I think the new Fujifilm X-E5 is overrated — and I'm so glad I bought this camera instead
To me, Fuji cameras feel magical with film simulation recipes that are just way too delicious.
So, of course, when Fujifilm announced the brand new X-E5, I was intrigued, and why wouldn't I be? It features a 40MP sensor, utilizes the X-Trans CMOS 5 processor, and has a film simulation dial... wait, that sounds an awful lot like the X-T50. And the X100VI.
The Fujifilm X-T50 succeeds and improves on the X-T30 II, and it packs a punch with a huge 40.2MP sensor, excellent in-body image stabilization and reliable autofocus. It's also the first Fuji camera to sport a dedicated film simulation dial on its body for maximum (and easy-to-reach) creativity.
As soon as the X-E5's product page went live, I quickly compared its specs against the X-T50 — a camera that had been sitting in my online cart for nearly a month. Nothing jumped at me (except for the price), and nothing made me go, "Okay, I'm waiting until August now." So what did I do? I paid for the X-T50 and within three days, it was in my hands.
Do I regret it? No. Should you buy the X-T50 instead of the X-E5? That depends. Let me show you why I pulled the trigger when I should have done so a month ago.
I have a soft spot for the Fujifilm X-T50: it's the first mirrorless camera I reviewed for Tom's Guide, and I immediately fell in love with its design. The charcoal gray colorway is stunning, and the metal alloy used in the construction of its top plate lends the X-T50 a premium edge.
One of the X-E5's most significant selling points is its compact design, with a body measuring 4.9 x 2.8 x 1.5 inches. Even when combined with the new 23mm pancake lens, the size change is negligible, allowing you to slip the camera into your pocket and go about your day.
However, it's not as if the X-T50 isn't portable either, measuring 4.8 x 3.3 x 1.9 inches.
Its current kit lenses are bulkier than the pancake lens, but even then, a handbag is more than enough for transport. No, scratch that, I'm hanging the X-T50 around my neck because it's such a gorgeous camera — why wouldn't I want to show it off? It's not heavy either, weighing 15.5 ounces (0.2 ounces lighter than the X-E5, actually).
When I tested the Fujifilm X-T50 back in May 2024, I took some lovely photos (if I can toot my own horn for a second, thank you), and you can scroll through the sample gallery above.
The X-T50, like I mentioned up top, boasts a 40.2MP sensor with Fuji's latest X-Trans CMOS 5 processor, just like the X-E5. Having that many megapixels at your disposal gives you some room for tight crops.
Both cameras' autofocus systems remain the same, too, utilizing 425 AF points to lock onto animals and humans. Fuji's color science is mindblowing, as always, and both cameras sport dedicated film simulation dials. You can quickly swap between recipes and assign custom ones too.
The X-T50 is a year old — which isn't old at all, in camera terms — and I think it's severely underrated. I get the appeal of the X-E5. It's a shiny new thing that online forums have quickly dubbed the savior of the X-E lineup. But the X-T50 shouldn't be underestimated. I believe it's the camera for those who don't want to spend too much money but still achieve beautiful colors and be able to change lenses.
Let's talk about the elephant in the room: the price difference between the Fujifilm X-E5 and the Fujifilm X-T50. The X-T50's body retails for $1,399 / £1,299, and if you're in the U.K., it's currently down to £1,039 at Amazon. On the other hand, the X-E5's body (currently available to pre-order) retails for $1,699 / £1,299.
Both cameras are the same price in the U.K., but the X-E5 is pricier in the U.S. — and attaching the new 23mm pancake lens to the camera drives its price up by $200. Or you could get the X-T50 with a 15-45mm lens for $1,499 / £1,399, which isn't shabby at all.
Specs-wise, the X-T50 one-ups the X-E5 in a few ways. Its 1.84 M-dot touchscreen is better than the X-E5's 1.04 M-dot one. It features a built-in flash for low-light shooting. It can shoot RAW video, which the X-E5 cannot. Both cameras' electronic shutters can shoot 20fps bursts.
If you can afford it without thinking twice about the money leaving your account, I can't think of any reason to stop you from buying the X-E5. But personally, for me, the X-E5 didn't offer anything enticing enough to tempt me away from the X-T50.
Sure, the flip-up screen for taking selfies is a thoughtful addition, but I'm not a chronic selfie-taker, so it's not useful enough for me. There's also a new front control lever to toggle the Surround View function, which I didn't use much even when testing the Fujifilm GFX100RF.
