Modi-govt must hold the line on food and fuel trade when dealing with Trump
From dismantling its protectionist 'inspector raj,' to cutting duties on
Tesla Inc.
cars, and treating Amazon.com Inc. and Walmart Inc. on a par with domestic retailers, India is under pressure on many fronts in its trade talks with the US.
While concessions in several of these areas will be beneficial to Indians, the sticking points will be food and fuel.
Take
ethanol blending
in gasoline. New Delhi has, over the past quarter century, modelled its intercity transport network on America's by centering it on highways, rather than rail. To manage the pollution from cars and trucks, and to reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels, the government has mandated the addition of 20% bio-ethanol in gasoline.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Kulkas yang belum Terjual dengan Harga Termurah (Lihat harga)
provokepulse.com/id
Cari Sekarang
Undo
But the program has a politically important third goal: Enhancing local farm income with the creation of a market in agricultural surplus and byproducts. This is where trade interests will collide. American farmers are allowed to sell corn-based ethanol to India for industrial use, but not for blending in transport fuel. Washington views this as an unfair nontariff barrier. Prime Minister
Narendra Modi
's administration is reviewing a US request to lift the restrictions, Bloomberg News reported this month.
Bloomberg
It's easy to see why prizing open the fast-growing market for ethanol mixing may be important to President Donald Trump. In theory at least, estimated annual demand of 10 billion liters (2.6 billion gallons) is big enough to absorb all of the corn grown in Indiana. A big win in agriculture will help the US president at a time when his trade war has all but closed off the opportunity to export sorghum from Kansas and Texas to China, where it is used in feedstock and to make Baijiu liquor. American corn, too, will need new buyers in Asia as Chinese demand retreats.
Live Events
You Might Also Like:
What are the thorny farm issues in India-US trade negotiations?
Trump is threatening to scuttle India's manufacturing ambitions. He has warned Apple Inc. of a 25% tariff if it assembles iPhones meant for sale in the US anywhere overseas. He has also damaged his friend Modi's strongman image at home by repeatedly claiming to have been the peacemaker who engineered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan in their recent hostilities. New Delhi has no option except to be conciliatory; it must at least reach a preliminary deal to avoid the 26% reciprocal tariff ahead of its July 9 deadline.
Yet, when it comes to food and fuel, the
Modi government
will have to proceed carefully.
Domestic sources of biofuels range from maize — what Americans call corn — to broken rice, rotten potatoes, sugarcane and molasses. These first-generation sources of ethanol achieve 30% to 40% reduction in carbon emissions. Homegrown clean-tech firms are investing billions of dollars in second-generation bio-ethanol. Hyderabad-based AM Green has acquired a Finnish technology company to extract green fuel and chemicals from bamboo, grass and bagasse, the pulp of crushed sugarcane stalks. Blending gasoline with 2G ethanol can cut CO2 by 90%. The bigger advantage is that these fuel sources don't compete with food.
That isn't true of corn. Amid low global oil prices, there is no economic case for India to grow a new dependency on an imported fuel-mixer that will leave its own farmers earning less from crop residues. They will, in turn, want higher subsidies for their main produce. Politically, they're too important a constituency for their demand to be ignored. Farmers in the country's north are asking for legally guaranteed minimum prices. So far, the Modi administration has resisted the pressure, but caving in to Trump on ethanol could spawn fresh unease.
Washington is also pushing New Delhi to allow genetically modified food, especially corn and soybean, its two biggest farm exports by volume. India allowed GM cotton in more than 20 years ago. But that's where it drew the line. Food security for 1.4 billion people is a strategic concern, and policymakers aren't keen to let multinational seed companies be in control. Even a locally developed variant of mustard, which received its environment clearance three years ago, is stuck in a legal limbo.
