logo
Rethinking development in an era of upheaval

Rethinking development in an era of upheaval

Bangkok Post2 days ago
For many developing countries, the global economic landscape has shifted dramatically in recent years. Lower growth, disrupted supply chains, reduced aid flows, and heightened financial-market volatility represent significant headwinds. Underpinning these changes is a fundamental restructuring, driven by the developed world, of the postwar economic and financial order. Against this background, a handful of factors are becoming critically important for the current and future well-being of developing countries -- and for the fate of multilateral institutions.
For much of the period following World War II, the global economic and financial order operated as a core-periphery construct, with the United States at its centre. The US provided global public goods, led multi-country policy coordination, and acted as a crisis manager, in accordance with a widely accepted set of rules and standards. The end goal was eventual convergence, securing an ever more integrated and prosperous world economy.
But three factors undermined this order. First, insufficient attention was paid to increasingly destabilising distributional outcomes, leading to widespread alienation and marginalisation within politically influential segments of society. Instead of continuing to influence politics, economics became subservient to it.
Second, the existing order struggled to integrate rapidly expanding, large, developing countries. The most notable example is China, whose immense economy but relatively low per capita income created a persistent misalignment between its domestic development priorities and its new global responsibilities. The world could no longer absorb smoothly the external consequences of China's economic strategy, generating tensions that international governance structures have struggled to resolve.
The third factor was the transformation of the US from a stabilising force to a source of volatility. Contributing to this development were the 2008 global financial crisis (which originated in the US), the weaponisation of tariffs against China in 2018, and the increasing use of payment-system sanctions. It accelerated in recent years with the failure to ensure the equitable global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines, the "uber-weaponisation" of tariffs against friends and foes alike, the dismantling of America's foreign-aid system, and continued indifference to devastating humanitarian crises and repeated violations of international law.
While the traditional core-periphery model is inherently ill-equipped to handle all this, there is nothing to replace it, resulting in a bumpy journey toward an unclear destination. Despite this, developing countries have navigated the changing landscape relatively well so far. Their success can be attributed largely to hard-won policy achievements, including the strengthening of macroeconomic frameworks and institutions in recent decades.
But to maintain this positive trajectory in an increasingly challenging external environment, developing countries must affirm four key policy priorities. The first is to preserve macroeconomic stability while aggressively addressing any structural and financial vulnerabilities, including shallow domestic financial markets, weak regulatory frameworks, and governance deficits.
The second priority is to strengthen international links that boost resilience, improve agility, and expand optionality. This requires coordinated, multiyear efforts to harmonise regulations, foster regional financial integration, and build trade infrastructure.
Third, developing countries should prepare themselves to exploit the new opportunities created by innovations -- from productivity enhancements in traditional sectors to improvements in social sectors where investment in human capital has the highest returns. AI, in particular, holds immense potential to revolutionise medicine, education, and agriculture, which could help these countries leapfrog traditional development stages. Building a supportive ecosystem requires investing in digital infrastructure, cultivating a skilled workforce, and developing an innovation-friendly regulatory environment.
Lastly, with many US assets appearing overvalued and US Treasuries becoming more volatile, the small but strategically important subgroup of developing countries with high levels of foreign reserves and substantial financial wealth in dollars is being pushed to reconsider their holdings' traditional US overweight. This process will inevitably be protracted and complex, and will require careful asset disaggregation, revised asset-allocation methodologies, and new investment mindsets that look beyond conventional safe havens.
Multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and regional development banks have a crucial role to play in helping their members pursue such an approach. To become trusted advisers, these institutions must get better at compiling and disseminating best practices for new and evolving technologies that can improve health, educational, and productivity outcomes, and they must do more to promote these technologies' uptake. For example, their staff must be equipped to answer questions about interacting with AI agents, leveraging innovations to deliver essential services, and managing the attendant risks.
Multilateral institutions should also encourage regional links and projects that facilitate trade, expand cross-border infrastructure, and promote shared resource management. And in a world shaped increasingly by frequent shocks, there is an urgent need to enhance contingency-funding facilities, such as by strengthening risk-sharing tools.
Of course, this should not undermine the essential work that these institutions perform in fragile countries. Given the overwhelming evidence that traditional development models struggle in countries with such serious governance and security challenges, this, too, is an area that requires more out-of-the-box thinking.
AI and other emerging technologies provide developing countries a rare opportunity to unlock new pathways to inclusive economic growth. But exploiting this historic opportunity is far from automatic.
Unless developing countries create the conditions necessary for the efficient and equitable diffusion of such innovations throughout their economies -- starting, crucially, with the health and education sectors -- they risk falling further behind, causing inequalities within and between countries to deepen, and accelerating the fragmentation of the global order.
Mohamed A. El-Erian, President of Queens' College at the University of Cambridge, is a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, an adviser to Allianz, and Chair of Gramercy Fund Management. He is the author of 'The Only Game in Town: Central Banks, Instability, and Avoiding the Next Collapse' (Random House, 2016) and a co-author (with Gordon Brown, Michael Spence, and Reid Lidow) of 'Permacrisis: A Plan to Fix a Fractured World' (Simon & Schuster, 2023). * This commentary is based on the author's keynote presentation at the 2025 Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rethinking development in an era of upheaval
Rethinking development in an era of upheaval

