China seeks power beyond water with world's biggest dam
The dam will consist of five cascade hydropower stations arranged from upstream to downstream and, once completed, will be the world's largest source of hydroelectric power. It will be four times larger than China's previous signature hydropower project, the Three Gorges Dam, which spans the Yangtze River in central China.
The Chinese premier, Li Qiang, has described the proposed mega dam as the 'project of the century.' In several ways, Li's description is apt. The vast scale of the project is a reflection of China's geopolitical status and ambitions.
Possibly the most controversial aspect of the dam is its location. The site is on the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River on the eastern rim of the Tibetan plateau. This is connected to the Brahmaputra River, which flows into the Indian border state of Arunachal Pradesh as well as Bangladesh. It is an important source of water for Bangladesh and India.
Both nations have voiced concerns over the dam, particularly since it can potentially affect their water supplies. The tension with India over the dam is compounded by the fact that Arunachal Pradesh has been a focal point of Sino-Indian tensions. China claims the region, which it refers to as Zangnan, saying it is part of what it calls South Tibet.
At the same time, the dam presents Beijing with a potentially formidable geopolitical tool in its dealings with the Indian government. The location of the dam means that it is possible for Beijing to restrict India's water supply.
This potential to control the dow nstream water supply to another country has been demonstrated by the effects that earlier dam projects in the region have had on the nations of the Mekong River Delta in 2019. As a result, this gives Beijing a significant degree of leverage over its neighbors.
One country restricting water supply to put pressure on another is by no means unprecedented. In fact, in April 2025, following a terror attack by Pakistan-based The Resistance Front in Kashmir, which killed 26 people (mainly tourists), India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, restricting water supplies to Pakistani farmers in the region.
So the potential for China's dam to disrupt water flows will further compound the already tense geopolitics of South Asia.
The Motuo mega dam is a testament to China's prowess in large-scale infrastructure projects. China's expertise with massive infrastructure projects is a big part of modern Chinese diplomacy through its massive Belt and Road Initiative.
This involves joint ventures with many developing nations to build large-scale infrastructure, such as ports, rail systems and the like. It has caused much consternation in Washington and Brussels, which view these initiatives as a wider effort to build Chinese influence at their expense.
The completion of the dam will bring Beijing significant symbolic capital as a demonstration of China's power and prosperity – an integral feature of the image of China that Beijing is very keen to promote. It can also be seen as a manifestation of both China's aspirations and its longstanding fears.
The Motuo hydropower project also represents the latest chapter of China's long battle for control of its rivers, a key story in the development of Chinese civilization.
Rivers such as the Yangtze have been at the heart of the prosperity of several Chinese dynasties (the Yangtze is still a major economic driver in modern China) and have devastated others.
The massive Yangtse flood of 1441 threatened the stability of the Ming dynasty, while an estimated 2 million people died when the river flooded in 1931. France 24 report on the construction of the mega dam project.
Such struggles have been embodied in Chinese mythology in the form of the Gun-Yu myth. This tells the story of the way floods displaced the population of ancient China, probably based on an actual flooding at Jishi Gorge on the Yellow River in what is now Qinghai province in 1920BC.
This has led to the common motif of rivers needing human control to abate natural disaster, a theme present in much classical Chinese culture and poetry. The pursuit of controlling China's rivers has also been one of the primary influences on the formation of the Chinese state, as characterised by the concept of zhishui 治水 (controlling the rivers).
Efforts to control the Yangtze have shaped the centralized system of governance that has characterised China throughout its history. In this sense, the Motuo hydropower project represents the latest chapter in China's quest to harness the power of its rivers.
Such a quest remains imperative for China, and its importance has been further underlined by the challenges of climate change, which has seen natural resources such as water becoming increasingly limited. The Ganges River has already been identified as one of the world's water scarcity hotspots.
As well as sustaining China's population, the hydropower provided by the dam is another part of China's wider push towards self-sufficiency. It's estimated that the dam could generate 300 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity every year – about the same amount as produced by the whole UK.
