Macron says the EU-US trade deal's not yet done
'To be free, one must be feared. We haven't been feared enough,' Macron said during a meeting of the French council of ministers, French media reported, calling for 'relentless efforts to rebalance trade, particularly in the services sector.'
'This is not the end of the story, and we will not stop here,' the French president added, as the EU Commission is still negotiating exemptions to the 15% US tariffs on EU imports agreed on 27 July.
Since the beginning of the tariff war with the US, France has consistently favoured a hardline approach, brandishing the threat of the anti-coercion instrument — an EU tool that allows foreign companies to be denied access to public procurement, licenses, or intellectual property rights.
The tool would enable the EU to target US services, where the bloc runs a trade deficit with the US, unlike in goods.
Countermeasures
The EU has also adopted a package of countermeasures worth €95 billion targeting US products, but these were suspended until 4 August. The Commission is now awaiting a US executive order confirming that a 15% blanket tariff will apply to imports of EU goods as of 1 August.
'Of course the measures are there,' an EU official said, adding: 'They have been approved by the member states. So if there was a need, we could always bring them back on Tuesday [4 August]. But that is not the assumption from which we start this next phase in transatlantic relations.'
The French President acknowledged that negotiations with the US had been difficult, and welcomed exemptions secured for the aerospace sector, considered strategic for Paris. France also hopes that the Commission will manage to negotiate an exemption for wine and spirits, which represent France's leading export market to the US.
'We are continuing to negotiate with the Americans so that, if possible, spirits, perhaps wine, and other sectors can be exempted. It's a work in progress," French Economy Minister Éric Lombard told French radio on Wednesday.
On top of aircraft, Von der Leyen on Sunday announced that zero-for-zero tariffs will apply to certain chemicals, generic drugs, semiconductor-making equipment, some agricultural products (but with the exclusion of all sensitive products like beef, rice, ethanol, sugar or poultry), some natural resources and critical raw materials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
12 minutes ago
- LeMonde
The encouraging response to France's initiative to recognize Palestine
One week after President Emmanuel Macron pledged on July 24 to recognize the State of Palestine at the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September, there have been notable shifts. Two other G7 member states, the United Kingdom and Canada, have also taken steps toward recognition, as has Portugal. While the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict calls for caution, this momentum is encouraging. The French commitment would certainly not have resonated the same way if Israel had finally ended its war against Gaza and the Palestinians surviving there – with no resolution for the hostages still held captive. Instead, the coalition led by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chose escalation by evoking ethnic cleansing and wielding starvation as a weapon. The Israeli-American organization set up to reinforce Israeli control over Gaza has produced well-known results: notoriously insufficient food distributions that have turned into bloodbaths due to its incompetence. With Israel maintaining total control over access to this narrow strip of land-turned-deathtrap, it is solely responsible for the global outrage provoked by the suffering inflicted upon its residents. Unsurprisingly, the French initiative has sparked Israel's fury. One can only hope that this will help open the eyes of those who still see Israel as it once was, rather than what it has become. The overwhelming adoption by the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, of a non-binding resolution in favor of annexing the West Bank is another warning sign. It is regrettable that Israeli centrist parties chose to abstain on an issue concerning a territory conquered militarily in 1967 and colonized by force, over which Israel has no legitimate right. Against this backdrop of Israeli intransigence, the French initiative stands out for restoring a political dimension at a time when the lack of any prospects has fueled extremism for years. Especially significant is its clear stance toward Hamas, which bears responsibility for triggering this ongoing tragedy – namely, the massacres of October 7, 2023. It is imperative that Hamas be disarmed and evicted, something that more than 22 months of all-out war have failed to achieve. A glimmer of hope This position is shared by Arab countries, which could help rebuild Gaza and offer a glimmer of hope to its people once the fighting ends. The corollary of Hamas's removal has also been reaffirmed: the rebuilding of a Palestinian Authority (PA) that is currently discredited. It is worth recalling that the PA was established by the 1993 Oslo Accords to support a peace process, not to serve as a powerless auxiliary to an occupying power. But there is no guarantee that the momentum seen since July 24 will bear fruit. The threats made by Donald Trump against Canada following Prime Minister Mark Carney's statement in favor of recognizing Palestine demonstrate the determination of those unwilling to exert any meaningful pressure on Netanyahu. Yet the voices in France and abroad that have criticized Macron's initiative offer no alternative but to remain entrenched in a dead end.
