Insurance cost warning after disasters hit bottom line
The economic impacts of natural disasters will extend beyond the federal budget, environmental groups warn as households are told to brace for higher insurance premiums.
Treasury figures show a loss of $2.2 billion from economic activity following Tropical Cyclone Alfred and floods in NSW and Queensland.
The impact is expected to be reflected in March-quarter GDP figures to be released on Wednesday.
The government's priority was helping fund recovery and rebuilding for communities, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.
"The human impacts matter to us most but the economic cost is very significant too and we'll see that in Wednesday's National Accounts," he said.
"Because of the progress Australians have made together in the economy, with inflation down, debt down and unemployment low, we're in a stronger position to provide support when communities need it most."
Policy holders are set to pay more for their insurance because of the increasing frequency of severe weather events.
Major insurance companies underwriting coal and gas projects were exacerbating the issue, environmental group Market Forces chief executive Will van de Pol said.
"Customers have every right to be ropeable with insurers for the staggering increase in premiums in recent years, especially when the global insurance industry is making the problem worse," he told AAP.
Skyrocketing premiums and refusing to cover climate change risks in some areas should ring alarm bells for policymakers, according to Mr van de Pol, who said the insurance industry was the "canary in the coal mine" for climate change.
Recent flooding in NSW has left 10,000 homes and businesses damaged or destroyed, and the Insurance Council of Australia reported more than 6000 insurance claims.
Tropical Cyclone Alfred in March caused widespread damage and flooding to communities across southeast Queensland and northern NSW.
Prolonged downpours in southwest and central Queensland flooded a vast area spanning about one million square kilometres.
The government's Disaster Assist website lists 27 separate natural disasters from January to May consisting of flooding, storms, cyclones and bushfires.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley travelled to the NSW mid-north coast on Monday to visit flood-affected communities with local MPs.
Emergency Management Minister Kristy McBain said the government was funding measures to increase resilience, adaptability and preparedness, and the Disaster Ready Fund initiative would provide another $200 million.
Multiple disaster payments have been activated and the federal government will continue working with NSW on any other funding requests, Ms McBain said.
The minister said she had been on the ground in disaster areas to see the impact and had been meeting with affected small business and primary producers.
The economic impacts of natural disasters will extend beyond the federal budget, environmental groups warn as households are told to brace for higher insurance premiums.
Treasury figures show a loss of $2.2 billion from economic activity following Tropical Cyclone Alfred and floods in NSW and Queensland.
The impact is expected to be reflected in March-quarter GDP figures to be released on Wednesday.
The government's priority was helping fund recovery and rebuilding for communities, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.
"The human impacts matter to us most but the economic cost is very significant too and we'll see that in Wednesday's National Accounts," he said.
"Because of the progress Australians have made together in the economy, with inflation down, debt down and unemployment low, we're in a stronger position to provide support when communities need it most."
Policy holders are set to pay more for their insurance because of the increasing frequency of severe weather events.
Major insurance companies underwriting coal and gas projects were exacerbating the issue, environmental group Market Forces chief executive Will van de Pol said.
"Customers have every right to be ropeable with insurers for the staggering increase in premiums in recent years, especially when the global insurance industry is making the problem worse," he told AAP.
Skyrocketing premiums and refusing to cover climate change risks in some areas should ring alarm bells for policymakers, according to Mr van de Pol, who said the insurance industry was the "canary in the coal mine" for climate change.
Recent flooding in NSW has left 10,000 homes and businesses damaged or destroyed, and the Insurance Council of Australia reported more than 6000 insurance claims.
Tropical Cyclone Alfred in March caused widespread damage and flooding to communities across southeast Queensland and northern NSW.
Prolonged downpours in southwest and central Queensland flooded a vast area spanning about one million square kilometres.
The government's Disaster Assist website lists 27 separate natural disasters from January to May consisting of flooding, storms, cyclones and bushfires.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley travelled to the NSW mid-north coast on Monday to visit flood-affected communities with local MPs.
Emergency Management Minister Kristy McBain said the government was funding measures to increase resilience, adaptability and preparedness, and the Disaster Ready Fund initiative would provide another $200 million.
