logo
HMRC sending letters to 1.4 million Brits who need to pay up

HMRC sending letters to 1.4 million Brits who need to pay up

Rhyl Journal20 hours ago
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issues the routine letters every year to people who need to pay tax on their income that has not been taxed through Pay As You Earn (PAYE) or Self Assessment.
The letters provide a detailed assessment of unpaid tax on income above the annual personal allowance and guidance on how customers can pay tax owed.
Download the HMRC app to manage your money easily.
When you're on it, you're on it.
Download today. 👇https://t.co/8NJGh489Xv pic.twitter.com/BBxflDIqNx
A Simple Assessment can be issued for a number of reasons, including where:
If customers receive a letter either through the post or online in their Personal Tax Account, they can go to GOV.UK to find out more, check the assessment against their own records and pay any tax owed.
The payment deadline is 31 January 2026, unless an alternative date is stated in the letter.
Simple Assessment payments can be made in full, or in instalments before the deadline.
Payments can be made using the free and secure HMRC app, online via GOV.UK, by bank transfer or cheque. A full list of payment methods can be found on GOV.UK.
HMRC has produced a detailed guide to help pensioners understand their Simple Assessment.
Simple Assessment letters are automatically generated and sent to customers when HMRC receives information from employers, Department for Work and Pensions, customers themselves and from banks, building societies and financial institutions that shows tax is due.
Recommended reading:
Anyone who believes an error has been made in the assessment should get in touch with HMRC within 60 days to query it. More information on how to contact HMRC is available on GOV.UK.
If HMRC agrees an assessment was incorrect, customers will be sent an updated letter with details of how to pay by the deadline.
If HMRC believes the assessment was correct, customers can go to GOV.UK to appeal within 30 days of the date of the decision letter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

England's Euro 2025 winners to lose major chunk of prize money after return home
England's Euro 2025 winners to lose major chunk of prize money after return home

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

England's Euro 2025 winners to lose major chunk of prize money after return home

England lifted the European Championship trophy for the second time in three years after overcoming Spain in Sunday's final - but a large chunk of their prize money could be taken away from them Sunday night's triumph made it two European Championship crowns in three years for the Lionesses as they outlasted Spain in Switzerland. But England's Euro 2025 stars face losing a major portion of their prize money due to the tax payable on their earnings. ‌ The Lionesses had to rally from behind in the final after Mariona Caldentey netted the opener for Spain in the first half. Alessia Russo levelled the score just before the hour mark, pushing the match into extra time and eventually penalties. ‌ Lionesses' goalkeeper Hannah Hampton saved two penalties in the shootout, with Chloe Kelly scoring the decisive penalty that sent England fans into raptures - as Richard Keys now calls for a major change to penalty shootouts. ‌ Prior to the tournament, UEFA announced a record £34million in prize money available for the 16 competing nations. A whopping £4.4m was set aside for the champions, inclusive of performance bonuses, with participating teams obliged to distribute between 30 per cent and 40 per cent of their prize money among the players. The Lionesses had also agreed upon a bonus structure with the FA ahead of Euro 2025, which would see England stars collectively receive a payout of £1.75m if they won the trophy. Following England's victory, leading audit, tax and business advisory firm, Blick Rothenberg, disclosed that over three quarters of a million pounds could be deducted from the Lionesses' prize fund and paid to HMRC. Robert Salter, a director at the firm, commented: "The Lionesses will be delighted with their win at Euro 2025 for what it represents and the hard work that went into it. But they will have a hefty tax bill to pay to HMRC on their prize money, at a combined total tax and National Insurance Contributions (NIC) liability of roughly £788,900 for the whole squad. "Although the Lionesses are not earning as much as their male counterparts, the average per player bonuses of £73,000 each will ensure that all of the squad's players become liable to an effective marginal tax rate of 47 per cent - 45 per cent income tax and 2 per cent NIC on their income above the £125,140 per annum threshold, meaning they could be paying around £34,300 each in tax." ‌ He further stated: "In addition to the tax and NIC payable on the winning bonuses by the players personally, the FA should be liable to employers' NIC on the prize bonuses, which will cost the FA c £255,000 more. "Many players are also making significant amounts through marketing, appearance fees and image rights, which are also liable to tax. "Their earnings from this are likely to increase significantly over the coming months given their success and the ongoing growth in the profile of the women's game, meaning HMRC will be getting even more tax 'wins' in the future." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Satander cuts more than 2,000 UK jobs — with more potentially on the way
Satander cuts more than 2,000 UK jobs — with more potentially on the way

Scottish Sun

time11 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Satander cuts more than 2,000 UK jobs — with more potentially on the way

