Khalistani issue casts a shadow on Indo-Canada ties once again
The Khalistan issue could once again cast a shadow over India-Canada ties following an invitation to Punjabi singers, including
Jazzy B
, a known Khalistani sympathiser, to the British Columbia (BC) assembly in the North American country.
The matter came to light when an Independent MLA of BC Assembly Dallas Brodie posted a video featuring British Columbia Conservative MLA Steve Kooner expressing admiration for Jazzy B, whose real name is Jaswinder Singh Bains and lives in Canada, during the singer's visit to the BC assembly. Canada's fondness for
Khalistani sympathisers
due to vote bank politics has been a major irritant in bilateral ties, particularly under the previous PM Justin Trudeau. Ties still remain downgraded with no high commissioners at the respective missions.
With Prime Minister Mark Carney leading the Liberal Party to a recent win, a thaw in ties was expected but the British Columbia assembly development has not gone down well with India, it has been learnt. Sources here said that the issue is being monitored.
"I come from a singing family myself, and Jazzy B did sing part of my dad's song about 30 years ago. I really appreciated that. And, so I wanna just welcome Jazzy B and also Sabi Gunnar, Inderpal Moga, Chani Nattan, who I know from the community, Marco, Mander," Kooner can be heard saying.
Later, Brodie posted on X, "Today, several prominent pro-Kalistani figures were welcomed in the BC Legislature by MLAs of both the BC Conservatives and New Democratic Party (NDP). Some of those individuals have openly celebrated violent extremists and murderers in their music videos. This is an insult to our Legislature."
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Israel orders military to stop Gaza-bound 'antisemitic' Greta Thunberg
Israel's Defence Minister, Israel Katz, has directed the military to stop a charity boat heading toward Gaza. The boat, named Madleen, is operated the pro-Palestinian Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) and carries 12 crew members, including Swedish climate activist Greta British-flagged vessel left Sicily on June 6 and is currently sailing off the coast of Egypt, planning to defy an Israeli blockade and reach instructed the IDF to act so that the Madleen ... does not reach Gaza," Katz said. "To the antisemitic Greta and her Hamas-propaganda-spouting friends, I say clearly: You'd better turn back, because you will not reach Gaza," he joined the mission to protest to challenge Israel's "illegal siege and escalating war crimes" in Gaza. She has also denied past accusations of CITES SECURITY REASONS FOR GAZA BLOCKADEIsrael's conflict with Hamas began in October 2023 after a surprise Hamas attack killed over 1,200 people. According to Israeli reports, Hamas also took 251 hostages back to the enclave. Since then, Israeli forces have been attacking Gaza, where health officials say over 54,000 Palestinians have infrastructure in the region has been destroyed, and the United Nations has warned that Gaza's 2.3 million people is facing the risk of Minister Katz said the naval blockade is critical to stop weapons from reaching Hamas."The State of Israel will not allow anyone to break the naval blockade on Gaza, whose primary purpose is to prevent the transfer of weapons to Hamas," he to FFC, Madleen is carrying only a small amount of aid, including rice and baby formula. A press officer for the group, said that the yacht was about 160 nautical miles (roughly 296 km) from Gaza. "We are preparing for the possibility of interception," she added as per news agency with Thunberg and others, the crew includes French European Parliament member Rima media reports claimed that if the boat reaches Israeli waters, the military will escort it to the Israeli port of Ashdod. The crew including activists would then be inputs from Reuters
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Bro-foes in throes of woes: Trump and Musk's bromance burns out
Live from Maar-aur-Lago Once upon a time, bros used to duel. Now they fling threats on social media. On the bright side, the whole world can watch the brawl in real time from the comfort of living rooms and sports bars. To be sure, it was a marriage of convenience based on mutual need. Money spent was favours earned. Scratching each other's back constituted marital bliss, and all conflicts of interest were shoved under the bed. But then it ended as so many marriages do. Of course, everyone predicted a Trump-Musk divorce. Two men with egos bursting at the seams and imbued with a deep sense they are 'transformers'-one of society, the other of technology-could hold it together for only so long. But the story may not be over. There are too many plot lines, and things could meander towards reconciliation, or retribution, or something in between. The betting money is obviously on Trump, because the state always wins. The levers of power are in his hands even if Musk's ketamine-fuelled imagination might have persuaded him otherwise. That cover of Time magazine must have helped. The divorce could have international implications, especially for those who invested heavily in Musk's heft and proximity to Trump. Beijing is probably doing a complete damage assessment. Musk was a strong pro-China voice in the White House who could manoeuvre his way into rooms beyond his remit. Even Trump was alarmed how the billionaire was approved for a Pentagon briefing back in March on top-secret military plans against China. As the news broke, Trump intervened through his chief of staff to stop any sharing of sensitive information given Musk's vast investments in China. It's not a secret that many in Trump's inner circle don't like Musk and indulge in strategic information leaks to the press. Those outside-like Trump's once political strategist Steve Bannon-want him deported back to South Africa from where he came. Musk was seen as getting too big for his billionaire boots. He even got into a physical fight with treasury secretary Scott Bessent in the White are carefully staying away from the blast range. Democrats are enjoying the feud gone nuclear. Late-night comics are having fun. 