Multiple disaster payments have been activated and the federal government will continue working with NSW on any other funding requests, Ms McBain said.
The minister said she had been on the ground in disaster areas to see the impact and had been meeting with affected small business and primary producers.
The economic impacts of natural disasters will extend beyond the federal budget, environmental groups warn as households are told to brace for higher insurance premiums.
Treasury figures show a loss of $2.2 billion from economic activity following Tropical Cyclone Alfred and floods in NSW and Queensland.
The impact is expected to be reflected in March-quarter GDP figures to be released on Wednesday.
The government's priority was helping fund recovery and rebuilding for communities, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.
"The human impacts matter to us most but the economic cost is very significant too and we'll see that in Wednesday's National Accounts," he said.
"Because of the progress Australians have made together in the economy, with inflation down, debt down and unemployment low, we're in a stronger position to provide support when communities need it most."
Policy holders are set to pay more for their insurance because of the increasing frequency of severe weather events.
Major insurance companies underwriting coal and gas projects were exacerbating the issue, environmental group Market Forces chief executive Will van de Pol said.
"Customers have every right to be ropeable with insurers for the staggering increase in premiums in recent years, especially when the global insurance industry is making the problem worse," he told AAP.
Skyrocketing premiums and refusing to cover climate change risks in some areas should ring alarm bells for policymakers, according to Mr van de Pol, who said the insurance industry was the "canary in the coal mine" for climate change.
Recent flooding in NSW has left 10,000 homes and businesses damaged or destroyed, and the Insurance Council of Australia reported more than 6000 insurance claims.
Tropical Cyclone Alfred in March caused widespread damage and flooding to communities across southeast Queensland and northern NSW.
Prolonged downpours in southwest and central Queensland flooded a vast area spanning about one million square kilometres.
The government's Disaster Assist website lists 27 separate natural disasters from January to May consisting of flooding, storms, cyclones and bushfires.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley travelled to the NSW mid-north coast on Monday to visit flood-affected communities with local MPs.
Emergency Management Minister Kristy McBain said the government was funding measures to increase resilience, adaptability and preparedness, and the Disaster Ready Fund initiative would provide another $200 million.
Multiple disaster payments have been activated and the federal government will continue working with NSW on any other funding requests, Ms McBain said.
The minister said she had been on the ground in disaster areas to see the impact and had been meeting with affected small business and primary producers.
The economic impacts of natural disasters will extend beyond the federal budget, environmental groups warn as households are told to brace for higher insurance premiums.
Treasury figures show a loss of $2.2 billion from economic activity following Tropical Cyclone Alfred and floods in NSW and Queensland.
The impact is expected to be reflected in March-quarter GDP figures to be released on Wednesday.
The government's priority was helping fund recovery and rebuilding for communities, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.
"The human impacts matter to us most but the economic cost is very significant too and we'll see that in Wednesday's National Accounts," he said.
"Because of the progress Australians have made together in the economy, with inflation down, debt down and unemployment low, we're in a stronger position to provide support when communities need it most."
Policy holders are set to pay more for their insurance because of the increasing frequency of severe weather events.
Major insurance companies underwriting coal and gas projects were exacerbating the issue, environmental group Market Forces chief executive Will van de Pol said.
"Customers have every right to be ropeable with insurers for the staggering increase in premiums in recent years, especially when the global insurance industry is making the problem worse," he told AAP.
Skyrocketing premiums and refusing to cover climate change risks in some areas should ring alarm bells for policymakers, according to Mr van de Pol, who said the insurance industry was the "canary in the coal mine" for climate change.
Recent flooding in NSW has left 10,000 homes and businesses damaged or destroyed, and the Insurance Council of Australia reported more than 6000 insurance claims.
Tropical Cyclone Alfred in March caused widespread damage and flooding to communities across southeast Queensland and northern NSW.
Prolonged downpours in southwest and central Queensland flooded a vast area spanning about one million square kilometres.
The government's Disaster Assist website lists 27 separate natural disasters from January to May consisting of flooding, storms, cyclones and bushfires.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley travelled to the NSW mid-north coast on Monday to visit flood-affected communities with local MPs.