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SANTANDER has cut more than 2,000 UK jobs as part of major restructuring — with more redundancies potentially on the way. Boss Mike Regnier said the cuts are part of a push to simplify operations and invest in tech, as more customers move to online banking. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Santander has cut more than 2,000 UK jobs Credit: Getty Last October, the bank, which has used TV's Ant and Dec in its ads, had announced its intention to cut more than 1,400 jobs. It then warned a further 750 were at risk after revealing in March it was closing 95 branches and reducing hours at 50 sites. Its Spanish parent firm recently struck a £2.65billion deal to acquire rival TSB, raising speculation about further job losses and branch closures. Mr Regnier said no decisions have been made as the deal is not yet finalised, but it is expected to be complete by early next year. The bank reported a five per cent drop in pre-tax profits to £764million for the first half of 2025. Meanwhile, HSBC revealed a 26 per cent drop in pre-tax profits for the same period. It blamed the fall on trade tensions and a £1.6billion hit from its Chinese investments, as well as selling off its operations in both Canada and Argentina. HSBC has saved £524million as part of its cost- cutting plan, targeting £1.1billion annually by 2027. Boss Georges Elhedery said the bank has started reviews of its retail banking businesses in Australia, Indonesia and Sri Lanka. What Does My Tax Code Mean? A Simple Guide to Your HMRC Letter 2 Santander previously used Ant and Dec in its ads Credit: Santander HMRC REFUNDS MORE than 500,000 people have claimed refunds for overpaid tax on pension withdrawals since Pension Freedoms began in 2015, HMRC figures show. Almost £1.5billion has been returned to those overcharged after being given an 'emergency tax code' when cashing in lump sums. As retirees must fill out forms to get refunds sooner, critics say the process prioritises HMRC convenience over those affected. BEER SAMPLES PUB giant Greene King is offering samples of a new beer in three-inch glasses so punters can try before they buy. Drinkers can request a taster of the brewer's Hazy Day Fruity IPA to decide if it's for them before paying out for a full pint. It comes after a poll found that 70 per cent of pubgoers do not ask to taste an beer before paying — with nearly a third of adults under 28 too nervous to ask. SAINSBURY'S BANK SALE SAINSBURY'S has taken another major step in winding down its banking arm — selling its car and home insurance business to Allianz and its travel money operations to Fexco Group. It follows last year's sale of loans, mortgages and savings to Natwest, as Sainsbury's shifts focus to its groceries. Thousands of insurance customers on auto-renew policies will be transferred to Allianz from November and travel money kiosks will stay open under Fexco. Pet and life insurance are Sainsbury's only products left but are set to be sold. Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.

There's a 'weird' tax in the UK that nobody has ever paid
There's a 'weird' tax in the UK that nobody has ever paid

Metro

time18 hours ago

  • Metro

There's a 'weird' tax in the UK that nobody has ever paid

People say that death and taxes are the only certainties in life, but it seems that only one of those is true. It turns out, there is a tax currently on the UK statute book that no one has ever paid, and it has never generated even a penny of revenue. Not a single one. It's the Public Interest Business Protection Tax, and, no, we'd never heard of it either. If you're wondering how it's possible that a tax was passed into law but never collected, there's actually some pretty clear logic behind it. The Public Interest Business Protection Tax (PIBPT) is something of a unique concept within the UK tax system, as it was originally, in some sense, not to be revenue-raising. Introduced in the Finance Act of 2022, the tax was presented as a deterrent to discourage large businesses (over £100 million) from taking actions that might lead to the collapse of energy companies. This was all amid huge uncertainty of the energy markets in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video These actions could have included transferring or cashing in valuable energy contracts within a corporate group, just before an energy supplier entered administration. In the HMRC summary of the tax, it states that 'such arrangements would lead to substantial increased cost falling on the government and energy consumers and would also risk disruption to the supply of energy'. Simply put, when energy suppliers collapse, the risk to the public purse goes up, and the government wanted to guard against any shady business moves that might see companies profit off that happening. Speculating on the need for the tax, and posting on X, 'tax realist' and founder of Tax Policy Associates, Dan Neidle said, 'I'd never heard of the Public Interest Business Protection Tax before this morning. 'It's a very weird measure which is using a tax to do the job of the energy regulator, presumably because the energy regulator was being too slow.' This theory is seemingly supported by a comment from a website on resources for accountants and advisors, which said, 'The government acted [with PIPBT] as it recognises that Ofgem cannot react quickly enough and this draws the question, why it is easier to create and impose a new tax than it is to enforce regulatory body actions?' More Trending While the legislation currently applies only to energy supply companies, it includes provisions that could allow future extension to 'other public interest businesses' deemed essential for the public good. If you think your last payslip on income tax gave you a raw deal, then you'll be glad you never had to pay PIBPT, as it ran at 75%. Today's quiz. There's a tax on the UK statute book that nobody has ever paid. Not once since it was is it?The prize is a lifetime subscription to the Tax Policy Associates newsletter. — Dan Neidle (@DanNeidle) July 25, 2025 Put simply, the reason the tax was never collected upon was that it seemingly did its job as a deterrent. View More » While several large energy suppliers collapsed during the market uncertainty, none of those cases involved the specific 'asset-shifting' actions above the £100 million threshold that would have triggered the PIBPT. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: Martin Lewis' MSE warns parents with kids aged 47 to 15 they could be owed thousands MORE: HMRC doesn't know how much tax billionaires in the UK pay Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store