disease, a condition in which red blood cells are misshapen due to a gene mutation.
OSU falls victim to budget cuts, putting a damper on scientific research
This disease is genetic and disproportionately affects those with African ancestry, with 9 of 10 of those affected by the disease identifying as Black. The condition can cause extreme health difficulties.
Emma Sandoe, Medicaid Director for Oregon Health Authority, said, 'The cost of cell and gene therapies for sickle cell disease is a real barrier that prevents Oregonians from living longer, healthier.'
The CGT program will also help patients in preparation for cell therapy. Before the therapy, patients undergo myeloablative chemotherapy, a process that can affect future fertility. CGT will cover, or drastically reduce the cost of, fertility preservation treatments as well as travel expenses and much more.
'This initiative is a big step forward in promoting innovative treatments and increasing access to lifesaving treatment,' Sandoe said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's how the House GOP's proposed Medicaid cuts could impact Minnesota
Thousands of protestors gathered at the Minnesota State Capitol as part of the nationwide "Hands Off" protests condemning several actions of the Trump administration Saturday, April 5, 2025. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer) Minnesota could lose up the half a billion dollars annually if a GOP-backed tax bill becomes federal law, Minnesota's Medicaid director warned Thursday. That could mean fewer services or tighter restrictions on eligibility, affecting health care for hundreds of thousands of Minnesotans and the hospitals and other providers that treat them. The bill, which has already passed the U.S. House on a 215-214 vote, is still far off from becoming law; Senate Republicans are drafting their own version, and the GOP remains deeply split over how to pay for tax cuts, which is their ultimate goal. For now, the House legislation is the most detailed public plan for how Republicans will fund an extension of President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts, plus a bunch more. The tax cuts passed by the House would decrease federal revenue by about $3.7 trillion over the next ten years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. To offset the loss of income, Republicans want to cut spending by $1.3 trillion, mostly by targeting Medicaid and SNAP, which helps low-income people buy food. (The $2.4 trillion gap between the revenue and spending cuts would be added to the federal debt, which will in turn increase what taxpayers must shell out in interest payments, which have surpassed $1 trillion annually.) Medicaid pays for health care for the elderly, low-income and disabled. The cost is shared between states and the federal government; last year, Minnesota spent $18 billion on Medical Assistance, which is Minnesota's version of Medicaid. The federal government covered $11 billion of that. More than 1.2 million Minnesotans rely on Medical Assistance, and deep cuts would cause 'serious harm' to Minnesotans, said John Connolly, Minnesota's Medicaid director. 'Our position at the Minnesota Department of Human Services is that the bill currently on the table is inefficient, ineffective and fundamentally unfair,' Connolly said during a press briefing. Minnesota is already grappling with how to pay for care for an aging population as health care costs continue to rise. The state Legislature made $270 million in cuts to Medical Assistance this year, as spending on the program has risen faster than tax revenues. DHS estimates that if the U.S. House tax bill were to become law, the state would lose out on $500 million per year. The bill would cause between 152,000 and 253,000 Minnesotans to lose health insurance, according to Kaiser Family Foundation. It would also push costs onto state and local governments, Connolly said, by requiring county and tribal governments to verify participants' eligibility twice as often as they do now, and increasing the administrative burden for the state. The largest chunk of the possible cuts to Minnesota comes from a provision that would reduce Medicaid reimbursements for states that subsidize health insurance for undocumented people. The Legislature voted this week to remove eligibility of undocumented adults for MinnesotaCare, a state- and federally-funded health insurance program for the working poor that is separate from Medical Assistance. As long as undocumented children remain eligible for MinnesotaCare — and if the House language becomes law — Minnesota would still have its federal funding cut by about $330 million, according to DHS. Senate Republicans are wary of deep Medicaid cuts, and are instead expected to target SNAP, the New York Times reported Thursday. The Senate has not yet introduced its version of the tax bill. A proposal to shift 25% of federal SNAP benefit costs onto states would shift up to $220 million annual cost to Minnesota, according to the state Department of Youth and Family Services. More than 440,000 Minnesotans rely on SNAP benefits, according to DCYF. More than one-third are children, 18% are seniors and 14% are adults with a disability. If these federal cost shifts and cuts become law, the Minnesota Legislature would likely be forced to return to St. Paul for a special session to either raise taxes, cut services or move money around to fulfill lawmakers' constitutional obligation to balance the budget.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Local families meet with legislators, advocating against Medicaid cuts
