Why ‘record' gross GST collections in April don't tell the full story
Every year, when the government releases the goods and services tax (GST) collection figures for April, they are touted as a 'record high' or the 'highest ever'. Technically, they are—but that's not the full story.
April GST figures are a seasonal quirk, boosted by the year-end push, and not a barometer of steady consumption growth, as collections normalise the following month. This, along with declining GST buoyancy and slower net revenue growth, indicates a less-than-encouraging trend.
A
Mint
analysis of GST data shows collections spike every April. With the impact of rising prices also reflected in the collections, the April figure usually marks a record high up to that point—
₹
2.37 trillion was a record high in April 2025, as was
₹
2.10 trillion in April 2024.
The reason for the spike is that the April figures, which reflect transactions that took place in March, are boosted by higher year-end economic activity as well as reconciliation and compliance processes.
Also read:
Games24x7 lays off staff as Supreme Court hears 28% GST case
These recurring April spikes, observed since the early years of the GST regime, are often celebrated as milestones. However, they do not reflect a sustained trend: the April figure for each year is not surpassed by collections in any of the following months. For example, from
₹
2.1 trillion in April 2024, average collections stood at
₹
1.82 trillion between May 2024 and March 2025.
While April figures grab eyeballs, the full-year data suggests a slower rise in collections relative to India's economic growth. GST collections, in absolute terms at current prices, rose from
₹
12.2 trillion in FY20 to
₹
22.1 trillion in FY25. While this was driven by a nearly 34% year-on-year rise in FY22 and a 21% rise in FY23, high wholesale inflation (13% in FY22 and 9.4% in FY23) was partly responsible. Growth rates have declined in the past two years, given the normalisation in wholesale inflation.
However, the fact that GST collection growth is now slower than GDP growth is a worrying trend. GST buoyancy (the ratio of tax growth to nominal GDP growth) has been declining since hitting 1.64 in FY22. In fact in FY24 and FY25, GST buoyancy fell below 1, showing that GST collections were not keeping pace with economic growth. In comparison, overall tax collections have been about 1.1 in the past two years, underlining the weakness in the consumption tax.
Also read:
Chartering the troubled waters of accommodation services under GST
While gross GST collections have become a key indicator to track the momentum of consumption and economic activity in the country, the government began providing details of refunds and net revenues only last year, after facing criticism from experts.
Net revenue, after adjusting gross tax collections for refunds, is the amount that goes into the government's kitty and can shape its priorities. An analysis of data from recent months, in which detailed information on net revenues is available, paints a gloomier picture. The growth in net GST revenue has been slower than the rise in gross collections more often than not.
In April 2025, while gross GST collections rose 12.6% year-on-year—the highest growth rate since November 2023—net revenue growth was significantly lower at 9.1%. Monthly GST figures can be volatile, but full-year data shows a similar trend. According to data released by the government for March, growth in net GST revenue was 8.6% in FY25, lower than the 9.4% increase in gross GST collections for the same period.
Also read |
Navigating GST registration hurdles: What freelancers and small businesses should know
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Attention B2C GST filers who are facing problem with GSTR-1: GSTN issues new advisory, Here's what experts say
The Goods and Service Tax Network ( GSTN ) has issued an advisory tweet mentioning that in table 12 of GSTR-1 return, B2B supplies information is mandatory, but B2C is optional. This means those Goods and Services Tax (GST) registered taxpayers who have to file GSTR-1 return on or before June 11, 2025 for June 2025 tax period need to mandatorily give their B2B sales information and HSN code , otherwise the system won't allow filing it. However, this has created another problem namely for those GST registered taxpayers who are selling their services or products to end consumers i.e. those with only B2C sales and no B2B sales. What did GSTN say about this problem? In a tweet dated June 7, 2025, GSTN said: As per the current implemented design, the GST system is only validating the values in Table -12 of GSTR-1 concerning the B2B table which is mandatory. Whereas the GST system is allowing any numerical value to be entered in B2C table of Table-12 of GSTR-1, even it could be left empty as the said field is not mandatory.' Chartered Accountant Deep Koradia says: 'GSTN has changed the GSTR-1 form and now separate reporting for B2B supply and B2C Supply. It's mandatory to report GSTR-1 B2B supply invoice details and its corresponding HSN codes from the May 2025 tax period. B2C supply details are optional for now. But the problem is for those GST registered taxpayers who don't have any B2B supplies. The system is not letting these taxpayers file their GSTR-1 return as their B2B supply HSN code column is blank, the deadline for which is June 11, 2025.