There's a 'weird' tax in the UK that nobody has ever paid
It turns out, there is a tax currently on the UK statute book that no one has ever paid, and it has never generated even a penny of revenue.
Not a single one.
It's the Public Interest Business Protection Tax, and, no, we'd never heard of it either.
If you're wondering how it's possible that a tax was passed into law but never collected, there's actually some pretty clear logic behind it.
The Public Interest Business Protection Tax (PIBPT) is something of a unique concept within the UK tax system, as it was originally, in some sense, not to be revenue-raising.
Introduced in the Finance Act of 2022, the tax was presented as a deterrent to discourage large businesses (over £100 million) from taking actions that might lead to the collapse of energy companies. This was all amid huge uncertainty of the energy markets in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
These actions could have included transferring or cashing in valuable energy contracts within a corporate group, just before an energy supplier entered administration.
In the HMRC summary of the tax, it states that 'such arrangements would lead to substantial increased cost falling on the government and energy consumers and would also risk disruption to the supply of energy'.
Simply put, when energy suppliers collapse, the risk to the public purse goes up, and the government wanted to guard against any shady business moves that might see companies profit off that happening.
Speculating on the need for the tax, and posting on X, 'tax realist' and founder of Tax Policy Associates, Dan Neidle said, 'I'd never heard of the Public Interest Business Protection Tax before this morning.
'It's a very weird measure which is using a tax to do the job of the energy regulator, presumably because the energy regulator was being too slow.'
This theory is seemingly supported by a comment from rossmartin.co.uk, a website on resources for accountants and advisors, which said, 'The government acted [with PIPBT] as it recognises that Ofgem cannot react quickly enough and this draws the question, why it is easier to create and impose a new tax than it is to enforce regulatory body actions?' More Trending
While the legislation currently applies only to energy supply companies, it includes provisions that could allow future extension to 'other public interest businesses' deemed essential for the public good.
If you think your last payslip on income tax gave you a raw deal, then you'll be glad you never had to pay PIBPT, as it ran at 75%.
Today's quiz. There's a tax on the UK statute book that nobody has ever paid. Not once since it was introduced.What is it?The prize is a lifetime subscription to the Tax Policy Associates newsletter. — Dan Neidle (@DanNeidle) July 25, 2025
Put simply, the reason the tax was never collected upon was that it seemingly did its job as a deterrent.
View More »
While several large energy suppliers collapsed during the market uncertainty, none of those cases involved the specific 'asset-shifting' actions above the £100 million threshold that would have triggered the PIBPT.
Do you have a story to share?
Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.
MORE: Martin Lewis' MSE warns parents with kids aged 47 to 15 they could be owed thousands
MORE: HMRC doesn't know how much tax billionaires in the UK pay
Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Red Lion in Holywell closes following council dispute
The Red Lion has been a popular part of Holywell's High Street down the years. Aside from during the Covid-19 pandemic, when such venues were forced to close for some time, the pub has served the community since around the mid-1700's. But, there was shock and disappointment earlier this month when staff announced it would be closing for good last Sunday (July 27). In a Facebook post, they said: "It's with great sadness to let you all know the Red Lion will be calling last orders for the final time this Sunday, July 27. Thank you to each and every customer that has come through our doors." Punters took to that post to recall the 'good nights' they had shared there and to wish the team well. When contacted by the Leader to ask why the pub was closing down, the team said they had been in a dispute with Flintshire Council over the upstairs property. After the previous tenant had passed away suddenly, lease holder John Roberts claims the upstairs area of the pub was viewed as his 'second home' by the council. And that, he claims, led to him being charged over £3,500 a month in business rates and council tax. John told us: "This has been going on for the last three years by now, and it's been an absolute joke. "I've asked someone from Flintshire Council to come out and have a look at the property upstairs, as we've had nobody living in it for years, but nobody has been out to see us to check we're telling the truth, instead they just want their money." TOP STORIES TODAY John added: "How they can call it a second home I don't know, as it's a part of the pub. We stock a lot of stuff up there and we have had to go up there to fetch things all the time, from the freezer and that. "But, I've decided I'm just not going to fight it any more to be honest. I'm not too upset about having to close, I'm more p****d off at the council for the way they've treated the whole situation." In response to the claims made by Mr Roberts, David Barnes, Revenues and Procurement Manager for Flintshire Council, said: "Many public houses, including the Red Lion in Holywell, qualify for full or tapered small business rate relief and/or Retail, Leisure, and Hospitality Rate Relief. These schemes are designed to support small businesses. "Public houses often have mixed use where the domestic part is typically subject to council tax and the non-domestic part is subject to business rates. "The council is unable to comment on the specific circumstances of this case, as it involves individual's council tax details that are subject to data protection and confidentiality requirements. "However, the council will always work constructively with individuals and businesses to assist and support where possible, and we would urge the taxpayer to contact the council on 01352 704848'.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Number of investors paying tax doubles in four years
