Iran tensions make thermal coal a winner against pricier LNG
Thermal coal may end up as a major beneficiary of escalating hostilities in the Middle East as the fuel used to generate electricity becomes cheaper than one of its main competitors liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Much of the focus of the potential fallout from the conflict between Israel, and now the US, and Iran is the threat to crude oil and refined fuels shipped through the Strait of Hormuz.
All of Qatar's LNG also goes through the narrow waterway separating the gulfs of Persia and Oman, and this amounts to almost 20% of the global seaborne supply of the super-chilled fuel.
While there hasn't yet been any disruption of Qatar's LNG, the threat that Iran may attempt to block the strait or attack shipping has seen spot LNG prices rise in Asia, the biggest market.
LNG for delivery to North Asia rose to $14 (R253.10) per million British thermal units (mmBtu) in the week to June 20, a four-month high and up from $12.6 (R227.79) the week before.
The weekly price assessment also came before the US joined Israel's bombing campaign against Iran, with President Donald Trump claiming on June 21 that the strikes had 'completely and totally obliterated' three nuclear facilities.
The involvement of the US makes it more likely that LNG prices will continue to rise to reflect the increased risk premium.
But even at the current level, LNG is no longer competitive against thermal coal in the two major markets where fuel-switching can occur, Japan and South Korea.
The price of Australian thermal coal with an energy content of 6,000 kilocalories per kilogram at Newcastle Port rose to a four-month high of $109.41 (R1,978) a tonne in the week to June 20, according to data from globalCOAL.
This is the grade of thermal coal most used by Japan and South Korea, as well as Taiwan.
Using LSEG data to convert the price of coal into mmBtu shows Australia's Newcastle benchmark is now about $12.18 (R220.30) per mmBtu, or a 13% discount to the spot LNG price.
The most recent low for spot LNG was in early May when the price dipped to $11 (R198.93) per mmBtu, at which point it was cheaper than Newcastle coal, which was $11.47 (R207.38).
But spot LNG prices have rallied harder than those for coal in recent weeks, a trend that is likely to continue for as long as tensions remain high in the Middle East.
As it has only been 10 days since Israel started its bombing campaign against Iran it's still too early to see a sustained trend in the volumes of coal being purchased by Japan and South Korea.
However, there are signs that coal imports are starting to increase, with commodity analysts Kpler tracking Japan's arrivals at 6.57-million tonnes in June, up from 6.39-million in May.
More interestingly, Kpler is already estimating that Japan's thermal coal imports will jump to 7.23-million tonnes, which would be the most since March.
It's likely that the July number will be revised higher as more cargoes are assessed.
There is also an element of seasonality to Japan's thermal coal imports, which tend to rise in the winter and summer peak demand periods.
This means it will be important to look at the year-on-year changes to see if Asia's third-biggest coal buyer is buying more of the fuel.
Japan imported 10.05-million tonnes of thermal coal in July last year, and given that the volume already assessed for this coming July is more than 70% of that total, it's likely that imports next month will show an increase from July 2024.
It's also worth noting that Asia's two biggest coal importers, China and India, don't have much ability to swap LNG for coal given their limited use of natural gas for power generation.
But on a longer-term note, both countries are likely to view the unrest in the Middle East as another compelling reason to reduce dependency on imported crude oil and LNG as rapidly as possible.
If that means using their vast domestic reserves of coal, supplemented by imports, to electrify transportation at a faster pace, it's likely that this is a path they will pursue irrespective of climate change concerns.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
Trump hints at Iran regime change
JOHANNESBURG -US president Donald Trump has hinted at a potential regime change in Iran, after attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites. Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, questioning whether the current regime, is able to "Make Iran Great Again'. His position contrasts with some his officials, who have been saying the military strike was not aimed at regime change.

IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Mixed views of US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites
One moment, Donald Trump was saying that he needed 2 more weeks to think about the next step, then, suddenly, 6 B-2 bomber jets are flying into Iran and dropping bunker-busting bombs- obliterating Iran's proudly protected Nuclear sites, deep underneath the hardened, mountainous facility. The World at large is a much safer place than it was 2 days ago, but Trump's critics are quick to jump to conclusions that there must be some political motivation for this attack on Iran's nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. Depending on where you stand with Donald Trump as a mere person, or what your ideological or religious views are, the way that you reason and the conclusions that you will reach will be directly linked to your belief systems. I do not believe that when a regime warns of your annihilation and keeps enriching uranium to weapons grade, I must be so naive to think that they have just been saying this for fun, for several decades now. Iran's ties with North Korea and Russia, as well as China, are enough to make the hairs stand up on the back of your neck. Some would say that the US should've never joined this war on terror, others would say that Trump betrayed his voters, while some would call Netanyahu a murderer and all kinds of ugly names, when in fact, both Trump and Netanyahu have proven to be men of truth, men of honour and above all, men of extreme strength. I cannot think of anything stronger and more admirable than 2 godly men who stand up in power, for the Free World, doing what no other nation has ever managed to do- striking Iran in its backyard, so quickly, that even the Ayatolla had no idea what had just happened.


The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
Possible name change on the cards for one of SA's oldest towns
The African Transformation Movement (ATM) has called on Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie to begin processes to change the name of Harrismith in the Free State due to its cultural sensitivities. According to BusinessTech , the ATM requested this of McKenzie in a recent parliamentary Q&A, revealing that towns named after historical figures who caused harm to the local indigenous population should be changed. MP for the Movement, Vuyolwethu Zungula, revealed that the name 'Harrismith' was an unpleasant reminder to the AmaXhosa Kingdom in particular, as it was their King, Hintsa kaKhawuta, who was captured and killed in 1835 by Governor Harry Smith, whom the town was named after. Harrismith itself has faced similar calls for name changes before, with proposals put forth as early as 2005, with Intabazwe being the preferred name choice. Another proposal was put forward in 2014/15, but did not find support from local communities, who petitioned to keep the name the same. Founded in 1849, Harrismith was named after British Governor Sir Harry Smith. The incredibly old South African town played a role during the Anglo-Boer War and still has some heritage buildings that reflect its colonial past. Minister McKenzie, in response to Zungula's proposal, said that it was not the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture's responsibility to initiate name changes in the country. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.