WASHINGTON, D.C. (WJW) – Local families are among dozens from across the country at the nation's capital on Thursday meeting with lawmakers to advocate against budget cuts to Medicaid. Mia Wilson, 14, of New Franklin, is in Washington with her family where they met with Senators Bernie Moreno, Jon Husted as well as Representatives Amelia Sykes and Michael Rulli. As FOX 8 shared on Friday, Wilson was born with a critical heart defect and on more than one occasion there were concerns she might not survive. She continues to endure daily breathing treatments along with other procedures. Her mother said Mia takes 40 doses of medication each day, totaling thousands of dollars a month. More than 400,000 Ohioans see driver's license suspensions lifted under new law Although her family has health insurance, she has also been helped through Medicaid. After meeting with legislators on Thursday, her mother said she believes Mia's story made an impression. 'I'm actually very surprised at the amount of time that the representatives and the senators have given us. They are obviously very, very busy and it's just been great,' said her mother, Wendy. Also in Washington representing Akron Children's Hospital is two-year-old Amaiyah Hill of Twinsburg. Amaiyah accidentally swallowed baby oil when she was being bathed at home. Complications resulted in an extended hospital stay, during which it was at one time believed she would need a double lung transplant. She was able to have access to the care she needed because of Medicaid. On Thursday, her mother, Stephanie Hill, sharing her heartwarming, inspirational story and 'triumph' with Ohio's senators and Representative Sykes. 'I am telling them to do whatever they can to keep Medicaid. It's extremely important to a lot of families in this country,' she said. The U.S. House of Representatives has already passed the budget bill which now resides in the Senate. There is pressure from the president for lawmakers to sign off on what he has called his 'big, beautiful bill' But the Children's Hospital Association, which has organized Family Advocacy Day for the past 20 years, hopes legislators are also paying attention to what their constituents are saying. 'The executive branch plays a key roll here for sure, but what I would love for lawmakers to do is really to listen critically to the children that have shared their stories. They are sharing stories of survival, their stories of resilience and hope and I really would hope that they'd be able to carry that forward when they're having these important discussions,' said Dr. Torey Mack, the organization's chief medical officer. They are also advocating for specific provisions within the program. On Friday, Chris Gessner, the CEO of Akron Children's Hospital, said as much as 54% of the hospital's patients benefit from Medicaid and the proposed cuts would be devastating. 'From my perspective, we understand the need to balance the budget and be responsible with resources, but we really don't want to see that done by cutting into the future of our country, our kids health,' said Gessner. Local OVI checkpoint planned after several arrests FOX 8 also reached out to Husted, who responded with a statement: 'We need to save Medicaid. And saving Medicaid means you have to make it financially sustainable. We want to make sure that children, people with disabilities and the people who are really in need have this program available to them. To do that, able-bodied, healthy Americans without dependents have to give back to their communities in return for the benefits they're getting. America has a $36 trillion national debt, so we have to be smart about finding savings in order to protect these programs.' Families were also expected to meet with Representative Shontel Brown of Cleveland who, in an earlier news conference, said she would do everything possible to preserve Medicaid. 'In my state of Ohio, the state government has already said that if these cuts are enacted under state law, they would end the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion in our state. So what does that mean? It means 770,000 people will lose their healthcare. That's an entire congressional district in just one state. This is suffering on a massive scale and it's going to hurt people of all backgrounds,' said Brown. The Children's Hospital Association represents roughly 200 hospitals across the country. Sixty of them sent families to Washington on Thursday where they were also advocating for access to pediatric hospitals, which Gessner said is particularly concerning in many rural areas of the country. They are also advocating for continued support for staffing at children's hospitals and support for what they describe as the 'growing youth mental health crisis.' 'What I would say is that children really are key to our future, so when we think about making cuts, the children shouldn't be on the chopping block. When I say that it's all of our children, they deserve access to care. They deserve a specialized treatment that children's hospitals are able to provide. We really hope to be able to get that across,' said Mack. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Concerns raised over unintentional coverage losses at final Medicaid work requirements hearing
