
Britain's new brain drain is just beginning
Net inward migration has reached staggering levels in Britain. We are absorbing such high numbers that even 250,000 would seem like a modest figure. Many arrivals are imposing huge fiscal costs; our public services and infrastructure are buckling under the strain. Failure to bring it down trashed the contract between government and citizen, destroyed public faith in the political class and may end up putting the Tories on an electoral par with the Monster Raving Loony Party.
Amid this slow-motion disaster, it's easy to forget that, not so long ago, Britain was a nation of emigrants. It was an exodus of people which kept politicians awake at night, not an in-flow of 1.2 million. Between 1815 and 1914 some 10 million people left these islands to seek new lives and opportunities in Australia, Canada, the US and New Zealand.
After the Second World War, so many fled that Winston Churchill issued a plea against the desertion of 'the old land', later describing emigrants as 'rats leaving a sinking ship'. The cost of fighting the most expensive war in history had triggered a series of economic crises – massive national debt, increased rationing, housing shortages – which swiftly dissolved any post-victory euphoria and pushed people to seek prosperity elsewhere.
Even as late as the mid-1980s more people were leaving the country than entering it, despite the near mythologised Windrush generations. Today, tired of flatlining growth and stagnant living standards, the rats are again packing their bags. This is now a country where 28 million private sector workers are expected to support nine million who are economically inactive, six million public sector staff and 13 million state pensioners. Where the top 1 per cent of earners pay 29 per cent of income tax and the top 10 per cent pay nearly two-thirds, and are then pilloried for failing to pay their 'fair share'.
No wonder 400,000 workers are reportedly planning to move abroad in the next two years. It's a miracle the figure isn't higher.
Even in the aftermath of Brexit, leaving has never been easier. Psychologically, it's no longer the commitment it was in the days of the Ten Pound Poms heading Down Under, or the Irish taking a week-long steamship journey to Ellis Island. Cheap flights and improved communications have made the process far easier.
Video calls and voice over IP make keeping in touch with Mum and Dad easier, and returning to see relatives two to three times a year is no different from how often many of us manage to reunite with the family when we live at opposite ends of the country. With rapid flights we can get back from Faro to Newcastle faster than we can drive up from Portsmouth.
And there's no shortage of places to go. We're fleeing not just to the Anglosphere but to Europe and the Middle East. Close to 250,000 British expats are now living in Dubai, with a similar number in Abu Dhabi. And the more British people there are in these cities, the more palatable they will seem to those left behind.
Back in the 1940s, Ontario Premier George Drew staged a series of publicity stunts to attract British immigrants. Today, Elon Musk believes that, 'if you want your team to win the championship, you need to recruit top talent wherever they may be'.
Were his buddy Donald Trump to open up a visa route to our top earners, it would surely plunge Britain into an even greater fiscal crisis.
Frankly, it would be precisely what our useless politicians – though not our once-great nation – deserve. Having treated the hard-working less as a prized horse pulling a wagon than a nag to be flogged until it collapses, they can't be surprised that so many are starting to make hay elsewhere.
The UK lost a net 10,800 millionaires to migration last year, a 157 per cent increase on 2023 and more than any other country bar totalitarian China.
There's still hope. When a population has sufficient energy and drive and the conditions are right, recovery can be rapid. Think West Germany and Japan after World War II.
But that relies on giving people the opportunity to build back again. Look also at Zimbabwe and South Africa – wealthy countries all but destroyed by incompetent and vicious, predatory governments. And with every net zero, DEI, welfarist, tax-and-spend policy Labour is moving our future further from the first world towards the junk heap.
