A Peaceful Appeal in China 26 Years Ago Still Echoes Today
The legacy of an unprecedented peaceful protest that happened decades ago in communist China was recently commemorated in New York, in the form of a parade and a vigil. A few participants in both events were among the protesters in China at the time, advocating for their right to practice their faith freely.
On April 25, 1999—exactly 26 years ago to this day—about 10,000 Falun Gong practitioners congregated in China's capital, Beijing, in one of the largest protests in China's recent history. The event, known as the April 25 appeal, came less than three months before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) launched a brutal campaign to eradicate the group—a persecution that has continued unabated to this day.
Wang Bingzeng, a calligrapher and former lecturer at China's Hebei University of Technology, was among thousands of Falun Gong practitioners who took part in a
Wang said he started practicing Falun Gong in 1995 and soon afterward diseases plaguging his muscle and spinal cord became a thing of the past. As for his decision to travel to Beijing for the appeal, he said he had heard about the
After a train ride of more than an hour, Wang said he arrived in Beijing at around at 9 a.m. local time on April 25. He then headed for the Office of Letters and Appeals, which is located near Zhongnanhai, the compound for the top CCP leaders.
'I went there early, and there were not many people. Later, more and more people arrived. We all stood there, very quietly, without shouting any slogans or holding any banners,' Wang said, pointing out that 'everything was in an orderly fashion.'
Related Stories
4/22/2025
4/19/2025
'Later, at around 9 p.m., I heard that several representatives of Falun Gong had talked to [then-Chinese Premier] Zhu Rongji, and several of our demands had been met. People began leaving when they heard about this,' Wang said. 'As for me, I went straight to the nearby train station and went home.'
Wang Bingzeng in Flushing, New York, on April 19, 2025.
Courtesy of Wang Bingzeng
Tianjin authorities released the 45 Falun Gong practitioners in the evening on April 25, 1999, which the New York-based Falun Dafa Information Center said was an orchestrated decision by the Chinese authorities, considering that multiple Falun Gong practitioners who had gone to the appeal 'were confronted by police at their homes for doing so.'
The April 25 appeal was significant because it became an excuse for the Chinese regime to launch its persecution later that year. China's state-run media have been distorting facts about the peaceful protest and have repeatedly published propaganda about the event, often calling it a 'siege' against the CCP's leadership,
As for the opportunity to take part in the parade, Wang said with tears in his eyes that he was thrilled and emotional.
'I want to say this from my heart, dissolving the CCP as soon as possible, so that Chinese people can regain their freedom,' he said.
Falun Gong
Falun Gong, also known as Falun Dafa, is a spiritual discipline that features meditative exercises and teachings based on the principles of truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance.
The practice became enormously popular in China by the late 1990s, with official estimates putting the number of practitioners at more than 70 million at the time. Fearing that the practice's following could threaten its rule, the CCP launched the persecution on July 20, 1999.
Since then, millions have been detained, with hundreds of thousands tortured while incarcerated and untold numbers killed, according to the Falun Dafa Information Center. Some were victims of China's state-sanctioned practice of
Zhang Guiying in Flushing, New York, on April 19, 2025.
Courtesy of Zhang Guiying
Zhang Guiying, a medical doctor, also took part in the parade. Speaking at a rally after the parade, Zhang said that she was at Tianjin Normal University and an eyewitness to the mass arrests in Tianjin in April 1999.
She said the police officer made their arrests violently—an old lady in her 60s was pushed and fiercely beaten, a young girl started crying after being beaten, and a young man who had come to defend the girl was injured after he was slammed against a wall.
Zhang also went to Beijing on April 25, 1999. The appeal was peaceful and orderly from start to finish, she said, noting that none of the Falun Gong practitioners there made a commotion or caused a disturbance.
Samuel Ortiz, president of a Queens-based leadership association for Puerto Ricans, was among those who came to see the parade. He said that he had heard about Falun Gong's three principles.