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo The image below shows how GSTR-1 filers can't file GSTR-1 due to absence of B2B sales. GSTR-1 Source: CA Deep Koradia Live Events — Infosys_GSTN (@Infosys_GSTN) Buyers GST input tax credit may be delayed if sellers can't file GSTR-1 on time Koradia explains: 'Ideally GSTN should make both B2C and B2B supply reporting mandatory ONLY IF there is such supply in their respective tab, but instead of solving this problem, GSTN issued a clarification that B2B is mandatory, and B2C is optional. As a direct impact of sellers being unable to file their GSTR-1 return, buyers will not be able to claim their input tax credit for May 2025 tax period as their GSTR-3B will not get auto-populated with this detail. The reason for this is that the seller's GSTR-1 return feeds information into the buyer's GSTR-3B.' What is the solution to this problem? Koradia says: 'Till the time GSTN comes out with a solution for this problem, we have found a makeshift solution. Sellers with no B2B sales should write 0 (zero) in the HSN column of B2B and then fill up the B2C data. This will enable them to file GSTR-1 returns successfully.' What is table 12 of GSTR-1 return? In an advisory GSTN said: In Table-12 validation with regards to value of the supplies have also been introduced. These validations will validate the value of B2B supplies shown in different Tables viz: 4A, 4B, 6B, 6C, 8 (recipient registered), 9A, 9B (registered), 9C (registered), 15 (recipient registered), 15A (recipient registered) with the value of B2B supplies shown in table-12) Similarly, validations will validate the value of B2C supplies shown in different tablesviz: 5A, 6A, 7A, 7B, 8 (recipient unregistered), 9A (export), 9A (B2CL), 9B(unregistered), 9C (unregistered), 10, 15 (recipient unregistered), 15A (recipientunregistered) with the value of B2C supplies shown in Table-12. In case of amendments, only the differential value will be taken for the purpose of validation.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
CBIC says DIN not required for GST notices issued via portal with reference number
CBIC has amended its earlier circular mandating Document Identification Number (DIN) for show cause notices and GST orders, stating that DIN is not required if the notice is issued through the GST portal and already carries a reference number. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 5 Wealth Management Firms in The United States SmartAsset Learn More Undo (More to come)
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
CBIC lays down plan for supportive, people-focused tax regime
New Delhi: The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), the government's indirect tax policy body, has laid down an annual plan for a supportive, people-focused and tech-driven tax administration for FY26, its chairperson Sanjay Kumar Agarwal said. In a communication to field officers, Agarwal told different zonal offices to prepare their own annual strategies based on the priorities set by the CBIC. The plan covers areas like GST, customs, human resource optimization, grievance redressal and capacity building among others, Agarwal said in the communication posted on CBIC's website. The plan reflects an 'aspiration for a facilitative, technology-driven, and citizen-centric tax administration,' Agarwal said. 'A decentralized, yet coordinated approach will be vital in ensuring that our efforts are responsive, measurable, and impactful throughout the year,' Agarwal stated. The central government has estimated an indirect tax collection of ₹ 17.3 trillion in the current financial year, expecting an 8.35% annual growth collectively from central excise duty, customs and GST. On GST, authorities have gradually increased the disclosure requirements to keep an eye on different points in the supply chain. Central and state GST authorities have also increasingly lowered the monetary threshold for various reporting requirements. This enables them to ensure that economic activity does not go unreported and that GST is collected. Customs duty collections—both basic customs duty and IGST on imports—will depend on the value of imports, while excise duty receipts will depend on consumption growth in fossil fuels. The CBIC's emphasis on a 'facilitative' tax administration comes in the context of signals from policy makers to ensure that ease of doing business is not compromised while collecting taxes. Last month, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman cautioned regulators that foreign investors were watching and any delays in approvals, lengthy litigation, and transparency gaps could hamper India's ability to strike trade deals in an uncertain global environment, Mint reported on 20 May. Last year, the then revenue secretary Sanjay Malhotra had cautioned tax officials to be careful not to hurt the economy's interests in the bid to mop up increased revenue.
