logo
'Stagflation' risk puts Federal Reserve in tricky spot as it meets this week

'Stagflation' risk puts Federal Reserve in tricky spot as it meets this week

Independent17-03-2025

When Federal Reserve officials last met in late January, things looked pretty good: Hiring was solid. The economy had just grown at a solid pace in last year's final quarter. And inflation, while stubborn, had fallen sharply from its peak more than two years ago.
What a difference seven weeks makes.
As the Fed prepares to meet Tuesday and Wednesday, the central bank and its chair, Jerome Powell, are potentially headed to a much tougher spot. Inflation improved last month but is still high and tariffs could push it higher. At the same time, ongoing tariff threats as well as sharp cuts to government spending and jobs have tanked consumer and business confidence, which could weigh on the economy and even push up unemployment.
The toxic combination of still-high inflation and a weak or stagnant economy is often referred to as 'stagflation,' a term that haunts central bankers. It is what bedeviled the United States in the 1970s, when even deep recessions didn't kill inflation.
Stagflation, should it emerge, is hard for the Fed because typically policymakers would lift rates — or keep them high — to combat inflation. Yet if unemployment also rises, the Fed would usually cut rates to reduce borrowing costs and lift growth.
It's not yet clear the economy will sink into stagflation. For now, like businesses and consumers, the Fed is grappling with a huge amount of uncertainty surrounding the economic outlook. But even a mild version — with the unemployment rising from its current low level of 4.1%, while inflation stayed stuck above the Fed's 2% target — would pose a challenge for the central bank.
'That's the tangled web they're in,' said Esther George, former president of the Federal Reserve's Kansas City branch. "You have inflation stickiness on the one hand. At the same time, you're trying to look at what impact could this have on the job market, if growth begins to pull back. So it is a tough scenario for them for sure."
Fed officials will almost certainly keep their key rate unchanged at their meeting this week. Once the meeting concludes Wednesday, they will release their latest quarterly economic projections, which will likely show they expect to cut their rate twice this year — the same as they projected in December.
The Fed implemented three cuts last year and then signaled at the January meeting that they were largely on pause until the economic outlook becomes clearer.
Wall Street investors expect three rate reductions this year, in June, September, and December, according to futures prices tracked by CME Fedwatch, in part because they worry an economic slowdown will force more reductions.
One development likely to unnerve Fed officials is the sharp jump in inflation expectations this month in the University of Michigan's consumer sentiment survey. It showed the biggest increase in long-term inflation expectations since 1993.
Such expectations — which basically measure whether Americans are worried inflation will get worse — are important because they can become self-fulfilling. If businesses and consumers expect higher costs, they may take steps that push up inflation, like demanding higher wages, which in turn can force companies to raise prices to offset higher labor costs.
Some economists caution that the University of Michigan's survey is preliminary and for now based on only about 400 responses. (The final version to be released later this month typically includes about 800.) And financial market measures of inflation expectations, based on bond prices, have actually declined in recent weeks.
The most recent inflation readings have been mixed. The consumer price index dropped last week for the first time in five months to 2.8% from 3%, an encouraging change. But the Fed's preferred price gauge, to be released later this month, is likely to be unchanged.
The jump in inflation expectations is also a problem for the Fed because officials, including Powell, have said they are willing to let inflation gradually return to their 2% target in 2027, because expectations have generally been low. If other measures show inflation worries rising, the Fed could come under more pressure to get inflation down more quickly.
'I do worry when I see consumer expectations moving in the opposite direction,' George said. 'I think you just have to keep an eye on that.'
The last time President Donald Trump imposed tariffs — in 2018 and 2019 — overall inflation didn't rise by much, in part because they weren't nearly as broad as what he is currently proposing and some duties, such as those on steel and aluminum, were watered down with loopholes. Now that Americans have lived through a painful inflationary episode, they are likely to be more skittish about rising prices.
Powell referred such concerns in remarks earlier this month. He said tariffs could just have a one-time impact on prices without causing ongoing inflation. But that could change 'if it turns into a series' of tariff hikes, he said March 7, or 'if the increases are larger, that would matter."
'What really does matter is what is happening with long-term inflation expectations,' Powell added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Americans want property in Scotland
Why Americans want property in Scotland