While this will meet the needs of the local population, it also further entrenches China's ability to produce cheap electricity – something that has enabled China to become and remain a manufacturing superpower.
Construction has only just begun, but the Motuo hydropower project has already become a microcosm of China's wider push towards development. It's also a game-changer in the geopolitics of Asia, giving China the potential to exert greater control in shaping the region's water supplies. This, in turn, will give it greater power to shape the geopolitics of the region.
At the same time, it is also the latest chapter of China's longstanding quest to harness its waterways, which now has regional implications beyond anything China's previous dynasties could imagine.
Tom Harper is lecturer in international relations, University of East London
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
China's safeguarding of cultural heritage signals its global ambition
China is making its cultural heritage protection a national priority – and a pillar of its global identity. As one of the world's fastest-growing art markets, China has taken steps in recent years to better safeguard its cultural heritage, both at home and abroad. From restoring ancient sites to recovering looted antiquities and building museums at a rapid rate, these efforts reflect more than a conservation push. They signal that the world's most populous nation views the protection of its antiquities as central to its national identity and role on the global stage. President Xi Jinping has repeatedly emphasised the importance of cultural preservation , making it a hallmark of his governance. Since taking office in 2012, he has addressed the issue repeatedly in inspection tours and key speeches, underscoring that heritage is integral to the 'cultural confidence' China is promoting as part of his core ideologies. This concept – that Chinese culture, values and history are not subordinate to those of other nations but stand on equal, if not greater, footing – reflects a belief that China's long and complex civilisation is not only a source of pride but also a guiding force for modern life and, increasingly, a tool of soft power This vision is taking shape through concrete policy and action. Historic neighbourhoods in cities such as Fuzhou – where Xi famously clashed with developers over conservation – are now protected and undergoing restoration. This shift represents a broader national trend of safeguarding urban cultural heritage in the face of modernisation. In Xi's first decade in office, China's central government allocated over 100 billion yuan (US$14 billion) to cultural heritage protection, more than doubling the number of national priority protected cultural sites and adding eight Chinese sites to the Unesco World Heritage list. China now has the second largest number of World Heritage sites at 60, in close competition with Italy and its 61 sites.
HKFP
an hour ago
- HKFP
HKFP Monitor August 2, 2025: Advocacy space shrinks as LGBTQ event axed, academia falls in line
Welcome back to HKFP Monitor. This week, we covered the cancellation of Hong Kong's biggest LGBTQ event after yet another last-minute venue pullout, new rules pushing public universities to align with Beijing, and a podcast taken down over 'sensitive' comments. We also dived into the ongoing debate over the same-sex partnerships bill within the pro-establishment camp, plus viral clips from the year's first Black Rainstorm Warning – and how netizens mocked the lack of 'advanced planning' by officials. Hong Kong's biggest LGBTQ event, Pink Dot, has been cancelled this year after organisers failed to secure their usual venue at the West Kowloon Cultural District. No reason was given for the sudden withdrawal. Large-scale LGBTQ events have become rare in Hong Kong. The last Pride Parade was held in 2018. In recent years, organisers have switched to indoor bazaars instead of street marches. The cancellation also comes as a controversial government bill granting limited rights to same-sex couples faces pushback from conservative lawmakers. The advocacy space has tightened since the national security law came into effect in June 2020, forcing more than 60 civil society groups to shut down. At the same time, sudden cancellations of venue bookings have become more common – impacting NGOs, opposition parties, and even artists. In September 2023, the Democratic Party had to cancel its fundraising dinner after two restaurants pulled out at the last minute – one blamed typhoon damage. Once the city's largest pro-democracy party, it now faces disbandment, with key figures jailed or barred from running in the city's overhauled elections. Singer-activist Denise Ho, who was arrested for suspected involvement in the Stand News sedition case, has also struggled to book venues. In 2021, her concert at the Hong Kong