It's simple, really: the X-E5 isn't the camera for me, but the X-T50 was always the camera for me, from the moment I first held it in my hands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What SoftBank, Government Investments Could Mean for Intel's Business—and Stock
Key Takeaways Intel on Monday said Japanese investment giant SoftBank had agreed to buy $2 billion of the chipmaker's stock, boosting hope on Wall Street that the Trump administration and allies will throw the beleaguered chipmaker a lifeline. Tech analyst Patrick Moorhead said the SoftBank deal may pave the way for more deals with potential foundry customers, and could signal SoftBank's own chip ambitions. UBS analysts said in a note Tuesday that Intel stock could reach $40—up from $25 on Tuesday—if the White House can entice companies to contract with Intel's foundries. Intel (INTC) shares jumped on Tuesday as investors responded to signals the Trump administration may throw the company's troubled foundry business a lifeline. Intel on Monday evening announced Japan's SoftBank agreed to invest $2 billion in the chipmaker, making it Intel's fifth-largest shareholder, according to FactSet data. In addition, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday told CNBC that Intel should give the U.S. an equity stake in exchange for the CHIPS Act grant committed by the Biden administration. The updates come after The Wall Street Journal last week reported that the federal government was mulling taking a 10% stake in Intel as part of broader efforts to shore up domestic chip manufacturing and give America a leg up in the global artificial intelligence arms race. Intel, 'for better or worse, remains the only US-headquartered prospect for leading edge semiconductor chips and processes,' wrote Bernstein analysts in a note last week. Shares of Intel closed 7% higher on Tuesday, making the stock the biggest gainer in the S&P 500. The stock has risen 26% since the start of the year, after losing nearly 60% of its value in 2024 as the once-storied chipmaker's problems mounted. What Do Investments Mean for Intel Foundry? Patrick Moorhead, founder and chief analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy, on Tuesday morning said he expected SoftBank's announcement to pave the way for the federal government's investment and other deals. 'I also think there's going to be other investors,' Moorhead told Yahoo! Finance on Tuesday. Those could include chip designers like Nvidia (NVDA), Broadcom (AVGO) and AMD (AMD), or hyperscalers like Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), and Alphabet (GOOG), which are all developing their own chips. The investment could also be a sign of SoftBank's chip ambitions. The most likely rationale for the investment is that 'SoftBank companies are intending to build its rumored Arm CPU tiles and AI XPUs and Ampere chips related to Stargate,' Moorhead told Investopedia. Contracting with Intel to make those products could count toward Masayoshi Son's commitment to invest $100 billion in the U.S., he added. Foundry Customers Key to Stock Upside? UBS analysts in a note on Tuesday said that while they maintain their 'neutral' rating and $25 price target on Intel's stock, they can imagine a path for Intel shares to reach $40—'but a lot would have to happen.' The stock closed Tuesday at just over $25. To reach that price, Intel will likely need to land a few major foundry customers, which they say could include Nvidia, Broadcom, and Apple (AAPL). 'An upside case could potentially come to fruition if the US Government pushes these companies to engage more immediately with Intel on foundry services,' the analysts wrote. Bernstein analysts agreed that the government could be instrumental in securing foundry customers. 'One could imagine the US government attempting to help with this, either directly through force (or at least heavy encouragement), or indirectly through tariff policy or other regulation,' the analysts wrote. But Can Intel Make the Chips Trump Wants? According to Bernstein, the White House's investment and efforts to nudge chip designers toward Intel foundries may not be enough to secure a self-sufficient American AI chip industry. Intel will also need to regain the technological edge that once made it the most valuable chipmaker in the world. 'Without a solid process roadmap,' a U.S. investment in Intel 'would be economically equivalent to simply setting 10s of billions of dollars on fire,' the analysts wrote. 'And there is unfortunately less that the US government can do directly to help with this.' Earlier this year, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM), the world's largest contract chipmaker, was rumored to be discussing a joint venture with Intel through which it would provide expertise and training. TSMC denied the report at the time, but 'we wonder if we might see some of that news flow resurrected,' said Bernstein. Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Commerce Secretary Lutnick says Intel needs to give government stake for CHIPS funding
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday confirmed that the government wants Intel to cough up a 10% equity stake in exchange for nearly $8 billion in CHIPS Act funding approved by the Biden administration. Lutnick said the the stake would be a return on its 'investment' in the struggling chipmaker. 'We should get an equity stake for our money,' Lutnick told CNBC's 'Squawk on the Street.' Advertisement 3 Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick during a television interview at the White House in July. AP 'So we'll deliver the money, which was already committed under the Biden administration. We'll get equity in return for it.' The government does not want control of the company, he added. Advertisement Lutnick's comments came on the heels of a report Monday that President Trump was seeking a 10% stake in the company. 