but rising yields could rain on the parade: By Prakash Bhudia
Because while Bitcoin's been partying, yields have been rising - and fast. And if there's one thing that can spook speculative assets, it's the sudden reminder that traditional finance still writes the rules on risk.
Bitcoin's big moment - Fueled by ETFs and Institutional FOMO
Let's start with the good stuff. Bitcoin didn't just edge past its previous high - it blew through it. Up 47% since April's dip to $75K, BTC's rally has been supercharged by inflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, which racked up $7.4 billion in net inflows over just five weeks. That's not retail punting for fun - that's serious capital making a bet.
Source: Coinglass
It's not just ETFs, either. Futures open interest hit a record $75.14 billion, showing that traders are all-in on this trend. Add in corporate moves like Indonesia's DigiAsia Corp planning a $100 million Bitcoin treasury reserve, and it's clear: institutions aren't sitting this one out.
The setup looked nearly perfect. Until it wasn't.
Then the bond auction happened
On 21 May, the U.S. Treasury held a routine 20-year bond auction. It should've been a non-event. Instead, it sent shockwaves through global markets.
Investor demand was weak. The auction was priced at a 5.047% yield, slightly above the expected 5.035%. That tiny gap? It's called a 'tail' - and this one, at 1.2 basis points, was the largest since December. In bond-speak, that's code for investors who are worried.
Source: Kobeissi Letter, X
The fallout was fast:
The S&P 500 fell nearly 80 points in half an hour
The 10-year Treasury yield jumped to 4.586%
The 30-year yield hit 5.067%
Source: Kobeissi Letter
That's not just noise. That's the market pricing in bigger risks: rising deficits, sticky inflation, and the possibility that the Fed won't be cutting rates anytime soon.
Why bond yields matter for Bitcoin
Crypto isn't in its own little universe anymore. Like it or not, Bitcoin now dances to the macro beat - and right now, the rhythm is changing.
Here's how soaring yields ripple through crypto:
Higher yields strengthen the U.S. dollar → Bitcoin tends to move inversely to the dollar
Tighter financial conditions → Less liquidity and less appetite for high-risk trades
Risk-off sentiment → Capital flows back into traditional safe havens like bonds, not Bitcoin
So even if the fundamentals look great - ETF inflows, corporate adoption, bullish momentum - the mood can turn quickly when macro headwinds start picking up. And that's what we saw this week.
The bigger picture: Trouble brewing in the background
The weak auction wasn't a fluke - it's a symptom. The U.S. is running a 7% budget deficit, inflation is still lurking, and trade tensions are re-emerging as Trump ramps up his campaign trail. Investors are starting to say, 'If you want us to lend you money, you're going to have to pay more.'
That adds pressure not just on the Treasury, but on every asset priced off yields - including crypto.
Analysts at K33 Research warned that macro risks could inject fresh volatility into Bitcoin's uptrend, especially if upcoming headline events disappoint. Case in point: Trump's $TRUMP Gala and VP JD Vance's appearance at Bitcoin 2025 might move sentiment - but they're no match for Treasury market shocks.
What traders should keep an eye on
This doesn't mean the Bitcoin bull run is over - but the game just got more complicated. If you're in the market, here's what to watch:
U.S. Treasury yields – particularly the 10- and 20-year
Inflation prints and Fed commentary – to gauge rate expectations
ETF inflows – a slowdown here would be a red flag
Futures open interest – high levels mean potential for sharp reversals
Right now, Bitcoin's still flying high - but the air is getting thinner. The next leg up (or down) could depend less on crypto news, and more on how the macro winds blow.
Bitcoin technical outlook: Further rally or reversal?
Bitcoin is still very much in a bullish trend. Institutions are coming in, ETFs are delivering inflows, and price action remains technically strong.
But this week's bond market shock is a reminder that macro still matters. If yields continue rising and financial conditions tighten further, Bitcoin could lose altitude fast. For now, traders remain optimistic - but the rally is skating on thinner ice than it appears.
So the big question remains: is this just a wobble, or the start of something bigger? The next bond auction might tell us more.
At the time of writing, Bitcoin's upside momentum is meeting some resistance, with a wick forming at the top of the up move. However, the volume tells a story of sellers not moving in with enough conviction which could lead to more upside. If sellers fail to force a reversal, buyers could struggle at the $112,000 price level that's currently holding prices. If we see a slump, on the other hand, prices could find support floors at the $102,990 and $93,000 price levels.
Source: Deriv MT5
Disclaimer
The information contained within this article is for educational purposes only and is not intended as financial or investment advice. We recommend you do your own research before making any trading decisions.
This information is considered accurate and correct at the date of publication. Changes in circumstances after the time of publication may impact the accuracy of the information.
