Median CEO pay at top US companies surges to $19m per year
executives
rose by 7.7 per cent last year as packages at the US's biggest companies keep increasing.
Median total pay for S&P bosses rose to $19 million (€16.3 million) last year. The jump in median chief executive pay was higher than a 7.2 per cent rise in 2023, according to Farient Advisors, a pay consultancy, and marked the quickest pace of growth since an 11.5 per cent gain in 2021.
Total pay for the broader American workforce increased 3.6 per cent in the 12 months that ended December 2024, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
'We're still seeing executive pay increases above the inflationary rate as well as above typical rank-and-file employees,' said Eric Hoffmann, chief data officer at Farient Advisors.
READ MORE
The highest paid S&P 500 CEO last year was Rick Smith of Taser maker Axon Enterprise, who raked in $164.5 million mostly from stock awards after meeting targets over several years, according to data provided by MyLogIQ.
Brian Niccol, chief executive of Starbucks, was second with $95.8 million in total last year, mostly from stock awards. His pay package included a $5 million sign-on bonus and two one-off stock awards that ranged from $75 million to $80 million to cover forfeited cash and unvested equity he accrued while running Chipotle.
Axon did not respond to a request for comment and Starbucks declined to comment.
In the UK, median pay for chief executives of the 100 most valuable London-listed companies rose 6.8 per cent to £4.58 million in 2024-25 year on year, according to the High Pay Centre's annual survey released on Sunday. This is the highest level on record, and the fourth successive year that bosses' pay has increased.
The level of pay for S&P 500 executives has drawn scrutiny from groups that question whether it is exacerbating inequality.
The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, a national trade union, flagged Niccol's pay package as an example of the widest pay gap between the top executive and median employee of one of the biggest US companies.
Niccol's annual pay was more than 6,666 times greater than the total pay for the median employee, a part-time barista, who earns about $15,000 a year, according to company filings.
'We just see ever-growing income inequality in this country, and it's becoming harder and harder for workers to make ends meet,' said Carin Zelenko, director of capital strategies at AFL-CIO.
Sarah Anderson, global economy project director for the non-profit research group Institute for Policy Studies, said the widening gap between chief executive and worker pay was bad for democracy.
'This gap between CEO and worker pay is a key driver of rising inequality and concentration of wealth at the top. We're seeing more and more signs of how ultra-wealthy people have too much influence over our political system,' she said.
Still, the larger pay ratio between an employee and a chief executive may also reflect a company's business model. A retail boss is likely to have a wider pay ratio than a technology chief executive who usually hires engineers who are full-time workers.
Nvidia, the most valuable US company, reported a chief executive to median employee pay ratio of 166 to 1, with its median employee earning $301,233 compared with CEO Jensen Huang's total pay of $49.9 million in 2024.
Meanwhile, shareholder support for executive pay packages has remained strong. ISS-Corporate found that the median shareholder support for executive pay packages has remained between 92.4 per cent and 92.6 per cent for the past five years.
Jun Frank, head of compensation and governance services at ISS-Corporate, said US economic uncertainty may affect executive pay trends in the future.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish gin maker increases investment in US market in spite of tariffs hit
The maker of Drumshanbo Gunpowder Irish Gin plans to double down on its investment in the United States in spite of the impact of US president Donald Trump's 15 per cent tariff on imported EU goods. Speaking to The Irish Times, Pat Rigney, co-founder of the Shed Distillery in Co Leitrim with his wife Denise, said the company will invest heavily to grow its position in the US market. 'We'll be increasing our investment in marketing, we'll be increasing our innovation and we'll be spending more time in the marketplace here. This is not a time for armchair marketing, you have to be on the streets and you have to support your partners,' he said. 'The good news for us is that our brand is doing well. We're now the number four premium gin in the US. We're growing at 15 per cent. The consumers love the brand, there are pockets of growth in the market and that's where we're going to focus.' READ MORE The company plans to spend more than $3 million (€2.6 million) pushing the brand in the US, and recently took a large billboard on Times Square in New York to advertise the gin. The US is one of Drumshanbo's biggest markets, with more than 100,000 cases of the gin sold there last year. [ Shed Distillery founder Pat Rigney: 'We're very focused on a premium position but also on giving value for money to consumers' Opens in new window ] 'We've worked hard to get there from a standing start eight years ago and we're not going to give it up. There's a lot of graft and a lot of hard work involved and we're not afraid of it.' The investment will involve some new 'expressions' of its award-winning gin, including a variation created with high-profile Italian mixologist Bruno Vanzan that has secured a listing with Publix, a large US grocery chain. There will also be a push on social media, to garner 300 million impressions online, and more boots on the ground to push the brand in the US. 'I don't think the Department of Finance have any respect for the tourism industry' Listen | 41:44 Mr Rigney said Drumshanbo's price tag hasn't increased to reflect the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs (10 per cent since April 5th and 15 per cent currently). He estimates that the tariff could, on average, add $2-$3 to the cost of a bottle of the Irish gin, although 'obviously we will try to minimise that'. To date, the Irish distillery has shared the tariff pain with its local distributor but he said prices would have to increase at some point this year. 