&w=3840&q=100)
India seeks to avoid Trump's Brics wrath as it pursues US trade deal
Bloomberg
By Ruchi Bhatia, Sudhi Ranjan Sen and Shruti Srivastava
India is trying to shield itself from President Donald Trump 's backlash against Brics by stressing it has no plans to challenge the US dollar's global dominance, according to people familiar with the matter.
The US leader has labeled the Brics group of developing nations 'anti-American' and accused it of trying to undermine the dollar's role as the world's key currency. He has repeatedly warned of a 10 per cent tariff on all 10 Brics members, including India — even as he says a trade deal with New Delhi is near.
On Wednesday, Trump followed through with a new round of levies, including a 50 per cent tariff on Brazil, one of the highest so far announced for the tariffs which are set to hit in August. The letter to Brazil comes just after a two-day Brics summit in Rio de Janeiro, in which leaders agreed on a joint statement that criticized trade-distorting tariffs.
Officials in New Delhi say they are watching Trump's latest tariff threats closely, but see no immediate cause for alarm. The US leader's view is that Brics is seeking to undermine the dominance of the US dollar, which is not India's goal, the officials said, asking not to be identified because the discussions are private. India doesn't support moves for a single Brics currency, and any participation in local currency trade arrangements is aimed solely at reducing risks, they said.
'Trump is unhappy with some Brics members who have been talking about an alternate reserve currency,' said Mohan Kumar, a former Indian envoy and lead negotiator at the World Trade Organization, who now teaches at OP Jindal Global University. 'India has time and again differentiated between local currency trade and de-dollarization and therefore doesn't fall in that category.'
With New Delhi set to assume the Brics chairmanship in 2026, it will need to differentiate itself from members like China and Russia, who are seeking to build the bloc as a stronger opposition voice to the US. India is betting that its strategic value to the US and its neutral currency stance will give the US reason to treat it differently than other Brics members.
India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't respond to an email seeking comment. Senior Indian diplomat P Kumaran said at a press briefing on Tuesday that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Brazilian counterpart Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had 'no discussion' on Trump's tariff threats during the Indian leader's state visit there. 'We didn't have an opportunity to discuss that.'
India has been cultivated by several US administrations over the years as a strategic partner and key regional counterweight to an increasingly assertive China. As recently as April, US Vice President JD Vance remarked that the fate of the 21st century 'is going to be determined by the strength of the United States and India partnership.'
Those ties have recently come under strain, though, after Trump took credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan in May. Modi has pushed back at Trump's claims he used trade as a bargaining tool to secure a truce. The Trump administration has also made overtures to Islamabad, including its powerful army chief, in the aftermath of the conflict, a source of concern in New Delhi.
Much is riding on the success of the India-US trade deal, which both countries have pledged to finalize by the fall of this year. Shashi Tharoor, an opposition lawmaker who has led India's diplomatic outreach since the Pakistan conflict, said a trade deal would signify the strong ties between the two countries.
'The relationship with the US is in a good shape,' he said in an interview in London on Tuesday. If the terms of the trade deal are agreed, 'that will be a very, very healthy sign.'
After months of talks, Indian trade negotiators have put forward their best offer to the Trump administration and are now awaiting a response.