The performance figures quoted are not a guarantee of future performance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Price Leaks: How Much Will it Cost?
Google is expected to officially announce that the Pixel 10 series, including its flagship model, the Pixel 10 Pro XL, will retain the same pricing structure as the previous Pixel 9 lineup. This decision is particularly noteworthy in a smartphone market where flagship prices have been steadily increasing. By maintaining stable pricing, Google positions itself as a competitive force, offering premium features without imposing higher costs on consumers. This approach reflects a deliberate strategy to balance innovation with affordability, making sure that innovative technology remains accessible to a broader audience. Watch this video on YouTube. Pixel 10 Series: Pricing That Defies Market Trends The Pixel 10 series consists of four models: Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, and Pixel 10 Pro Fold. Unlike many competitors who have raised prices in response to rising production costs and inflation, Google has chosen to keep its pricing consistent with last year's lineup. This decision underscores Google's commitment to providing value without compromising on quality or features. In the US, the Pixel 10 starts at $799 for the 128GB variant, while the Pixel 10 Pro XL begins at $1,199 for the 256GB model. This pricing strategy ensures that you can access premium features and advanced technology without the financial burden often associated with flagship devices. By resisting the industry trend of price hikes, Google appeals to both loyal customers and new buyers seeking high-quality smartphones at reasonable prices. Global Pricing and Regional Adjustments Google's pricing strategy reflects a careful balance between global consistency and regional market dynamics. While the company maintains a uniform pricing structure across major markets, it also accounts for local economic factors such as currency fluctuations and purchasing power. This approach ensures that the Pixel 10 series remains competitively priced worldwide. In the US, the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, the most premium model in the lineup, is priced at $1,799 for the 256GB variant. for the 256GB variant. European markets follow a similar pricing alignment, making sure that the Pixel 10 series remains accessible and competitive across regions. This transparent pricing strategy not only enhances accessibility but also reinforces Google's reputation as a customer-focused brand. By addressing regional market needs without compromising on quality or features, Google strengthens its global presence in the premium smartphone segment. Storage Options Designed for Every User The Pixel 10 series offers a variety of storage configurations to meet the diverse needs of its users. This tiered approach ensures that you can select a model that aligns with your specific requirements, whether you prioritize affordability or need additional storage for professional tasks and media. The Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro start at 128GB , making them ideal for users with moderate storage needs, such as casual app usage and photo storage. , making them ideal for users with moderate storage needs, such as casual app usage and photo storage. The Pixel 10 Pro XL and Pixel 10 Pro Fold begin at 256GB, catering to users who require more space for apps, high-resolution media, and professional workflows. By offering multiple storage options, Google provides flexibility without forcing users to compromise on essential features. This thoughtful approach ensures that the Pixel 10 series appeals to a wide range of consumers, from casual users to tech enthusiasts and professionals. Challenging Market Trends with Strategic Pricing Google's decision to maintain stable pricing for the Pixel 10 series stands in stark contrast to the broader industry trend of rising flagship smartphone costs. Many manufacturers justify price increases by citing advanced features, higher production expenses, and inflation. However, Google has taken a different path, prioritizing affordability while continuing to deliver innovative features and premium build quality. This strategy not only strengthens Google's position in the competitive premium smartphone market but also resonates with price-conscious consumers who seek value without sacrificing performance. By offering flagship-level features at consistent prices, Google challenges the notion that innovative technology must come with a hefty price tag. This approach positions the Pixel 10 series as a compelling choice for those who demand both quality and value. A Balanced Approach to Premium Smartphones The Pixel 10 series, led by the Pixel 10 Pro XL, exemplifies Google's commitment to delivering a balanced combination of affordability, innovation, and market competitiveness. By retaining last year's pricing structure, Google sets a new benchmark for value in the flagship smartphone segment. Whether you are in the US, India, or Europe, the Pixel 10 lineup offers consistent pricing and advanced features, making it a strong contender in today's premium smartphone market. With its transparent pricing strategy, diverse storage options, and focus on accessibility, the Pixel 10 series redefines what consumers can expect from a flagship smartphone. Google's approach not only challenges industry norms but also ensures that premium technology remains within reach for a wide audience, solidifying its position as a leader in the evolving smartphone landscape. Browse through more resources below from our in-depth content covering more areas on the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL. Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Leak: Specs, Features, and Release Date Google Pixel 10 Pro XL: Specs, Features, and Release Details Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Launch Date, Features, and More Google Pixel 10 Pro XL: Specs, Features, and More Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Features, Specs, and Pricing Leaked Source & Image Credit: Demon's Tech Filed Under: Android News, Mobile Phone News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Historic red state town with Victorian charm faces population boom