'I think compassion is what it's all about,' Ortiz said.
Ortiz said he had also heard about the Chinese regime's forced organ harvesting, calling such a practice sinister and shocking.
'Every force of Heaven and Earth should be brought together to bring those people to justice,' he said. 'It's a terrible thing. Beyond medieval.
'I think we need to shine a light on justice. And I think one of the goals in our journey is to bring people together. Find out what we must do together in order to uplift humanity.'
Falun Gong practitioners attend a vigil in front of the Chinese Consulate in New York on April 19, 2025.
Larry Dye/The Epoch Times
Vigil
About 500 Falun Gong practitioners held a vigil to commemorate the April 25 appeal in front of the Chinese Consulate in New York on the evening of April 19. Among them was Wen Ying, who had managed to flee China with her husband, Liu Jianping, and their son six months earlier.
Wen, who is from northern China's Heilongjiang Province, said she started practicing Falun Gong in 1994. Since the start of the persecution, Wen said she had been arrested five times, and she completed her seven-year imprisonment in 2023.
Now living in the United States, Wen expressed her gratitude for the chance to practice her faith openly in a society that values freedom.
Wen Ying and her husband, Liu Jianping, in New York on April 19, 2025.
Zhao Fenni/The Epoch Times
Gao Hongmei had come to the vigil appealing to the Chinese regime to release her mother, a Falun Gong practitioner named Hu Yulan, who is in her 70s. Gao said her mother was given a five-year sentence in 2020.
'There are many Falun Gong practitioners, including those around my mother's age, who are still in prison,' Gao said. 'Now we hope that the CCP will quickly end the persecution and release all the Falun Gong practitioners.'
Gao Hongmei in New York on April 19, 2025.
Zhao Fenni/The Epoch Times
The Tian Guo Marching Band takes part in a parade to commemorate the 26th anniversary of the April 25 appeal, in Flushing, New York, on April 19, 2025.
Larry Dye/The Epoch Times
Falun Gong practitioners take part in a parade to commemorate the 26th anniversary of the April 25 appeal, in Flushing, New York, on April 19, 2025.
Larry Dye/The Epoch Times
Falun Gong practitioners take part in a parade to commemorate the 26th anniversary of the April 25 appeal, in Flushing, New York, on April 19, 2025.
Larry Dye/The Epoch Times
Shi Ping contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
8 minutes ago
- Business Insider
African countries excluded as China expands visa‑free transit to 55 nations
China has expanded its 10-day visa-free transit policy to 55 countries, but notably excluded all African nations, raising questions about the scope of its global engagement. China has expanded its 10-day visa-free transit policy to 55 countries, excluding all African nations. It facilitates stays of up to 240 hours for travelers transiting to a third destination, with certain restrictions. The exclusion of African nations sparked debates about China's geopolitical strategies and diplomatic priorities. China's visa-free transit policy, which grants a 10-day stay for travelers in transit, now includes 55 countries but excludes all African nations—a move that has sparked disappointment and raised questions about Beijing's travel diplomacy and its Africa policy. The absence of African nations, despite China's strong economic and diplomatic ties across the continent, has surprised analysts and travel industry stakeholders alike. China's new transit policy allows travelers from select countries to stay visa-free for up to 240 hours if transiting to a third destination. Visitors must remain in the city or region of entry and have a confirmed onward ticket. While not a general tourist visa, the policy permits short-term activities like tourism, business, and family visits. Aimed at boosting convenience for businesspeople, tourists, and frequent travelers, it also helps save on visa fees and processing time. China-Africa relations threatened? China's recent visa-free travel policy for over 50 countries has sparked debate over the exclusion of African nations, raising questions about Beijing's stance toward the continent. This move appears contradictory given China's deepening trade ties with Africa, including zero-tariff treatment for 53 African countries and import duty exemptions for products from 33 least developed nations. However, the omission may not signal waning interest. Rather, it could reflect strategic prioritization of diplomatic and economic relationships. China's investments in Africa focused on trade, infrastructure, and development, suggest a long-term commitment. Understanding Beijing's approach requires considering the broader geopolitical and economic context in which its Africa policy operates. Observers note that this exclusion could be interpreted as a missed opportunity for people-to-people exchange, especially given Beijing's consistent rhetoric about its 'win-win' cooperation with Africa. With African countries hosting massive Chinese investments and infrastructure projects under the Belt and Road Initiative, the lack of reciprocal travel ease underscores a gap in the relationship that some believe needs urgent attention. Full list of eligible countries The countries included under China's 10-day visa-free transit policy are: Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. These travelers are eligible for entry at any of the approved 60 transit points, which include international airports in cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Chengdu, and Shenzhen, as well as a select number of seaports. Authorities have clarified that travelers must be in direct transit, meaning they must travel from Country A, transit through China, and continue to Country B. A return trip to the country of origin would not qualify under this policy.