For many contemplating emigration, the question may soon be 'when', not 'if'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
36 minutes ago
- Metro
Violence spirals out of control across LA after Trump says 'bring in the troops'
Los Angeles has been rocked by violent protests, with Donald Trump calling for soldiers to bring the city under control. Rioters blocked off a major road and set self-driving cars on fire as police used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs to control the crowd. British photographer Nick Stern, 60, from Hertford, was among those shot: he had his thigh pierced by a rubber bullet while taking pictures on Saturday evening, and told Metro how he passed out from the pain and needed surgery. The unrest was sparked by sweeping immigration raids, part of the pledge by the president to arrest some 3,000 suspected illegal migrants every day. Thousands of protesters took to the streets in response to Trump's deployment of the National Guard, against the wishes of California's state governor. The situation calmed down somewhat by yesterday evening, with police declaring an unlawful assembly, which means they can arrest those who do not leave. Some of those remaining hurled objects at police from behind a makeshift barricade, and others threw chunks of concrete, rocks, electric scooters and fireworks at California Highway Patrol officers and their vehicles parked on the closed southbound 101 freeway. Officers ran under an overpass to take cover. The protests in LA, a sprawling city of four million people, were centred in downtown several blocks. The Guard was deployed specifically to protect federal buildings, including the detention centre where protesters concentrated. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said officers were 'overwhelmed' by the remaining protesters. He said they included regular agitators who appear at demonstrations to cause trouble. Several dozen people were arrested throughout the weekend of protest. One was detained on Sunday for throwing a Molotov cocktail at police, and another for ramming a motorcycle into a line of officers. Mr Trump responded to Mr McDonnell on Truth Social, telling him to arrest protesters in face masks. 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!! he wrote. Starting in the morning, the troops stood shoulder to shoulder, carrying long guns and riot shields as protesters shouted 'shame' and 'go home'. After some closely approached the guard members, another set of uniformed officers advanced on the group, shooting smoke-filled canisters into the street. Minutes later, the Los Angeles Police Department fired rounds of crowd-control munitions to disperse the protesters, who they said were assembled unlawfully. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Much of the group then moved to block traffic on the 101 freeway until state patrol officers cleared them from the roadway by late afternoon. Nearby, at least four self-driving Waymo cars were set on fire, sending large plumes of black smoke into the sky and exploding intermittently as the electric vehicles burned. By evening, police had issued an unlawful assembly order shutting down several blocks of downtown Los Angeles. Flash bangs echoed out every few seconds into the evening. Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom requested that Mr Trump remove the guard members in a letter on Sunday afternoon, calling their deployment a 'serious breach of state sovereignty'. He was in Los Angeles meeting local law enforcement and officials. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Elon Musk has 'PTSD' after leaving White House, his dad says MORE: Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained MORE: The Dark MAGA conspiracy about Trump, Musk and a new world order


Glasgow Times
41 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Retail giant announced shock closure of Glasgow Fort store
Scotts will shut down its shop at the East End leisure facility. A sign, which has been placed on the store's window, revealed the closure. It reads: "Closing down. Up to 70 per cent off." READ MORE: Global retailer opens stunning 'new' store at Glasgow shopping centre READ MORE: Major retailer to reopen its 'brand-new' store at Glasgow Fort (Image: Newsquest) According to Glasgow Fort's website, the retailer is known for selling some of the 'finest brands and premium fashion lifestyle outfits'. They also claim Scotts has been operating for more than 25 years. It sells brands including Adidas Originals, Lacoste, Fred Perry, and Pretty Green. At the moment, it is unknown why or when the shop will close its doors. Scotts has been contacted for comment. READ MORE: Major retailer suddenly closes down Glasgow Silverburn store It comes after we reported how Superdry recently closed down its store in Glasgow's Silverburn shopping centre. Signage revealed the closure of the British clothing firm's shop in the Southside leisure facility.


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
My money rule to avoid arguments with my housemates and girlfriend – it's fair but not everyone will agree
We also reveal tips from a financial therapist on how to avoid rows over money BILL-IANT My money rule to avoid arguments with my housemates and girlfriend – it's fair but not everyone will agree THERE'S nothing more British than the silence at the end of a meal in a restaurant as you wait for someone to say how you'll split the bill. With my mates and girlfriend there's an unwritten rule that we always split the bill equally based on how many of us there are. Advertisement 1 Consumer Reporter Sam Walker's easy trick avoids money-based arguments Of course, this can get tricky if someone hasn't had booze or a much cheaper meal, as it can feel like they've got a raw deal. On the other hand, there's always one in every friendship group who orders an extra side and pudding. I can't help but feel a bit resentful that I'm funding their extra indulgence. So I wasn't surprised to hear that the number one issue that couples row about is money, according to Royal London. Advertisement It gets even more complicated when you go on holiday. I've often found myself in scenarios with mates where people have taken umbrage at having to split the cost of a night out the day