Yet, here a concession may be in India's own interest. The population has already been exposed to modified soybean and canola seeds via imported edible oils. Besides, China, the second-largest seed market after the US, has already laid down a clear roadmap for GM crops. Farmers' organizations in India want to follow the same path. A boost to farm productivity may help lower urban factory workers' inflation expectations by making food prices less volatile. That will keep a tighter lid on manufacturing wages without any drop in living standards. Assembling iPhones in India could become more competitive — even with the threat of Trump's tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The Indian common man and the road the happiness
On April 28, Hariman Sharma, a farmer from the hills of Himachal Pradesh, walked up barefoot to Rashtrapati Bhavan's Durbar Hall to receive the Padma Shri from the President of India. He had developed a new variety of apple that could be cultivated in tropical or sub-tropical climate regions, potentially enabling it to be grown almost anywhere in our country. Sharma is not a government scientist or a researcher in a multinational biotech company. He is a common man. What does it mean to be a common man in India? A battle to make ends meet? Stealing moments of happiness before harsh reality creeps up? The World Happiness Index 2025, an initiative of Gallup, the University of Oxford and the UN's Sustainable Development Solutions Network, ranked India 118th among 147 countries. The ranking is based on people's self-evaluation of their lives. So, we have ranked ourselves lower than most of the world. A large portion of our economy thrives on our perceived unhappiness. From Bollywood to the health-supplement industry, everyone wants us to believe that they can bring joy into our lives. This pursuit of happiness is fuelled not by an inner striving for emancipation but by a confluence of images which seem to suggest a lack of meaning in our lives. With the information revolution, a new and powerful driver of unhappiness has emerged: FOMO. Our addiction to social media keeps us always wanting to not just keep up with our peers, but do better than them. In One-Dimensional Man (1964), Herbert Marcuse prophesied a world in which consumerism and mass media stifle originality. They create a 'blissful slave' , who is kept preoccupied due to the creation and pursuit of 'false needs'. He wasn't completely correct. We are far from being blissful. The pursuit of false needs hasn't been an entirely fulfilling affair. What we need in our lives determines our happiness, and unfortunately, we haven't really been good at identifying these needs, let alone planning a path towards achieving satisfaction. Union Minister of Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal ruffled a few sentiments when he chided Indian start-ups for concentrating on food delivery apps when their Chinese counterparts were developing deep tech. What exactly is the need10-minute delivery apps are fulfilling? The need for instant gratification? In contrast, people like Sharma are quietly working towards fulfilling real needs. Hailing from Paniala village in Bilaspur (HP), Sharma observed apple seeds discarded in his backyard take root and grow into a fruit-bearing tree despite the warm, unfriendly climate. This set him off on a journey of experimentation that led to the development of the HRMN-99 apple. Similarly, Arunachalam Muruganantham designed and produced machines that produce low-cost sanitary napkins — these have benefitted 13 million women. He has created over 25,000 jobs with his invention. The movie, Pad Man (2018), winner of a National Award in 2019, was based on his story. Muruganantham was conferred the Padma Shri in 2016. Yanung Jamoh Lego from Arunachal Pradesh has popularised nature's herbal remedies. Her methods offer affordable and culturally rooted healthcare. She has helped revive traditional healing, empowered local women, and promoted sustainable health practices. Over 300,000 patients have been reported cured using her medicines. Yanung was conferred the Padma Shri last year. These stories have another thing in common. The National Innovation Foundation, an autonomous organisation under the Department of Science and Technology, nurtured their innovations. It has funded and supported 13 such common men and women who have later won the Padma Shri. Our society needs more such organisations. The theme of the World Happiness Report for 2025 is caring and sharing. We need to find more ways as a society to start caring for others around us. The writer is an Indian Revenue Service officer Views are personal
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Staying the course on trade pacts with the UK and US
The uncertainty unleashed by Donald Trump's tariffs has only been aggravated by a spate of recent court rulings. On May 28, the US Court of International Trade struck down Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, saying that the emergency law (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) does not give the President the power to impose broad tariffs. However, a day later, a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated the tariffs. The case is now likely to work its way through the US legal system. The uncertainty is likely to linger on as the 90-day pause on the Liberation Day tariffs ends in the second week of July. The Trump administration may have hoped that some trade deals would be quickly negotiated. And while the US and the UK have reached an agreement — the deal was announced on May 8th — progress with other major trading nations/blocks remains a protracted process. Take the case of China. A few days ago, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is reported to have said that trade talks between the US and China 'are a bit stalled'. Last Friday, Trump said that China has 'totally violated' its agreement with the US, a charge that China has rejected. The US President is expected to speak to Chinese President Xi Jinping this week to iron out their differences. In the case of Japan, several rounds of talks have taken place, and another is expected before the G7 summit. But last Friday, the legal challenges to his tariffs notwithstanding, Trump also raised the tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50 per cent, potentially impacting countries such as Canada, Mexico and South Korea, which account for a sizeable share of US steel imports. A day later, the European Union, which had agreed to 'accelerate talks' on a US trade deal, has also responded firmly, saying it is prepared to impose 'countermeasures' against the US. It noted that such moves to increase tariffs 'undermine ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution'. The new tariffs are effective from June 4. These latest tariff moves come at a time when India and the US are negotiating a bilateral trade deal. A US team is expected to visit India over the coming few days. On Monday, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, speaking in Washington at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum's leadership summit, said that a deal between the US and India could happen in the 'not too distant future'. The India-EU trade deal also appears to be on course. As per a report, the two sides have agreed on several chapters, and the pact could be concluded before the end of the year. Coming after the finalisation of the India-UK agreement, the successful culmination of these deals would increase the country's attractiveness as an investment destination.
