PUBG Cheat Tools in 2025: Why Gamers Trust ProofCore for Undetected Performance
As competitive gaming continues to evolve, so does the demand for smarter tools that help players maintain an edge. In 2025, PUBG cheat tools are more sophisticated than ever—but not all are created equal. Many players face bans, lag, or exposure due to unreliable cheats. That's why thousands of serious gamers now turn to ProofCore—a trusted provider of undetected PUBG cheats designed for performance, safety, and privacy.
With PUBG's matchmaking system becoming more competitive, many players use cheats not just for fun—but to test the limits of their skills, rank up faster, or experiment with new playstyles. However, PUBG's anti-cheat technology has also become stricter, meaning: Public cheats are easily detected
Free hacks often come with malware
Risk of permanent bans has increased
This is where private cheat providers like ProofCore stand out.
ProofCore has earned a solid reputation in the game enhancement space by offering safe, privatePUBG cheats that consistently avoid detection. Here's why gamers in 2025 trust ProofCore over other platforms:
The cheat software is continuously updated to bypass PUBG's BattlEye and other anti-cheat systems. This reduces the risk of detection and ban to nearly zero when used correctly.
Unlike public hacks that anyone can download, ProofCore's PUBG cheat tools are available only to verified members. This exclusivity keeps detection rates extremely low.
ProofCore's PUBG cheat includes essential features like aimbot, ESP (wallhacks), radar hacks, recoil control, and smooth aim adjustments. Every setting is customizable to match your playstyle and minimize suspicion.
ProofCore requires ID verification for membership. While this might sound strict, it ensures a private, trustworthy community—keeping both users and the software safe.
As PUBG updates its game engine or anti-cheat measures, ProofCore rolls out cheat updates almost instantly, so you're never left vulnerable.
Many users on private forums and Reddit have praised ProofCore for its consistency and reliability. Here's what users typically highlight:
'I've used ProofCore's PUBG cheat for over a year—no bans, no bugs. Best investment I made for my gameplay.'
– A Verified Member
'Tried free cheats before and lost two accounts. Switched to ProofCore and haven't looked back. Worth every penny.'
– Competitive Player, Asia Server
In 2025, the only way to safely use a PUBG cheat is through a trusted private provider. ProofCore delivers: Undetected gameplay
Premium performance
Security and privacy
Reliable customer support
For serious gamers looking to dominate in PUBG without the risk of bans or performance issues, ProofCore'sPUBG cheat remains a top-tier choice.
The world of PUBG cheats has changed dramatically in 2025. While public cheats are more dangerous than ever, ProofCore offers a secure, professional solution trusted by competitive gamers worldwide. If you want to enhance your PUBG experience without compromising your account, performance, or integrity, ProofCore's private PUBG cheat is your go-to choice.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Helldivers 2 players ask for better UI with in-game info but joke it "would break 50% of the game," director says "that's mean... and also sadly true" but "we are working on an improved system"
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Fun though it is, protecting Super Earth in Helldivers 2 often isn't helped by the UI. Less than graceful and not always intuitive, it's been a bugbear within the multiplayer shooter's community since it came out back in early 2024. In discussing their hopes for an improved system, players commented that doing so would cause a lot of problems elsewhere within the game's structure. Johan Pilestedt, creative director of Helldivers 2 and CCO of Arrowhead Games Studio, responded to this jab on Reddit, offering agreement and teasing improvements in the pipeline. "Hey! That's mean... and also sadly true. Our UI system is very cumbersome to develop - but we are working on an improved system that will allow us to build in-game UI faster," Pilestedt comments. "Also, we made a decision early to focus on Discord as the primary platform for the community. (As it's what we use internally for playtests and for other games)." The official Helldivers 2 Discord server is a pillar of the playerbase, where people socialize online together and receive updates from the development team. Polls on prospective changes and such are voted on through the server, and players would like more in-game functionality for these features, to make sure as many can vote as possible. Though such a thing may sound simple enough, game development is rarely so simple. As Pilestedt states, editing the UI in any way is currently a difficult proposition. But, from the sounds of things, Arrowhead is working on how to make this easier for everyone, potentially lowering the gap between the players and Discord users in the process. Discord has been an invaluable tool for Helldivers 2's community, especially as the audience scaled up dramatically soon after release. But clearly the overall reliance is something that needs altering, and Arrowhead's working on ways to do that. Watch this space. To continue serving Super Earth at optimal levels, keep our Helldivers 2 weapon tier list handy.