after. Other times people have kicked up a fuss about splitting the cost of off the cuff activities. The bill splitting app I swear by A few years ago on a weekend away with University mates where we play sport, including football, cricket and rounders, one of my friends suggested we use Splitwise. Advertisement We were trying to figure out how to share the cost of all the food and drink we'd bought when one friend recommended using the app. It's free to download off the Apple App Store or Google Play and couldn't be easier to navigate. There's also a Pro version which costs £3.99 a month or £39.99 a year, letting you add an unlimited number of expenses and scan and add receipts to a running your running total. Once downloaded, you create a new group (of friends, family or between you and a partner) and can allocate a "type" to that group. Advertisement For example, you can make it a "trip", "home" or "couple"-based group. Once you've done this, you add any expenses to the group and can decide how it's split between the members. The options are: you paid, split equally you are owed the full amount someone else paid, split equally someone else paid and is owed the full amount Once you've added any expenses, they are added to a grand total which tells you whether you owe money, or are owed it. Advertisement How it has made my life easier Splitwise has easily become one of my most-used apps, especially since moving in with my partner a year ago. We use it to split the cost of the weekly food shop, monthly utility bills and takeaways. You might ask "why would you need a bill-splitting app" for these basic expenses, but in reality it's a lifesaver. Her job involves shift work and I work occasional weekends meaning we can sometimes go days without having a proper conversation. Advertisement So being able to quickly add a little Tesco Express basket of food or a holiday car rental cost to the app in a matter of seconds, and know how much each person owes, makes for a much more efficient way of tracking our shared expenses. Using the app for trips abroad with friends has been incredibly helpful as well, especially with larger groups. I've used it on stag dos where costs can quickly add up and various members of the group have different budgets and need to track how much they've spent. Putting everything through the app can avoid awkward conversations where you ask for a few quid back. Advertisement It might seem stingy that I'm quibbling with my girlfriend and mates over a couple of quid - but it can quickly add up and it really helps us all feel like things are fair. Other apps you could use Unsurprisingly, Splitwise is not the only bill-splitting app out there. There is also Settle Up which also comes in a basic free version and works similarly to Splitwise. You can also pay £3.99 a month for Premium which comes with no ads, charts and lets you scan receipts. Advertisement The app comes with a 4.8* rating on the Apple App Store, compared with 3.8* for Splitwise. Splid is another option which comes with no ads even in the free version. You can also choose to add expenses in 150 currencies while on the Apple App Store reviews show it with a 4.9* rating. Then there's acasa, which unlike Splid, Settle Up and Splitwise, lets you pay bills like council tax directly through the app. Advertisement It's free to download and comes with a 4.5* customer rating on the Apple App Store. How to avoid finance-based tension in relationships WE spoke to Vicky Reynal, financial psychotherapist, who shared her tips for avoiding arguments over money: Don't assume that everyone has the same money values People have different views when it comes to money: what's frugal or excessive, what's too risky vs. responsible, what's reasonable or petty. We can't assume that others will see what's right or fair the same way we'll see it come up all the time because we all have different views on what money is for and how it should be used. When conflict comes up, be curious not attacking When couples or close friends clash over money, the most powerful thing they can do is create a safe space for honest conversations - free from blame. Instead of trying to convince the other that they are wrong and you are right, try to be curious about why they might be seeing things their way and share how you feel about it. It can be helpful – particularly when couples have very different ways of handling money – to ask: 'What are the downsides of my approach to money?' and 'What are the upsides of theirs?' As an example, your caution might protect your future, but your partner's spontaneity might help you live more fully in the present. Once you begin appreciating each other's perspectives, it becomes easier to blend approaches and make collaborative financial decisions. Never rely on assumptions - be crystal clear in your financial agreements Common sources of conflict I see involve informal financial arrangements among loved ones: 'I thought it was a gift—now they're asking for it back.' 'I thought we were splitting the cost evenly'. The real issue usually lies in the lack of clarity from the start. People often avoid being specific because they don't want to make things 'weird' with someone they care about—but it's precisely because you care that it's essential to set clear, unambiguous expectations. Use financial tools and apps thoughtfully Apps like Splitwise or Monzo's shared tabs can be great tools for transparency but it's best when they are introduced early and used consistently. If you bring them in after tension has built, they can sometimes feel accusatory. Frame their use as a shared effort to be fair, not to keep score or place blame. If conflict persists, look at the bigger picture What I mean by this is that sometimes money conflict is not about money at all. Sometimes a friend making a big deal about £7 you owe them could actually be feeling owed a lot more (has she felt you have been a neglecting friend lately?). A partner who is uncomfortable because you spent 'too much' on a gift might be feeling they don't have enough to give you emotionally in the relationship. The point is: ask yourself whether there is a different message that you or the other are trying to convey through this financial conflict. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories