logo
Entain shares jump 13% as US sports betting powers growth

Entain shares jump 13% as US sports betting powers growth

Irish Times16-06-2025
Shares in troubled gambling group Entain jumped 13 per cent on Monday after its US sports betting business upgraded its annual forecasts, in an early boost for new chief executive Stella David.
Second-quarter trading at BetMGM, Entain's US joint venture with New York-listed MGM Resorts International, has been 'broadly consistent' with the 34 per cent growth seen in the first quarter, the company said on Monday.
BetMGM now expects to report annual group revenues of at least $2.6 billion (€2.2 billion) and earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of at least $100 million. It had earlier forecast revenue of between $2.4 billion and $2.5 billion, and 'positive' ebitda.
David, Entain's former chair, was appointed permanent chief executive of the FTSE 100 company in April after performing the role in an interim capacity since February.
READ MORE
Today's upgrade showed she had been able to deliver ahead of expectations, said Barclays analyst Pravin Gondhale. 'This is a good sign for them ... the strategy is working,' he said.
David plans to revive the group's fortunes by growing its share in US online gaming and sports betting – a market that was only legalised in 2018 – as well as tapping into the fast-growing sports betting market in Brazil, another new market.
In the first three months of the year, BetMGM, which was formed in 2018, reported earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of $22 million, its first quarterly profit. Last quarter's strong performance was driven by growth in sports betting and online gaming, the company said.
Entain, which owns Ladbrokes and Coral, provides the technology that sits behind BetMGM, while MGM Resorts International handles the venture's customer-facing activities.
Shore Capital analyst Greg Johnson said Entain's valuation was 'failing to reflect the improving trends' both at the group level and in the US.
David is striving to rebuild investor confidence in Entain after a turbulent period characterised by corporate governance concerns and a series of executive departures.
The company signed a deferred prosecution agreement in the UK over allegations it failed to prevent bribery in Turkey, while Australia's financial crimes watchdog launched legal proceedings against Entain, citing breaches of anti-money laundering rules.
Entain said previously that it took the allegations 'extremely seriously' and that it was enhancing its compliance arrangements.
The company's languishing share price frustrated investors and left the UK-headquartered group vulnerable to a takeover. The US's second-largest gaming company, DraftKings, made a £16.2 billion bid for Entain in 2021, before walking away. Activist investors, including US hedge funds Eminence Capital and Sachem Head Capital Management, have also circled the company. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Median CEO pay at top US companies surges to $19m per year
Median CEO pay at top US companies surges to $19m per year

Irish Times

time2 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Median CEO pay at top US companies surges to $19m per year

Pay for S&P 500 chief executives rose by 7.7 per cent last year as packages at the US's biggest companies keep increasing. Median total pay for S&P bosses rose to $19 million (€16.3 million) last year. The jump in median chief executive pay was higher than a 7.2 per cent rise in 2023, according to Farient Advisors, a pay consultancy, and marked the quickest pace of growth since an 11.5 per cent gain in 2021. Total pay for the broader American workforce increased 3.6 per cent in the 12 months that ended December 2024, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 'We're still seeing executive pay increases above the inflationary rate as well as above typical rank-and-file employees,' said Eric Hoffmann, chief data officer at Farient Advisors. READ MORE The highest paid S&P 500 CEO last year was Rick Smith of Taser maker Axon Enterprise, who raked in $164.5 million mostly from stock awards after meeting targets over several years, according to data provided by MyLogIQ. Brian Niccol, chief executive of Starbucks, was second with $95.8 million in total last year, mostly from stock awards. His pay package included a $5 million sign-on bonus and two one-off stock awards that ranged from $75 million to $80 million to cover forfeited cash and unvested equity he accrued while running Chipotle. Axon did not respond to a request for comment and Starbucks declined to comment. In the UK, median pay for chief executives of the 100 most valuable London-listed companies rose 6.8 per cent to £4.58 million in 2024-25 year on year, according to the High Pay Centre's annual survey released on Sunday. This is the highest level on record, and the fourth successive year that bosses' pay has increased. The level of pay for S&P 500 executives has drawn scrutiny from groups that question whether it is exacerbating inequality. The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, a national trade union, flagged Niccol's pay package as an example of the widest pay gap between the top executive and median employee of one of the biggest US companies. Niccol's annual pay was more than 6,666 times greater than the total pay for the median employee, a part-time barista, who earns about $15,000 a year, according to company filings. 'We just see ever-growing income inequality in this country, and it's becoming harder and harder for workers to make ends meet,' said Carin Zelenko, director of capital strategies at AFL-CIO. Sarah Anderson, global economy project director for the non-profit research group Institute for Policy Studies, said the widening gap between chief executive and worker pay was bad for democracy. 'This gap between CEO and worker pay is a key driver of rising inequality and concentration of wealth at the top. We're seeing more and more signs of how ultra-wealthy people have too much influence over our political system,' she said. Still, the larger pay ratio between an employee and a chief executive may also reflect a company's business model. A retail boss is likely to have a wider pay ratio than a technology chief executive who usually hires engineers who are full-time workers. Nvidia, the most valuable US company, reported a chief executive to median employee pay ratio of 166 to 1, with its median employee earning $301,233 compared with CEO Jensen Huang's total pay of $49.9 million in 2024. Meanwhile, shareholder support for executive pay packages has remained strong. ISS-Corporate found that the median shareholder support for executive pay packages has remained between 92.4 per cent and 92.6 per cent for the past five years. Jun Frank, head of compensation and governance services at ISS-Corporate, said US economic uncertainty may affect executive pay trends in the future. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Short sellers ridicule fund managers' vanishing attention spans
Short sellers ridicule fund managers' vanishing attention spans