The number of investors paying tax on dividends is set to more than double in just four years as successive governments have cut the tax-free allowance, analysis suggests. More than 3.7 million taxpayers are projected to pay dividend tax this year, according to an internal HMRC forecast, up from 1.8 million in 2021-2022. In addition, frozen income tax thresholds mean that more investors are expected to be dragged into higher tax bands, and in turn pay higher dividend tax bills. The tax-free limit on dividend income was cut last year from £1,000 to £500 by the then chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, who had already halved it from £2,000 in 2023. It comes amid speculation that Chancellor Rachel Reeves could further target dividends in the autumn Budget, as her fiscal headroom tightens. Scrapping the allowance entirely could raise as much as £300m, and was one of a package of measures suggested by Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, in a memo leaked earlier this year. Officials are said to be considering abolishing the £500 tax-free allowance for dividend payments, or increasing the rate of tax from its current level of 39pc. The number of higher-rate taxpayers is expected to increase by 44,000 this tax year, and the number of additional rate taxpayers caught will rise from 324,000 to 340,000. However, the number of savers-rate payers – whose income does not exceed the personal allowance, but pay the dividend levy – is anticipated to fall by 22,000. Laith Khalaf, at AJ Bell, said: 'Taxes on dividends have skyrocketed in recent years as a result of severe cuts to the annual dividend allowance. 'Combined with frozen tax thresholds dragging more people into higher tax bands, this could mean heaps more tax for those with even modestly sized share portfolios.' Mr Khalaf said that stocks on the FTSE 100 would be particularly vulnerable to the tax because of their relatively high dividend payments. He said: 'The dividend tax, combined with stamp duty on UK share purchases, means the tax system actually penalises those who invest domestically rather than overseas.' Between April and July this year, UK dividends fell by 1.4pc to £35.1bn, according to Computershare's Dividend Monitor. A stronger pound against the dollar wiped £934m from headline payouts. Mike Warburton, The Telegraph's tax expert, said that unlike savings tax, for which interest paid is reported to HMRC by banks, taxpayers have to report dividend income themselves. He said: 'For dividends, there is no system in place to capture the information, so it has to rely on disclosure by taxpayers. 'It really is disgraceful that we now have 1.7 million basic rate taxpayers paying tax on dividends. It is an example of successive chancellors scraping around for extra tax to avoid having to put up the tax rate.' It comes as fears for the future of the £20,000 annual allowance for cash Isas grow, despite backlash from savers and building societies. The Government has said that it would like more cash savers to invest their money instead, and signalled it was prepared to slash the allowance to encourage them to do so. But money held outside the tax-free accounts could attract other charges, such as capital gains tax or savings tax. Jason Hollands, of wealth manager Evelyn Partners, said: 'These options, which might not happen, underline the importance of doing what makes sense anyway – utilising Isa allowances as fully as you can, including migrating any shares of funds held in a taxable environment into Isas if you aren't already making the most of the £20,000 allowance. 'The Chancellor is on record as stating the £20,000 Isa allowance will stay, and government sources have briefed that plans to cut the cash component have been put on pause. For now at least, the important thing is to use Isas while the rules remain as they currently are.' Around 3.1 million taxpayers were caught when the dividend tax allowance was halved from £2,000 in 2023, meaning an extra 700,000 have been dragged into the tax net. Before 2017, the allowance was £5,000. Dividends are taxed at 8.75pc for basic rate taxpayers, 33.75pc for higher rate taxpayers and 39.35pc for additional rate taxpayers. The rates paid on dividend tax rose in 2021 by 1.25 percentage points. A Treasury spokesman said: 'This government inherited the previous government's policy of frozen tax thresholds. At the Budget and the Spring Statement, the Chancellor announced that we would not extend that freeze. 'We are also protecting payslips for working people by keeping our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee National Insurance or VAT. That's the Plan for Change – protecting people's incomes and putting money into people's pockets.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Taxpayer bill for public sector pensions jumps by record £47bn
Taxpayers were hit with a record £47bn bill to fund public sector pensions last year. Civil servants, doctors and teachers banked pots worth three times more than their private sector counterparts. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) data showed contributions from public sector employers hit a record high in 2024, eclipsing those made by businesses in the private sector, which stood at £46.4bn. This is despite the private sector employing 27.9m people, four times more than the public sector, which has just over six million employees. Gold-plated public sector pensions offer members a guaranteed income in retirement, making them much more generous than the workplace pensions in the private sector, which provide no such guarantee and rely on stock market returns to grow their retirement pot. Contributions by schools and hospitals are ultimately met by the taxpayer once teachers, nurses and doctors retire. The data also showed the average employee in the public sector enjoyed an average increase of £9,320 on their future pension pots – or the equivalent of a quarter of their salary – compared with £3,230 in the private sector. The figures were released against the backdrop of a summer of strikes, with a five-day doctors' walkout ending this week and nurses threatening further industrial action unless the government boosts their pay. The British Medical Association (BMA) is asking for a 29pc pay rise on top of an uplift of almost 30pc since 2022-23, according to the Nuffield Foundation. Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, said: 'These figures are a reminder of the great value of public service pensions. The typical public sector worker gained pension rights worth over £9,000 last year, compared with not much more than £3,000 for the average private sector worker.' The data also show that total tax relief on pensions grew to £78.2bn in 2023-24, up from £72.1bn in the previous year. Labour has left the door open to a tax raid on pension pots as Rachel Reeves struggles to fill a yawning black hole. Torsten Bell, the pensions minister, refused to rule out a raid in the autumn Budget, suggesting that reliefs such as the 25pc tax-free lump sum currently available to retirees could be in the firing line, or salary sacrifice contributions, which enjoy National Insurance relief. However, a pensions raid could lower incomes in retirement. HMRC data showed individuals poured £14.6bn into their personal pensions in 2023-24, up from £12.9bn in the previous year. The Government has also paved the way for the state pension age to be raised and suggested millions of workers would have to sacrifice more of their pay to prevent a looming retirement crisis. Currently, workers who are auto-enrolled into a pension scheme give up 5pc of their salary in return for a minimum 3pc top-up from their employer. Retirement giants have suggested the split needs to be closer to 6pc each to avoid swathes of the population struggling financially in retirement. Public sector workers, including nurses, doctors and teachers, are currently in discussions about swapping lower pension contributions for higher pay today. The Telegraph revealed this month that Catherine Little, the permanent secretary to the Cabinet Office, has been heading discussions within Whitehall about the changes.
