Vigil held to remember Minnesota politician and husband shot dead at home
As a brass quintet from the Minnesota Orchestra played, Governor Tim Walz wiped away tears and comforted attendees at the gathering for former House speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, who were killed early on Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs.
Colin Hortman, the Hortmans' son, embraced Mr Walz and laid a photo of his parents on a memorial.
The memorial, which sprang up outside the Capitol after the killings, features flowers, American flags, photos and sticky notes with such messages as 'Thank you for always believing in me and in Minnesota' and 'We got this from here. Thank you for everything'.
The vigil also included a Native American drum circle, a string quartet and the crowd singing Amazing Grace.
Around the gathering, there was a heavy police presence, with law enforcement blocking off streets leading up to the Capitol and state troopers standing guard.
The event did not include any speeches and attendees were instructed not to bring signs of any kind.
Vance Boelter, the man charged in federal and state court with killing the Hortmans, is also accused of shooting another Democratic lawmaker, Senator John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, at their home a few miles away in Champlin. They survived and are recovering.
Boelter's attorneys have declined to comment on the charges.
Mrs Hortman had served as the top House Democratic leader since 2017, and six years as speaker, starting in 2019.
Under a power-sharing deal after the 2024 election left the House tied, her title became speaker emerita and Republican representative Lisa Demuth became speaker.
Mr Walz has described her as his closest political ally and 'the most consequential speaker in state history'.
The Hortmans were alumni of the University of Minnesota, which held a memorial gathering on the Minneapolis campus.
Rebecca Cunningham, the university's president, spoke during the event about the grief and outrage people are grappling with along with questions about how things got to this point.
'I don't have the answers to these questions but I know that finding answers starts with the coming together in community as we are today,' she said.
Funeral information for the Hortmans has not yet been announced.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Juventus star breaks ranks and speaks out on awkward Donald Trump visit
Juventus players were invited to the Oval Office for a meeting with Donald Trump on Wednesday, with the US president proceeding to discuss the Civil War and the escalating crisis in the Middle East Juventus star Timothy Weah admitted the team's meeting with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday was ' weird '. It is not clear exactly why Juve were invited to the Oval Office to meet the 79-year-old. The Serie A giants are currently competing in the Club World Cup and kicked off their campaign with a dominant 5-0 win over Al-Ain in Washingon DC on Wednesday night. Before that game, they were called for an audience with Trump. But rather than discuss Juve's hopes of winning the tournament, the president instead decided to speak about a potential attack on Iran, whether the U.S. Civil War could have been avoided, his administration's travel bans and transgender athletes. It made for an uncomfortable atmosphere in the White House meeting, which lasted 16 minutes. The Juventus delegation included owner John Elkann, chief executive Maurizio Scanavino, general manager Damien Comolli and director of football strategy Giorgio Chiellini. American players McKennie and Weah, as well as Dusan Vlahovic, Manuel Locatelli, Teun Koopmeiners, Federico Gatti and the team's head coach Igor Tudor were also in attendance. And Weah was less than complimentary about the meeting. 'It was all a surprise to me, honestly — they told us that we have to go and I had no choice but to go,' Weah said. 'I was caught by surprise, honestly. It was a bit weird. When he started talking about the politics with Iran and everything, it's kind of like, I just want to play football man. 'I guess it was a cool experience, obviously, being in the White House… as the first time, it's always wonderful, but I'm not one for the politics, so it wasn't that exciting." FIFA president Gianni Infantino also attended the meeting, which Trump kicked off by making introductions. He told journalists that there was going to be a game in D.C. on Wednesday evening. 'It's totally sold out,' Trump said. 'Of course,' Infantino replied. Despite those claims, only 18,161 people attended the game out of capacity of 20,000. Trump then turned to the two American players in Juve's team, McKennie and Weah. 'We have two great American players. Where are you, my American players? Fantastic, so good luck,' he said, shaking their hands. 'I hope you're going to be the best two players on the field.' Trump then asked the Juventus players: 'Could a woman make your team, fellas?' When he did not receive a response, the president turned to general manager Comolli. The Frenchman said Juventus have a very good women's team. Trump continued: 'But they should be playing with women.' Comolli did not answer. Trump interjected: 'They're being very diplomatic." The conversation then moved on to the situation in the Middle East. Trump said: 'I hate to see so much destruction and death." He then said that the U.S. Civil War could have been solved without losing 600,000 people. The president also invited questions, encouraging journalists to ask about the World Cup, though instead almost all were about the escalating crisis between Israel and Iran. After being questioned about evacuations, he was then quizzed on his plans for a regime change. He said he had a plan for everything and that he would see what happens. He then admonished the Iranians for not making a deal with the United States. Throughout all of this, the Juventus players were stood behind him. Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Daily Mirror
