SMEs' growth absent in Budget 3.0. Here's what entrepreneurs expected
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana delivered the third budget on Wednesday for the current financial year, which may have calmed the country's political landscape and ensured fiscal continuity.
However, Shawn Theunissen, founder of Entrepreneurship To The Point (eTTP) and Property Point, says the budget failed to deliver what South Africa really needs: a bold pivot toward inclusive economic transformation driven by small and medium enterprises (SMEs).
'Budget 3.0 offers fiscal discipline, but not bold economic inclusion. Small businesses remain on the sidelines, waiting for support to reach them. The continued absence of direct, scalable SME-focused policies risks deepening inequality, slowing recovery, and failing to unlock entrepreneurial potential.'
ALSO READ: Political uncertainties that will impact SMEs in the coming months
No enterprise funding in the Budget
After the value-added tax (VAT) was rejected in the first two budgets, Godongwana had to find a way to compensate for the shortfall that the VAT hike was going to provide. That came at the expense of the government and businesses.
He announced that additional government spending will be cut by R68 million, and this is primarily aimed at provisional allocations that have not yet been assigned to votes.
However, his mention of benefits to small businesses was absent. The third version of the budget made no mention of new tax relief, grants, or enterprise funding targeting SMEs.
At the same time, he announced a fuel levy increase. This increase will raise input and logistics costs, which might force businesses to increase the prices of their services and products.
Small business support absent in the budget
Theunissen said the third budget was an opportunity to fast-track real SME recovery through targeted tax breaks, working capital relief, and formalised access to state-backed funding. 'Instead, we saw continuity with little urgency.'
The revised GDP growth forecast of just 1.4% for 2025 reflects a subdued economic outlook, which offers little stimulus to small enterprises. '
Despite years of commitments, no new mechanisms were introduced to address persistent credit and working capital gaps, and previously announced SME funding remains largely undisbursed.
'It's not just about what's missing in the new budget, it's also about what hasn't been delivered from the last three,' said Theunissen.
ALSO READ: Godongwana cuts zero-rated food basket in Budget 3.0
Where is support for women and the youth?
He added that the government ignored the many calls for inclusion as the budget did not include any measures to support women- or youth-led enterprises, both of which are disproportionately excluded from procurement, finance, and formal supply chains.
'Budget 3.0 failed to introduce or revitalise entrepreneurship training, innovation incentives, or enterprise support, especially for youth and women. This oversight is short-sighted, as these sectors offer high impact for job creation and inclusive economic growth,' Theunissen added.
He pointed out that SMEs account for 98.5% of all formal businesses in the country, provide more than 60% of private sector employment and contribute more than a third of the country's GDP.
What SMEs expected
He outlined the below as what small businesses in the country expected the budget to include:
Targeted tax relief for small businesses on essential inputs: With rising input costs and shrinking margins, SMEs urgently need targeted tax relief on basic goods and services to remain viable in low-growth conditions. Fast-tracked disbursement of existing SME funding commitments: Billions committed to SME support remain undisbursed; this budget should have prioritised fast-tracking delivery to entrepreneurs who can't wait another year. Legal enforcement of the 30-day payment rule in public procurement: Late payments from the government remain a chronic problem; legally enforcing a 30-day payment rule is essential to protect SME cash flow and survival. Clear SME inclusion in Operation Vulindlela and structural reforms: Reform efforts will bypass entrepreneurs without transparent SME procurement targets and timelines in Operation Vulindlela. Dedicated enterprise development for women and youth entrepreneurs: The absence of tailored programmes for women and youth-led enterprises is a missed opportunity to tackle unemployment where it hits hardest. Incentivised formalisation of the informal economy through tax credits and simplified registration: Formalisation must be driven by incentives, not penalties, giving informal entrepreneurs tax breaks and easy registration pathways to enter the mainstream economy.'