Scotsman

time5 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Why Americans want property in Scotland

The New Eidyn development at St James Quarter, Edinburgh could be just the thing for buyers from the US Alan Cumming on why so many people from across the Pond are buying homes over here Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland is seeing a steady rise in interest from American property buyers in 2025, driven by a mix of lifestyle appeal, relative affordability and strong cultural ties. Whether it's relocating, investing in a second home, or planning for retirement, more Americans are exploring the Scottish market as a viable and attractive option. At Rettie we have had an 18 per cent rise in our website traffic from the US in the last year alone. Rightmove recently reported that analysis of their data showed an increasing number of people from the US have been enquiring about homes for sale in the UK since the start of the year, and Scotland has replaced London as the most popular region for potential US movers to enquire about, with Edinburgh the most popular area for movers from the US. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Cities like Edinburgh and Glasgow are becoming increasingly popular with overseas buyers — and it's easy to see why. They're straightforward to get around, packed with character and offer a great mix of culture, green space and everyday convenience. Edinburgh especially continues to stand out in European rankings, thanks to its strong infrastructure and vibrant lifestyle. For many Americans, these cities offer a smart and appealing alternative to the high costs and fast pace of major US cities. Scotland has replaced London as the most popular region for potential US movers to enquire about, says Alan Cumming Coastal towns such as North Berwick, St Andrews and Oban are also drawing interest. These areas offer a quieter pace of life, access to outdoor activities and a strong sense of community – all of which appeal to buyers looking for a change from the fast-paced urban environments they are used to. The availability of high-quality housing stock and scenic surroundings adds to the appeal. However, purchasing property in Scotland comes with its own set of financial considerations. One of the key factors American buyers are often unaware of is the Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) – Scotland's version of stamp duty. This tax can be significantly higher than in other parts of the UK, particularly for properties over £400,000 and for second homes (where there is an additional surcharge of 8 per cent compared to 6 per cent down south). For buyers unfamiliar with the UK's devolved tax systems, this can be an unexpected cost that affects overall affordability. Despite this, Scottish property remains relatively good value in a US context and average prices are below those down south. Many buyers are also working with local agents and legal professionals who can help them navigate the process and understand the full cost of ownership, including taxes, legal fees and ongoing maintenance. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What's clear is that American buyers are not just looking for a holiday home – they're looking for a long-term base that offers quality of life, stability and a sense of place. Scotland's combination of accessible cities, scenic towns and strong local identity makes it an increasingly attractive option. Americans aren't just visiting Scotland – they're settling in, drawn by charm, value and maybe just a wee dream of owning a castle (or two).

Who benefits from Republicans' 'big beautiful' bill depends largely on income. Children are no exception
Who benefits from Republicans' 'big beautiful' bill depends largely on income. Children are no exception

NBC News

time11 hours ago

  • NBC News

Who benefits from Republicans' 'big beautiful' bill depends largely on income. Children are no exception

