Protests erupt at Payyambalam crematorium over firewood shortage
The Kannur Corporation's Payyambalam Shanti Crematorium witnessed protests on Monday (April 21, 2025) as families were made to wait for hours for the cremation of their relatives owing to a shortage of firewood.'
As the Corporation officials failed to provide timely support, some families had to arrange firewood and carry out the rites independently. Anger mounted as the staff allegedly delayed issuing receipts. 'The officials were just sitting there doing nothing,' said Manoj, who had come to attend a funeral, expressing frustration over the lack of action by the civic body.
CPI(M) district secretary K.K. Ragesh, area secretary K.P. Sudhakaran, BJP State secretary K. Ranjith, and north district president K.K. Vinod Kumar visited the site following the protest.
The situation grew more tense when Corporation secretary Vinu C. Kunhappan arrived at the crematorium. He was met with criticism from those present, who pointed out the lack of preparation and failure to maintain proper arrangements for the deceased. The Corporation later arranged for firewood and completed the pending cremations.
Mr. Ragesh said the civic body had awarded the contract for providing firewood to the crematorium, however, the contract period had ended. Though a new contractor was found, the Corporation reportedly failed to sign an agreement. 'The Corporation should have been more careful. Even the gasifier crematorium is not functioning, despite spending several crores,' he added.
Mr. Vinod said that there were facilities to perform cremations according to Hindu rituals. However, such facilities were no longer available. He added that the BJP would raise a strong protest against the Corporation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Why Is The Congress Reluctant To Endorse Tejashwi Yadav As Bihar Poll Nears?
New Delhi: The 2025 Bihar Assembly election is just months away and the main opposition alliance - the Mahagathbandan, which is basically the Congress and the RJD - has its work cut out to defeat the ruling pair of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar 's JDU and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's BJP. With that in mind, the Congress' apparent continuing reluctance to back senior RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav - the son of party patriarch Lalu Prasad Yadav and a two-time former Deputy Chief Minister - as the Mahagathbandan chief ministerial candidate has raised eyebrows. Bihar's 'grand alliance' was formed in 2015, more, possibly, out of necessity than claims to ideological unity. In its current avatar - post Nitish Kumar's January 2024 flip-flop, when he dumped the alliance and returned to the BJP's side - the RJD has been the dominant force. That fact has been underlined by the results of the two most recent elections in the state - the 2024 federal election, in which Tejashwi Yadav's party won four seats to the Congress' three, and the 2020 state poll, in which the RJD was the single-largest party with 71 of 243 seats. The Congress - reeling from a string of losses to the BJP in state and federal elections over the past decade - has been relegated to the role of a junior partner, much like in Tamil Nadu, where the party has played second fiddle to Chief Minister MK Stalin's DMK in the past three elections. However, unlike in Tamil Nadu, in Bihar the Congress is trying to break free from the 'junior partner' tag, boosted by senior leader Rahul Gandhi's sustained campaigns across the state. The RJD has made its position clear - Tejashwi Yadav is the party's chief ministerial candidate. Tejashwi Yadav will be the RJD' chief ministerial face in the Bihar election (File). The Congress, the subtext therefore says, can either get with the programme or leave. Does Congress Have Votes To Go Solo? Not really. In the 2020 state election the party contested 70 seats and won just 19. The RJD contested 144 and won 75. The alliance lost the election by 12 seats. The hugely disparate conversion rates - 27 per cent to 52 per cent - have often been red-flagged by the state party as a big reason for that narrow loss. The Congress, though, has argued its candidates were "set up to fail" and blamed the RJD for not extending grassroots support and allotting 'difficult-to-win' seats to the larger party. And it wants 'respectable and winnable' seats this time to remain allied, sources said. The situation, i.e., the disparity in performance between the two parties, was evident in last year's federal election too, in which 40 parliamentary seats were in play. The Mahagathbandan was trounced - it won nine seats, campaigning as the INDIA bloc, to the BJP-led NDA's 30. The RJD won four and polled over 22 per cent of the votes. The Congress got three and only nine per cent of the votes. This has led to RJD expressing frustration at the Congress' 'overestimation' of its strength. Nevertheless, the Congress reportedly remains insistent it can contest this election on its own, and its unwillingness, at this time, to back the RJD, indicates it wants to do just that. As an aside, the Congress' inability to play nicely with state/regional parties has made headlines over the past few years, and has often played its part in a big BJP win. A good example of this is the 2023 Madhya Pradesh Assembly election and the spat with Akhilesh Yadav's Samajwadi Party over six of the state's 230 seats. The Congress' subsequent defeat provoked caustic comments from other allies about not working with friendly parties. Can Congress Win Without RJD? The Congress reportedly has reservations over what it sees as a 'one-dimensional' campaign of the RJD, which is based on caste factors and, particularly, the Muslim-Yadav base. It wants to broaden the Mahagathbandan's appeal and project a more modern and inclusive image, which is why Rahul Gandhi has made frequent trips - seven in the last six months - to Bihar, with the focus on Dalits and issues of importance to the community. The Congress believes Rahul Gandhi's visits to Bihar will help it get more votes (File). But this has made the RJD anxious, since it is seen as poaching its voter base. Congress leaders in Bihar have also argued they need to contest on issues important to the party as a whole, such as employment, education, and secularism, and so attract urban voters who feel alienated from both the RJD's caste politics and BJP's Hindutva focus. A Mahjong Effect? The Congress, meanwhile, is also aware that it cannot be seen as too accepting of a junior role, of scraps in seats and at the decision-making table, since this weakens its position when negotiating with other state allies, including the DMK in Tamil Nadu. The refusal, so far, to endorse Tejashwi Yadav may therefore also be a strategic signal to allies - that the Congress is unwilling to play an increasingly weak second fiddle. So, what can the Congress do now? Either agree, again, to be the RJD's junior partner or bargain hard, knowing that this might leave the opposition alliance in tatters, and give the JDU-BJP a big boost, months before voting. And all of this does not factor in the role of Left parties that are part of the Mahagathbandan alliance. These have, so far, remained silent. They are not seen as having any objection to Tejashwi Yadav as the Chief Minister, but they are watching the Congress' moves closely. If the Congress decides to break free from the RDJ's 'shackles', it might find support from smaller parties, including the Left, unhappy with both the RJD and the BJP (and JDU).
