logo
France court jails migrant smugglers over 2022 Channel deaths

France court jails migrant smugglers over 2022 Channel deaths

Local France01-07-2025
France and Britain have vowed to crack down on people smugglers who heap migrants on flimsy dinghies to make the dangerous Channel crossing in exchange for thousands of dollars.
In the latest such case to go to court in France, a small boat departed France early on December 14th, 2022, carrying people from Afghanistan, Albania, India and Senegal.
Four people died and four went missing after the dinghy burst a few kilometres from the English coast.
Only one of the bodies was identified – that of an Afghan man.
Rescuers saved 39 people from drowning.
A court in the French city of Lille sentenced three men to eight years behind bars.
They included an Afghan being tried in absentia and thought to be the mastermind of the smuggling operation.
It handed the rest seven-year sentences over the disaster.
They included two Afghan brothers accused of financing the operation and another Afghan who admitted to summoning passengers for the crossing, although he claimed he did it after being threatened.
The court ordered all to pay €50,000 to €100,000 in fines, and to leave French territory at the end of their sentences.
A tenth man, who is being held in Belgium, is to be tried at a later date.
A British court has already sentenced a Senegalese minor who steered the boat to nine years in jail, French prosecutors said.
During the trial earlier this month, the prosecutor said the dinghy involved in the accident had been 'completely unsuitable for navigation on high seas'.
She said the defendants had been benefitting from a 'highly lucrative' illegal trade, with migrants paying on average €3,500 for the crossing.
According to the investigation, several people heard a loud bang that sounded like the dinghy had been punctured before the departure.
Advertisement
The smugglers told the passengers not to worry and that the boat was the only one available for the crossing.
But the sea was rough and there were not enough life jackets for all the passengers.
Those who died were not wearing any, according to the testimony of survivors.
After one or two hours, the boat filled with water and panicked passengers stood up to get the attention of another ship.
But the hull of the capsizing boat burst under the weight of the water.
All the passengers fell into the freezing sea.
The 2022 accident was one of the deadliest in the Channel in recent years.
In November 2021, another deadly incident killed 27 people off the French coast, in a case that has not yet gone to court.
At least 17 people have died attempting the Channel crossing this year, after a record 78 lost their lives last year.
As part of efforts to stem migrant crossings, French authorities intervene on land to try to prevent boats leaving.
They also intervene at sea but only to rescue passengers if a boat asks for help.
Paris says it is now considering also stopping migrant boats in its shallow coastal waters, though the move raises both safety and legal issues.
Advertisement
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US court upholds order blocking immigration agents' patrols in California
US court upholds order blocking immigration agents' patrols in California

LeMonde

time21 hours ago

  • LeMonde

US court upholds order blocking immigration agents' patrols in California

A US appeals court has upheld an order blocking immigration agents from carrying out patrols in California. The patrols have led to indiscriminate detentions without reasonable grounds to suspect people of being undocumented immigrants. The ruling, delivered by a three-judge panel late on Friday, August 2, denies the federal government's appeal to overturn a temporary July order to halt "roving patrols" in Los Angeles, which immigration rights groups have described as illegally using racial profiling. California residents and advocacy groups sued the Department of Homeland Security over the detentions. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong had ordered an end to the arrests. She had argued that such actions by agents violate a person's constitutional rights, which safeguard against unreasonable seizures by the government. She had said the detentions were being made "based upon race alone," on whether a person was speaking Spanish or English with an accent or because of their place of work, and ordered them stopped. The Jason Gavidia case Friday's ruling by the US Ninth Circuit Court of appeals described the case of plaintiff Jason Gavidia. A US citizen, born and raised in East Los Angeles, Gavidia was arrested outside a tow yard in Montebello by agents carrying military-style rifles on June 12. "The agents repeatedly asked Gavidia whether he is American – and they repeatedly ignored his answer: 'I am an American,'" the ruling said. Agents asked what hospital he was born in, and Gavidia responded he did not know, but said he was born in "East LA." The court said Gavidia told the agents he could show them his government-issued ID. "The agents took Gavidia's ID and his phone and kept his phone for 20 minutes. They never returned his ID." A victory against ICE raids Los Angeles and the surrounding suburbs have been ground zero for President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown. He ordered the US military deployed there for weeks, and agents have rounded up migrants at car washes, bus stops, stores and farms. The ruling said the government's defense team argued that "certain types of businesses, including car washes, were selected for encounters because (...) they are likely to employ persons without legal documentation." Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. Rights groups hailed the order as a victory for those seeking to bar the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from conducting the raids. "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," said attorney Mohammad Tajsar of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California. "We look forward to holding the federal government accountable for these authoritarian horrors it unleashed in Southern California."

Jury finds Tesla partly responsible for deadly Autopilot crash case
Jury finds Tesla partly responsible for deadly Autopilot crash case

LeMonde

time2 days ago

  • LeMonde

Jury finds Tesla partly responsible for deadly Autopilot crash case

A Miami jury has decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $200 million in damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk is seeking to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome, but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along − despite its repeated denials − by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. "Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, "and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," claiming that the plaintiffs concocted a story "blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility." In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million in compensatory damages, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. Tesla said it will appeal. Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks − falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like "driver assist" and "copilot" to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. "Words matter," Schreiber said. "And if someone is playing fast and loose with words, they're playing fast and loose with information and facts."

Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is moved to a minimum security prison in Texas
Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is moved to a minimum security prison in Texas

LeMonde

time2 days ago

  • LeMonde

Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is moved to a minimum security prison in Texas

Ghislaine Maxwell, the accomplice of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has been moved from a prison in Florida to a minimum security facility in Texas, the Bureau of Prisons said on Friday, August 1. No reason was given for the move but it comes a week after a top Justice Department official met with Maxwell to ask her questions about Epstein, who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking underage girls. "We can confirm Ghislaine Maxwell is in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons at the Federal Prison Camp (FPC) Bryan in Bryan, Texas," a Bureau of Prisons spokesman said. The Texas prison houses 635 female inmates and is a minimum security facility. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer, interviewed Maxwell for two days at a Florida courthouse last week in a highly unusual meeting between a convicted felon and high-ranking Justice official. Blanche has declined so far to say what was discussed but Maxwell's lawyer, David Markus, said she answered every question she was asked. Maxwell has offered to testify before Congress about Epstein if given immunity and has also reportedly been seeking a pardon from Trump, a one-time close friend of Epstein. The former British socialite is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2021 of recruiting underage girls for Epstein. Trump is facing mounting demands from Democrats and many of his supporters to be more transparent about the case of the wealthy and well-connected Epstein. Trump's conspiracy-minded supporters have been obsessed with the Epstein case for years and have been up in arms since the FBI and Justice Department said last month that Epstein had committed suicide while in jail, did not blackmail any prominent figures and did not keep a "client list." The president raised further questions this week as he told reporters he fell out with Epstein after the financier "stole" female employees from the spa at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. One of those girls was Virginia Giuffre, who accused Epstein of using her as a sex slave and committed suicide at her home in Australia in April.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store