Bangkok Post

time2 days ago

  • Bangkok Post

Rethinking development in an era of upheaval

For many developing countries, the global economic landscape has shifted dramatically in recent years. Lower growth, disrupted supply chains, reduced aid flows, and heightened financial-market volatility represent significant headwinds. Underpinning these changes is a fundamental restructuring, driven by the developed world, of the postwar economic and financial order. Against this background, a handful of factors are becoming critically important for the current and future well-being of developing countries -- and for the fate of multilateral institutions. For much of the period following World War II, the global economic and financial order operated as a core-periphery construct, with the United States at its centre. The US provided global public goods, led multi-country policy coordination, and acted as a crisis manager, in accordance with a widely accepted set of rules and standards. The end goal was eventual convergence, securing an ever more integrated and prosperous world economy. But three factors undermined this order. First, insufficient attention was paid to increasingly destabilising distributional outcomes, leading to widespread alienation and marginalisation within politically influential segments of society. Instead of continuing to influence politics, economics became subservient to it. Second, the existing order struggled to integrate rapidly expanding, large, developing countries. The most notable example is China, whose immense economy but relatively low per capita income created a persistent misalignment between its domestic development priorities and its new global responsibilities. The world could no longer absorb smoothly the external consequences of China's economic strategy, generating tensions that international governance structures have struggled to resolve. The third factor was the transformation of the US from a stabilising force to a source of volatility. Contributing to this development were the 2008 global financial crisis (which originated in the US), the weaponisation of tariffs against China in 2018, and the increasing use of payment-system sanctions. It accelerated in recent years with the failure to ensure the equitable global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines, the "uber-weaponisation" of tariffs against friends and foes alike, the dismantling of America's foreign-aid system, and continued indifference to devastating humanitarian crises and repeated violations of international law. While the traditional core-periphery model is inherently ill-equipped to handle all this, there is nothing to replace it, resulting in a bumpy journey toward an unclear destination. Despite this, developing countries have navigated the changing landscape relatively well so far. Their success can be attributed largely to hard-won policy achievements, including the strengthening of macroeconomic frameworks and institutions in recent decades. But to maintain this positive trajectory in an increasingly challenging external environment, developing countries must affirm four key policy priorities. The first is to preserve macroeconomic stability while aggressively addressing any structural and financial vulnerabilities, including shallow domestic financial markets, weak regulatory frameworks, and governance deficits. The second priority is to strengthen international links that boost resilience, improve agility, and expand optionality. This requires coordinated, multiyear efforts to harmonise regulations, foster regional financial integration, and build trade infrastructure. Third, developing countries should prepare themselves to exploit the new opportunities created by innovations -- from productivity enhancements in traditional sectors to improvements in social sectors where investment in human capital has the highest returns. AI, in particular, holds immense potential to revolutionise medicine, education, and agriculture, which could help these countries leapfrog traditional development stages. Building a supportive ecosystem requires investing in digital infrastructure, cultivating a skilled workforce, and developing an innovation-friendly regulatory environment. Lastly, with many US assets appearing overvalued and US Treasuries becoming more volatile, the small but strategically important subgroup of developing countries with high levels of foreign reserves and substantial financial wealth in dollars is being pushed to reconsider their holdings' traditional US overweight. This process will inevitably be protracted and complex, and will require careful asset disaggregation, revised asset-allocation methodologies, and new investment mindsets that look beyond conventional safe havens. Multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and regional development banks have a crucial role to play in helping their members pursue such an approach. To become trusted advisers, these institutions must get better at compiling and disseminating best practices for new and evolving technologies that can improve health, educational, and productivity outcomes, and they must do more to promote these technologies' uptake. For example, their staff must be equipped to answer questions about interacting with AI agents, leveraging innovations to deliver essential services, and managing the attendant risks. Multilateral institutions should also encourage regional links and projects that facilitate trade, expand cross-border infrastructure, and promote shared resource management. And in a world shaped increasingly by frequent shocks, there is an urgent need to enhance contingency-funding facilities, such as by strengthening risk-sharing tools. Of course, this should not undermine the essential work that these institutions perform in fragile countries. Given the overwhelming evidence that traditional development models struggle in countries with such serious governance and security challenges, this, too, is an area that requires more out-of-the-box thinking. AI and other emerging technologies provide developing countries a rare opportunity to unlock new pathways to inclusive economic growth. But exploiting this historic opportunity is far from automatic. Unless developing countries create the conditions necessary for the efficient and equitable diffusion of such innovations throughout their economies -- starting, crucially, with the health and education sectors -- they risk falling further behind, causing inequalities within and between countries to deepen, and accelerating the fragmentation of the global order. Mohamed A. El-Erian, President of Queens' College at the University of Cambridge, is a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, an adviser to Allianz, and Chair of Gramercy Fund Management. He is the author of 'The Only Game in Town: Central Banks, Instability, and Avoiding the Next Collapse' (Random House, 2016) and a co-author (with Gordon Brown, Michael Spence, and Reid Lidow) of 'Permacrisis: A Plan to Fix a Fractured World' (Simon & Schuster, 2023). * This commentary is based on the author's keynote presentation at the 2025 Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics.

