Did Vladimir Putin prefer Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump in 2016? Declassified intelligence report makes startling claim
Vladimir Putin
's true preferences in the 2016 US election. Contrary to the widely accepted narrative that Russia aimed to boost
Donald Trump
's chances, the reports show that key intelligence indicators suggesting Putin may have preferred
Hillary Clinton
were ignored or dismissed.
The ICA's failure to explore alternative hypotheses has been called a "serious tradecraft mistake" with high-impact consequences, influencing top US government decisions across three branches. These revelations are shifting the focus of Russiagate from alleged collusion with Trump to overlooked intelligence about Clinton.
Declassified reports:
CIA
ignored signs Putin may have wanted Clinton to win
According to Finding #7 from the declassified oversight report, the ICA failed to perform a systematic evaluation of alternative explanations, a core requirement of intelligence tradecraft under ICD 203.
Specifically, it dismissed the possibility that Putin did not care who won, or even had strategic reasons to prefer a Clinton presidency.
The overlooked evidence suggests that:
Putin might have viewed Clinton as a more vulnerable and predictable adversary, potentially easier to manipulate diplomatically.
Russia held back more damaging kompromat on Clinton, suggesting a calculated move to retain leverage over a future Clinton administration, leverage that would not exist with Trump.
The ICA authors' insistence on a 'single-track hypothesis' led them to ignore contrary intelligence and attempt to shape weak evidence to support the conclusion that Putin favored Trump.
A 'high-impact' intelligence failure with political consequences
The report criticizes the ICA's methodology, especially given its massive influence. The document was disseminated across 250 US officials, including members of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches, and heavily influenced public opinion.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Understand The Importance Of Steam-Based Sterilization
contentcuehub
Search Now
Undo
Analysts argue that the ICA's failure to account for alternative theories misled US policymakers at a critical time.
Furthermore:
The ICA's narrow focus fueled years of partisan conflict and undermined public trust in democratic institutions.
The claim that Putin 'aspired' to help Trump may have lacked solid grounding, while stronger evidence pointing to Clinton as the real strategic choice was sidelined.
Intelligence insiders now admit the ICA 'glossed over' the possibility that Putin withheld pre-election operations for future use, particularly against Clinton.
Revisiting the narrative, reconsidering the truth
The recent declassification of intelligence documents has cast new light on the origins and direction of the Russiagate narrative. While Donald Trump faced years of scrutiny over alleged Russian ties, including investigations, public doubt, and political fallout, it now appears that some intelligence suggesting Vladimir Putin may have preferred Hillary Clinton was known but not given equal attention.
If true, this raises difficult questions about the role of selective disclosure and political influence within intelligence channels.
For Trump and his supporters, this serves as vindication, not just from the false collusion accusations, but from a broader establishment effort to delegitimize his presidency before it even began. The fact that this evidence was hidden until now suggests institutional bias at the highest levels.
As the US enters another election cycle, the importance of transparency and trust in democratic institutions becomes even more urgent. Both sides of the political divide can agree that the public deserves a full accounting, not just of what happened, but of who decided what the American people were allowed to know.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kapil Patil challenges development claims by sitting Bhiwandi MP, demands proof of work
THANE: Former Union Minister of State and former Member of Parliament from Bhiwandi, Kapil Patil, took a sharp dig at the current MP, Suresh (Balya Mama) Mhatre, challenging him to provide proof of his claimed development work. At a press conference organised to present a decade-long record of development in the Bhiwandi Lok Sabha constituency, Patil questioned the credibility of the current MP's recent statements. 'If the present Member of Parliament completed as many development projects in the last year as he claims, then let him show them to the people—and we will be the first to honour him,' Patil said. Patil engaged in a detailed discussion with journalists on key issues such as the prominent development works over the past decade, the Kalyan Metro, the proposed indoor stadium at Subhash Maidan, the renaming of Navi Mumbai Airport to D.B. Patil, the Lok Sabha elections, the poor condition of the Bhiwandi-Wada highway, the Marathi-Non-Marathi dispute, the KDMC elections, and the slow progress of the SATIS project under the Smart City initiative in the Kalyan station area. 'If someone is genuinely working for development, it doesn't matter which party they belong to. If someone is truly working in the public interest and shows us the work, we should not have any resentment about it. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next Tips and Tricks Undo Over the past ten years, we approved development projects worth at least Rs 28 to 29 thousand crores, and you will see that all these projects are underway. And they claim that all these projects were completed in one year, so we should also ask them to show at least a couple of the projects they have done,' Kapil Patil criticised the current MP Balya Mama Mhatre without naming him. About 85% of the metro work in Bhiwandi city is complete, and Patil criticised the previous coalition govt for the delay in the metro coming to Kalyan due to their indifference. He accused the coalition govt of completely neglecting the approval of the revised DPRs for both Bhiwandi and Kalyan, which led to the delay of the Kalyan Metro. However, he expressed confidence that the current Chief Minister, Devendra Fadnavis, recently approved both DPRs, and the work on the Kalyan Metro will begin soon. Box: "An investigation should be conducted into the organisation using the name of Rajmata Jijamata for corruption..." Rajmata Jijamata not only shaped Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj but also the entire Maharashtra. Therefore, she holds a place of respect and reverence in everyone's heart. However, if a contractor organisation is using Jijamata's name for corruption and fraudulent work, the state govt should take action to prevent them from using this name, Kapil Patil criticised the Jijau organisation and its head, Nilesh Sambre, without naming him over the poor construction of the Bhiwandi-Wada road. Due to the deplorable condition of the much-discussed Bhiwandi-Wada road, 21 people died so far, and many have been disabled. Several social organisations have also protested against the poor condition of this road. Additionally, Kapil Patil indicated that he corresponded with Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis regarding all these matters, and an investigation will commence at the appropriate time.