Arts Centre was axed over vague 'public safety' concerns. A planned live show in May 2024 was also scrapped and moved online. For the first time, Hong Kong's University Grants Committee has explicitly told its eight publicly funded universities to follow guidance from Beijing and align with remarks by Chinese leader Xi Jinping. This new directive appeared in the latest University Accountability Agreement signed by the eight public universities in late June. Schools were urged to support Hong Kong's integration with the mainland, with a focus on 'invigorating China through science and education.' They were also told to follow Xi's views on driving Hong Kong's growth and nurturing young talent, including the 'four musts' and 'four proposals' from his 2022 Hong Kong visit. The latest accountability deal seems to be another step in keeping local universities in check, following the 2019 protests and unrest – during which campuses became battlegrounds between police and protesters. Since then, most universities have cut ties with student unions, while 'democracy walls' and sculptures marking the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown were removed. University councils were also reshaped to boost the number of external members, while reducing student influence. In September 2024, the Hong Kong government slammed a Human Rights Watch and Hong Kong Democracy Council report that warned of a 'severe decline' in academic freedom since the national security law. The report cited self-censorship and professors avoiding 'sensitive' topics. Officials dismissed the report as 'fabricated,' insisting academic freedom remains a core value in Hong Kong. Meanwhile, state media attacks continue. This week, Beijing-backed Ta Kung Pao targeted the Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies at the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) over a poll showing weaker support for Chief Executive John Lee, contradicting another survey that claimed 70% approval. The paper also went after two honorary researchers – American academic Morton Holbrook and Taiwan's Michael Hsiao – calling them 'anti-China forces' and accusing them of smearing the Chinese and Hong Kong governments. CUHK responded by stating both scholars were unpaid and would have their honorary titles revoked. The university said it would also suspend future hires who may violate local laws. LOCAL MEDIA MONITOR The episode in question, which discussed the passing of renowned food critic Chua Lam, was removed from platforms including Xiaohongshu (RedNote), Ximalaya, and Bilibili. Chua is considered one of Hong Kong's 'Four Great Talents,' along with writers Louis Cha and Ni Kuang, and lyricist James Wong. Leung mentioned that Chua's early columns appeared in Next Magazine, a now-defunct publication, which he called a 'very sensitive' topic. He added that bringing up its owner – jailed pro-democracy tycoon Jimmy Lai – is considered 'unhealthy.' Still, he named 'Jimmy' and noted that Apple Daily, also under Lai's Next Digital, once 'pushed certain things in Hong Kong to a peak.' Towards the end, Leung discussed political commentary by the 'Four Great Talents,' saying some views expressed by Cha, better known by his pen name Jin Yong, could land someone in jail in today's climate. He also commented on the city's current downturn, saying Hong Kong's economy is 'very bad,' with a wave of business closures, while officials focus on 'soft resistance.' Leung told HK01 on Wednesday that his team was notified they couldn't post for 15 days. While expecting the podcast to return on August 6, they declined to speculate on the reason for the takedown. Constitutional crisis? The government's plan to let same-sex couples married overseas register their partnerships in Hong Kong has sparked debate within the pro-establishment camp, with politicians and legal scholars split on the issue. This week, Gu Mingkang, a scholar at the Education University of Hong Kong, wrote in Ming Pao to rebut City University of Hong Kong legal academic Zhu Guobin. In an earlier op-ed published in Ming Pao, Zhu had warned that if lawmakers reject the bill, it could be seen as going against a 2023 Court of Final Appeal ruling – putting the judiciary in an 'awkward' spot and possibly triggering a constitutional crisis. Gu disagreed, saying that passing or rejecting a bill is part of the legislature's normal function. He argued that calling it a 'constitutional crisis' is just sensationalism, and shows either a lack of understanding or disrespect for the city's constitutional setup. In early July, University of Hong Kong law professor Albert Chen offered a similar view to Zhu's, warning that failing to follow the court's ruling would be a 'major shock' to Hong Kong's constitutional system. Black rainstorm chaos: Photos and videos of serious flooding in Hong Kong went viral this week after the