'If SMEs are the future of work and wealth in South Africa, then we need a budget that treats them as central to recovery, not peripheral to macroeconomic stability.'
NOW READ: Sensible or underwhelming? Economists react to Godongwana's Budget 3.0
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
SASSA payment dates for September 2025: What you need to know
SASSA payment dates for September 2025: What you need to know South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) beneficiaries can start preparing for the upcoming September 2025 grant payments. Here are the official payment dates for September: Old Age Grant: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Disability Grant: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 All other SASSA grants (including child grants): Thursday, September 4, 2025 SASSA has reminded beneficiaries to avoid rushing to collection points on the first day, as funds will remain available in their accounts until they are needed. For any queries or assistance regarding your grant, contact the SASSA toll-free line at 0800 60 10 11 or visit your nearest SASSA office. All social grants, barring the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant, increased in April this year. Delivering the 2025 Budget Speech in Parliament earlier this year, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana stated that the number of social grant beneficiaries – excluding those receiving the SRD grant – was expected to rise to around 19 million in 2025/26 and 19.3 million in 2027/28 due to a growing population of older persons. Godongwana said that for 2025/26, social grants were allocated approximately R284.7 billion. 'As announced by the President in the State of the Nation Address, the SRD was to be used as a basis for the introduction of a sustainable form of income support for unemployed people. 'The future form and nature of the SRD would be informed by the outcome of the review of active labour market programmes, which was expected to be completed by September 2025. 'The truth was that ours was one of the most comprehensive social safety nets among emerging economies. This reflected our commitment to addressing poverty and inequality, while keeping our spending sustainable,' he said. The grant increases that took effect in April were: Old age grant: increased from R2185 to R2315 War veterans grant: increased from R2205 to R2335 Disability grant: increased from R2185 to R2315 Foster care grant: increased from R1180 to R1250 Care dependency grant: increased from R2185 to R2315 Child support grant: increased from R530 to R560 Grant-in-aid: increased from R530 to R560 In the Budget Review, National Treasury stated that the budget for social grants was increased by R8.2 billion over the medium term to account for higher living costs. 'An amount of R35.2 billion was allocated to extend the payment at the current SRD rate of R370 per month per beneficiary, including administration costs,' the department said. Also read: Is there an outbreak of Staphylococcus in Pretoria? Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.
TimesLIVE
05-08-2025
- TimesLIVE
Decay, refurbishments prompt move uptown for National Treasury
Finance minister Enoch Godongwana says the National Treasury can expect to save millions in its relocation from two buildings in the Pretoria CBD being vacated due to decay in one and refurbishments in the other. This emerged in a written reply by Godongwana to a parliamentary question by EFF MP Nothando Nolutshungu, who asked whether the Treasury had decided to permanently move from the two CBD buildings. 'The National Treasury has decided to vacate the building at 240 Madiba Street, Pretoria, due to significant building decay and infrastructural challenges, which pose serious health and safety risks for staff and operations,' Godongwana said. 'However, 40 Church Square has not been vacated. It remains state-owned and forms part of the Treasury's long-term accommodation strategy. The intention is to refurbish and retain it as a heritage finance building, given its historic and strategic value.' The Treasury was finalising the new leased offices and waiting for the signed lease agreement between the prospective landlord and the public works and infrastructure department (DPWI). 'The rental cost under the former lease for 240 Madiba Street was R6,799,376.36 per month. The rental for 40 Church Square is R2,629,209.66 per quarter. Leases are entered into between the DPWI and the prospective landlord and are waiting to be finalised.' The new premises are owned by the Public Investment Corporation and finalising the lease is still under way. A signed lease agreement between the prospective landlord and the DPWI is being awaited. 'An assessment was conducted on the condition and potential refurbishment of 40 Church Square. As a result, the building is to be retained and refurbished, with plans aligned to preserving its heritage status and ensure it remains functional within the Treasury's accommodation portfolio.' While the Treasury acknowledged the long-term fiscal benefits of government ownership of office accommodation, these matters reside with the DPWI, he said.