Euronews
44 minutes ago
- Euronews
EU AI Act doesn't do enough to protect artists' copyright, groups say
As the European Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act)comes into force, groups representing artists say there are still many loopholes that need to be fixed for them to thrive in a creative world increasingly dominated by AI. The AI Act, celebrated for being the first comprehensive legislation to regulate AI globally, is riddled with problems, these organisations say. Groups like the European Composer and Songwriter Alliance (ECSA) and the European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (GESAC) argue that it fails to protect creators whose works are used to train generative AI models. Without a clear way to opt out or get paid when tech companies use their music, books, movies, and other art to train their AI models, experts say that their work is continually at risk. 'The work of our members should not be used without transparency, consent, and remuneration, and we see that the implementation of the AI Act does not give us,' Marc du Moulin, ECSA's secretary general, told Euronews Next. 'Putting the cart before the horse' The purpose of the AI Act is to make sure AI stays 'safe, transparent, traceable, non-discriminatory and environmentally friendly,' the European Commission, the European Union's executive body, says in an explainer on the law. The law rates AI companies based on four levels of risk: minimal, limited, high, or unacceptable. Those in the unacceptable range are already banned, for example AIs that are manipulative or that conduct social scoring, where they rank individuals based on behaviour or economic status. Most generative AI falls into a minimal risk category, the Commission says. The owners of those technologies still have some requirements, like publishing summaries of the copyrighted data that companies used to train their AIs. Under the EU's copyright laws, companies are allowed to use copyrighted materials for text and data mining, like they do in AI training, unless a creator has 'reserved their rights,' Du Moulin said. Du Moulin said it's unclear how an artist can go about opting out of their work being shared with AI companies. 'This whole conversation is putting the cart before the horse. You don't know how to opt out, but your work is already being used,' he said. The EU's AI Code of Practice on General-Purpose (GPAI), a voluntary agreement for AI companies, asks providers to commit to a copyright policy, put in place safeguards to avoid any infringements of rights, and designate a place to receive and process complaints. Signatories so far include major tech and AI companies such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. AI providers have to respect copyright laws, the Commission says The additional transparency requirements under the AI Act give artists clarity on who has already used their material and when, du Moulin added, making it difficult to claim any payment for work that's already been scraped to train AI models. 'Even if the AI Act has some good legal implications, it only works for the future – it will not be retroactive,' Du Moulin said. 'So everything which has been scraped already … it's a free lunch for generative AI providers who did not pay anything'. Adriana Moscono, GESAC's general manager, said some of her members tried opting out by sending letters and emails to individual AI companies to get a license for their content, but were not successful. 'There was no answer,' Moscono told Euronews Next. 'There was absolute denial of the recognition of … the need to respect copyright and to get a license. So please, European Commission, encourage licensing'. Thomas Regnier, a Commission spokesperson, said in a statement to Euronews Next that AI providers have to respect the rights holders when they carry out text and data mining, and if there have been infringements, they can settle it privately. The AI Act 'in no way affects existing EU copyright laws,' Regnier continued. Mandate licence negotiations, groups ask Du Moulin and Moscono are asking the Commission to urgently clarify the rules around opting out and copyright protection in the law. 'The code of practice, the template and the guidelines, they don't provide us any capacity to improve our situation,' Moscono said. 'They're not guaranteeing … a proper application of the AI Act'. The advocates said the Commission could also mandate that AI companies negotiate blanket or collective licenses with the respective artist groups. Germany's Society for Musical Performing and Mechanical Reproduction Rights (GEMA) filed two copyright lawsuits against AI companies OpenAI, the parent of ChatGPT, and Suno AI, an AI music generation app. While not directly related to the AI Act, Du Moulin says the verdict could determine to what extent AI companies could be bound to copyright laws. The Commission and the European Court of Justice, the EU's high court, have also signalled that they will review the text and data mining exemption in the copyright legislation issued in 2019, Du Moulin said. New AI companies have to make sure they are compliant with the AI Act's regulations by 2026. That deadline extends to 2027 to companies already operating in the EU.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Cruel summer turns up heat on Ursula von der Leyen's second mandate
It's fair to assume Ursula von der Leyen will be looking forward to her summer break. This July, typically a month of low-intensity in Brussels politics, has been nothing short of a whirlwind for the president of the European Commission, with consequential decisions and pivotal moments that could reshape the trajectory of her five-year mandate. Nobody expected her second term to be an easy ride, certainly not after the electoral victory of Donald Trump, a man whose beliefs are directly at odds with the bloc's defence of predictable rules, open markets and international cooperation. Still, the events of the last five weeks, a powerful blend of domestic bickering, global turmoil and personal scrutiny, crack the president's tightly controlled image and leave her vulnerable to a sort of stinging criticism she had previously avoided. Here's how von der Leyen's summer got crueller and bleaker. First, the motion Von der Leyen never enjoyed hugely harmonious relations with the European Parliament. MEPs have routinely complained about the president's well-known preference for engaging with member states, the real holders of political power, and her perceived tendency to treat the hemicycle as a second-rate legislator. Tensions and discontent had been simmering for