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Cash haul row: SC questions Justice Yashwant Varma over his petition against impeachment; posts plea for hearing on July 30
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday raised several questions while hearing Justice Yashwant Varma's plea seeking to invalidate an in-house inquiry committee's report that indicted him over a large quantity of burnt cash found at his official residence during his tenure as a Delhi high court judge. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and A G Masih questioned senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Justice Varma, asking, "Why did you appear before the inquiry committee? Did you come to the court that the video be removed? Why did you wait for the inquiry to be completed and the report be released? Did you take a chance of a favourable order there first?" The bench also expressed concern over the parties named in the petition and observed that the in-house inquiry report should have been filed along with the plea. In response, Sibal argued that Article 124 lays out the process and said, "The release of video on SC website, public furore, media accusations against judges are prohibited as per constitutional scheme." The court then directed Sibal to file one-page bullet points and correct the memo of parties, and posted the matter for hearing on July 30. Justice Varma has challenged the May 8 recommendation made by then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, which urged Parliament to begin impeachment proceedings against him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo In his plea, Justice Varma claimed the inquiry had "reversed the burden of proof", effectively requiring him to disprove the allegations instead of the panel proving them. He alleged that the panel's findings followed a 'preconceived narrative,' and that the inquiry was rushed 'even at the expense of procedural fairness'. According to the petition, the panel reached adverse conclusions without granting him a full and fair hearing. The report, prepared by a three-judge committee led by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the Punjab and Haryana high court, concluded that Justice Varma and his family had "covert or active control" over the storeroom where the half-burnt cash was discovered, amounting to serious misconduct warranting removal. The panel conducted the inquiry over ten days, examined 55 witnesses, and visited the site of the accidental fire, which broke out around 11:35 pm on March 14 at Justice Varma's official residence in Delhi. At the time, he was serving as a Delhi High Court judge; he currently serves in the Allahabad high court. Following the findings, then CJI Khanna wrote to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi recommending Justice Varma's impeachment.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court raps MP minister Kunwar Vijay Shah for not issuing public apology to Col Sofiya Qureshi
The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up Madhya Pradesh minister Kunwar Vijay Shah for not issuing a public apology over his remarks against Indian Army officer Col Sofiya Qureshi , saying he is testing the court's patience. A bench of Justice Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said the conduct of the minister was making the court doubt his intentions and bonafide. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category PGDM CXO healthcare Data Science Data Analytics Cybersecurity Technology Degree Others Artificial Intelligence Management Leadership Project Management Data Science MBA Design Thinking MCA Public Policy Finance Digital Marketing others Product Management Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis & Decision Making Quantitative & Analytical Skills Organizational Management & Leadership Innovation & Entrepreneurship Duration: 24 Months IMI Delhi Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Online) Starts on Sep 1, 2024 Get Details Senior advocate K Parmeshwar, appearing for Shah, said he had issued a public apology, which was online, and would be placed on court's record. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now The bench asked the special investigation team (SIT) constituted to probe the statements made by the minister to submit its report by August 13. The top court noted 87 people were examined by the probe team, which was currently examining the statements. Live Events The bench also refused to examine a plea filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur seeking Shah's resignation but said some of the allegations made in the writ petition about the past instances would be looked into by the three-member SIT. The top court posted the hearing for August 18. The SIT constituted by the Madhya Pradesh government was in compliance with the top court's order. On May 19, the top court chided Shah and constituted the SIT to probe the FIR lodged against him. Shah came under fire after a video, which was circulated widely, showed him allegedly making objectionable remarks against Col Qureshi, who gained nationwide prominence along with another woman officer, Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, during the media briefings on Operation Sindoor . The Madhya Pradesh High Court rebuked Shah for passing "scurrilous" remarks and using "language of the gutters" against Col Qureshi, and ordered police to file an FIR against him on the charge of promoting enmity and hatred. After drawing severe condemnation, Shah expressed regret and said that he respects Col Qureshi more than his sister.