Once celebrated for its historic Victorian architecture and small-town charm, Clarksville, Tennessee , is now grappling with the growing pains of being one of the fastest-expanding cities in America. The population of the military town that sits close to Fort Campbell on the border with Kentucky has soared past 186,000. This is a jump of nearly 20,000 in just four years - but the housing market hasn't kept pace, driving prices sky-high and leaving many locals struggling to find a place to live. A new housing study warns that the shortage spans both rental and for-sale properties, with limited supply and a lack of variety in available homes. The squeeze is forcing some residents to spend a disproportionate share of their income on housing, cutting into local spending and threatening long-term economic stability. City officials acknowledge the problem, but the scale of Clarksville's growth has left them scrambling to balance development with infrastructure needs while preserving the historic charm that draws people here in the first place. Council member Deanna McLaughlin called the situation 'urgent', pointing to a severe five-year housing gap of more than 15,000 units - including 8,595 for-sale homes and 6,598 rentals across all price points - and noted that both affordable and market-rate rentals are nearly at full occupancy. 'Limited options and rising costs are creating a significant cost burden for residents,' she said. 'We're seeing 43.6 percent of renters and 20 percent of homeowners spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing, which is above the state average. Incomes simply aren't keeping pace with the cost of living .' Local real estate agent Tyler Forte, who services Clarksville from his base in Nashville, says the city has undergone a dramatic transformation in just a few years. 'Even three years ago, Clarksville was kind of Nashville's stepsister - known mainly for the military base and university, with a lot of farmland and a small-town feel,' Forte said. 'Since COVID, it's just absolutely taken off. They're building a ton of homes and commercial projects, new grocery stores, and even two new hospitals. It's gone from being an afterthought to a major city in Tennessee.' Much of that growth, Forte says, has been driven by both out-of-state buyers and Nashville residents seeking a lower cost of living. 'As Nashville prices have climbed, I've had a lot of clients who've moved to Clarksville for more affordable housing,' he explained. Forte notes that new construction dominates the market, which can be a double-edged sword. 'Most of the homes I see in Clarksville are brand new - even something built in 2015 is considered old. Builders are offering big incentives, like interest rate buy-downs through their preferred lenders. One client just locked in a 3.99 percent rate through Lennar's in-house lending program - a huge drop from the 6.5-7 percent you'd see with a typical lender. 'Because the builder owns the lender, they can offer aggressive financing deals that make new construction especially attractive,' he said. While bidding wars aren't as common as they once were, Forte says competition still exists for certain properties. 'If a home is unique, move-in ready, and priced right, it can still spark multiple offers. But out of the 80 homes I sold in the past year, only about three had bidding wars.' Some parts of the city remain hotter than others. 'The Sango area in the south is the most competitive,' Forte said. 'It's closer to Nashville, has a strong school district, and that combination is always going to drive demand.' However, Forte doesn't believe the real shortage is in housing stock. 'They're building as fast as they possibly can,' he said. 'The bigger issue is infrastructure. This was mostly farmland 10 years ago, and the public systems just aren't built to handle this kind of population growth so quickly.' Although the boom has brought new businesses and job opportunities, it has also fueled concerns about traffic congestion, rezoning battles, and environmental impacts in a city where Victorian-era streets and landmarks now sit in the shadow of sprawling new subdivisions. McLaughlin said younger residents and first-time buyers are especially hard-hit, with many unable to qualify for mortgages and a shortage of smaller 'starter' homes in the market. She warned that building quickly without careful planning could worsen traffic congestion, strain public services, and erode the character of historic neighborhoods. 'If the housing shortage persists, the most pressing concerns would be an increase in the number of cost-burdened residents, particularly those in lower- and middle-income brackets,' she said. 'That could lead to the departure of essential workers and drive prices even higher,' she added. Patrick Bowen, president of Bowen National Research, led the assessment that laid bare Clarksville's housing shortage - and its wider economic consequences. 'Whether it's rental or for-sale housing, there's not much available,' Bowen told local FOX affiliate WZTV Nashville. 'And what you do have is really not affordable for many low- to moderate-income households.' He warned that rising housing costs don't just hit residents - they ripple through the local economy. 'When you've got people spending exorbitant amounts on housing, that's less money going back into the local economy. It has an impact on employers, too; the workforce can't afford to stay in the market, or afford the rent they're paying.' Bowen says the newly compiled data can help Clarksville plan smarter: 'Now you have data to look to, so when you're setting priorities and goals, you have something that gives you structure, to say, we need to focus on this type of housing or this population.' He also stressed that rushing development could make matters worse. 'Yes, housing is needed quickly, but that doesn't mean it should be rushed. You want to make sure you're building the right kind of housing, in the right places, with the right infrastructure in place.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Putin won in Anchorage. Now Zelenskyy and Europe are in an even more perilous position