year's first Black Rainstorm Warning was issued on Tuesday. One clip showed a man walking on a road barrier near Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, as water covered both roads and sidewalks. Eastern District was among the hardest hit – another video showed water gushing down a hillside on Yiu Hing Road in Shau Kei Wan, turning into mini waterfalls and flooding nearby areas. Some joked it looked like Niagara Falls. A viral photo also showed flooding outside Quarry Bay MTR station, where a big crowd of commuters were stuck at the exit. Memes quickly spread, with many questioning why the Observatory only raised the warning at 9.10am – just after most people had already started work. Others mocked the lack of 'advanced planning,' a phrase used by Chief Secretary Eric Chan earlier last month when explaining a premature class suspension decision. Barely any rain fell the next day, sparking public backlash at the time. HKFP PHOTO OF THE WEEK Hong Kong's non-binary artist Holok Chen and an activist, who chose to stay anonymous, staged a performance on Monday outside the Cotton Tree Drive Marriage Registry in Central and spoke to reporters. The two were dressed as monsters – Chen in a wedding gown and the activist in a tuxedo. Chen explained that their outfits were a response to how lawmakers have been 'demonising' the LGBTQ community during discussions on the government's proposed framework for granting limited rights to same-sex couples. 'I want to create a speculative future where monsters, even monsters of different taxonomy, can live, can love, can kiss and can enjoy their divine union,' they said.
HKFP
11 hours ago
- HKFP
UK to ‘never allow' political extradition of Hongkongers after alarm over law changes
The UK security minister has said the country would 'never' allow Hongkongers to be extradited for political reasons, after activists raised alarm that changes to an extradition act could put them at risk. Dan Jarvis, the UK's security chief, said on Wednesday that there had been 'inaccurate' reporting on modifications being made to the country's extradition laws. Last month, he said the UK was planning to remove Hong Kong from the UK's Extradition Act 2003, as it no longer had a formal extradition arrangement with the city after the UK scrapped the treaty in response to Beijing imposing a national security law in Hong Kong in 2020. In place of that, the UK would cooperate with Hong Kong on 'the case-by-case ad hoc basis available for non-treaty partners,' Jarvis added. In response, UK-based advocacy group Hong Kong Watch said the proposal could give rise to 'opaque extradition cooperation outside the protections of a formal treaty-based system.' Conservative Party lawmaker Alicia Kearns wrote a letter to Jarvis expressing concern about the 'transnational repression' faced by Hong Kong democracy activists and questioning how the UK could protect them from Hong Kong authorities. In response, Jarvis said on Wednesday that the change – removing Hong Kong from the UK's Extradition Act 2003 – simply 'formalises the severing of ties between the British and Hong Kong extradition systems.' 'The government will never allow a situation where [Hongkongers] or any other nationality is extradited for politically motivated purposes, he said, adding that UK courts have 'extensive powers' and could bar extradition if it is determined that a request is political. Arrest warrants Since Beijing imposed a national security law in Hong Kong following the 2019 protests and unrest, scores of activists have relocated to other countries – with the UK being one of the most popular destinations. Hong Kong police have issued arrest warrants and bounties of up to HK$1 million for 19 overseas activists accused of breaching the national security law. Some of them are now based in the UK, including activists Nathan Law, Finn Lau, and Chloe Cheung. Last week, police issued a new round of warrants for 15 activists, plus a HK$200,000 bounty each for information that could lead to their arrests. Police cited their involvement in a political group deemed subversive by Hong Kong authorities. Jarvis said the UK government 'stands resolutely' with Hongkongers who have relocated to the UK, and that he was 'deeply concerned by the news of further bounties having been issued.' 'Any attempt by any foreign state to intimidate, harass or harm individuals in the UK will not be tolerated,' he said. In June 2020, Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution – bypassing the local legislature – following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts, which were broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers, alarming democrats, civil society groups and trade partners, as such laws have been used broadly to silence and punish dissidents in China. However, the authorities say it has restored stability and peace to the city.