The Sioux Falls One Stop houses offices for several state departments, including Health, Social Services and Revenue. It hosted a hearing for proposed Medicaid expansion work requirements on June 12, 2025. (Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight) More than a dozen people raised concerns and questions about unintentionally separating patients from their health care and other aspects of South Dakota's proposed Medicaid expansion work requirements during the plan's final public hearing Thursday in Sioux Falls. Dana Bacon, state government affairs director at The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, told the state Department of Social Services his organization has 'pretty big concerns' due to the technical problems, costs and unintended loss of coverage that people encountered during attempted work requirements in other states. 'That's going to make individuals, families, systems and communities pay a price for the outcomes,' Bacon said. 'We have a good sense of where this waiver is going, but we still see these problems getting in the way of the stated goal of making sure people get the health care they need.' Written comments about South Dakota's Medicaid expansion work requirements proposal may be submitted by June 18 via email to MedicaidSPA@ with the subject line 'SDCareerLink Public Comment,' or mailed to the Division of Medical Services, Department of Social Services, 700 Governors Drive, Pierre, SD 57501-2291. Other people questioned the need to implement work requirements and expressed concern about a potentially disproportionate impact on tribal members, as well as the potential barrier the plan could create to health care for sick, homeless and older people. Medicaid is government-funded health insurance for people with low incomes. South Dakotans voted in 2022 to expand Medicaid to adults with incomes up to 138% of the poverty level, a decision that allowed the state to capitalize on a 90% federal funding match — funding that could be in jeopardy, pending the outcome of congressional action. Last year, voters passed another constitutional amendment to let the state seek approval from the federal government to impose work requirements on expansion enrollees. The state began drafting its proposal immediately following the end of the state legislative session in March, before debates about potential federally imposed work requirements heated up at the congressional level. Those debates are ongoing. The department only heard from one person at its first hearing in May. The state is also accepting written comments through Wednesday, which will be included in the state's application to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services later this summer. South Dakota's plan would require adult Medicaid recipients to work, train, attend school or serve as a caretaker for a child or elderly or disabled person in their home unless they qualify for an exception. Compliance with the state-level work rules would be reviewed on an annual basis, at the time of Medicaid renewal, rather than at the time of application. The state would not require a set number of hours of work or education time. South Dakota would allow exceptions for people who are: Pregnant or up to 12 months postpartum. Disabled, as determined by the Social Security Administration. Diagnosed with cancer or another serious or terminal medical condition by a physician. In an intensive behavioral health treatment program, hospitalized or living in a nursing home. In an area with unemployment 20% or more above the national average and are exempt from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents. As of last month, 30,542 South Dakotans were covered by the Medicaid expansion. The state estimates 80% of them already work or qualify for an exception. The proposed state-level work requirement would reduce enrollment by an estimated 5-10% in the first year. That would save the Medicaid program between $48.9 million and $71 million in the first year, the department says. Federal action could make SD's Medicaid work requirements 'an exercise in futility,' official says Department officials explained that expansion enrollees would be sent three notices before being removed from Medicaid rolls. People could reapply later if they don't meet work requirements at their renewal time. Heather Petermann, Medicaid director at the department, said people who are seeking treatment for substance use disorder or other mental health disorders outside of intensive treatment programs could obtain an exemption if their physician or health care provider provided documentation that they can't work because of their condition. Department Secretary Matt Althoff said the state's proposal is meant to be administratively simple and to encourage work among Medicaid recipients rather than track hours. 'We are helping them, we believe, not only by providing a safety net, but a lift up. Isn't it true that personal industry is the antidote to poverty?' Althoff said. 'The more that we can do to discover fulfillment through serving others, the more that we can do to garner an income that we earn, the higher likelihood we will be able to escape the clutches of poverty.' Other suggestions made during public comment during the hearing included: Adding volunteer or community service time as an exemption, to benefit older adults who can't find employment because of their age. Exempting Indian Health Service beneficiaries, since they are eligible for Medicaid coverage at the federal level even if they do not meet other Medicaid requirements, such as income limits. Allowing more flexibility to exempt caregivers of older adults who don't share the same residence. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