Emergency Management Minister Kristy McBain said the government was funding measures to increase resilience, adaptability and preparedness, and the Disaster Ready Fund initiative would provide another $200 million.
Multiple disaster payments have been activated and the federal government will continue working with NSW on any other funding requests, Ms McBain said.
The minister said she had been on the ground in disaster areas to see the impact and had been meeting with affected small business and primary producers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
29 minutes ago
- News.com.au
This is how much super you really should have by now
ANALYSIS Australians spend a lot of time worrying about their super. I'm going to show you the average super balance for someone your age. Then I want you to forget it. Here's the chart, it shows that the average 30 year old has well under $100,000, the average person in the early 40s has just over $100,000, the average person in their early 50s has a bit over $200,000 and the average person over 65 has over $400,000. But this is kinda dumb. Averages are useful for understanding things like height where people are all pretty even. Superannuation is not like height! Instead lots of people have no super, and some people have absolutely crazy amounts of it. Let's check in on the 60-somethings. Remember we said the average amount of super was $400,000? Well here's the thing. The average is not actually a common amount for 60-64 year olds to have. A lot of them have way less than that. But some have way more, as the next chart shows. Each red bar is 5 per cent of taxpayers. So we have 20 groups of 60-64 year olds in the graph, ranked from least super at the left to most super at the right. The top 5 per cent have more than a million dollars in super. We can see the median, or the amount in the middle, where half have more and half have less. I gave that a gold-coloured label on the chart. If your super account contains $177,421 you're at the median. Some important things to know here: this is the latest detailed data out of the ATO but it is not current, it's from 2022. The shape of the balance distribution will be the same but the dollar values will have gone up. Height of red bar represents minimum threshold for entering that group. Which is perfect for understanding how the money is spread out, except for the top group. Inside the top 5% all the balances are higher than $1.176 million, and sometimes far higher. In fact, the distribution inside the top 5% is similarly unequal to the distribution overall. One Australian famously has over $400 million in super!] What's important about this way of laying out the data is it reveals how unequal super is. Most articles about super just lay out the averages by age group and they don't reveal the secret truth: super is a form of wealth that is highly uneven. That can leave people freaking out and worrying they don't have enough. They spend ages stuffing their super accounts when they might actually be better using that money in the here and now. Certainly the superannuation industry would like people to put more and more money in their accounts, they want to create that FOMO feeling! Here's the chart for people in their early 30s. if you've cracked $140,000, you're in the top 5 per cent (remember this data is from 2022, the figure is probably a touch higher now). Many people go through their life feeling like being on the pension is a fate worse than death; they worry everyone else has so much super that the government might shut down the pension any old day now. What these charts hopefully show you is … nah. The pension is going to be with us for a long time. A huge number of Australians have an amount in super that means they will be using the pension at some point after retirement. And the pension is $1585 a fortnight for a couple, $792.50 for a single. If you own a house that's far from a poverty wage. The pension age rose from 65 to 67, it is not scheduled to rise any more. And it is indexed to inflation so its value is maintained. Too much super Is it possible to have too much super? They say you can't be too rich! But certainly some people have enough super that their balance goes up after they retire. Imagine your super makes $100,000 in investment returns every year. If you spend $50,000 a year on groceries and bills, you are spending only half of your earnings and your super balance will rise. Let's see how that looks for groups over retirement age: Over 70, 65 to 69 and 60-64. The next chart is three charts put together. The important thing to notice is that low balances get lower after retirement and high balances get higher. The panel in the left is the oldies – taxpayers over 70. There's loads of them with no super by the time they're over 70. And the median (gold label) is falling as people spend their super. But the super balances of the top 5 per cent are actually rising! Perhaps some are still making contributions but most are just making money faster than they can spend it. This benefits their heirs, who are probably going to get this money in the next 20 years. Most likely it arrives when the heirs are deep into their 50s, and barely moves the needle on their wealth – the sort of people whose parents have millions in super probably have a lot of assets themselves! The last thing I want to do in this piece is share with you guys the whole picture of all the age ranges. The next few charts are like the one above, with three-in one. They cover all the age groups and if you look closely you can figure out where your super balance sits. For example, if you're 22-years-old, you're in the middle chart of this group of three, and if you have $20,000 in super, you're in the second red bar, putting you in the top 10 per cent. But if you have the same amount at 27, that's only the median. The point of this piece has been to hopefully put your mind at ease – the numbers we like to compare ourself to are very high!