The Citizen
04-08-2025
- The Citizen
Godongwana hits back at Reserve Bank's 3% inflation target
Treasury makes it clear that this is not Sarb's isolated call. Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana threw shade on the SA Reserve Bank's (Sarb) 3% inflation target announced last week – saying he has no plans to announce a lower inflation target in the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS). Sarb governor Lesetja Kganyago last week said the bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) now prefers to settle on a 3% inflation target, which would allow repo rates to settle at slightly below 6% from the current 7%. This had created an expectation that the minister would confirm this move. 'It is well-established that policy-making responsibility in this area resides with the minister of finance, working with the President and Cabinet, who sets the inflation target in consultation with the Sarb,' said the minister's office in a statement on Friday. 'The Sarb then operates independently in its pursuit of the inflation target. Added Godongwana: 'As I emphasised during the Budget presentation, any adjustments to our inflation-targeting framework will follow the established consultation process. This means comprehensive consultation between National Treasury, the Reserve Bank, Cabinet, and relevant stakeholders – not unilateral announcements that pre-empt legitimate policy deliberation. 'Any changes to the target, if necessary, will follow this process that I have outlined above.' Godongwana's statement appears to be a nod to trade unions and those on the political left arguing that the Sarb should prioritise economic growth and jobs over lower inflation. Lower inflation creates room for the Sarb to drop interest rates further, thereby stimulating growth and reducing the government's spiralling interest burden. ALSO READ: A 3% inflation target: What it means for SA markets, and will it solve our debt issues? It is 'quite extraordinary' that the Sarb, rather than National Treasury, is lowering the inflation target from 3-6% to 3%, when that policy mandate resides with government, notes Stephen Hanival, chief economist at the Department of Trade and Industry. Sarb's 3% inflation target suggests no further rate cuts for now, but it is 'a positive development if we take a longer-term view,' says Izak Odendaal, chief investment strategist at Old Mutual's Symmetry business unit. 'There will always be inflation cycles, but structurally lower long-term inflation will benefit the South African economy and also support a rerating in its financial markets.' Gina Schoeman, chief economist at Citibank South Africa, says expectations of a change in the official inflation target are misplaced. 'I think it was incorrect for anybody to expect that just because the Sarb announced their preferred target of 3%, within the official target range of 3-6%, that there would automatically be an announcement of a change in the official range by the time of the MTBPS. 'Sarb did a similar change in 2017, (from) what was then seen as a target of around 5.9% to what it said would be a preferred target of 4.5%. It has effectively done the same thing now, having managed to anchor inflation expectations at much lower levels around 3%. It is clear that with economic reforms moving forward – perhaps not at the pace people would like – comes efficiencies, which means the economy can afford to have a lower preferred [inflation] target.' ALSO READ: What lowering the inflation target will mean for SA Can SA handle a 3% target? The issue of inflation targeting has been the subject of widespread consultation between National Treasury, the finance minister, deputy finance ministers and the Sarb. National Treasury's macro policy review last year said inflation targeting works and the economy would benefit from a lower target. 'Can this economy handle a 3% target? Yes, I believe it can,' says Schoeman. 'Sarb has said it will not try to achieve this immediately, but over a two- to three-year period. 'There will be supply shocks, which is why they have given themselves quite a long runway to achieve this 3% target. What they want to see is a trend towards 3%, rather than the [previous] mid-point of 4.5%.' Odendaal told Moneyweb's Jimmy Moyaha that recent inflation data – excluding administered prices controlled by government-controlled entities such as Eskom and municipalities – put inflation at 4.5%, exactly midway in the 3-6% target range. 'Regulated prices, those that are directly controlled by the government, are running at 9.7% year on year,' said Odendaal. The challenge for SA is to get these regulated price increases, such as electricity and municipal tariffs, into line with price increases elsewhere in the economy. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