The latest tariff threats from Trump may also be a bargaining tool to secure more concessions from New Delhi. Trump has previously threatened to slap 100 per cent levies on Brics if they ditch the dollar in bilateral trade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
Indian tricolour hoisted atop Seattle's iconic Space Needle in historic first
The Indian tricolour was hoisted at Seattle's iconic 605-feet-tall Space Needle on India's 79th Independence Day, the first time that a foreign nation's flag was raised at the popular American destination. Consul General of India in Seattle Prakash Gupta along with Mayor of Seattle Bruce Harrell and other select dignitaries from the Seattle city leadership joined the historic and landmark occasion. "No greater honour than this ! Raising the Tiranga on top of Seattle skyline at Space Needle," Mr. Gupta said in a post on X, along with a video of the tricolour flying high atop the iconic Seattle monument with sprawling views of the city below. Calling the commemoration a "historic first in Seattle", the Consulate General of India in Seattle said the celebration underscored the contributions of the Indian-American diaspora in shaping the city's journey as a tech hub in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Later, a community reception was hosted by the Consulate at the scenic Kerry Park, with India's flag on top of the Space Needle in the backdrop. A large number of Indian-American community members turned up to witness the historic sight, the Consulate said in a press release. The reception was attended by several dignitaries including US Congressman Adam Smith, Chief Justice of the Washington Supreme Court Debra Stephens, Seattle Port Commissioner Sam Cho and Superintendent/Director of Seattle Parks and Recreation AP Diaz. Addressing the gathering, Mr. Smith welcomed the historic celebration, noting that the Indian tricolour's hoisting atop the Space Needle is a tribute to the region's diversity and the strong bonds between India and the Pacific Northwest. The Space Needle, which was built in 1962, stands as a symbol of Seattle's skyline and epitomises the U.S. Pacific Northwest region's tech-driven future. In a special gesture to honour India's Independence Day in the Greater Seattle area, King County, which covers 39 cities, along with Seattle, Spokane, Tacoma and Bellevue, issued official proclamations marking August 15 as India Day. Separately, several iconic buildings across Seattle were also lit up in the Indian tricolours. These included the Lumen Stadium, T-Mobile Stadium, Westin, Seattle Great Wheel and Space Needle. The Indian flag was also hoisted at the prestigious Tacoma Dome, Tacoma City Hall and at the Headquarters of Tacoma Police and Fire Departments, the Consulate said. A vibrant cultural extravaganza featuring national anthems, along with dance performances showcasing the rich diversity of Indian art forms as well as a poetic recital by renowned artist and actor Piyush Mishra also enthralled those attending the special celebrations.
Time of India
a minute ago
- Time of India
Trump Softens Stand On India After Meeting Putin; Hints At No Secondary Sanctions
US President Donald Trump signaled that he may not impose secondary tariffs on India for buying Russian oil. In an interview with Fox News, Trump said, "Putin lost an oil client, which is India, which was doing about 40% of the oil, and secondary sanctions would be very devastating." Watch this video to know more. Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a minute ago
- Business Standard
NCERT modules blame Cong for partition, cite leaders underestimated Jinnah
NCERT's new special modules on the Partition of India have placed significant responsibility on the Congress leadership for the division of the country, saying they "accepted the plans of Partition" and "underestimated Jinnah" while failing to anticipate the long-term horrors that followed. Two modules, one for the middle stage and another for the secondary stage, were released this August to mark Partition Remembrance Day. "The Partition of India and the creation of Pakistan were by no means inevitable," the module states. Instead, they argue, three actors shaped the division, "Jinnah, who demanded it; the Congress, which accepted it; and Mountbatten, who formalised and implemented it." The secondary stage module notes, "None of the Indian leaders had experience in running national or even provincial administration, the army, police, etc. Hence, they had no idea of the massive problems that would naturally arise... Otherwise, such haste would not have been made." The modules describe Partition as an "unprecedented human tragedy, with no parallel in world history." They document mass killings, the displacement of nearly 1.5 crore people, large-scale sexual violence, and trains of refugees arriving "filled only with corpses, having been slaughtered en route." One section notes, "Some horrors began even before Partition was finalised... The horrific events in Noakhali and Calcutta (1946), and Rawalpindi, Thoha, and Beval (March 1947) stand as chilling examples." The content highlights that the Muslim League's Direct Action Day in August 1946, accompanied by violence, was a turning point. It cites Jinnah's warning, "Either a divided India or a destroyed India," as pressure that led Congress leaders Nehru and Patel to finally concede. The secondary module also links Partition directly to enduring challenges, including the Kashmir conflict, communal politics, and external pressures on India's foreign policy. "Pakistan has waged three wars to annexe Kashmir and, after losing them, adopted a policy of exporting jihadist terrorism... All this is a consequence of Partition," it states. Even Jinnah, the module notes, later admitted he had not expected Partition to materialise in his lifetime: "I never thought it would happen. I had never expected to see Pakistan in my lifetime." For younger students, the middle stage module narrates the Partition in simpler terms but strikes the same note of shared responsibility. It states, "There were three elements responsible for the Partition of India: Jinnah, who demanded it; second, the Congress, which accepted it; and third, Mountbatten, who implemented it." The section also emphasises Mountbatten's role in advancing the transfer of power from June 1948 to August 1947, calling the haste "a great act of carelessness" that left millions unaware which country they belonged to even after Independence Day. The modules conclude by framing Partition as a warning for future generations: "Shortsightedness in rulers can become a national catastrophe. Giving concessions to violence to gain peace results in whetting the appetite of violence-prone groups." They emphasise that recalling the "horrors of Partition" is crucial only if India draws lessons, rejecting communal politics and ensuring leadership that prioritises national welfare over personal or party interests. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