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Homeowners warned insurance costs set to soar as policies factor in natural disaster uptick spurred by climate change
Households are being told to brace for higher insurance premiums. The alert from environmental groups warns that the economic impacts of natural disasters will extend beyond the federal budget. Treasury figures show a loss of $2.2 billion from economic activity following Tropical Cyclone Alfred and floods in NSW and Queensland. The impact is expected to be reflected in March-quarter GDP figures to be released on Wednesday. The government's priority was helping fund recovery and rebuilding for communities, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said. 'The human impacts matter to us most, but the economic cost is very significant too, and we'll see that in Wednesday's National Accounts,' he said. 'Because of the progress Australians have made together in the economy, with inflation down, debt down and unemployment low, we're in a stronger position to provide support when communities need it most.' Policyholders are set to pay more for their insurance because of the increasing frequency of severe weather events. Major insurance companies underwriting coal and gas projects were exacerbating the issue, environmental group Market Forces chief executive Will van de Pol said. 'Customers have every right to be ropeable with insurers for the staggering increase in premiums in recent years, especially when the global insurance industry is making the problem worse,' he told AAP. Skyrocketing premiums and refusing to cover climate change risks in some areas should ring alarm bells for policymakers, according to van de Pol, who said the insurance industry was the 'canary in the coal mine' for climate change. Recent flooding in NSW has left 10,000 homes and businesses damaged or destroyed, and the Insurance Council of Australia reported more than 6000 insurance claims. Tropical Cyclone Alfred in March caused widespread damage and flooding to communities across southeast Queensland and northern NSW. Prolonged downpours in southwest and central Queensland flooded a vast area spanning about one million square kilometres. The government's Disaster Assist website lists 27 separate natural disasters from January to May consisting of flooding, storms, cyclones and bushfires. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley travelled to the NSW Mid-North Coast on Monday to visit flood-affected communities with local MPs. Emergency Management Minister Kristy McBain said the government was funding measures to increase resilience, adaptability and preparedness, and the Disaster Ready Fund initiative would provide another $200 million. Multiple disaster payments have been activated, and the federal government will continue working with NSW on any other funding requests, McBain said. The minister said she had been on the ground in disaster areas to see the impact and had been meeting with affected small business and primary producers.
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Second man charged over fatal stabbing of 29-year-old at Croydon Park in Sydney
A second man has been charged over a 'gruesome' murder that police believe was the result of a drug deal gone wrong. Officers found the victim, a man believed to be aged 29, stabbed to death at about 5pm on Monday at a home in Croydon Park, in Sydney's inner west. Mohammad Sofwan Bin Mustafha, 32, was arrested at the scene and taken to hospital for assessment under police guard. He was later charged with murder and faced Burwood Local Court on Tuesday. He did not apply for bail and will return to the same court on July 30. A second man, aged 26, handed himself in on Tuesday, following a widespread appeal from police in which an image of the alleged suspect was released. He was charged with conceal serious indictable offence of other, and was refused bail to appear before Burwood Local Court on Wednesday. Superintendent Christine McDonald said the victim had still not been formally identified but police were 'confident' he was a Malaysian national who had a wife and children. She said police have been in contact with his family in Malaysia. It's believed all three men were known to each other, with the 32-year-old man allegedly living at the Croydon Park home where the crime took place. The 36-year-old man was known to police and was on bail. 'We are confident that he was at the scene at the time of the murder, in relation to the role that he had to play, it's (led) to him being charged for conceal serious indictable offence,' McDonald said. She previously described the crime as 'gruesome' and that the victim's injuries were 'horrific'. On Wednesday, McDonald said she still stands by the theory that the incident was the result of a 'drug deal gone horribly wrong', but that police were still investigating how the victim came to be at the home. 'Certainly, we believe drugs were involved,' she said. 'We say so often that drugs ruin lives and families.' A number of items have been seized from the home, however the weapon used in the murder remains unclear. Police are not looking for anyone else in relation to the crime. — With AAP Stream free on