Irish Times

time9 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Short sellers ridicule fund managers' vanishing attention spans

A new study of short sellers paints an unflattering portrait of the professional investors entrusted with others' money . The study, Short Sellers' Information Acquisition, interviews nine prominent short sellers and analyses 820 short reports. It confirms shorts are informed and skilled, yet much of their work simply re-examines public filings overlooked by other professionals, exposing how often investing experts miss the obvious. Their edge lies less in uncovering new facts than in presenting evidence clearly. 'The best points come first', says Blue Orca Capital's Soren Aandahl. READ MORE 'The collective attention span of market participants is horrible and has gotten worse over time. A few years ago, I would write an 80-page short report. Today, I laugh at that. No one gives a flying rat's ass about 80 pages.' Concurring, another interviewee says less powerful information 'dilutes the powerful information. Let's say there's evidence of fraud, but then you add some minor issues – it makes the fraud evidence less powerful'. Reports must be concise, their points distilled to survive a skim-happy readership. Muddy Waters Capital's Carson Block describes his audience as 'hostile … They want you to be wrong'. Shorts must 'break through this hostility and make them realise they've been misled by the company's management'. For short sellers, the challenge is less uncovering fraud than navigating a market that can be lazy, inattentive, and too quick to trust company claims.

Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel
Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel

Irish Times

time19 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel

The Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10 per cent in Intel, according to a White House official and other people familiar with the matter, in a move that could see the US become the beleaguered chipmaker's largest shareholder. The US government is considering a potential investment in Intel that would involve converting some or all of the company's grants from the US Chips and Science Act into equity, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is confidential. Intel has been slated to receive a combined $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants for commercial and military production. That figure is roughly enough to pay for the targeted holding. At Intel's current market value, a 10 per cent stake in the chipmaker would be worth roughly $10.5 billion. The exact size of the stake, as well as whether the White House chooses to move ahead with the plan, is still in flux, the people said. Intel shares dropped as much as 5.5 per cent after Bloomberg reported on the talks Monday. They had climbed 23 per cent last week for their best weekly gain since February. White House spokesman Kush Desai declined to comment on the specifics of the discussions, saying only that no deal is official until it's announced by the administration. Intel didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House official also floated the possibility that the administration could convert other Chips Act awards into equity stakes. It's not clear whether that idea has gained traction broadly within the administration or whether officials have broached the possibility with any companies that could be affected. Last month, in an unprecedented move, the Defense Department said it will take a $400 million preferred equity stake in the little-known US rare-earth producer MP Materials – a deal that would make the Pentagon the company's largest shareholder. News of a potential government investment in Intel kicked off a rally in the company's shares after Bloomberg News first reported the discussions among US officials and company representatives last week. As is the case for all Chips Act winners, Intel's grant money was originally designed to be disbursed over time as the company hits negotiated project milestones. Intel had received $2.2 billion in grant disbursements as of January. It's unclear whether that $2.2 billion would be included in the possible equity stake, whether the company has received additional tranches of its award since President Donald Trump took office, and on what timeline Intel would receive money under a possible equity stake. – Bloomberg

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store