Donald Trump portrays himself as a hard-nosed dealmaker. Yet in the run-up to Friday's summit with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, his claim that the Russian leader held him in high regard and was therefore serious about ending the war in Ukraine sounded naive. Putin doesn't let sentimentality shape his political and military decisions. Nor has he disavowed his longstanding claim to four Ukrainian provinces: Donetsk and Luhansk, which together comprise Ukraine's eastern Donbas region, and Zaporizhzhia and Kherson in the south. Despite Russia's overwhelming numerical advantage in troops and weaponry, Putin occupies only one province, Luhansk, almost entirely. Yet he persists. In the days before his meeting with Putin, Trump said the Russian economy 'stinks' and that falling oil prices would cause Russia's war to run aground. The war has certainly placed severe strains on Russia's economy, including high inflation and interest rates, labour shortages and a lack of investment by private businesses. Earnings from oil sales, a key source of state income, have also shrunk by 18% this year due to falling prices. There has even been talk of a recession. But these pressures have not prompted Putin to reassess his war plans. He ignored Trump's proposal for a 30-day ceasefire, which Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, accepted right away. Likewise, he was unfazed by Trump's threats to impose additional sanctions – with 'severe consequences', as he put it just before the summit – if Russia did not relent. Trump returned from Anchorage empty-handed for other reasons. Successful summits require painstaking advance work by leaders' subordinates; this one was arranged in haste. Given the rush, it was unsurprising that the Anchorage talks ended hours ahead of time. (The working lunch the two delegations were to have was cancelled.) During his post-summit press conference, Trump gamely praised Putin's goodwill and said that they had agreed on 'many points' during discussions that he described as 'productive'. Yet he failed to identify a single point of agreement and, atypically, didn't stay to answer reporters' questions. Putin came out ahead in Anchorage. He didn't agree to Trump's pet proposal for a ceasefire. It was Trump who ended up accepting Putin's position that a ceasefire must be preceded by a comprehensive peace agreement that addresses the 'root causes' of the war. Putin did show some flexibility by agreeing to freeze the frontline if Ukraine were to withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, and thus the entire Donbas, enabling Russia to acquire lands it has failed to conquer despite more than 40 months of fighting. Yet this offer could prove to be a trap. If Zelenskyy, who arrives in Washington for talks with Trump on Monday, refuses to do this, Putin may be able to look on as Trump tries to coerce the Ukrainian leader, forcing Europe to take sides. If Trump fails, Putin can paint Zelenskyy as the real obstacle to peace. Trump had declared that there would be no future talks if the summit failed – which it did, as he couldn't obtain a ceasefire, his main objective – yet in Anchorage, he spoke of follow-up meetings. Putin concurred, mischievously suggesting Moscow as the venue, but without indicating that he was open to including Zelenskyy and European leaders. By agreeing to further negotiations and keeping Trump's hopes for a peace deal alive, Putin may have ensured that the efficacy of additional US sanctions on Russia remains untested. By simply showing up in Anchorage, Putin demonstrated that the western policy of isolating him won't work. Zelenskyy and European leaders are undoubtedly relieved that the duo didn't unveil a deal to end the war by partitioning Ukraine. Still, Trump's readiness to accept Putin's insistence on this bilateral meeting after US efforts to include Zelenskyy failed had already sown more mistrust between Washington and Europe. Now Trump has embraced Putin's view that there can be no ceasefire without an overall agreement that addresses all aspects of the conflict. He has also in effect endorsed Putin's call for Ukraine to cede Donbas in exchange for a freeze of the frontline. These shifts will increase Ukraine and Europe's distrust of Trump – to Putin's advantage. Putin's confidence in Russia's eventual victory has been bolstered by Trump's decision, taken well before the summit, to cease direct weapons deliveries to Ukraine – assistance that totalled $65.9bn while Joe Biden was the US president. Russia will continue bombing Ukraine's cities, and its ground troops will keep pushing to grab even more land. In this respect, the summit has changed nothing. What has changed since Trump's return to the White House, though, is the US's role in the war. Ultimately, Trump believes that Russia's invasion does not threaten the US so it's up to the Europeans to support Ukraine's defence, a point JD Vance reiterated shortly before the summit. European countries have been increasing its defence spending and military support to Ukraine. But it had better be prepared to do even more and summon the unity to stay the course. Meanwhile, the lure of additional talks with Putin will keep alive Trump's illusion that continued diplomatic engagement with Russia and his self-proclaimed deal-making skills will eventually end the war – clearing the path to the Nobel peace prize he covets. Rajan Menon is a professor emeritus of international relations at the City College of New York and a senior research scholar at Columbia University's Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies