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
No More Student Visas? No Problem.
Just how mad is Beijing about President Donald Trump's decision to revoke student visas for Chinese nationals? Not as mad as it says, and not as mad as one might expect. Publicly, China's leadership will likely complain that Trump's action is yet another attempt to thwart the country's rise. But in reality, Beijing would probably just as soon keep its smartest kids at home. Late last month, the U.S. State Department announced that it would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields,' and that it would 'enhance scrutiny' of the applications it received in the future. The new visa policy, a spokesperson said, is meant to prevent China from exploiting American universities and stealing intellectual property. A spokesperson for the foreign ministry quickly registered Beijing's objection to the new policy. But when Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke with Trump by phone last week, either he didn't raise the new visa policy or his foreign ministry didn't regard his comments on the matter worth including in its official summary of the call, which suggests that the issue is not a top priority in Beijing's negotiations with Washington. One reason for this underwhelming response may be that re-shoring its university students serves Beijing's current agenda. China first opened to the world in the 1980s; in the decades that followed, securing a Western education for its elite helped the country bring in the technology and skills it needed to escape poverty. China was 'sending people out, learning from other places, finding the best quality wherever it was, and bringing that quality back to China,' Robin Lewis, a consultant for U.S.-China education programs and a former associate dean at Columbia University, told me. Now that period has given way to one of nationalism and self-reliance, which means promoting China's own companies, products, technologies—and universities. Rose Horowitch: Trump's campaign to scare off foreign students Xi has consistently stressed the importance of education in sustaining China's rise. His government has invested heavily in China's schools and lavished resources on science and technology programs, with some success. Some of China's top institutions, such as Tsinghua University in Beijing, have gained international recognition as serious competitors in scientific research. China would like to have its own Harvards, rather than sending its elite students to the United States, for political and cultural reasons as well as economic ones. Chinese authorities have long worried that the hundreds of thousands of students it exports to America will absorb undesirable ideas about democracy and civil liberties—and that they will access information about China that is suppressed at home, such as the story of the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. In fact, many young Chinese who study in the United States seem to enjoy American freedoms and seek to stay rather than return to serve the motherland. Beijing has tried to deal with this in part by monitoring the activities of its students in the U.S. and attempting to hold them firmly to the party line, including by harassing the families back home of those who stray. Within China, authorities can more easily confine students inside the government's propaganda bubble, which in recent years has become more airtight. Domestic media seek to portray the U.S. as unsafe, especially for Asians, by highlighting incidents of racial discrimination, violence, and disorder. One story published last year by the state news agency Xinhua, under the headline 'Chinese Students' Dreams Turned Into Nightmares at U.S. Doorstep,' tells the harrowing tale of a Chinese student detained and deported at an airport and claims that others had suffered the same fate. China's top spy agency, the Ministry of State Security, warned Chinese students at universities abroad against being recruited as foreign agents, and told of one such unfortunate national who was discovered and punished. Even before Trump's announcement, this climate of mutual distrust had led to a drop-off in Chinese students enrolled in American universities. The number had reached an all-time high during the 2019–20 academic year, topping 372,000, according to the Institute of International Education. But that figure has fallen since—by a quarter, to 277,000, in the 2023–24 academic year. Now India, with more than 331,000 enrolled, sends more students to American institutions than China does. The Trump administration appears to believe that curtailing Chinese access to American technology, money, and, in this case, education will give the U.S. the edge over its closest competitor. In some areas, this might work: Restricting the export of advanced U.S. semiconductor technology to China seems to have helped hold Beijing's chip industry back. So why not do the same with higher education? A case can be made that keeping Chinese students out of some of the world's top research institutions will hold back their skills acquisition and, with it, the country's progress. Adam Serwer: Trump is wearing America down In practice, though, the effect of this policy could be hard to gauge. The engineers behind the Chinese AI firm DeepSeek, which wowed Silicon Valley by developing a competitive chatbot on the cheap, were mainly locally trained. And the skills that Chinese students can't find at home they can seek in any number of places. There may be only so many Harvards, but Chinese students can receive a good education—and a warmer reception—in countries other than the United States. Universities in Japan and Hong Kong are already trying to capitalize on Trump's harassment of international students to lure them. The idea that any American policy can effectively dampen Chinese ambition may be far-fetched. 'People wake up in the morning and it's all about education here. There is nothing more important,' James McGregor, the chair for China at the consulting firm APCO, told me. 'You're going to stop Chinese people from learning the top skills in the world? No. They'll just deploy them somewhere else.' For now, the Trump team can't seem to decide whether it wants to get tough on China or make deals with China, and the new student-visa policy reflects this confusion. 'Chinese students are coming. No problem,' Trump said in a briefing after his call with Xi. 'It's our honor to have them, frankly.' China's leadership surely knows that many Chinese families still aspire to send their young-adult children to American universities. But Beijing is much more single-minded than Washington about the future of relations between the two countries: Xi appears to see Washington as the primary impediment to China's rise, and ties to the U.S. as a vulnerability best eliminated. From that viewpoint, relying on Harvard to train China's most promising students is a national-security risk. That means that Trump may be doing Xi a favor.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Why the Euthanasia Slope Is Slippery
This week the Legislature of New York State passed a bill, now sitting on Gov. Kathy Hochul's desk, allowing assisted suicide for people facing a diagnosis that gives them six months or less to live. A few days before the vote, my colleague Katie Engelhart published a report on the expansive laws allowing 'medical assistance in dying' in Canada, which were widened in 2021 to allow assisted suicide for people without a terminal illness, detailing how they worked in the specific case of Paula Ritchie, a chronically ill Canadian euthanized at her own request. Many people who support assisted suicide in terminal cases have qualms about the Canadian system. So it's worth thinking about what makes a terminal-illness-only approach to euthanasia unstable, and why the logic of what New York is doing points in a Canadian direction even if the journey may not be immediate or direct. In a debate about euthanasia I was once asked, by the husband of a woman who sought assisted suicide unsuccessfully before her painful death, what I would have had the doctors offer her in place of the quietus she sought. His implication was that doctors always need to offer something: In most situations, that means care and treatment, but at the exceptional point when nothing further can be given, it's legitimate to expect them to deliver something else. This is the logic that undergirds laws that offer assisted suicide only to the terminally ill. It assumes that the dying have entered a unique zone where the normal promises of medicine can no longer be kept, a state of exception where it makes sense to license doctors to deliver death as a cure. The problem is that a situation where the doctor tells you that there's nothing more to be done for you is not really exceptional at all. Every day, all kinds of people are told that their suffering has no medical solution: people with crippling injuries, people with congenital conditions and people — like Ms. Ritchie — with an array of health problems whose etiology science does not even understand. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