'We went 50-50 with our partner in the US. But that is not sustainable because you've got 17 per cent depreciation in the dollar plus a 15 per cent tariff. 'Like everybody else, we will have to take a price increase. I don't think we'll get full recovery but we'll have to get partial because we need to fund the investment in marketing and the costs [of producing the gin] in Ireland. 'All import brands will be going up. But we have momentum and momentum is everything here. Importers and the distribution system will reduce the number of brands that they will carry, there's no question about that. 'They will tighten up their range because there is a 15 per cent hit whenever they import something. So it won't be easy for new entrants. The fact that we're in the market already, there's a real opportunity for success.' Mr Rigney said the Irish company has also secured listings for the gin with Disney Cruise Line, grocery chain Winn-Dixie and HMS Host, which operates airport venues. When asked last December how big Gunpowder Irish Gin could become, Mr Rigney said: 'I think we can get to half a million cases. We're about 270,000 now. We've a long way to go. It's a big leap but I think we will get there. We might do it in the next three to four years. It's all about sales now.'
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
US government investment in Intel looks bad for Leixlip
Intel is getting the Donald Trump treatment. Two weeks ago, the president of the United States called for the resignation of Lip-Bu Tan , the recently appointed chief executive of America's flagship microchip maker. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem,' he blasted on his Truth Social account. The reason being the connections of Tan – a US citizen born in Malaysia – to China, including the sale of chip design products to a Chinese military university by one of his businesses, Cadence. The writing was on the wall for Tan, but four days later he was invited to the White House. All talk of his resignation evaporated and was replaced by the suggestion that the US government would take a direct stake in Intel as it tries to reinvent itself, having missed out on the boom in chips to power artificial intelligence. Depending on where you stand on Trump, the proposal is either further evidence of his business acumen and deal-making skills or more proof of his erratic temperament and general unsuitability for office. READ MORE Few details have emerged of the proposed investment, but Intel shares – which have lost half their value over the past couple of years – are up strongly on the news. It's hard to gauge what the consequences of the investment would be for Intel's Irish operation in Leixlip, which seems to have escaped the worst of the cost-cutting measures introduced by Tan when he took over in March (although it was reported in July that almost 200 mandatory redundancies would be implemented this year at the Leixlip plant). [ Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel Opens in new window ] The best guide is the deal that Trump made to allow Japan's Nippon Steel take over US Steel, the iconic American steelmaker. Trump insisted on the federal government getting a so-called golden share, which gives it the right to appoint an independent director and also a veto over some investment decisions. These include the transfer of production and jobs outside of the US as well as 'certain decisions on closure or idling of US Steel's existing US manufacturing facilities, trade, labour and sourcing outside of the United States'. There are cosmetic measures such as keeping the name US Steel, but the import of the agreement is clear. It is to safeguard US jobs and maintain domestic capacity in a strategic industry in the interest of national security. It is hard to see how a significant investment in Intel – which is also being promoted on national security grounds – could come without similar strings attached, which in turn would have to militate against significant new investment in Leixlip. If the rationale for the US government taking a significant stake in Intel is to ensure that the country boosts domestic chip-making capacity, why put money into Ireland? The ability of Intel to resist Trump's overture – even if it wanted to – is limited. The company is haemorrhaging cash and before Tan's appointment was contemplating splitting off its chip-making arm to focus on chip design. This is the model adopted by more successful rivals who have wiped it eye on AI chips. Tan seems committed to staying in the chip-making business although he has made this contingent on finding customers for its two latest chip-manufacturing processes known as 18A and 14A. Both processes are based in domestic plants in Oregon and Arizona, which received billions of dollars' worth of investment under the Chips Act brought in by the Biden administration. The Act aimed to bolster domestic chip manufacturing. Leixlip has been touted as a possible site for 18A manufacturing but there does not seem to be any progress in that regard. To date, Intel has failed to find enough third-party customers for its new manufacturing processes and remains its own biggest customer. Unless it can find more customers, its business model is simply not viable, hence the weakness of its share price over the past two years. The presumption is that once the US government is on board as a shareholder – a 10 per cent stake worth about €10 billion has been touted – Trump will pressurise other US companies such as Apple and Qualcomm to become customers of Intel. They currently source chips from manufacturers in Japan and Taiwan. The jump in Intel's share price and the decision by Softbank to take a 2 per cent stake in the business on Monday reflects the obvious short-term benefits of the Trump administration bullying other US firms to become its customers. More red-blooded capitalists have warned that the US will fall into the nationalisation trap whereby a government decision to prop up an uncompetitive national champion weakens the economy long term. But if things continue to unfold in this way, it looks likely that Intel's Leixlip plant will, at best, be left to wither on the vine as future investment is focused on boosting manufacturing capacity in the US. Alternatively, Trump could change his mind in the morning.
Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Wall Street falls, European shares rise as investors digest Ukraine peace efforts
Wall Street stocks fell, European equities rose and oil edged down on Tuesday as traders assessed the previous day's White House talks on the war in Ukraine, and looked ahead to a key meeting of central bankers. US president Donald Trump said he hoped Russia's Vladimir Putin would move forward on ending the war in Ukraine but conceded the Kremlin leader may not want to make a deal. On Monday, Mr Trump told Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any agreement to end Russia's war there, though the extent of any assistance was not immediately clear. Declines in Nvidia and other heavyweight artificial intelligence stocks pulled the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq in New York down. READ MORE DUBLIN Ryanair led a relatively positive session on Dublin's Iseq, rising by 1.3 per cent to €26.98, despite winning the dubious accolade of being the most complained about Irish company, according to new data from the consumer watchdog. Glanbia , which enjoyed a positive bounce in the wake of recent results, continued its climb, rising by 1.3 per cent to €14.28. AIB and Bank of Ireland rose by 1 per cent and 1.3 per cent respectively in line what other financials across Europe. Insulation maker Kingspan also had a strong session, rising by close to 2 per cent. EUROPE Europe's broad Stoxx600 index rose 0.7 per ent, outperforming Asian stocks, which fell slightly. Europe's gains were capped by declines in defence names, with the Stoxx Europe Total Market Aerospace & Defense index down 2.6 per cent, as traders saw the talks as a chance to take profit in the sector after a strong run. With any breakthrough in talks, 'I think European stocks are likely the biggest winners, and within that framework, I think industrial companies, construction for rebuilding materials, and financial companies,' said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Investment Management. Losers could include shares in energy and defence after their recent gains, he said. LONDON Britain's main indexes climbed on Tuesday with broad-based gains, though advances were tempered by losses in defence stocks as investors assessed prospects for a Russia-Ukraine peace deal. The blue-chip FTSE 100 gained 0.3 per cent. The midcap index FTSE 250 rose 0.4%, snapping a three-day losing streak. Market sentiment improved following Mr Trump's meeting on Monday with Mr Zelenskiy and European allies, where he pledged US support for Ukraine's security in any war-ending agreement. However, Mr Trump conceded that Russian president Vladimir Putin might reject negotiations entirely. Aerospace and defence sector fell 2.8 per cent, marking its largest single-day decline since early April, though it maintains a 70 per cent yearly gain. This retreat mirrored broader European defence stocks as investors locked in profits after a strong performance. Financials led the FTSE 100 gains, with the banking index rising 0.3 per cent. Lender Metro Bank advanced 5.3 per cent after RBC Capital Markets upgraded the stock to 'outperform' from 'sector perform'. 'Banks are potentially benefiting from the fact that the Bank of England may be slower in cutting rates than initially expected,' said Fiona Cincotta, senior market analyst at City Index. NEW YORK US equities decline on Tuesday as earnings from Home Depot kicked off a string of key retail reports and as investors awaited a Federal Reserve symposium this week to set expectations for the path of interest rates. The S&P 500 Index fell 0.2 per cent initially in New York, led by technology and communication services sectors. Palo Alto Networks rose 4.8 per ent in the second-biggest gain in the index after releasing a stronger-than-expected annual sales forecast. The tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index dropped 1% amid a rotation into blue-chip stocks. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.2 per cent and is on pace to close at a record. Retail earnings reports expected this week will give investors a clearer picture of US consumer spending. A Home Depot sales returned to growth in the second quarter. Lowe's, Target and Walmart are all scheduled to report this week. Meanwhile, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said a recent uptick in services inflation was driven by investment services. The comments come before an annual Fed symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, where chair Jerome Powell is scheduled to deliver a speech on Friday that investors will be studying for clues around the potential for an interest-rate cut as soon as next month. - Additional reporting Reuters/Bloomberg
