Legal clarification sought in marriage case of a 12-year-old bride
Image: File
A legal dispute is underway between two widows regarding their marriages to the deceased.
One widow claims she was married at the age of 12. The Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg has referred the case for oral evidence due to uncertainties about the legality of the marriage and the customs governing it in the 1970s.
The applicant, Ms M, approached the court seeking a declaration that her marriage to B, who is now deceased, is valid at customary law.
The first respondent, Mrs T, in countering the application, said she was married to the deceased at the time of his death. She claimed that by that time, the deceased and the applicant were divorced.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
M explained in court papers that at the time the marriage between her and the deceased took place, he was 20. She claimed that as a 12-year-old in the 1970s, her parents 'gave' her to the deceased to marry.
She stated that by virtue of an agreement, the marriage was valid at customary law. Both her parents are now deceased.
Judge Stewart Wilson remarked that the evidence is insufficient on the papers concerning almost every material fact that he would have to determine to decide this application.
'I do not know what customs governed the marriage that allegedly took place in the 1970s between Ms M and Mr B, when Ms M was 12. I do not know whether those customs would have tolerated a marriage between a 20-year-old and a 12-year-old, even with parental consent.'
The judge added that he also does not know what customs would have been necessary to conclude an ordinary marriage between two adults under the applicable customary law. Nor does he know whether it is possible to divorce in terms of the customary law that applied to the parties at the time.
In their papers, neither of the parties dealt with the form of customary law applicable at the time, or the content of that law. 'Much in these papers is done by way of bare assertion. It is asserted that Ms M married Mr B with her parents' consent. It is asserted by her relatives that that marriage took place. It is equally starkly asserted by Ms T that the marriage was dissolved by the traditional leader with jurisdiction over Ms M's ancestral home.'
The judge said the traditional leader's evidence on affidavit is itself unsatisfactory, since it is common cause that he is blind, and yet he alleges in his affidavit that he has read the papers in this case.
'I do not say that a blind person cannot read legal papers. I say only that where a blind person claims to have done so, it is necessary to state the form in which the papers were made available to them.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
High Court dismisses R4 million defamation claim
A municipality high ranking official's defamation of character R4million claim failed in court this week. The employee said the comments made in a report were 'false and defamatory". Image: Pexels A would-be R4 million defamation of character claim has failed in the High Court of South Africa, at the Mpumalanga Division (Mbombela Main Seat), after a municipality employee could not prove defamatory statements were publicised. Sinenhlanhla Manqele, employed as a technical director at the Thaba Chweu Local Municipality, sought that an attorney and the firm that were mandated to compile a report to investigate the causes of sewer spillage contained 'false and defamatory statements'. Manqele sought that the firm and the attorney each pay him R2 million and interest on the amounts, based on the claim that the contents of the report were intended to tarnish his reputation. Jimmy Baloyi, a lawyer at Baloyi Masango Inc. Attorneys, compiled the report after the local municipality mandated him to investigate a criminal guilty finding of the municipality for the sewage spill. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Regarding the sewage spillage, the guilty finding necessitated the municipal manager to sign an admission of guilt, having been found guilty of transgression of the National Environmental Management: Waste Act (NEMWA Act). Baloyi was mandated to investigate whether the municipality could have avoided the transgression; whether there was any sort of negligence by any of the municipal employees; whether there was proper accountability to workflow of the relevant departments that are necessarily in charge of compliance and to reflect on the criminal case brought against the municipality, and demonstrate the complexities and seriousness of the problem surrounding unlawful municipal sewage discharge. Manqele was one of several employees interviewed during the investigation, and when it was concluded, the report was tabled at the municipality council sitting during August 2022. At the time, the privileged document was presented to 28 councillors. An extract from Baloyi's report read: 'There is an emergency in the technical department that has not been recognised as such by the technical services director and technical services management team. There is a lack of knowledge and skills among the people who ought to be managing the department. 'Whether this is a result of a lack of basic approach to employment or not, there is a lack of will when it comes to applying oneself in the position that one is employed in, from the technical director down to the plumber in the command chain. We were unable to interview the technical director, as he had taken a stand against this by involving an attorney, who indicated that we cannot have a conversation with the technical director without the attorney involved. 'This, on its own, indicated that the technical director knows exactly what is happening in the department. The technical director, in this regard, has no skills to occupy the position he is occupying, which is the reason why he does not comprehend the severity of the impact of the pollution of the sewer spillages around and within the municipal boundaries. 'The technical director does not even comprehend the emergency and urgency that this issue had to be addressed in.' In his delictual claim, Manqele rebutted that 'the report intentionally and maliciously makes false, wrongful, unlawful and defamatory statements against him'. He added that the readers of the report understood the above to mean that he is 'incompetent, unethical and unprofessional; that he is unqualified and occupies the position of a technical director through a dubious appointment; that he lacks skills and knowledge in the portfolio of technical director; and that he is corrupt, insolent and engages in unlawful activities in the municipality.'