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Niti Aayog and a deepening federalism
In the past 11 years, India has witnessed an era of cooperative and fiscal federalism. The Centre and state governments have worked together on socioeconomic transformation for the achievement of shared goals. The ideal of Team India championed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been the driving force behind this approach. Institutional and process reforms of unprecedented scale have brought about exceptional impact at all levels, the most significant being the rise of 25 crore citizens from multidimensional poverty. The transformation of the Planning Commission into the NITI Aayog in 2015 was an important change – it replaced a Centre-to-state one-way flow of policy with a collaborative partnership between the two. For long, knowledge resided where power was wielded. A phygital world is increasing the gap. NITI Aayog plays a vital role in bridging it. Unlike the Planning Commission, it encourages states to take ownership of their development agendas and has become a bridge between the Centre and states. The Aayog's annual Governing Council Meeting acts as the apex platform for the political leadership of the Centre and states to deliberate on issues of national importance. The annual Chief Secretaries Conference is a platform for the senior-most bureaucrats of the country to discuss challenges and share best practices. Its indices have acted as a catalyst for a competitive federal system, inspiring laggard states to improve their performance. The Aspirational Districts and Blocks Programme has been transformative in improving the quality of life of citizens from nearly 350 districts and 500 blocks. It has brought the most backward regions at par with state averages across key socio-economic parameters. The key to development for states is the availability of sufficient resources. A significant step in this direction was the decision to increase the states' share in the divisible pool of taxes from 32 per cent to 42 per cent. Recommended by the 14th Finance Commission and implemented by the Centre, this was the largest-ever change in tax devolution at one go. This was implemented in a cooperative spirit to provide autonomy to states in designing and implementing schemes. The Finance Commission's formula has been constantly evolving to address the states' fiscal autonomy and reduce inequality. Transfers to poorer states such as UP, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh between the 11th (2004-05) and 15th Finance Commissions (2023-24) have seen substantial increases. If one looks at aggregate numbers from 2014-15 to 2024-25, states' share in central taxes increased from Rs 3.37 lakh crore to Rs 12.23 lakh crore. The GST Council has acted as a platform for fiscal federalism with decision making through consensus between the Centre and states. In actual terms, states receive around 71 per cent of the revenue from GST, while the Centre's share remains at about 29 per cent. Since the rollout of GST, the Centre has foregone 0.5-1 per cent of GDP in revenue annually to fund the 14 per cent compensation guarantee to states. About Rs 6.52 lakh crore have been provided as GST compensation to states from 2017-18 to 2024-25. The Centre's commitment to fiscal federalism has empowered states with more resources in the last decade compared to the previous decade. The ratio of gross transfers (including states' share in central taxes, grants, and loans) to GDP was 5.2 per cent in the decade preceding 2015-16, and has now increased to 6.5 per cent. During this period, grants from the Centre have increased by 234 per cent, and gross loans from the Centre have increased by a massive 992 per cent. The Union budget 2025-26 further proposed an outlay of Rs1.5 lakh crore for 50-year interest-free loans to states for capital expenditure. Even in states like Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, average central taxes and grants from the Centre as a percentage of total revenue increased from 25 per cent to 31 per cent and 49 per cent to 56 per cent, respectively, from the decade of 2004-14 to 2014-24. In absolute terms, the annual total transfer by the Centre to all states/UTs increased by Rs 14.96 lakh crore in this period. The division of subjects into the Union, State and Concurrent Lists enables efficient distribution of responsibilities to each level of the government. However, the Centre continues to contribute to subjects in the State and Concurrent Lists through the Central Sector (CS) and Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS). Between 2015-16 and 2023-24, CS and CSS releases registered an increase of 197 per cent. Some of the CSS have had a transformative impact. The Jal Jeevan Mission witnessed a 570 per cent resource allocation increase between 2019-20 to 2025-26 and benefitted 15.44 crore rural households with tap water connections. Between its launch in 2018-19 and 2025-26, the budget estimate for PM Jan Aarogya Yojana surged by 292 per cent. Consequently, out-of-pocket health expenditure has declined from 62.6 per cent to 39.4 per cent, with recorded savings of Rs 1.25 lakh crore during the same period. From 2020 to 2025, the allocation for PM Awas Yojana-Gramin surged by approximately 181 per cent with 2.67 crore houses already constructed by 2024. The grassroots change that these impactful schemes have brought into the lives of common citizens is evident. The Centre's commitment to cooperative federalism is equally evident as water, health and housing are all in the State List of the Constitution. The word 'federalism' is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Yet, it has been our guiding mantra. B R Ambedkar had said, 'Our Constitution would be both unitary as well as federal according to the requirements of time and circumstances'. The last decade has been a testimony to the power of cooperative, competitive and fiscal federalism and the positive impact it has had on the lives of 140 crore citizens. (Subrahmanyam is CEO and Shah is senior specialist, NITI Aayog. Views are personal)
