Your Voice Your Vote: Relief road a key issue
The four-mile-long single carriageway "needs to go ahead", according to Shropshire HGV driver Kyle Longmuir, who got in touch with us via Your Voice Your Vote.
The 38-year-old said the North West Relief Road would stop village roads being used as rat runs and improve air quality in the town centre.
All of the main political parties fielding candidates in Shropshire Council elections on 1 May are against the project, except the Conservative group.
"Professionally, I drive an HGV and often need to get around Shrewsbury and face similar problems [to those travelling in the town centre]... it is impractical to drive through town," said Mr Longmuir, who lives in Shawbury.
"So, if there's an accident or heavy traffic, especially around holidays, then it costs a lot of time."
He frequently drives through the town centre to visit his wife's parents in Copthorne or take his young son to the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital.
"The centre of town is often the shortest and quickest route [in a car], despite the congestion. Building the relief road would make life a lot simpler and safer for everyone," Mr Longmuir added.
However, there are various reasons why people are opposed to a new road, linking the A5 to the west of the town with the A5124 to the north east at Battlefield.
Environmental campaign groups claim it would destroy the countryside, create excessive greenhouse emissions and result in veteran trees being felled.
Others like Debbie Carvell, who runs a clothing shop in Shrewsbury, thinks the road would not solve the town's traffic problems.
"If you build more roads, then you just create more traffic and I think it would be a really bad decision to do that," she said.
"More cars will come in, instead of using the Park and Ride [or] bikes or walking into town."
The cost of the project is another reason why many people, especially outside the county town, object to the road.
The latest estimate puts the total cost of the project at £215m - more than treble the 2019 price tag of £71m.
It is one of the reasons why the Labour, Liberal Democrat and Green groups on the council wrote a joint letter to the government in February to say they would cancel the funding application as "a first priority" if they take control on 2 May.
The letter, signed by Labour leader Rosemary Dartnall and Liberal Democrat Roger Evans, criticised the relief road for offering "no credible solution to the current and future traffic problems Shrewsbury and Shropshire face".
It means the road is almost certainly doomed if the Conservatives do not maintain their majority of councillors.
National polling and the decline of Tory support at the last general election suggest it will be challenging for the party to hold on to power after next week's vote.
Reform UK's national leader, Nigel Farage, mocked the price of the road during a recent visit to Shropshire.
The party, which has candidates standing for all 74 seats available, said it was "pro-road" but very concerned by the rising cost of the project.
The Conservative group on Shropshire Council said the relief road would take a considerable amount of traffic out of the town centre, improving air quality and the local economy.
The party's concerns about traffic problems are shared by local businessman Tony Bywater, who is chairman of the caravan and motorhome dealership Salop Leisure, based near the busy Emstrey Island.
"Shrewsbury is clogged and it's not good for our businesses," he said.
"Our staff are having to leave home half an hour earlier than normal just to get to work on time. It seems to be getting worse every day.
"Shrewsbury is a fantastic place to live and work and the onus is on Shropshire Council to ensure that the town continues to prosper."
You can find a full list of candidates standing in Shropshire Council elections on 1 May here.
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Ring road costs set at £215m as budget talks loom
Plan to scrap bypass revealed ahead of election
Relief road business plan delayed until Christmas
Shropshire Council: Shrewsbury North West Relief Road
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Data centre developers hand cash to Labour in ‘Yimby' charm offensive
The developer behind one of Europe's biggest data centres has donated tens of thousands of pounds to Labour amid a race to get more properties built across Britain. DC01, a property developer that is seeking to build a £3.75bn data centre in Hertfordshire, gave £20,000 to the Labour Growth Group, which includes dozens of Labour MPs, in May, according to Electoral Commission records. The property company sponsored a reception at the De Vere Grand Connaught Rooms in Covent Garden for Labour MPs in June that was attended by senior ministers, including Darren Jones, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary. At the dinner, Mr Kyle spoke of the 'essential role data infrastructure will play in delivering the UK's technology ambitions', DC01 said in a LinkedIn post. Another property company owned by London-listed developer Tritax Big Box gave £25,000 to a Labour pressure group called Labour Yimby – or 'yes in my back yard' – in June. Labour Yimby calls itself a 'grassroots pro-housing, pro-growth movement' largely made up of Labour councillors. Tritax Big Box manages billions of pounds in properties for logistics and warehousing, but has increasingly pitched its facilities as 'compelling data centre opportunities'. New planning applications The donations come amid deepening ties between Labour, developers and the technology sector as the Government seeks to boost investment in Britain, at a time when interest in artificial intelligence (AI) is booming. Labour ministers have sought to smooth over planning rules to make it easier for data centres to be built on the green belt in so-called 'grey belt' areas. Multiple new data centre applications have been waved through, despite concerns from residents and in some cases objections from local councils. It follows concerns that a glut of new data centres could ramp up the UK's emissions. Data centres for AI require racks of thousands of powerful and power-hungry computer processors. In September, the Government tweaked planning rules to classify data centres as projects critical to national security, which can help bypass planning roadblocks. Announcing the measures, Mr Kyle also hailed DC01's data centre plans as a 'vote of confidence' in Labour's approach. DC01 received outline planning permission from Hertfordshire County Council in January for its 2m sq ft facility near South Mimms. It still requires full planning permission for the project. It is not clear who funds DC01 or who its ultimate customer will be. If the project goes ahead, it could secure a deal with a technology giant such as Amazon or Microsoft. DC01 has said its project will create 200 permanent jobs and 500 construction roles. Marc Harris, the co-chairman of Labour Yimby, said: 'We make no apology of supporting the industry to build the homes and infrastructure so desperately needed. 'Britain's finances and services cannot afford to side with blockers over builders. We support the Government's pledge to build 1.5 million homes, and unlock our data centre potential, but bold planning reforms are needed to make it happen.' Labour Growth Group declined to comment. Tritax Big Box declined to comment. DC01 was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Labour councillor ‘horrified' by own cutting throats comment at rally, jury told
