After 12 years, PMK hopes to display its hold among Vanniyar community
Several lakh youth, mostly Vanniyars, are expected to congregate at the Vanniyar Youth Conference in Mamallapuram being organised by the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) after a gap of 12 years on Sunday (May 11, 2025) evening.
On both sides of the East Coast Road, party cadres have put up banners of PMK founder S. Ramadoss and president Anbumani Ramadoss and other leaders, including the late 'Kaduvetti' Guru, who was known for making incendiary speeches.
Extensive security and seating arrangements have been made for the event, which would be an opportunity for the party to exhibit its strength a year ahead of Tamil Nadu Assembly elections. This morning, former PMK president G.K. Mani and senior leader A.K. Moorthy oversaw preparations as the cadres began trickling into the venue.
Twelve years ago, when the PMK organised the massive Chithirai Pournami Youth Conference, the party was in a very different place.
In 2006, PMK had won in 18 Assembly seats and believed it was destined for bigger things in Tamil Nadu politics. Despite winning just 3 seats in 2011 in alliance with the DMK, it harboured great ambition; it wanted to lead an alliance without the Dravidian parties. The PMK joined the NDA in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections with Dr. Anbumani winning the Dharmapuri seat. In 2016 Assembly polls, it went solo projecting him as Chief Ministerial candidate but failed to make a mark.
It was also during this period, the party pursued a sharp-edged caste politics, in particular rallying against inter-caste marriages involving Schedule Caste youth and caste Hindu women. In November 2012, large scale violence unfolded in Natham Colony, a SC hamlet in Naickenkottai of Dharmapuri district after a Vanniyar woman fell in love with an inhabitant of the village. Subsequently, in 2013, violence erupted between Vanniyar youth and SCs in Marakkanam as they were en route to attend the Youth Conference.
Senior leaders including Ramadoss and his son were arrested, which had resulted in further violence.
Much has changed in the State politics since then. Today, PMK has 5 MLAs, no representation in the Lok Sabha and it remains uncertain if would cease to have a representation in the Rajya Sabha soon as Dr. Anbumani's term is due to end. Years of pursuing pro-Vanniyar politics has resulted in non-Vanniyar counter consolidation against the PMK in several elections, severely affecting its fortunes. It also appears to have temporarily given up its ambitions of capturing power in the State for practical reasons.
The Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi, which largely seeks to represent the interests of the Scheduled Castes and oppressed sections, and considers the PMK as its political rival, has become a party recognised by the Election Commission of India and has settled on a firm 'secular' ideological plank.
Joining the AIADMK alliance in 2019, the PMK found it tough to improve its strike rate. It lost in all seven parliamentary constituencies it contested. In 2021, AIADMK government enacted a law to provide 10.5% internal reservations to Vanniyars within the MBC quota on the last day of the Assembly session before the notification of the Assembly elections. That year, the party contested in 23 Assembly constituencies, winning just five. The law was struck down by the Supreme Court subsequently due to lack of relevant and recent data. As part of BJP-led NDA in 2024 Lok Sabha elections, it again failed to win a single seat, with Dr. Anbumani's wife, Sowmya Anbumani, losing a close contest in Dharmapuri.
All of this has meant that the new president, under whose supervision this conference is being organised, has had to pivot and reinvent the party. Dr Anbumani has sought to sidestep the anti-VCK/anti-Dalit rhetoric and has demanded appropriate representation for all backward and scheduled caste communities through caste enumeration.
Though internal party conflict between Dr. Ramadoss and his son came to the fore recently, party sources have said the rally would be an opportunity to show that the support for the party has only grown among the young people.
