Gunmen Involved In Indian Kashmir Tourist Attack Killed: Minister
The heavily-armed men were killed in a military operation on Monday, more than three months after 26 people were gunned down in a popular resort town of Indian Kashmir on April 22.
"I want to tell the parliament (that) those who attacked in Baisaran were three terrorists and all three have been killed," he said.
Shah said all three were Pakistani nationals and identified two of them as members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a UN-designated terrorist group based in Pakistan.
"Indian security agencies have detailed evidence of their involvement in the attack," he said in a speech in the lower house of parliament.
Monday's operation took place in the mountains of Dachigam, around 30 kilometres (18 miles) from the disputed region's main city of Srinagar, the army said in a statement.
The attack in April saw gunmen burst out of forests near Pahalgam and rake crowds of visitors with automatic weapons.
All those killed were listed as residents of India except one man from Nepal.
Survivors said gunmen had separated the men from the women and children and ordered some of the men to recite the Muslim declaration of faith.
India accused Pakistan of backing the attackers, a charge Islamabad denied, sparking an intense four-day conflict between the nuclear-armed rivals in May that killed more than 70 people on both sides.
Muslim-majority Kashmir has been divided between India and Pakistan since their independence from British rule in 1947, and the neighbours -- who both claim the region in full -- have fought two wars and several conflicts over its control.
Shah said a security meeting was held immediately after the attack and it was decided that the attackers should not be "allowed to leave the country and return to Pakistan".
Investigators relied on eyewitness accounts and forensic evidence to establish that the rifles found on the men were the same that were used in the April attack, he said.
"It was confirmed that these three rifles were involved in killing of our innocent civilians," said Shah.
A shadowy group called The Resistance Front (TRF) initially claimed responsibility for the April attack.
But as public criticism mounted over the killings, the group retracted its claim.
Earlier this month, the United States described the TRF as a "front and proxy" of Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Sri Lanka: Farmers fight solar plans on ancestral lands – DW – 08/04/2025
Tamil farmers say the Sri Lankan and Indian governments' plans for a solar power plant in eastern Sri Lanka will use land that was seized during the country's civil war. What is being done to compensate them? Standing next to a tall, wired fence, Sinnathurai Chitravelayutham looks out at his farming land. It's been nearly 20 years since he was allowed to use it. "Don't ask me how I feel, I'll get upset," the 68-year-old told DW. Chitravelayutham is a rice farmer from Sampur in eastern Sri Lanka's Trincomalee District. He fled his homeland in April 2006, after the area came under heavy shelling during Sri Lanka's civil war. The conflict, which spanned from the mid 1980s to 2009, was primarily a struggle between the Sinhalese majority and the Tamil minority, with the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) — also known as the Tamil Tigers — fighting government forces for an independent state. When he returned after the conflict had ended, he and 107 others found their farming land was under government control. They said attempts to farm on their land were met with threats of arrest, and a fence was later erected to stop them from gaining access. To date, they say they have not received any compensation. Now, their land has been allocated as the site for a new solar power plant to be built as a collaborative project between Sri Lanka's Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) and India's state-owned National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC). Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake jointly inaugurated the project during Modi's visit to Sri Lanka in April. The land belonging to Chitravelayutham and the other villagers was designated as a high-security zone in 2008, at the height of the civil war. Kandumani Lavakusarasa, the coordinator of the AHAM Humanitarian Resource Center in Trincomalee, said over 500 acres had now been allocated for the solar power plant. Of that total, he said 147 acres used to be farming land belonging to villagers including Chitravelayutham, and a further 58 acres was residential land. The Governor of the Eastern Province's Media Division told DW that "legal action" was being taken to provide redress to claimants "who have rights to the land," while those "who are able to prove their legal status in writing and live here can apply for the compensation process." Although the villagers have temporary deeds, they said the Divisional Secretariat, which handles land allocation, had requested to see the original deeds and survey plans before examining any claims. The villagers told DW they wanted their original lands back because they were fertile and well irrigated, and that other land would likely not meet the same specifications. In a statement, the Muthur Divisional Secretariat (DS), which is responsible for oversight of the land in Sampur, told DW that only two people had applied for compensation, but did not say whether they had received it. It also said officials had received a report from 33 people requesting that the land be returned to them, but that they were "currently residing in other government land and engaged in cultivation." The DS added that steps would be taken to