months when a hard-right lawmaker, Romania's Gheorghe Piperea, drafted a motion of censure against the European Commission and managed to secure the necessary 72 signatures to put it to a vote. Piperea's motion, which combined the Pfizergate scandal with conspiracies about electoral interference, never had a realistic chance of succeeding. The far-fetched move was ultimately rejected with 360 votes against and 175 in favour. But the arithmetic was not the point. The motion put von der Leyen in a rare position of defiance. The Commission chief was forced to address, one by one, the accusations that Piperea had levelled against her, rejecting them all as "false claims" and "sinister plots". Socialists, liberals and greens, all of whom backed her re-election last year, seized the moment to air their pent-up frustration and run through a shopping list of recriminations, raising serious questions about the viability of the centrist coalition. "I will always be ready to debate any issue that this house wants, with facts and with arguments," she said, offering an olive branch for "unity". The saga polarised the Parliament and weakened von der Leyen. Crucially, it proved how relatively easy it is for MEPs to file a motion of censure at any point. Manon Aubry, the co-leader of The Left, has begun collecting signatures for a fresh attempt. Then, the budget Bruised from the motion of censure, von der Leyen shifted gears to focus on what was expected to be her biggest announcement of the year: the Commission's long-awaited proposal for the bloc's next seven-year budget (2028-2034). It was the perfect opportunity for von der Leyen to showcase her political gravitas, reframe the conversation and turn a page on the acrimonious vote. As it happened, the proposal was marred by internal fights over the total size of the budget, the restructuring of programmes and the financial allocation for each priority. Her novel idea to merge agricultural and cohesion funds into a single envelope leaked in advance and prompted immediate criticism from the powerful farming lobby. Her cabinet's penchant for secrecy left other Commissioners in a scramble to figure out how much money they would have in future for their portfolios. By the time von der Leyen unveiled the €2 trillion budget, the largest ever put forward, attention was split between her ground-breaking blueprint and the behind-the-scenes drama, which stretched through the night until the final meeting. During the press conference, the president was asked the awkward question on whether she had treated her 26 Commissioners with fairness and respect. "Not everyone was satisfied," she said, explaining the one-by-one consultations. "There's strong support. The collegial decision is taken. And now we have to fight to bring this budget further in the next two years." Later, the summit "Unsustainable." That is how Commission officials had described the state of EU-China relations in anticipation of a high-stakes bilateral summit in Beijing. China's generous use of state subsidies to boost domestic production despite lacking the internal demand to absorb it has provoked the fury of Brussels, which fears the intense race-to-the-bottom could decimate European industry. Beijing's decision to curb exports of critical raw materials, hinder market access for foreign firms and continue its "no-limits partnership" with Moscow added to the piled-up tensions. Despite the urgent need for tangible change, Ursula von der Leyen left the summit with little to show. There was a new commitment to address bottlenecks in the supply of rare earths and a joint statement on climate action. Beyond that, no progress was achieved, and the main points of friction were left conspicuously unaddressed. "We have reached a clear inflection point," von der Leyen told reporters. "As we said to the Chinese leadership, for trade to remain mutually beneficial, it must become more balanced. Europe welcomes competition. But it must be fair." The underwhelming summit suggests EU-China relations will remain confrontational for the foreseeable future, trapping von der Leyen between two perilous avenues: retaliate and risk facing Beijing's wrath or offer concessions that might not be reciprocated. "With its rare earth controls, China has given Europe a glimpse of the havoc it can wreak if the trade battle gets hot," Noah Barkin, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, wrote in his latest newsletter. "But if Europe fails to push back forcefully, throwing all the defensive trade tools it has at China, the long-term damage to its industrial base is likely to be profound." And finally, the deal Ursula von der Leyen's admiration for the transatlantic alliance faced its most gruelling test on 2 April 2025, when Donald Trump unveiled his contentious "reciprocal" tariffs to single-handedly redesign the economic order built at the end of World War II. That fateful day triggered frantic negotiations to spare the export-oriented bloc from Trump's sweeping duties. His ultimatum to apply an across-the-board 30% rate, made in a letter addressed to von der Leyen, caused palpable panic across Brussels. With the deadline of 1 August looming ever closer, the Commission chief flew to Scotland and met Trump in a last-ditch attempt to seal a deal of sorts. What emerged from those talks was an agreement to apply a 15% tariff on the majority of EU products and a 0% tariff on the majority of US products. Additionally, the bloc made tentative pledges to spend an astonishing $750 billion on American energy and invest $600 billion in the American market by the end of Trump's mandate. The outcry was loud and fast: critics spoke of capitulation, humiliation and submission to decry the extremely lopsided nature of the deal, which codifies the highest tariffs that transatlantic commerce has seen in over 70 years. Von der Leyen, who had just stood firm against Beijing's demands, struggled to explain why she had offered such far-reaching concessions to satisfy Trump. "15% is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get," she said. The deal, factually disadvantageous for the bloc, takes the shine off von der Leyen's reputation as a reliable manager-in-chief and threatens to become a painful thorn in her second term, which is meant to prioritise competitiveness and growth. If anything, she might take comfort in the fact that none of the 27 EU leaders appear to have the stomach to tear the deal apart and start negotiations from scratch. "Europe does not yet see itself as a power," said French President Emmanuel Macron. "To be free, you must be feared. We were not feared enough."