With Dr. Anbumani reiterating to his cadres to maintain strict discipline, the party leaders expressed confidence that the conference, which became a talking point for all the wrong reasons 12 years ago, will be successful and that it would show that PMK continues to retain the support of the Vanniyar community.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Lot of money is wasted, no long-term goals are set": Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan advocates for 'One Nation One Election'
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], June 8 (ANI): Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Sunday participated in the One Nation One Election campaign in Bengaluru, Karnataka, emphasising the need for simultaneous elections in India. Chouhan argued that the current system of frequent elections leads to a significant waste of resources and energy, highlighting that the constant election cycle diverts a major part of the nation's energy and resources, which could be better utilised for long-term development goals. He stressed that holding Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections together would enable policymakers to focus on policy-driven decisions rather than being preoccupied with election preparations. 'In our nation, all parties are immersed in election preparations, and a major part of our energy goes into that. Due to this, a lot of money is wasted, and no long-term goals are set. It is time the nation thinks about this. At least Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections should now be conducted together, so there is no waste of time, and we can take policy-driven decisions. For this, the One Nation One Election campaign is going on across the country,' he said. The One Nation One Election campaign aims to raise awareness and build consensus on simultaneous elections nationwide. The campaign's proponents argue that simultaneous elections would reduce the strain on the electoral machinery, minimise disruptions to governance, and promote more focused and sustained policy implementation. The Constitution 129th Amendment Bill, 2024, and the Union Territories Laws Amendment Bill, 2024, were introduced in the Lok Sabha during the Winter Session of Parliament to achieve one nation, one election. They propose simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha and state assemblies across the country. The bill was referred to the JPC for scrutiny and discussion. Opposition members have been opposing the amendments and have argued that the proposed change could disproportionately benefit the ruling party, giving it undue influence over the electoral process in states and undermining the autonomy of regional parties. They have also argued that the bills proposing simultaneous elections are against the federal structure. On Sunday, Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini said that the 'One Nation, One Election' initiative would help speed up India's development and reduce election-related expenses. Speaking at a marathon organised to support the proposal, CM Saini stated frequent elections stall growth and disrupt momentum. On March 25, the JPC held an important meeting that lasted over five hours. Several MPs in the committee raised concerns about the practicality of holding Lok Sabha and state elections together. The Constitution Amendment Bill empowers ECI to recommend to the President to postpone an election to a State Assembly. Currently, Article 356 of the Constitution allows for postponing an Assembly election only under specified conditions, which also involve approval by Parliament. The Bill does not have such requirements, and hence, it lowers the threshold for postponing elections. The Constitution Amendment Bill does not specify a time limit on the postponement of an Assembly election. This opens the possibility of a state being left without an Assembly. Legislatures in India have a term of five years. Elections to the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies were held together from 1951 to 1967. However, this cycle was disrupted in 1968 and 1969 due to the premature dissolution of some State Assemblies. In 1970, the fourth Lok Sabha was also dissolved prematurely. Since then, elections for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies have been held with different schedules. (ANI)
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Decoding the Kamal-Kannada episode
Actor Kamal Haasan's remark that 'Kannada was born from Tamil' has sparked several debates. But this is not a new idea; it has existed within the Tamil discourse for two centuries. Robert Caldwell and other linguists have said Dravidian languages branched off from a shared language, termed Proto-Dravidian. However, Tamil nationalists have never accepted this view. They have claimed that all Dravidian languages are offshoots of Tamil. At its peak, this belief extended to proclaiming that Tamil is the world's first language and that all other world languages were born from it. The more acceptable idea Even today, these two schools of thought continue to thrive in the Tamil intellectual space. The idea of a Proto-Dravidian language has gained traction beyond Tamil Nadu. In contrast, the notion that Tamil is the source of all languages has little traction or acceptance outside. We now live at a time when awareness around linguistic dominance has grown politically in India's multilingual context. Every national group tends to hold its language as the primary marker of its identity. Any idea or action that is perceived as one that diminishes their linguistic pride often invites a fierce backlash. In such a climate, it is more appropriate on public platforms to affirm the idea that all Dravidian languages emerged from a common Proto-Dravidian root. Culturally and politically, this view fosters harmony and equality. To say other languages came from Tamil can easily be perceived by others as demeaning to their language and identity. They may see such a claim as a form of dominance imposed on them. For Tamil nationalists, who mix ancestral pride with political messaging, such assertions may help construct a narrative of ancient greatness. But beyond that, in contemporary politics, this view only serves to isolate Tamil Nadu. Without strong, widely accepted academic evidence, there is no need to insist that Tamil is the source of all languages. "I won't apologize if I am not wrong" Kamal Haasan on Kannada-Tamil controversy The classical attributes of Tamil — its antiquity, literary richness, and unbroken literary tradition — are well known to other language communities and to the world at large. Merely presenting these strengths is enough to bring honour to Tamil. Even when compared with modern literature of any Indian language, Tamil literature stands equal, if not superior. What we need are conscious efforts to take this richness of Tamil to a wider world. In 2022, Hindi writer Geetanjali Shree won the International Booker Prize. This year, Kannada writer Banu Mushtaq received the same honour. Tamil, too, deserves to be taken to such global heights. What we need is a sustained cultural effort in that direction — not the unproductive habit of making provocative statements that alienate speakers of other languages. When Mr. Haasan said 'Kannada was born from Tamil,' his intent was not to insult that language. Kannada actor Shivarajkumar was on stage, and Mr. Haasan was speaking with pride about his warm relationship with that family. He was pointing to the kinship between Tamil and Kannada and was trying to say 'we are family; ours are sibling languages'. It is likely that in that moment, the idea that 'Tamil is the origin' — an idea long held by a section of Tamil thinkers — came to his mind. But there is no reason to doubt his intentions. He has the freedom to express such a view in public. Those who hold opposing views can disagree, and speak or write in response. But to issue threats to him is a violation of his right to express an opinion. The court's view When a case regarding the release of his film Thug Life came before the court in Karnataka, the judge almost compelled Mr. Haasan to apologise. While linguistic fundamentalists are prepared to turn this into a conflict between two regional nationalities, should the court be approaching it in a way that favours them? The police may treat this as a law-and-order issue, but the court cannot view it that way. Should the court function like a kattapanchayat (extrajudicial body) enforcing commercial compromise? The court should have treated this as an issue of freedom of expression. Anyone can say they are hurt by a particular view, but what is the measure of being hurt? Anyone can deliberately create social tension. The court cannot consider such people as a party to compromise. The court should have said that it will carefully examine whether Mr. Haasan has the right to express such a view; that this has no relation to the release of the film; and that it will allow the film's release with police protection. Whatever way the case came before the court, it should have been approached from the standpoint of freedom of expression. In a democracy, the court is the final refuge that safeguards that right. Mr. Haasan did not apologise. He explained that 'the opinion was not wrong; it was misunderstood.' Normally, if any issue arises around a film, the standard response is to issue an immediate apology, remove scenes, and make compromises to facilitate the film's release. For the first time, someone from the film industry has said, 'I will not apologise.' 'Thug Life' premieres amid fan frenzy & tight security in Tamil Nadu Whatever commercial calculations may lie behind that stance, the courage to make such a statement must be acknowledged. As the court itself said, this is not a matter of arrogance, but of self-respect. A person has every right to express an opinion and to stand by it if they believe it is right. Democratic opposition to such views can certainly be voiced. But issuing violent threats or denying someone their right to live must be treated as punishable crimes. Perumal Murugan, scholar and literary chronicler who writes in the Tamil language
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Kabrastan crisis could snowball into political plank for 2027 polls
Margao: The prolonged failure to establish a kabrastan for South Goa's Muslim community threatens to transform from an administrative hiccup into a potential electoral landmine that could reshape the 2027 assembly elections. Community leader Abdul Matin Carol's recent letter to the assembly speaker reflects mounting frustration over 'decades of unfulfilled promises'. The strongly worded missive demands immediate action on the long-pending burial ground issue, seeking a review of 'all pending assurances' and urging authorities to expedite the establishment of burial facilities statewide. The community recently launched a drive to secure proper burial grounds by directly appealing to village panchayats across the state. Community leaders cited constitutional obligations and govt directives that mandate panchayats to provide suitable burial grounds for all religious communities. The crisis deepened after the high court's Oct 2022 directive to develop the kabrastan at Sonsoddo 'within six months' remained unimplemented. More than two years later, technical assessments revealed only 2,500 sqm of the originally acquired 30,000 sqm land are usable due to terrain limitations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo The community's anger has found political expression. 'In the last Lok Sabha elections, Muslim voters contributed to BJP losing the South Goa seat, sending a clear electoral message. Govt may ignore the demand at its own peril,' a political observer said. Community leaders have explicitly stated the kabrastan issue will be a 'deciding factor' in the 2027 polls. 'This issue is of great public importance and deserves urgent attention in the interest of justice, equity, and good governance,' Carol said, adding that delays have caused 'continued inconvenience and hardship' while raising concerns about the 'efficacy of assurances made in the assembly'. 'With Goa's wafer-thin margins that decide victories, consolidated opposition from any significant community can tip scales dramatically. Kabrastan is an emotive issue and it could override traditional voting patterns,' another political observer said. 'Opposition parties are likely to make political capital of this administrative failure, painting it as govt's insensitivity toward minorities.' Carol's request for a personal hearing by the speaker on the matter is seen by observers as the community's final attempt at resolution through established channels.