provide alternative land "if they are confirmed to be truly landless". Dhammike Wimalaratne, spokesperson for the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB), told DW that he had no knowledge that anyone had come forward to claim the land, which had been identified as being owned by the government. However, he added that "the people are number one" and said they should meet the Divisional Secretariat to prove their right of ownership. DW reached out to India's NTPC and government officials for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Initially, India and Sri Lanka wanted to collaborate on a coal power plant in Sampur, but the plan was scrapped in 2016 after a widespread outcry. Current president Dissanayake's Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) party was a staunch opponent of the initial plan. "People were happy because they thought they would get their land back, but it didn't happen," AHAM coordinator Lavakusarasa told DW. Villager Chitravelayutham said he had voted for leftist Dissanayake, whose government took power in November, in the hopes that things might change. "We thought that when this government came to power, they would give us our land back, but it doesn't look like we're going to get anything," he said. He believes Sampur was chosen "because it's a Tamil area" and that the government "wouldn't do this in a Sinhalese area." But Chitravelayutham refused to criticize India. "It's the Sri Lankan government who gave it and it's their responsibility to solve the problems here," he said. "The Indian government doesn't know this land belongs to people." Alakurasa Mathan, deputy coordinator of the AHAM Humanitarian Resource Center, said he believed the "real reason" for the collaboration between India and Sri Lanka was the former's security interests, and that the plant might never be built. "In the interests of international politics, the livelihoods of poor farmers have been sacrificed," he told DW. "That's the truth." The Governor's Media Division rejected the claims about Tamil areas being targeted and India's security intentions as "false," adding that "there is no need or purpose for any group of people or a select group to be inconvenienced." Namasivayam Sivapatham, 58, said the villagers are not against the idea of a solar power plant, but that there was "lots of other land that isn't used for farming" where it could be built. He is also skeptical about the proposed compensation. "They don't have any plans to give us compensation. They have a plan to cheat us," he said. For villagers like Sivapatham, the construction will come at the cost of their land, which they say has been passed down through generations. "I feel sad. What should we do? I'm worrying about how to get my land back, it's a huge concern. How will I give it to my children?" he told DW. "What's the point in giving the land to another country?" Sivapatham asked. "What can you do with electricity? Farming provides us with food. Can you eat current?"
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Afghan refugees in Iran: Deported to uncertainty – DW – 08/04/2025
More than 1.3 million Afghan refugees have been forced to leave Iran in 2025, according to the UN. For many, returning to Afghanistan means facing extreme hardship under the Taliban regime. Zahra's family fled Afghanistan to Iran almost 30 years ago. Today, the 23-year-old — who is married with a young daughter — lives in constant fear of deportation. Her husband, who also fled Afghanistan, works as an agricultural laborer. "He can be arrested at any time on his way to work or home and deported to Afghanistan, like so many others," said Zahra. According to a UN report published last month, 1.35 million Afghan refugees have been forced to leave Iran in recent months. Many were arrested and deported, while others returned voluntarily for fear of arbitrary arrest. Zahra, who was born and raised in Iran, only has a temporary residence permit. "I'm listed in my parents' family passport, which is valid until September," she explained. The travel document is checked regularly and renewed every six months. Even those Afghan refugees who have lived in Iran for generations — some now in their second or third — they are not granted Iranian citizenship. For over 40 years, people have been fleeing Afghanistan to escape war, poverty, and now the Taliban's rule. Many initially seek refuge in neighboring countries such as Iran or Pakistan, however, they are often among the first people to be blamed for pushing up unemployment and crime. After the recent 12-day war between Israel and Iran, Iranian authorities launched a large-scale deportation campaign against Afghans who they say are living in their country illegally. In response to the deportation campaign, more than 1,300 Iranian and Afghan activists, journalists, artists, and citizens have written an open letter to the Iranian government. They are calling for an immediate end to the repression of Afghan refugees, who are being arbitrarily arrested and deported. They also call on the Iranian people to oppose these attacks so that their silence is not perceived as complicity. Refugees have long complained about systematic and increasingly intense racist attitudes in society, which they say are being fueled by the authorities. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Negative media in Iran coverage shifts blame for social and economic problems onto refugees, fueling resentment among disadvantaged groups and turning them against the migrants. Zahra recalls that, as a documented refugee, she wasn't even given a place in school, on the grounds that there weren't enough places for locals. "The deportations in recent months have often been carried out without regard for international standards," argued Afghan human rights activist Abdullah Ahmadi. "Many of those deported were taken to the border overnight — without shelter, medical care, or adequate food. Some even had to pay for the journey themselves." Among the returnees are numerous families who returned to Afghanistan on their own initiative for fear of arbitrary arrest. Many of them say they have not received their outstanding wages or the deposits they paid for their apartments. In response to growing criticism, the Iranian authorities emphasize that they had asked all "illegal" refugees to leave the country six months ago. Nader Yarahmadi, head of the Center for Foreigners and Refugees at the Ministry of the Interior, told the state news agency IRNA in early July: "We announced in March that all illegal migrants must leave the country by July 15 at the latest." The increased number of irregular immigrants from Afghanistan following the Taliban's takeover has placed an enormous strain on the country's limited resources. In January, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi traveled to the Afghan capital, Kabul, to negotiate cooperation with the Taliban, including the deportation of refugees. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said in July that he was "ready to travel to Afghanistan to open a new chapter in relations between the two countries." His announcement was widely interpreted as possibly signaling recognition of the Taliban. However, Iran's Foreign Ministry later clarified that the statement was merely an expression of personal interest and there were no official travel plans. The mass deportations have led to growing criticism of Iran within Afghan society. "The current situation is not conducive to a diplomatic trip," according to international relations expert Ahmad Ehsan Sarwaryar. "In just 40 days, almost one million people have been deported. This is overwhelming basic services in western Afghanistan," he said. Sarwaryar supports the accommodation of returnees in the western Afghan city of Herat, where he has described a worsening humanitarian catastrophe. Almost 23 million people in Afghanistan already depend on humanitarian aid. Now hundreds of thousands of returnees are joining them, left without shelter, work, or prospects for the future. "My plan was always to return to Afghanistan after school and study there," Zahra told DW. "In Iran, I have to pay for my studies because I don't have an Iranian passport. The Taliban came to power in Afghanistan in August 2021 and shattered my dreams." Four of her friends and acquaintances, who were deported from Iran with their families in recent months, now live together with their young children in a sparsely-furnished small house that has no electricity. Zahra and her family were forced to leave Iran 20 years ago. After a brief stay, they returned. Today, the 950-kilometer (590-mile) long frontier with Afghanistan — parts of which run through inaccessible, high mountain ranges — remains largely uncontrolled by Iranian authorities, making border crossings difficult to monitor. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Philippine, Indian Navies Begin First Joint South China Sea Patrols
Indian Navy warships have begun patrolling areas of the disputed South China Sea with their Philippine counterparts for the first time, Manila's military said Monday, as President Ferdinand Marcos departed for a state visit to New Delhi. The two-day sail includes three Indian vessels and started Sunday, a day before Marcos left on a trip that will include talks with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The Philippines has heightened defence cooperation with a range of allies over the past year after a series of clashes in the South China Sea. Beijing claims nearly the entirety of the waterway despite an international ruling that its assertion has no legal basis. India's naval vessels, including the guided missile destroyer INS Delhi, arrived in Manila for a port visit late last week. The patrol "started yesterday afternoon, then it's ongoing up to this moment... the activity at the moment is replenishment at sea," Lieutenant Colonel John Paul Salgado told AFP. China in response accused Manila of "drawing in external countries to stir up trouble" in the South China Sea. The joint patrol "undermines regional peace and stability", said Senior Colonel Tian Junli, spokesperson of the Chinese military's Southern Theater Command. He said Beijing had conducted "routine patrols" in the South China Sea on Sunday and Monday, and remained on "high alert". While in India, Marcos is expected to sign pacts in such fields as law, culture and technology, according to foreign affairs assistant secretary Evangeline Ong Jimenez-Ducrocq, but all eyes will be on any potential defence agreements. Before departing Monday, Marcos praised the two countries' "steadfastness in upholding international maritime law, including the UNCLOS", the UN treaty granting an exclusive economic zone within 200 nautical miles (370 kilometres) of a country's shores. The Philippines has previously purchased BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles from India, a weapon which has a top speed of 3,450 kilometres (2,140 miles) per hour. India, which has engaged in border clashes with China in the Himalayas, is a member of the so-called Quad, a group that includes fellow democracies the United States, Japan and Australia. Beijing has repeatedly alleged that the four-way partnership, first conceived by late Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, was created as a way of containing China.