Few kids turn up as border schools reopening
Few kids turn up as border schools reopening

Bangkok Post

time2 days ago

  • Bangkok Post

Few kids turn up as border schools reopening

The first day of school in the border districts on Wednesday was marked by anxiety and near-empty classrooms, with fewer than 40% of students showing up. Parents remain fearful following a landmine explosion that cost a Thai paramilitary soldier one of his legs near the Ta Muean Thom temple in Surin's Phanom Dong Rak district on Tuesday. Schools in several border districts in Surin, including Phanom Dong Rak, Kap Choeng, Sangkha, and Buachet, reopened. However, many schools near the frontline, such as Ban Dan School in Kap Choeng district, which is near the Chong Chom border crossing, postponed classes until at least Friday, opting for online classes during this period instead. In Buri Ram's Ban Kruat district, Nikom Sang Ton Eng 8 School reopened for the first time since closing on July 24, but attendance was under 40% as parents remained concerned about safety following the explosion. Acting Sub-Lieutenant Thanu Wongchinda, secretary-general of the Office of the Basic Education Commission (Obec), said that of the 751 schools initially closed due to border clashes, 736 have reopened, with 15 still shut pending security clearance. He said Obec is preparing alternative classes for affected students, using methods similar to those during the Covid-19 pandemic, including onsite learning in safe areas, DLTV broadcasts, online classes, on-demand classes via applications and take-home worksheets. Privy Councillor Gen Dapong Ratanasuwan has met Obec officials to discuss solutions while Education Minister Narumon Pinyosinwat has instructed the schools to prioritise the safety of their personnel and students, and reopen only when it is safe. Meanwhile, residents near the Thai-Cambodian border have expressed growing fears of renewed conflict following the landmine incident, while there have been rumours about Cambodian military reinforcements during the ceasefire period. Some community leaders have advised residents to pack essentials in case of emergency evacuation. Although no further clashes were reported overnight or by Wednesday morning, many families began leaving border areas for safer locations such as their relatives' homes, temples or resorts.

Singapore million-dollar flat sales hit record
Singapore million-dollar flat sales hit record

Bangkok Post

time3 days ago

  • Bangkok Post

Singapore million-dollar flat sales hit record

SINGAPORE — A record number of Singapore public housing units were sold for S$1 million (US$780,000) or more in the June quarter, a private data provider said on Wednesday, taking the number of high-value sales in the first half of the year to almost 75% of the 2024 total. Eight out of 10 Singapore citizens live in public housing built and sold by the government, and its affordability is a key issue for policymakers alongside high living costs. According to real estate agency OrangeTee Group, a record 415 apartments were sold at prices above S$1 million in the second quarter, a 75.8% increase compared to the same period in 2024, after 348 sales in the first quarter. Sales of million-dollar flats this year are "on track to exceed last year's full-year record of 1,035 units", OrangeTee Group analysts said in a report. The most expensive resale in the quarter was a 122 square metres (1,313 square feet) apartment which sold for S$1,658,888, the report showed. Overall, resale prices rose 0.9% on a quarterly basis, according to earlier government data. While prices have now risen for 21 straight quarters, it was the smallest rise since the second quarter of 2020, during the coronavirus 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic. OrangeTee Group analysts expect public home resale prices "to rise modestly for the remainder of the year, driven by our stable economic fundamentals and declining interest rates", forecasting an annual rise of 4% to 5.5%. Last year, the government sought to cool the market by reducing how much buyers can borrow from the state. After a better-than-expected first half performance, the government on Tuesday raised its GDP growth forecast for 2025 to 1.5% to 2.5% from 0.0% to 2.0%, having cut the forecast earlier this year after the announcement of US tariffs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store