House reconciliation legislation, also known as the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, includes changes aimed at helping to boost family's finances. Those proposals — including $1,000 investment 'Trump Accounts' for newborns and an enhanced maximum $2,500 child tax credit — would help support eligible parents. Proposed tax cuts in the bill may also provide up to $13,300 more in take-home pay for the average family with two children, House Republicans estimate. 'What we're trying to do is help hardworking Americans who are trying to provide for their families and make ends meet,' House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said during a June 8 interview with ABC News' 'This Week.' Yet the proposed changes, which emphasize work requirements, may reduce aid for children in low-income families when it comes to certain tax credits, health coverage and food assistance. Households in the lowest decile of the income distribution would lose about $1,600 per year, or about 3.9% of their income, from 2026 through 2034, according to a June 12 letter from the Congressional Budget Office. That loss is mainly due to 'reductions in in-kind transfers,' it notes — particularly Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, formerly known as food stamps. 20 million children won't get full $2,500 child tax credit House Republicans have proposed increasing the maximum child tax credit to $2,500 per child, up from $2,000, a change that would go into effect starting with tax year 2025 and expire after 2028. The change would increase the number of low-income children who are locked out of the child tax credit because their parents' income is too low, according to Adam Ruben, director of advocacy organization Economic Security Project Action. The tax credit is not refundable, meaning filers can't claim it if they don't have a tax obligation. Today, there are 17 million children who either receive no credit or a partial credit because their family's income is too low, Ruben said. Under the House Republicans' plan, that would increase by 3 million children. Consequently, 20 million children would be left out of the full child tax credit because their families earn too little, he said. 'It is raising the credit for wealthier families while excluding those vulnerable families from the credit,' Ruben said. 'And that's not a pro-family policy.' A single parent with two children would have to earn at least $40,000 per year to access the full child tax credit under the Republicans' plan, he said. For families earning the minimum wage, it may be difficult to meet that threshold, according to Ruben. In contrast, an enhanced child tax credit put in place under President Joe Biden made it fully refundable, which means very low-income families were eligible for the maximum benefit, according to Elaine Maag, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. In 2021, the maximum child tax credit was $3,600 for children under six and $3,000 for children ages 6 to 17. That enhanced credit cut child poverty in half, Maag said. However, immediately following the expiration, child poverty increased, she said. The current House proposal would also make about 4.5 million children who are citizens ineligible for the child tax credit because they have at least one undocumented parent who files taxes with an individual tax identification number, Ruben said. Those children are currently eligible for the child tax credit based on 2017 tax legislation but would be excluded based on the new proposal, he said. New red tape for a low-income tax credit House Republicans also want to change the earned income tax credit, or EITC, which targets low- to middle-income individuals and families, to require precertification to qualify. When a similar requirement was tried about 20 years ago, it resulted in some eligible families not getting the benefit, Maag said. The new prospective administrative barrier may have the same result, she said. More than 2 million children's food assistance at risk House Republican lawmakers' plan includes almost $300 billion in proposed cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, through 2034. SNAP currently helps more than 42 million people in low-income families afford groceries, according to Katie Bergh, senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Children represent roughly 40% of SNAP participants, she said. More than 7 million people may see their food assistance either substantially reduced or ended entirely due to the proposed cuts in the House reconciliation bill, estimates CBPP. Notably, that total includes more than 2 million children. 'We're talking about the deepest cut to food assistance ever, potentially, if this bill becomes law,' Bergh said. Under the House proposal, work requirements would apply to households with children for the first time, Bergh said. Parents with children over the age of 6 would be subject to those rules, which limit people to receiving food assistance for just three months in a three-year period unless they work a minimum 20 hours per week. Additionally, the House plan calls for states to fund 5% to 25% of SNAP food benefits — a departure from the 100% federal funding for those benefits for the first time in the program's history, Bergh said. States, which already pay to help administer SNAP, may face tough choices in the face of those higher costs. That may include cutting food assistance or other state benefits or even doing away with SNAP altogether, Bergh said. While the bill does not directly propose cuts to school meal programs, it does put children's eligibility for them at risk, according to Bergh. Children who are eligible for SNAP typically automatically qualify for free or reduced school meals. If a family loses SNAP benefits, their children may also miss out on those benefits, Bergh said. Health coverage losses would adversely impact families Families with children may face higher health care costs and reduced access to health care depending on how states react to federal spending cuts proposed by House Republicans, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The House Republican bill seeks to slash approximately $1 trillion in spending from Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program and Affordable Care Act marketplaces. Medicaid work requirements may make low-income individuals vulnerable to losing health coverage if they are part of the expansion group and are unable to document they meet the requirements or qualify for an exemption, according to CBPP. Parents and pregnant women, who are on the list of exemptions, could be susceptible to losing coverage without proper documentation, according to the non-partisan research and policy institute. Eligible children may face barriers to access Medicaid and CHIP coverage if the legislation blocks a rule that simplifies enrollment in those programs, according to CBPP. In addition, an estimated 4.2 million individuals may be uninsured in 2034 if enhanced premium tax credits that help individuals and families afford health insurance are not extended, according to CBO estimates. Meanwhile, those who are covered by marketplace plans would have to pay higher premiums, according to CBPP. Without the premium tax credits, a family of four with $65,000 in income would pay $2,400 more per year for marketplace coverage.