'Leader of the free world fights breeder of the free world' was one take referencing Musk's many kids. Anxiety in foreign capitals is rising. How much 'reality' can people bear in this reality show presidency?It took about 8 months-from Musk pouring $275 mn into Trump's campaign and Trump declaring, 'A star is born-Elon' during his victory speech-to a crash and burn. At one stage Musk professed on X, 'I love @realdonaldtrump as much as a straight man can love another man'. Alas, it turned out to be shorter than a green card marriage. It was torrid while it lasted. Musk as 'First Buddy' was listening in on Trump's calls with foreign leaders. He did preliminary diplomatic explorations with Iran. Swaggered around at cabinet meetings, and did not wear a suit. Trump indulged him even as White House aides fumed. But finally the billionaire got into presidential hairs. The trigger was Musk's criticism of Trump's signature legislation, 'One Big, Beautiful Bill'. He called it a 'disgusting abomination' that was so 'pork-filled' it would add $2.5 tn to the deficit. He then claimed, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election'. Hang on. How about giving some credit to Dems for ensuring Trump's victory? Trump had had enough. With the welcome 'wearing thin', he suggested ending billions in federal contracts for SpaceX as a way to save money, which the much-reviled DOGE has failed to do. The loud musings hit a nerve, and Musk dropped a bombshell-he claimed Trump was allegedly involved with the late sexual predator Jeffery Epstein. That X post has since been deleted. Trump declared Musk had gone 'crazy' because the White House had withdrawn government subsidies for EVs and tossed out his Nasa nominee. He wondered aloud whether to 'terminate' other government contracts with Musk's companies. The Tesla-Space Xer is already less rich today than when he joined the nothing is simple in a DOGE-eat-DOGE world. If Trump really does take the axe to other Musk companies like SpaceX, America's space programme could be in trouble. At one point in the spat, Musk threatened to decommission Dragon, the spacecraft that takes astronauts to ISS and back. Then he backtracked. Incidentally, India fighter pilot Shubhanshu Shukla is scheduled to blast off aboard the Dragon this week and become the first Indian astronaut to join should mediate between the warring parties. They could have lunch together at the Bombay Club right near the White House. Modi could happily take credit. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Will Royal Enfield's back to the future strategy woo GenZ? We don't have a global legacy, so our products can be tailor-made: IndiGo CEO HSBC's next move could shake up India's venture debt play Everything 'e' won't make you a millionaire. Just look at e-pharmacies Are Indian banks staring at their worst in 7 years? F&O Radar | Deploy Short Strangle in Nifty to benefit from volatility, Theta Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 28% in 1 year For investors with patience & ability to take moderate risk: 6 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential up to 36%
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Carney had no options": Foreign affairs expert KP Fabian on Canada's invitation to PM Modi for G7 Summit
New Delhi [India], June 8 (ANI): Foreign affairs expert KP Fabian on Sunday shared his insights on Canada's decision to invite Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 Summit. Speaking with ANI, he said, 'Carney had no options. The others said, Listen, India must be there. It's a vital link in the supply chain and any talk of Indo-Pacific stability.' Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, the host of this year's summit, reportedly faced significant pressure from other G7 members after initially hesitating to invite Prime Minister Modi. This reluctance was largely due to domestic political backlash within Carney's own Liberal Party, triggered by a diplomatic row linked to the killing of a Khalistani separatist in British Columbia in June 2023. He added, 'Now, of course, one should expect big demonstrations by the World Sikh Federation and others, but then it is for the government of Canada to deal with it.' Fabian remarked that India, as the world's fourth-largest and fastest-growing economy, must be included in G7 discussions given its strategic importance in global trade and Indo-Pacific stability. Fabian pointed out that India has participated in the G7 Summit in the past, including five times during former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh's tenure. He added that Canada's hesitation ultimately yielded to pressure from the G7 nations, who recognised India's critical role. He further said, 'Carney is walking a tightrope when it comes to Canadian values. At a press conference, he was asked whether he believes the Indian government was involved in the killing of Nijjar. He refused to answer, citing the ongoing RCMP investigation. That's quite ironic. When did this happen, and why is the RCMP taking so long to conclude the investigation? And if you recall, why did Justin Trudeau accuse India before the investigation was even complete? Canadian political leaders have shown a lot of inconsistency. In the end, Mark Carney did the right thing, though it took some time -- and that's that.' The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) is investigating the incident, but no conclusions have been drawn yet. Despite these political challenges, Carney reaffirmed Canada's commitment to the G7 summit's agenda. On Friday (local time), he said that G7 countries will discuss important issues, including security and energy, emphasising that India's presence at this intergovernmental political and economic forum is essential. Carney emphasised that India, being the fifth-largest economy and the most populous country in the world, must be at the table. 'Let's put the two aspects in context -- first is, we are in the role -- Canada's in the role of the G7 chair and in those discussions as agreed with our G7 colleagues, include important discussions on energy, security, on digital future, critical minerals amongst others and partnerships actually in building infrastructure in the emerging and developing world,' he said. Prime Minister Modi received a call from his Canadian counterpart, who extended India's invitation to attend the G7 Summit. 'Glad to receive a call from Prime Minister @MarkJCarney of Canada. Congratulated him on his recent election victory and thanked him for the invitation to the G7 Summit in Kananaskis later this month. As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the Summit,' PM Modi wrote in his post. The G7 Summit (Group of Seven) is an informal grouping of seven of the world's advanced economies and the European Union. Its members meet annually at the G7 Summit to discuss global economic and geopolitical issues, according to the G7's official website. The members of the G7 are France, the US, Germany, Japan, Italy, Canada, and the UK. (ANI)