A Labour councillor who called at an anti-racism rally for far-right activists' throats to be cut has told a jury he felt 'horrified' after realising what he had said. In the wake of rioting after the Southport murders last summer, Ricky Jones, 58, described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists', his trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court heard. He told jurors on Wednesday that his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them. A video showing Jones addressing the crowd in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year, went viral on social media after the protest. Wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, the councillor said: 'You've got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays. 'They don't give a shit about who they hurt. 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd. Jones, who at the time worked as an official for the Transport Salaried Staff's Association (TSSA) union, later sent an edited version of his speech video to union members, the court heard. Asked by his defence barrister, Hossein Zahir KC, why he edited the video, Jones replied: 'When I had time to view the footage after the demonstration, I was shocked at what I had actually said. 'I was horrified. 'Under no circumstances did I want to portray that to anybody, so I edited that last bit out.' The unedited video was eventually posted on social media platform X, formerly Twitter, where it attracted millions of views, the trial heard. Jones told jurors he felt 'very emotional and very upset' after receiving pictures, the day before the rally, of National Front stickers that had been left on a train, which had razor blades hidden behind them – supposedly so that people who tried to remove the stickers would injure themselves. He had also received reports from union members that more razor blades had been found stuck between seats, Jones added. 'I was very concerned about what had happened on the train. 'I was thinking, this (the speech) is a good opportunity to raise what happened.' The father-of-four and grandfather described the mood in the crowd at the time as 'happy and joyful', adding: 'There clearly wasn't any upset or anger from any people in that scene, because they clearly knew it was about what happened on the train.' Prosecutor Ben Holt, cross-examining, told the defendant: 'Your words about slitting people's throats were not cheerful or happy.' Jones replied: 'I totally agree, I'm ashamed.' The defendant however denied intending to encourage violence towards far-right protesters. 'What violence could have anyone caused to those people in the train?' Jones said. 'It was nonsensical – I didn't believe there was a risk.' Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the alleged incident. He was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton Police Station that night. The demonstration had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau. It followed the disorder in parts of the UK last summer after the Southport murders. Jones, of Dartford, denies one count of encouraging violent disorder. The trial continues.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cooper defends live facial recognition technology expansion amid privacy row
The Home Secretary has defended the Government's expansion of live facial recognition technology as a 'targeted' crackdown on high-harm offenders, amid concerns over privacy. Yvette Cooper denied the technology was being used to catch lower-level crimes such as ticket-touting, as it has been previously in Wales, and said 'safeguards and protections' will govern its deployment. Critics including Labour peer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti have attacked new plans to roll out 10 vans equipped with facial recognition technology across seven police forces in England as part of a Government overhaul of neighbourhood policing. The former shadow attorney general said the expansion was a step towards a 'total surveillance society' in the UK. Asked whether the rollout would infringe on people's privacy, Ms Cooper said: 'Well, the way this technology is being used is to identify people who are wanted by the court, who maybe should be returned to prison, or who have failed to appear before the court, or who have breached things like sexual harm prevention orders, so serious criminals. 'And I think being able to identify them, alongside having proper legal safeguards and a legal framework in place because there do have to be safeguards and protections, but we also need to be able to use the technology to catch dangerous criminals and to keep communities safe.' In 2017, South Wales Police said facial recognition was being used to track suspects including ticket touts as the force prepared for the Champions League final in Cardiff. Pressed on whether she was happy for the technology to be deployed in this way, she said: 'No, that's not how they've (police in South Wales) used it. 'They used it for targeting where there's serious organised crime, where there are criminal gangs, but in every case that they do use it, they need to obviously have safeguards in place and we need to make sure that we've got a new legal framework for it to be operating under, and also that it can be used to tackle serious crimes and keep communities safe.' Ministers have said a new legal framework will be drawn up to support use of the technology following a consultation launching this autumn. Checks would only be done against police watchlists of wanted criminals, suspects and those subject to bail or court order conditions such as sex offenders, the Home Office said. The vans would be deployed across seven forces – Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire – in the coming weeks. They would be manned by trained officers operating within College of Policing guidance. But Lady Chakrabarti said the technology was 'incredibly intrusive' and had been 'developed pretty much completely outside the law'. 'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society – challenges to privacy, challenges to freedom of assembly and association, and problems with race and sex discrimination because of the higher likelihood of false matches in the context of certain groups,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'It's particularly odd that this has all been developed pretty much completely outside the law.' She welcomed plans to consult ahead of possible new legislation, but warned that to date, 'it's been a bit of a Wild West'. Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson dismissed the claims, telling BBC Breakfast: 'With the greatest of respect, that's not what this is about. 'This is about giving the tools to our police officers to enable them to keep us safe.' Forces already deploying live facial recognition had used it to arrest rape, domestic abuse, knife crime and robbery suspects as well as sex offenders breaching their conditions. Meanwhile, the Home Office said every community across England and Wales had now been assigned a 'named, contactable' officer to handle reports of crimes such as anti-social behaviour. Their details would be made available for residents on their local force's website, it is understood. The pledge was made as part of the Government's previously announced Neighbourhood Policing Guarantee, under which forces have signed up to a commitment to respond to neighbourhood queries within 72 hours. The Government said the move would help ensure 'the public will have consistent direct links to their local force, with dedicated anti-social behaviour leads and new visible patrols in town centres'.