Retailers Accepting Crypto Payments – With Instant Settlement in Cash: By Shane Rodgers
Retailers Accepting Crypto Payments – With Instant Settlement in Cash: By Shane Rodgers

Finextra

time15 hours ago

  • Finextra

Retailers Accepting Crypto Payments – With Instant Settlement in Cash: By Shane Rodgers

Cryptocurrency payments are gaining interest in the retail world, from luxury watches to fast food. As consumers express interest in paying with digital assets, businesses see a means of gaining a larger customer base. With a new generation of crypto payment solutions now available, businesses can accept crypto seamlessly, converting it instantly to their local currency. The merchants never touch the crypto, so there is no need to worry about crypto volatility, wallets to manage, or compliance headaches. A Shift in Retail Payments Consumer desire to use crypto at checkout is growing fast. The numbers back it up: 65 million Americans now own crypto, and according to Capital One, 80% would like to use it for everyday purchases. These consumers may be shopping for luxury items, but they also want to pay for groceries, plane tickets, and even fast food with digital currency. What's more, crypto users typically spend twice as much as those using traditional cards. Retailers are responding. In the United States alone, over 6,000 merchants already accept Bitcoin payments, and a Deloitte survey reveals that 85% of retailers see crypto as a tool to engage new audiences. Early Adoption Across Sectors The pay by crypto option isn't just theoretical — businesses are already seeing the impact. PDX Beam has been piloting its payment gateway with dozens of merchants across diverse industries, from diamond sellers to luxury car dealerships. By offering crypto-based payment these businesses are accessing a new demographic of spenders. One international fast-food chain is launching a crypto payment pilot in ten Miami-Dade locations, part of its expansive U.S. presence of 6,800 outlets. These tests could soon bring crypto payments to the mainstream of fast-food transactions. Beyond individual retailers, major retail payment players behind the scenes are getting involved. A $7.5 billion financial institution has signed a deal to process crypto payments, while a private equity group is using PDX Beam to enable crypto transactions for its portfolio of retailers. Eliminating Crypto Exposure for Merchants For most merchants, the biggest worry is dealing with crypto's price swings and the operational headaches of managing digital assets. PDX Beam's modern crypto-to-cash gateway eliminates that concern entirely. When a customer pays in crypto, the system instantly converts it to local currency and deposits the funds directly into the merchant's account — usually within seconds. Retailers don't touch the crypto themselves, meaning there's no exposure to volatility and no need to maintain separate crypto accounts. Plus, because these payments settle on blockchain rails, they help reduce the risk of chargeback fraud, offering merchants an extra layer of security. Lower Fees and Instant Settlement Another major benefit is the fees associated with crypto payments. While traditional card payments come with fees that can reach 3-4% for standard transactions and up to 7% in high-risk sectors (including cannabis stores), crypto payments bypass these intermediaries, lowering transaction costs to less than half Visa/MC charges. Settlement speeds are another major advantage. Credit card transactions can take days to clear, but crypto payments through these new gateways settle in real time or the same day — helping retailers improve cash flow. Positioning for the Future The shift toward crypto payments isn't slowing down. Big banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are launching crypto products, and the U.S. government is laying the groundwork for regulations that will support the growing digital asset economy. Worldpay forecasts that crypto spending worldwide will more than double by 2030, from $16 billion to $38 billion. For retailers, the takeaway is clear: crypto payments aren't a passing trend. Consumers want to use it, and with modern gateways eliminating risk and complexity, merchants can meet this demand safely and efficiently. By enabling crypto transactions without ever directly handling digital assets, retailers can meet the needs of this new generation of shoppers who are living increasingly digital-first lives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store