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Complainant against influencer Sharmistha Panoli arrested in Kolkata
Wajahat Khan, the man who filed the police complaint that led to the arrest of social media influencer and law student Sharmistha Panoli, was arrested in Kolkata on Monday after allegedly being on the run since 1 June. Panoli was arrested in Gurugram on 30 May in connection with a hate speech case and was granted bail by the Calcutta High Court on 5 June. She was released from Alipore Women's Correctional Home on 6 June. Who is Wajahat Khan? Khan had lodged the initial complaint against Panoli, citing hate speech. Following that, he allegedly went into hiding with his father. On 2 June, a formal complaint was filed against him by the Shree Ram Swabhiman Parishad, accusing him of using derogatory, inflammatory, and sexually explicit language aimed at Hindu deities, religious practices, and the community at large. Who is Sharmistha Panoli? What is the case against Sharmistha Panoli? Panoli had posted a video on social media making communal remarks and referring to Operation Sindoor. The video drew criticism and led to a police complaint on 15 May at the Garden Reach police station in Kolkata. The Kolkata Police classified the content as hate speech and filed a case against her. Later the same day, she deleted the video and issued an unconditional public apology for her remarks. TMC vs BJP in the Panoli case The case has taken on a political dimension in West Bengal. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has accused Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of appeasement politics, alleging bias in the police action. Leader of the Opposition and BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari posted on X, calling Panoli's arrest a case of 'police atrocities'. He wrote, 'This is a case of police atrocities as an innocent young lady, for using her freedom of speech and expression, has been illegally arrested by the Kolkata Police and was sent to judicial custody. This is yet another example of police overzealousness and eagerness to please their political masters.' BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul echoed these sentiments, claiming that the police were shielding Wajahat Khan due to 'Muslim appeasement'. In response, Trinamool Congress (TMC) spokesperson Riju Datta defended the police action, stating that the Kolkata Police was acting on a court warrant. He also issued a warning to young social media users and their families, saying: 'Do not get influenced by the RW cabal run by BJP IT Cell… they will earn their salary hiding behind a cellphone but your children's lives will be spoiled forever.'
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Nearly 300 illegal Bangladeshis pushed back from Assam, says CM Himanta Sarma
GUWAHATI: Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said on Monday that his government has pushed back nearly 300 illegal Bangladeshis to the neighbouring country in the past few months. Addressing a one-day special session of the state assembly, Sarma said that the process to push them back will continue as per provisions of a 1950 law to identify and evict illegal foreigners. 'We will adopt two roads to deal with illegal foreigners. One is to take their cases to foreigners tribunals and the other to use provisions of the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950,' Sarma said. 'We have pushed back almost 300 people till now and none of them have returned. This process will be intensified and way fundamentalist elements from Bangladesh have taken roots in Assam, the government needs to be more active and proactive in this regard,' he added. Sarma stated that his government has decided to enforce provisions of the 1950 Act into action and empower district commissioners to identify and push back illegal Bangladeshis without referring to the foreigners tribunals. Assam has 100 such tribunals where people deemed to be illegal foreigners and who have entered the state after March 25, 2025 (the deadline set to identify illegal immigrants in the state) are referred to and their cases heard. Once they are declared as foreigners by these tribunals they are sent to detention centres set up for such illegal foreigners. They have the option of appealing their cases in higher courts with proper documents. In recent weeks, following directives from the union home ministry, several state governments, especially those ruled by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), have started drives to detect illegal Bangladeshis and initiate a process to deport them. Many such people, who are allegedly illegal Bangladeshis, have been pushed back to the no man's land between India and Bangladesh through the borders in Assam, Tripura and West Bengal. Last week, Bangladesh had refused to accept 14 such people from Assam, who were again sent back.
