logo
US garment spending dips, imports rise amid tariff uncertainty

US garment spending dips, imports rise amid tariff uncertainty

Fibre2Fashion11-06-2025
US consumer spending on garments fell by 0.7 per cent month-over-month in April 2025, despite a 4.6 per cent year-over-year increase. The CPI for garments also dipped by 0.1 per cent month-over-month and 0.5 per cent year-over-year, according to Cotton Incorporated.
Meanwhile, imports of cotton-dominant apparel rose 13.4 per cent from a year earlier, maintaining average import costs near $3.70 per square meter equivalent since late 2023.
US garment spending fell 0.7 per cent in April despite a 4.6 per cent annual rise, while cotton-dominant apparel imports rose 13.4 per cent year-over-year. Garment CPI declined slightly, and import costs remained stable. Tariff uncertainty looms as courts challenge the President's authority under IEEPA. Job growth slowed to 139,000 in May, with unemployment steady at 4.2 per cent.
This import activity occurred amid ongoing trade uncertainty. In April, the US began implementing broader tariff increases, prompting mixed responses from retailers—some pulled orders forward to avoid higher duties, while others delayed shipments in hope of a rollback. The situation was further complicated in late May by two court rulings that questioned the President's authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariff changes. These decisions, now under appeal, may escalate to the Supreme Court, with existing tariff rates currently remaining in place, Cotton Incorporated said in its Executive Cotton Update - US Macroeconomic Indicators & the Cotton Supply Chain - June 2025.
The US economy added 139,000 jobs in May, though prior months were revised down. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.2 per cent—its highest since 2021, yet historically low. Wage growth continued to moderate, rising 3.9 per cent year-over-year.
Consumer confidence rebounded in May, with the Conference Board's Index rising by 12.3 points to 98 after five consecutive months of decline. Broader consumer spending rose just 0.1 per cent in April, following a strong 0.7 per cent increase in March.
Ongoing tariff negotiations are set to conclude by July 9 for most partners and mid-August for China. If unresolved, reciprocal tariffs may take effect, posing further challenges for retailers and global supply chains.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (KD)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Probe link between Noida officials and landowners, says SC
Probe link between Noida officials and landowners, says SC

Economic Times

time6 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Probe link between Noida officials and landowners, says SC

Supreme Court Synopsis The Supreme Court has mandated a preliminary investigation into potential collusion between Noida officials and landowners concerning land acquisition payouts. This action follows a resumed hearing regarding inflated compensation to ineligible landowners. A special investigation team (SIT) consisting of three IPS officers will probe irregularities, examining financial trails and asset acquisitions to ascertain any collusion. The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered a preliminary inquiry into an alleged collusion between Noida officials and landowners on land acquisition payouts. The development took place during the resumed hearing of a case linked to alleged inflated compensation to ineligible landowners. ADVERTISEMENT A bench comprising justice Surya Kant and justice Joymalya Bagchi ordered the constitution of a special investigation team comprising three IPS officers to probe irregularities in the land acquisition payouts. The bench ordered an inquiry after perusing a report of an SIT - set up earlier - which flagged shortcomings in the functioning of Noida Authority. The court said that no new building projects should be taken up in Noida without environment impact assessment (EIA) clearance and permission from the green bench of the Supreme Court, which hears cases related to the environment. The new three-member SIT will replace the earlier one and will work on a new mandate. ON financial trail The previous SIT's findings pointed out excessive payments in 20 cases and said some Noida officials were suspected of involvement. The new SIT has been asked to examine financial trails, including bank accounts of officials, their families and landowners, as well as assets acquired during the period in question, to ascertain collusion. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. NEXT STORY

Probe link between Noida officials and landowners, says SC
Probe link between Noida officials and landowners, says SC

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Probe link between Noida officials and landowners, says SC

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered a preliminary inquiry into an alleged collusion between Noida officials and landowners on land acquisition payouts. The development took place during the resumed hearing of a case linked to alleged inflated compensation to ineligible landowners. A bench comprising justice Surya Kant and justice Joymalya Bagchi ordered the constitution of a special investigation team comprising three IPS officers to probe irregularities in the land acquisition payouts. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program The bench ordered an inquiry after perusing a report of an SIT - set up earlier - which flagged shortcomings in the functioning of Noida Authority. The court said that no new building projects should be taken up in Noida without environment impact assessment (EIA) clearance and permission from the green bench of the Supreme Court, which hears cases related to the environment. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo The new three-member SIT will replace the earlier one and will work on a new mandate. ON financial trail Live Events The previous SIT's findings pointed out excessive payments in 20 cases and said some Noida officials were suspected of involvement. The new SIT has been asked to examine financial trails, including bank accounts of officials, their families and landowners, as well as assets acquired during the period in question, to ascertain collusion.

Changing track on pollution
Changing track on pollution

Hindustan Times

time5 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Changing track on pollution

The Supreme Court's decision on Tuesday to halt coercive action against owners of so-called end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) is more than just a procedural breather: It's a much-needed shift away from an unscientific, punitive approach that has bothered motorists for nearly a decade. The court has agreed to revisit its own 2018 order, which upheld the National Green Tribunal's 2014 directive banning diesel vehicles over 10 years old and petrol vehicles over 15 from the roads in the National Capital Region. In doing so, it has given space to discuss a valid argument: Emissions, rather than age, should be the yardstick of a vehicle's roadworthiness. There is no data-based evidence proving that every diesel vehicle over 10 years old is uniformly more polluting than a newer one. (Hindustan Times) On paper, the logic of the original ban appeared to be straightforward — older vehicles are presumed to pollute more. But such a presumption is a poor substitute for scientific rigour. There is no data-based evidence proving that every diesel vehicle over 10 years old is uniformly more polluting than a newer one. In fact, many such vehicles have low annual mileage, are well maintained, and meet pollution under control (PUC) norms. A vintage car that is taken out a few times a year may be cleaner over its lifetime than a modern SUV driven daily through Delhi's gridlock. The age-based ban is a blunt approach — easy to enforce, but scientifically questionable. The broader point is that Delhi's pollution crisis will not be solved through piecemeal measures. Targeting motorists while leaving far more damaging sources — industrial emissions, construction dust, biomass burning — largely untouched is selective enforcement. Such bans also disproportionately affect lower- and middle-income citizens for whom replacing a vehicle is a financial burden. They also ignore the environmental cost of scrapping and manufacturing — processes that consume vast energy resources. If the aim is cleaner air, the route must be a comprehensive, sector-wide strategy that marries technology with policy. Real-world emissions monitoring, expansion of clean public transport, mandatory retrofitting of high emitters, and investment in walkable and cyclable infrastructure must form the core. The role of the State is to create systems that are proactive, consistent, and rooted in science. The Supreme Court has now opened the door to establishing a more rational framework — one that focuses on pollution vehicles, not their birthdays. If the government can seize this moment to craft a broad-spectrum, evidence-based plan, Delhi could finally take a step towards solving its air crisis.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store