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
All of Trump's options as president faces his most consequential decision yet
Will Donald Trump bow to Netanyahu's calls for escalation in the Middle East, hold his nerve and wait, or listen to MAGA voices urging him to pull back from the brink? Donald Trump is facing the most consequential decision of his presidency since returning to the White House. The US president must decide whether to carry out military strikes on Iran and risk dragging America into a new Middle East war, or resist the pressure and stand by his campaign promise to end 'forever wars'. The former reality TV star-turned-president has signed off on detailed strike plans, including the use of bunker-busting bombs to target Iran's underground nuclear sites, but has so far stopped short of giving the final order to attack. 'There are a lot of things in motion,' a senior US official told the Mirror. 'But the President wants to keep his options open until the very last moment.' Trump is walking a geopolitical tightrope, caught between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's demands for American military might, growing MAGA sentiment at home, and his own instinct for spectacle and legacy. Trump himself summed up the dilemma from the Oval Office this week: 'I like to make the final decision one second before it's due. Especially with war, things change with war. It can go from one extreme to the other.' He is reportedly wary of becoming 'bogged down' in the region but is open to arguments that limited, decisive strikes could deliver a clear win and a legacy-defining moment. Whether he yields to Netanyahu, backs MAGA or tries to thread the needle may come down to a single question: Does Trump see more glory in restraint or retribution? As one Washington source put it: 'This won't just be about strategy. It'll be about ego. Trump wants to be remembered; the question is for what.' As the world waits, what options does Trump now have? Option One: Strike and secure his place in history Sources say Trump is being heavily lobbied by Netanyahu, who insists only the United States has the firepower to 'end Iran's nuclear ambitions once and for all'. The Israeli leader claims Tehran is mere weeks away from a working bomb - a point US spies disagree with - and has urged Trump to act before it's too late. With Israel already bombing Iranian enrichment and missile sites, and claiming to have assassinated top nuclear scientists, Netanyahu wants Washington to deliver the final blow. And for Trump, the lure of legacy could be decisive. One adviser said: 'He wants to be remembered as the man who ended Iran's nuclear programme. Barack Obama gave them a deal. Trump wants to be the one who took the bomb away.' That thinking plays directly to Trump's ego - a man who craves being seen as strong, decisive, and history-making. Yet the risks are colossal. Iran has already warned that any US involvement will result in 'irreparable damage'. American bases in Iraq, Egypt, Qatar, Kuwait and the Gulf are within striking range, and a wider regional conflict could erupt almost overnight. Option Two: Stay the course and wait So far, Trump has tried to balance strength with restraint. He has deployed additional warships and bombers to the region and remains in close contact with Israeli officials. But he has also signalled he wants to see how far Israel can go alone before committing US firepower. European diplomats say US allies were told over the weekend that the White House would assess Israel's progress during the initial phase of operations before making a final call. Privately, Pentagon officials fear a 'limited' strike could spiral, and Trump himself is keenly aware of the risks. 'He doesn't want to look weak,' said one insider. 'But he doesn't want to sleepwalk into another war either.' Waiting allows Trump to keep the pressure on Iran while avoiding direct involvement for now. But it is a delicate gamble. One miscalculation or American casualty could force his hand. Option Three: Step back and stick to MAGA The loudest opposition to any military action is coming not from opposition Democrats, but from Trump's own base. MAGA-aligned voices like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon and Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene have all urged the president to avoid another 'endless war in the Middle East'. Greene said true Trump supporters 'do not support foreign intervention' and accused Republicans backing strikes of being 'fake America First'. Their message echoes Trump's re-election campaign pledges. He won the White House twice by promising to bring US troops home, tear up international entanglements, and put 'America First.' A source close to the Trump campaign said: 'If he goes to war, he betrays his base. They didn't elect him to be Bush. They elected him to end these wars.' But MAGA's message clashes with Trump's desire to look strong on Iran. Walking away could be spun as weakness, something the president finds anathema.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A US senator's X posts after the Minnesota shootings were horrific – and predictable