'The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday in confirming that Lutnick was working on a deal. Intel declined to comment. Advertisement Shares of Intel jumped 7% on the prospect of the government bailing out the chipmaker. 'The stake would be a conversion of the grants and maybe increase the investment into Intel to help stabilize the company for chip production here,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC. On Monday, Japanese firm SoftBank announced it would invest $2 billion in Intel, making it the fifth-largest shareholder, according to FactSet. Intel was awarded $8.5 billion in CHIPS Act funding under the Secure Enclave program, a national security initiative to make microchips for defense and intelligence applications. Advertisement 3 Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan delivers a speech at an exhibition in Taiwan in May. AP It was later slashed by more than $600 million to about $7.85 billion, but Intel still tops the list as one of the companies receiving the most federal funding. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company has also been awarded $6.6 billion to boost chip production at its Arizona facilities. 'The Biden administration literally was giving Intel money for free, and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving them money for free,' Lutnick told 'Squawk Box.' Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan met with Trump at the White House last week to clear the air over accusations of having financial ties to China. 3 Intel slowed its construction and now expects its first factory to start operations in 2030. Getty Images Trump had initially called on Tan to 'resign immediately' following a letter from Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) to Intel's board requesting information on the CEO's business dealings. Tan, who was born in Malaysia and grew up in Singapore, took the helm at Intel in March after the software giant ousted Pat Gelsinger following dismal earnings and several rounds of layoffs. Advertisement Intel has struggled financially in recent months and recorded an annual loss of $18.8 billion in 2024, its first such loss since 1986. The Trump administration has been making a series of moves involving US companies, including proposing to allow Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China in exchange for the government receiving 15% of the company's sales of some advanced chips to Chinese businesses and offering a similar deal with Nvidia's smaller rival AMD. MP Materials said last month that the Defense Department will become its largest shareholder as part of a multibillion-dollar deal with the government to boost output of rare earth magnets.
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
A tech bailout? Trump admin in talks about taking 10% stake in chipmaker Intel
An Intel deal would be one of the largest government interventions in private industry since the U.S. auto industry's bailout under President Obama. WASHINGTON ― The Trump administration is in talks for the federal government to take a 10% equity stake in the troubled chipmaker company Intel, White House officials confirmed. The discussions, which come as Intel has struggled to open manufacturing centers planned in the United States, would be one of the largest government interventions in the private industry since the bailout of the U.S. auto industry under former President Barack Obama. "It's a creative idea that has never been done before to ensure that we're both reassuring these critical supply chains while also gaining something of it for the American taxpayer," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at an Aug. 19 press briefing when asked about the government potentially acquiring stake in Intel. Leavitt said U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutick is "ironing out the details." Any deal between the U.S. and Intel would likely require approval from the company's board of directors. During an interview earlier in the day on CNBC's "Squawk Box," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the federal government would take an equity stake in Intel in exchange for billions in federal grants awarded to the company by the Biden administration. "The stake would be a conversion of the grants and maybe increase the investment into Intel to help stabilize the company for chip production here in the U.S.," Bessent said. Former President Joe Biden's Chips and Science Act, signed into law in 2022, included $39 billion in subsidies to boost U.S. semiconductor manufacturing. President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked the incentives as giveaways. Bloomerg News, which first reported on the discussions, said a 10% stake in the chipmaker would be worth around $10.5 billion ‒ an amount that would nearly match the $10.9 billion in federal grants Intel has received for commercial and military production. The greatest beneficiary of the Biden law was Intel, which announced several projects with help from the incentives including a sprawling semiconductor facility outside Columbus, Ohio, that the company hoped would become "the largest semiconductor manufacturing site on the planet." The Ohio project has been marred by delays, however. Intel's first Ohio plant was originally set to open in 2025, but financial challenges forced the company to delay that opening to 2030 or 2031. Lutnick told CNBC that the U.S. wants a return on any "investment" in Intel. "We should get an equity stake for our money," the Commerce secretary said in a separate interview with the network. "Instead of just giving grants away." The Intel arrangment wouldn't be the first time Trump has secured U.S. stake of private companies during his second term. As part of a merger between Japanese-based Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel that Trump approved in June, Nippon granted his administration a "golden share" in the company. Contributing: Max Filby, Columbus Dispatch; Reuters Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
