Khalistani issue casts a shadow on Indo-Canada ties once again
Jazzy B
, a known Khalistani sympathiser, to the British Columbia (BC) assembly in the North American country.
The matter came to light when an Independent MLA of BC Assembly Dallas Brodie posted a video featuring British Columbia Conservative MLA Steve Kooner expressing admiration for Jazzy B, whose real name is Jaswinder Singh Bains and lives in Canada, during the singer's visit to the BC assembly. Canada's fondness for
Khalistani sympathisers
due to vote bank politics has been a major irritant in bilateral ties, particularly under the previous PM Justin Trudeau. Ties still remain downgraded with no high commissioners at the respective missions.
With Prime Minister Mark Carney leading the Liberal Party to a recent win, a thaw in ties was expected but the British Columbia assembly development has not gone down well with India, it has been learnt. Sources here said that the issue is being monitored.
"I come from a singing family myself, and Jazzy B did sing part of my dad's song about 30 years ago. I really appreciated that. And, so I wanna just welcome Jazzy B and also Sabi Gunnar, Inderpal Moga, Chani Nattan, who I know from the community, Marco, Mander," Kooner can be heard saying.
Later, Brodie posted on X, "Today, several prominent pro-Kalistani figures were welcomed in the BC Legislature by MLAs of both the BC Conservatives and New Democratic Party (NDP). Some of those individuals have openly celebrated violent extremists and murderers in their music videos. This is an insult to our Legislature."
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Aid and advice: on Jammu and Kashmir, LG's Assembly member nominations
The Union Ministry of Home Affairs' assertion to the J&K High Court that the Lieutenant Governor (LG) can nominate five Assembly members without the 'aid and advice' of the elected government overrides democratic accountability. Consequential decisions such as nominating members who have voting rights in an elected assembly must flow from democratic mandate, not administrative discretion. The High Court's constitutional question could not be more direct: do the 2023 amendments to the J&K Reorganisation Act, allowing the LG to nominate five Assembly members 'which have the potential of converting the minority government into a majority government and vice-versa,' violate the Constitution's basic structure? Rather than addressing this, the Ministry delves into legal technicalities. Its submission argues that nominations fall outside the elected government's remit, seemingly invoking the K. Lakshminarayanan vs The Union of India precedent from Puducherry while claiming the 'sanctioned strength' includes elected and nominated members. It even references Section 12 of the 1963 Union Territories Act (voting procedures) as justification for bypassing democratic consultation. When five nominated members could determine government stability in a 119-member Assembly, the issue transcends statutory definitions of 'sanctioned strength'. The real question is whether any legal framework allowing appointed officials to potentially overturn the people's electoral verdict violates the democratic essence of the Constitution. The amendments inserted Sections 15A and 15B into the 2019 Act, allowing the LG to nominate two Kashmiri migrants (including one woman) and one from the Pakistan-occupied J&K community, besides the existing power to nominate two women, if inadequately represented in the elected Assembly. This effectively creates five nominated seats. The High Court's framing of this issue acknowledges the stakes involved: this could 'convert minority government into majority government and vice-versa', potentially subverting the electoral process. This concern is not unsubstantiated — in 2021, three years after Lakshminarayanan, Puducherry saw nominated members and defecting elected MLAs contributing to the collapse of the Congress-led government. Also, J&K's trajectory to Union Territory, without consultation with elected representatives, makes democratic accountability even more crucial. The unfulfilled promise of Statehood restoration, acknowledged by the Supreme Court and despite overwhelming support in J&K, reinforces that current arrangements should strengthen democratic governance. The Ministry's argument that nominations exist 'outside the realm of the business of the elected government' also contradicts evolving Supreme Court jurisprudence. In the Delhi services cases of 2018 and 2023, it ruled that the LG should act on elected governments' aid and advice, with discretionary powers treated as exceptions. Seen in this light, the Ministry's arguments do not hold water.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Over 13 lakh houses sanctioned for poor in last three years: Uttar Pradesh minister
LUCKNOW : More than 13 lakh houses have been sanctioned over the last three years for the poor, underprivileged, and destitute in Uttar Pradesh , Rural Development Minister Vijay Laxmi Gautam informed the state Assembly on Tuesday. She was replying to a question by Samajwadi Party member Arman Khan during Question Hour on the second day of the Monsoon Session. Gautam said that between 2022-23 and 2024-25, 10,44,876 houses were sanctioned under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana , while 2,62,594 houses were approved under the Mukhyamantri Awas Yojana . She said that a survey is underway and has covered 57.73 lakh people so far. The process of allotting houses will begin soon, she added.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Land-pooling policy revoked: ‘AAP govt bowed under BJP pressure'
Ludhiana: To celebrate the withdrawal of the land pooling policy, which was withdrawn by the AAP government, 'Kisan Vijay Diwas' was celebrated on Wednesday in Sahnewal constituency. Laddus were distributed in the village of Punjab cabinet minister Hardeep Singh Mundian by BJP Punjab spokesperson Pritpal Singh Baliawal. On the occasion, Baliawal said this victory was not only of the farmers and labourers, but also of every Punjabi, who raised their voice in this struggle and forced AAP government to withdraw this policy. This is a big defeat of the AAP's plan to oppress the farmers at the behest of the people in Delhi and to loot these lands and give them to the dealers of Delhi, the credit for which goes only to the people of Punjab. He said that he had already stopped the AAP's attempt to grab the land in 40 villages in Sahnewal constituency through land pooling. Gram Sabha resolutions and Panchayat resolutions were passed against this in the villages, but the govt was not ready to accept these proposals. However, now the govt finally had to bow down. He said the BJP had been fighting for the rights of farmers from the very first day and this fight would continue in the future as well. "If any government, no matter which party it belongs to, tries to grab the land of farmers, then the BJP will come out on the streets and protest strongly". Advising the farmers to be cautious, Baliawal said that the cunning strategy of the AAP govt cannot be trusted, as it may try to implement this policy again through some other means. But BJP Punjab will always be at the forefront to protect the rights of the farmers of Punjab and will keep exposing the anti-farmer steps of the Bhagwant Mann government. MSID:: 123281543 413 | Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