National tragedy used to bring national unity. If only momentarily, partisanship was put aside, and people of all political persuasions came together. No more. The nation received a startling reminder of that sad fact on Sunday when Republican senator Mike Lee went online to share his reaction to the weekend's horrible shooting of two Minnesota state lawmakers and their spouses. 'This is what happens,' Lee wrote in a since-removed post on X, 'When Marxists don't get their way.' Accompanying this ugly, unfounded comment was a photo of the suspect in the shooting, Vance Boelter, wearing what appears to be a latex face mask. As if that wasn't enough, Lee posted another picture of Boelter under the caption 'Nightmare on Waltz Street', an apparent reference to the Minnesota governor and former Democratic nominee for vice-president, Tim Walz. During the 2024 campaign, Republicans accused him of being soft on crime and mishandling the riots after the murder of George Floyd. So why not suggest that he is somehow to blame for the shootings? Shameful. Lee has dishonored the institution in which he serves, and he knows it. Republican Senate leaders should censure their colleague. If they do not, they will further shred whatever dignity is left in that body. Put in context, Lee's posts show how far we have come from the vision and hopes of the founders of the American republic. Recall that James Madison, co-author of the Federalist Papers and fourth president of the US, warned that government by the people could become what he called a 'spectacle … of turbulence and contention', driven by passions to make decisions 'adverse to the rights of others or the permanent and aggregate good of the community'. Madison preferred what he called a republic, a government in which representatives would display the wisdom necessary to 'discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations'. Oddly enough, in October 2020, Lee channeled Madison when he insisted 'that our form of government in the United States is not a democracy, but a republic … Insofar as 'democracy' means 'a political system in which government derives its powers from the consent of the governed', then of course that accurately describes our system'. He continued: 'But the word … is often used to describe … the view that it is the prerogative of government to reflexively carry out the will of the majority of its citizens. 'Our system of government,' Lee noted, 'is best described as a constitutional republic. Power is not found in mere majorities, but in carefully balanced power.' In that system, the job of the Senate, Lee suggested – citing Thomas Jefferson – is to cool 'hot passions … It's where consensus is forged, as senators reach compromise across regional, cultural, and partisan lines.' Perhaps the senator has forgotten those lines. His posts about the Minnesota shootings seem designed to further fuel the 'hot passions' of our political moment, rather than to 'cool' them. They surely do not help build consensus across party lines. Now Lee's agenda seems different. He wants to show his Maga scapegoating bona fides by conjuring leftist plots as an explanation for every problem. And he is not the only member of the Maga crowd to do so. He was joined by Elon Musk, who wrote on X: 'The far left is murderously violent.' Musk reposted the following from a person who identifies herself with these words: 'GOD | #MAGA | Freedom |#Trump2024 | Constitutionalist | America First | Shall Not Be Infringed | USMC Wife'. 'The left kills the CEO of United Healthcare. Kills two Israeli ambassadors staffers. Attempts twice to assassinate the President. Doxes and attempts to murder federal ICE agents and Police - all week. And now kills a MN state rep and her husband and injures a Senator and his wife. The left has become a full blown domestic terrorist organization.' Madison must be turning over in his grave. And, as to the evidence that supports Lee's or Musk's claims about the Minnesota suspect? There is none. Don't forget that the president himself has frequently demonized 'radical left lunatics' and labelled people Marxists. Last September, he blamed a 'violent, radical-left monster' for the second attempt on his life. Using tragedy to demonize others and stoke fears about adversaries has become a new normal. No more rallying around the flag and doing the job that Madison thought political leaders in a representative democracy should and would do. In 2016, the Washington Post's Karen Tumulty, writing in the wake of what was then the deadliest mass shooting in American history, suggested that 'not since 9/11 has a moment like this brought the nation together, and that evaporated quickly. Since then, calamity seems only to drive the left and the right further apart, while faith in the nation's institutions deteriorates further.' We know that Lee knows better than to do what he did on Sunday. He demonstrated that in 2020. So why, five years later, would he go after Walz or Marxists after a national tragedy? We can only speculate. Politicians like Lee live for and on social media. Legislating is hard; accumulating 'likes' with a quick post is easier. Getting attention by being outrageous or provocative is the name of the game in what is now referred to as the attention economy. Madison, who thought that any damage done by what he called 'fractious leaders' would be limited to their local area, could never have imagined the gravitational pull of that economy or its global reach. Sadly, Lee's posts are making him a winner in that economy. By Monday morning, the first of them had been viewed 5.3 million times, and the second attracted 7.8 million views. Not bad for someone with 799,000 followers on X. In a deeply divided nation riven by political sectarianism, Lee did what his partisan supporters expect him to do. Give no quarter. Be on the offensive. Push your point. These are the rules, even when a tragedy occurs. In fact, it increases the 'opportunity for free publicity' that people like Lee crave. But let's be clear. While we can understand the forces that might explain why Lee turned tragedy into disinformation, that doesn't mean we should accept or forgive him for doing so. In the kind of constitutional republic that Madison imagined and Lee once praised, tragedies like the murders in Minnesota should bring out the best in our leaders. Their duty was, when Madison wrote, and remains today: 'to remind us of our shared humanity, not deepen our political divides.' Austin Sarat, William Nelson Cromwell professor of jurisprudence and political science at Amherst College, is the author or editor of more than 100 books, including Gruesome Spectacles: Botched Executions and America's Death Penalty