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Art heist: R1 million worth of sculptures stolen from Pringle Bay gallery
One of the pieces stolen at the Fomo Fine Art Centre sculptured by by Anton Smit Image: Supplied A brazen overnight theft at the FOMO Fine Art Gallery in Pringle Bay has stripped the space of seven sculptures worth more than R1million and left an even greater sentimental wound. The stolen works, by celebrated South African artists Anton Smit and Janko de Beer, are not only of significant financial value but also irreplaceable cultural treasures. 'The theft took place during the night of Tuesday 5 August or the early hours of Wednesday 6 August. I was at the gallery until early Tuesday evening and returned at around 09:00 on Wednesday morning, when I immediately noticed that several sculptures were missing and one of our security cameras had been broken,' said de Beer, co-owner of the gallery and a celebrated visual artist and sculptor. 'Later, we also discovered that the camera positioned at the entrance to Pringle Bay, at the main intersection, was not functioning. We cannot confirm whether this was damaged during the incident or was already out of order. 'This does not appear to have been an opportunistic crime. The sculptures are large and somewhat heavy, so the thieves would have needed a suitable vehicle, the right equipment, and enough people to move them. All indications suggest it was a planned and targeted theft.' According to de Beer, seven sculptures were taken in total: six by Anton Smit and one by Janko de Beer, with a combined value of just over R1 million. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The Janko de Beer Sculpture was also stolen Image: Supplied However, the emotional and cultural loss is far greater. These works are unique and instantly recognisable to those familiar with South African sculpture, making them difficult to sell openly without raising suspicion. 'This theft is not only a personal blow to the gallery and the artists involved but also to the broader South African art community.' Despite damaged security equipment and no confirmed leads, police have been actively investigating de Beer. Three of these Anton Smit sculptures were stolen Image: Supplied 'The Kleinmond SAPS have been extremely proactive and supportive, but at this stage we are not aware of any solid leads,' de Beer said. Efforts to recover the artworks began immediately. 'We immediately posted details and photographs of the stolen works on social media, which have been shared widely. Our network of collectors, reputable auction houses, and fellow galleries has also been alerted, and we are grateful for the solidarity and support. Because of the distinctiveness of these works, it will be challenging for the thieves to sell them without someone recognising them. 'We are asking members of the public, collectors, and galleries to remain vigilant and report any attempt to resell or transport sculptures that match these descriptions. There is no reward currently on offer, but our focus is on mobilising the art community and the public to help recover the pieces.' In total 7 sculptures were stolen Image: Supplied De Beer said the incident has been deeply felt by all involved. 'The impact is both financial and deeply personal. For the artists, these sculptures represent months of creative effort, skill, and inspiration, and their theft is profoundly discouraging. For us as a gallery, our sculpture garden is something we are proud of. It brings joy to our community and to visitors, and we have always believed that showcasing art outdoors was worth the inherent risks. Until now, we never felt this kind of targeted theft was a likely threat. 'While the incident is disheartening, it will not stop us from doing what we love. We have already strengthened our security measures and remain committed to making art accessible to the public.' He urged the public to act swiftly if they encounter any of the stolen works. 'Please contact Kleinmond SAPS immediately, or get in touch directly with FOMO Fine Arts. Quick action is vital in recovering these works and holding those responsible to account.' Weekend Argus
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Judicial bias claims arise in Joshlin Smith appeal case
According to Nobahle Mkabayi, Judge Nathan Erasmus was biased and hostile towards her client. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers The disappearance of six-year-old Joshlin Smith from Middelpos, Saldanha Bay, returned to the Western Cape High Court on Thursday, this time with defence lawyer Nobahle Mkabayi locked in a heated exchange with Judge Nathan Erasmus over claims of judicial bias. Joshlin's mother, Racquel 'Kelly' Smith, her boyfriend Jacques 'Boeta' Appollis, and family friend Steveno 'Steffie' van Rhyn were earlier convicted of kidnapping and human trafficking after the little girl vanished in February 2024. The State's case centred on witness testimony and statements allegedly made by the accused, but Joshlin has not been found. Representing Van Rhyn in his bid for leave to appeal, Mkabayi accused Erasmus of mishandling key evidence and showing prejudice against her client during the original trial. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ She argued that the judge should have examined certain statements before the trial-within-a-trial to determine whether they were confessions or admissions, and that comments made from the bench discouraged Van Rhyn from testifying. 'When I was leading my client, the court said Ms Swanepoel (State prosecutor) would make a field day out of you,' Mkabayi told Erasmus, describing the remark as threatening. Erasmus rejected her version: 'Why did you not ask for a special entry? I didn't say Ms Swanepoel was going to 'wipe the floor' with your client. Ms Heeramun was wiping the floor with Mr Harmse's client. Don't make statements that are not true.' The back-and-forth intensified as the judge pressed Mkabayi to explain why another court would view Van Rhyn's testimony differently. 'Tell me why his testimony should have been accepted. Is there a reasonable prospect they will win in the next court?' he asked. Mkabayi insisted her client's right to a fair trial had been compromised and said she wanted the matter heard by a different court to prove his innocence. Erasmus stood firm: 'When the defence closed their case, all we did was manage their case. Are you saying I was biased towards your client by saying that?' Mkabayi said yes.