Tom's Guide
7 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
From AI training to banning VPNs – here are 8 questions the internet is asking about the Online Safety Act
It's been almost two weeks since the Online Safety Act was introduced in the UK. The law requires websites and apps to conduct age verification checks before allowing users to view content deemed as potentially harmful to under 18s or explicit. Despite the law being well intentioned, people are unhappy at having to hand over sensitive personal information to third-party companies. Many have turned to the best VPNs in an attempt to bypass age verification checks. Supporters and opponents of the law have made their views clear but there are still questions being asked. People are wondering how their data is used and stored, what the risks are, and are even asking if there'll be a VPN ban. We've pulled together some of the most popular questions people are asking and give them our best answer. This is probably a good place to start. The Online Safety Act 2023 is a new law introduced by the UK government which aims to keep children, and adults, safe online. In an explainer, the UK government said "platforms will be required to prevent children from accessing harmful and age-inappropriate content." The main way this is done is through age verification checks. In order to access age-restricted content, users will have to prove they are over 18. This can include submitting photo ID, completing credit card or bank checks, and uploading a live selfie. OFCOM has the power to enforce regulations and fine those found to be breaking the law. Fines may be up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. There are numerous privacy and cybersecurity risks posed by the Online Safety Act. Privacy advocates believe the law imposes on people's online freedoms and argue we shouldn't need to hand over our data to browse the web. Cybersecurity experts see it as a "disaster waiting to happen." We're trusting our highly sensitive personal information to third-parties, many of which are not based in the UK. These age check providers store data for different lengths of time but it only takes one to suffer a data breach and risk serious consequences for huge amounts of people – one expert believed this was a matter of when, not if. We fully support the law's goals, but we're not surprised it doesn't cover personal data safety. There must be a balance between protecting vulnerable internet users but not compromising our data privacy and security. The answer varies between providers. Persona, Yoti, and AgeGO are some notable providers. Persona, used by Reddit, says it retains personal data "for as long as necessary to provide the service and fulfill the verification you have requested." But it also says data collection may vary depending on how you use the service and how third-parties implement it. In Reddit's case, the site says Persona doesn't retain your uploaded photo for longer than 7 days. Yoti, which is used by Spotify, says it stores your data for up to 28 days, and doesn't have access to it beyond that. Yoti says some of its clients will configure the service to delete your data as soon as age verification is complete. AgeGO says it does "not access or retain your personal data during the verification process." However it uses third-party providers in the age-check process and only receives the results. Although it improves anonymity, these third-parties are not disclosed so we don't know how they process and store data. This leaves us asking if AgeGO is safe to use. This is a big concern people have and is another question which doesn't have a straightforward answer. AI-powered age estimation techniques are employed by some age-check providers. AI will analyze a picture of your face, or even your browsing habits, to determine whether you're over 18. Age-check providers, including Persona, have said it uses "uploaded images of identity documents" to train its services and enable it to understand what documents and their features look like. Age verification on social media app X is another which utilizes AI-based age estimation, using its own AI systems. Its Age Assurance on X policy doesn't state how its AI systems use this data. However its wider privacy policy states it may use the data it collects "to help train our machine learning or artificial intelligence models." We would therefore exercise caution in uploading your information to providers using AI-based age estimation. By the letter of the law, any site or app hosting adult content must introduce age verification checks and they're present on many popular sites. Reddit and X require age checks, as well as Spotify – something which has baffled people online. There have been complaints of overreach and unintended consequences of the legislation. Reddit users have noted that subreddits discussing sobriety, mental health support, and combating addiction have been impacted. Wikipedia may have to introduce checks and it is fighting the regulations as a result. The BBC reported that information and news reports covering the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine have also been blocked by age verification rules. Reports of this type of content being blocked is worrying, especially at a time when internet censorship and disinformation is highly prevalent. The UK government has said "platforms should not arbitrarily block or remove content and instead must take a risk-based, proportionate approach to child safety duties." It also said the law is "not designed to censor political debate." It "does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children." No, the government will not look at any age verification related information you upload. Beyond passing the law, the government has little to no involvement in its day-to-day running or enforcement – and this makes the process quite inefficient. There are multiple age-check providers, requiring multiple proofs of age. You'll likely have to prove your age multiple times as not every site uses the same provider. Some experts, and internet users, believe the UK government should have set up a secure, government-run, age-check system and database. This would be more streamlined and having only one database would reduce the risk of data breaches. Major VPN providers saw a surge in sign ups in the first week of the law's introduction as people searched for ways to avoid age verification checks. The likes of Proton VPN, NordVPN, Opera VPN, and Surfshark – as well as suspect free VPNs – rose up the Apple App Store's top charts. In 2022, Labour MP Sarah Champion proposed an amendment to the Online Safety Act – then still a Bill – which would see OFCOM investigate if VPN use was undermining internet regulations. The amendment didn't pass and on July 28 2025, Champion responded to the news of a UK VPN surge. She said in a tweet she warned the previous government this would happen and "child protection should always be the priority." So frustrating, I did warn the last Government this would happen, but was shut down. Child protection should always be the priority. 😞 28, 2025 The UK's Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Peter Kyle, has acknowledged VPN use is rising and would look "very closely" at how they're being used – however, he said he would not ban VPNs. So, it is very unlikely the UK government will ban VPNs. The law is well intentioned. It aims to protect children from seeing content they shouldn't and this can only be a good thing. It can be easy to access harmful content and children shouldn't be able to accidentally access it. However, as we've detailed, the law's implementation has raised serious concerns around data privacy and security. So, while its motives are a good thing, the law risks compromising our safety in other ways. A petition calling on the UK government to repeal the law is approaching 500,000 signatures. The government has said it won't repeal the law and Peter Kyle has said those wanting to overturn it are "on the side of predators." These types of accusations do nothing but widen divisions and fail to recognise the genuine concerns people have regarding their personal information and its safety. We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Business Insider
17 hours ago
- Business Insider
'Bond King' Bill Gross made millions betting against GameStop. He says the stock is behaving like bitcoin now.
Bill Gross says he's steering clear of the latest crop of meme stocks for now, despite making millions of dollars betting against GameStop and AMC in the past. The billionaire investor told Business Insider he had "no interest" in Opendoor, Kohl's, American Eagle, and other stocks whose prices spiked as buzz on Reddit and other social media spurred retail traders to pile in. Day traders have Microsoft and Meta "to play with for now," Gross said. The tech titans are up 30% and 25% respectively this year because of AI excitement. Gross says GameStop isn't acting like a meme stock Gross — known as the "Bond King" for growing fixed-income titan PIMCO's flagship Total Return Fund to $270 billion over nearly 30 years — said the stock that started it all, GameStop, is "not behaving like a meme" and is "much less volatile" than before. He added he still viewed it as a "good candidate for option selling." He added that the stock "seems to mimic bitcoin," the most valuable cryptocurrency, known for its volatility and passionate fanbase. Bitcoin's price fell by a quarter between early January and early April this year, but has rallied to record highs of above $110,000. GameStop announced its first bitcoin purchase in late May, securing 4,710 tokens worth around $537 million at current prices. Adjusted for a stock split in 2022, GameStop soared from around $1 in the summer of 2020 to a peak intraday price of $121 on January 28, 2021. It has traded within a much tighter range of around $20 to $35 over the past 12 months. It followed a similar trajectory to bitcoin by rising sharply in the fourth quarter of 2024, slumping this spring, and rebounding through early June. However, GameStop then fell after disappointing first-quarter earnings and dilutive share sales, whereas bitcoin kept climbing to fresh highs in July. Gross bet against GameStop by selling call options at the height of its meme-stock surge in January 2021. An options contract gives the buyer the right to purchase or sell a stock at an agreed price within a set period. Sellers wager these contracts will expire worthless, and they can simply keep the premium paid by the buyer. Gross was $15 million in the red, losing sleep at one point as GameStop kept climbing, but he doubled down. He later said he made between $15 million and $20 million betting against GameStop and AMC. "I knew I had an advantage over Reddit and the boys," Gross has said about his original meme-stock wagers, as he had access to real-time options and volatility data on his Bloomberg terminal. Gross has been a vocal skeptic of meme stocks for years, calling them "lottery tickets" and describing buyers of overpriced options as "fish at the poker table." He's also said that each buying frenzy ends with a "musical chair, me-first exit" from the stock. Besides GameStop and AMC, Gross also sold put and call options on Trump Media in the spring of 2024 to cash in on the craze around the president's stock.
